Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Measuring Business Process Model Reuse in a Process Repository

Authors : Ross S. Veitch, Lisa F. Seymour

Published in: Business Process Management Workshops

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The value of process modeling increases with process model reuse. Previous research into process model reuse has focused on behavioral aspects of reuse such as the intention to reuse, the repeated reuse of a process model over time, and the identification of elements of process models which could be reused. However, process model reuse can also be considered from the perspective of the reuse of process models by other process models in the same repository. Such a measure would be a direct measure of whether process modelers are creating bespoke versions of existing process models or are indeed reusing existing process models and reaping some of the purported benefits of reuse. Furthermore, it would provide a measure of reuse which can be automated. Organizations which operate in a multi-channel, multi-product environment have business processes which frequently share functionality (consider authentication for example) and which may be used in different organizational units. While the reuse of complete process models in a process repository is one of the benefits of using a process repository, no research could be found relating to the measurement of the reuse of complete process models by other process models within such a repository. We believe that this paper is the first to propose and validate a measure of complete process model reuse by other process models in the same process repository. The measure is then applied to a real-world process repository of a large financial services organization, illustrating the applicability and potential usefulness of the measure.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Seck, A.M., Philippe, J.: Service encounter in multi-channel distribution context: virtual and face-to-face interactions and consumer satisfaction. Serv. Ind. J. 33, 1–15 (2011) Seck, A.M., Philippe, J.: Service encounter in multi-channel distribution context: virtual and face-to-face interactions and consumer satisfaction. Serv. Ind. J. 33, 1–15 (2011)
2.
go back to reference Recker, J.C.: Process modeling in the 21st century. BPTrends (5), 1–6 (2006) Recker, J.C.: Process modeling in the 21st century. BPTrends (5), 1–6 (2006)
3.
go back to reference Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(4), 333–363 (2009) Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(4), 333–363 (2009)
4.
go back to reference Fantinato, M., de Toledo, M., Thom, L.H., Gimenes, I.M., Rocha, R., Garcia, D.: A survey on reuse in the business process management domain. Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag. 6(1), 52–76 (2012)CrossRef Fantinato, M., de Toledo, M., Thom, L.H., Gimenes, I.M., Rocha, R., Garcia, D.: A survey on reuse in the business process management domain. Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag. 6(1), 52–76 (2012)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Koschmider, A., Fellmann, M., Schoknecht, A., Oberweis, A.: Analysis of process model reuse: where are we now, where should we go from here? Decis. Support Syst. 66, 9–19 (2014)CrossRef Koschmider, A., Fellmann, M., Schoknecht, A., Oberweis, A.: Analysis of process model reuse: where are we now, where should we go from here? Decis. Support Syst. 66, 9–19 (2014)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Poulin, J.S.: Measuring Software Reuse: Principles, Practices, and Economic Models, p. 195. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997) Poulin, J.S.: Measuring Software Reuse: Principles, Practices, and Economic Models, p. 195. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)
7.
go back to reference Fellmann, M., Koschmider, A., Schoknecht, A.: Analysis of business process model reuse literature: are research concepts empirically validated? Modellierung, pp. 185–192 (2014) Fellmann, M., Koschmider, A., Schoknecht, A.: Analysis of business process model reuse literature: are research concepts empirically validated? Modellierung, pp. 185–192 (2014)
8.
go back to reference Ferrucci, F., Tortota, G., Vitiello, G.: Exploiting visual languages in software engineering. In: Chang, S.-K. (ed.) Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 53–76. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., New Jersey (2002)CrossRef Ferrucci, F., Tortota, G., Vitiello, G.: Exploiting visual languages in software engineering. In: Chang, S.-K. (ed.) Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 53–76. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., New Jersey (2002)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H., van der Aalst, W.M.: Pattern-based translation of BPMN process models to BPEL web services. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 5, 42–61 (2008)CrossRef Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H., van der Aalst, W.M.: Pattern-based translation of BPMN process models to BPEL web services. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 5, 42–61 (2008)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zhao, W., Hauser, R., Bhattacharya, K., Bryant, B.R., Cao, F.: Compiling business processes: untangling unstructured loops in irreducible flow graphs. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 2(1), 68–91 (2006)CrossRef Zhao, W., Hauser, R., Bhattacharya, K., Bryant, B.R., Cao, F.: Compiling business processes: untangling unstructured loops in irreducible flow graphs. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 2(1), 68–91 (2006)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Frakes, W.B., Tech, V., Terry, C.: Software reuse: metrics and models. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(2), 415–435 (1996)CrossRef Frakes, W.B., Tech, V., Terry, C.: Software reuse: metrics and models. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(2), 415–435 (1996)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn. (1997) Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn. (1997)
13.
go back to reference Daneva, M.: Measuring reuse in SAP requirements: a model-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability - SSR 1999, pp. 141–150. ACM Press, New York (1999) Daneva, M.: Measuring reuse in SAP requirements: a model-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability - SSR 1999, pp. 141–150. ACM Press, New York (1999)
14.
go back to reference Terry, C.: Analysis and implementation of software reuse measurement. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Master’s Project and Report (1993) Terry, C.: Analysis and implementation of software reuse measurement. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Master’s Project and Report (1993)
15.
go back to reference Peffers, K., Tuure, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRef Peffers, K., Tuure, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fenton, N.E., Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Towards a framework for software measurement validation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(12), 929–944 (1995)CrossRef Fenton, N.E., Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Towards a framework for software measurement validation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(12), 929–944 (1995)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Malinova, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: An empirical investigation on the design of process architectures. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig (2013) Malinova, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: An empirical investigation on the design of process architectures. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig (2013)
18.
go back to reference zur Muehlen, M., Wisnosky, D.E., Kindrick, J.: Primitives: design guidelines and architecture for BPMN models. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2010, Brisbane, Australia, 1–3 December 2010 zur Muehlen, M., Wisnosky, D.E., Kindrick, J.: Primitives: design guidelines and architecture for BPMN models. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2010, Brisbane, Australia, 1–3 December 2010
19.
go back to reference Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A.: Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 129–158 (2016)CrossRef Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A.: Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 129–158 (2016)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Van Nuffel, D., De Backer, M.: Multi-abstraction layered business process modeling. Comput. Ind. 63(2), 131–147 (2012)CrossRef Van Nuffel, D., De Backer, M.: Multi-abstraction layered business process modeling. Comput. Ind. 63(2), 131–147 (2012)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Abramowicz, W., Mayer, H.C. (eds.) 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2006), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 1–12 (2006) Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Abramowicz, W., Mayer, H.C. (eds.) 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2006), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 1–12 (2006)
Metadata
Title
Measuring Business Process Model Reuse in a Process Repository
Authors
Ross S. Veitch
Lisa F. Seymour
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_58

Premium Partner