Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Production Engineering 2/2017

31-03-2017 | Assembly

Model Predictive Control Approach for assembling Large Components in Motion

Authors: C. Storm, A. Schönberg, R. H. Schmitt

Published in: Production Engineering | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The assembly of large components is characterized by a large number of varieties and a high process influence by environmental factors. For this reason the assembly in the field of truck manufacturing is in most cases carried out as a moving line with a high percentage of manual processes. Automation of these assembly process, albeit desired from a quality viewpoint, is presently limited as it requires the workpiece to be stationary. The ability to keep the workpiece on the moving assembly line while keeping the used handling systems flexible can enable business benefits. By assembling for example the windshield of a truck in motion, lead times can be shortened and floor space requirements can be reduced while at the same time the quality can be increased. To enable assembly in motion of large components, it must be possible to synchronize the movement between the handling system and the moving workpiece placed on an unguided transport system. Within this article we describe a Model Predictive Control Approach for robotic assembly of large components on moving assembly lines. One approach to synchronize the motion between product and robot is a direct metrological reference between them. This can be done by using an iGPS metrology system in which every handling system can be referenced to every work piece throughout the whole production line. The measurement system must be able to detect sufficiently small movements to ensure a reliable synchronization and thereby a high quality of the assembly process. The interaction of several systems makes for a number of restrictions. Here especially the delay times of the measuring system and the preset position for the robot have to be taken into consideration. To control the assembly process, a model predictive control loop is necessary. Only this control approach can meet the restrictions which are strictly necessary for the assembly. This article shows the first results and describes a demonstrator which has been set up to mount a windshield on a moving truck cabin with the help of a robot.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi S, Eakins WJ, Fuhlbrigge TA (2010) Trends and opportunities for robotic automation of trim and final assembly in the automotive industry. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE 2010). doi:10.1109/COASE.2010.5584524 Choi S, Eakins WJ, Fuhlbrigge TA (2010) Trends and opportunities for robotic automation of trim and final assembly in the automotive industry. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE 2010). doi:10.​1109/​COASE.​2010.​5584524
2.
go back to reference Demeester F (2011) Referenzsysteme für wandlungsfähige Produktion. Wettbewerbsfaktor Produktionstechnik-Aachener Perspektiven. Shaker, Aachen Demeester F (2011) Referenzsysteme für wandlungsfähige Produktion. Wettbewerbsfaktor Produktionstechnik-Aachener Perspektiven. Shaker, Aachen
3.
go back to reference Heylighen F, Gershenson C (2003) The meaning of self-organization in computing. IEEE Intell Syst 18(4) Heylighen F, Gershenson C (2003) The meaning of self-organization in computing. IEEE Intell Syst 18(4)
4.
go back to reference Hülsmann M (2007) Understanding autonomous cooperation and control in logistics: the impact of autonomy on management information communication and material flow. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-47450-0 Hülsmann M (2007) Understanding autonomous cooperation and control in logistics: the impact of autonomy on management information communication and material flow. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.​1007/​978-3-540-47450-0
6.
go back to reference Lange F, Willberg B, Meusel P, Langwald J, Jorg S, Frommberger M, Hirzinger G, Werner J (2008) Montage am kontinuierlich bewegten band. VDIBERICHT 2012:127 Lange F, Willberg B, Meusel P, Langwald J, Jorg S, Frommberger M, Hirzinger G, Werner J (2008) Montage am kontinuierlich bewegten band. VDIBERICHT 2012:127
7.
go back to reference Massotte P (1995) Self-organization: a new approach to improve the reactivity of the production systems. IEEE 1 Massotte P (1995) Self-organization: a new approach to improve the reactivity of the production systems. IEEE 1
8.
go back to reference Prabhu VA, Song B, Thrower J, Tiwari A, Webb P (2015) Digitisation of a moving assembly operation using multiple depth imaging sensors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–22 Prabhu VA, Song B, Thrower J, Tiwari A, Webb P (2015) Digitisation of a moving assembly operation using multiple depth imaging sensors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–22
9.
go back to reference Prabhu VA, Tiwari A, Hutabarat W, Thrower J, Turner C (2014) Dynamic alignment control using depth imagery for automated wheel assembly. Proc CIRP 25:161–168CrossRef Prabhu VA, Tiwari A, Hutabarat W, Thrower J, Turner C (2014) Dynamic alignment control using depth imagery for automated wheel assembly. Proc CIRP 25:161–168CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Prasch M (2010) Integration leistungsgewandelter Mitarbeiter in die variantenreiche Serienmontage. Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich Prasch M (2010) Integration leistungsgewandelter Mitarbeiter in die variantenreiche Serienmontage. Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich
11.
go back to reference Probst G (1987) Selbst-organisation: Ordnungsprozesse in sozialen systemen aus ganzheitl. Sicht, Berlin Probst G (1987) Selbst-organisation: Ordnungsprozesse in sozialen systemen aus ganzheitl. Sicht, Berlin
12.
go back to reference Schlickenrieder K (2008) Methodik zur Prozessoptimierung beim automatisierten elastischen Kleben großflächiger Bauteile. Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich Schlickenrieder K (2008) Methodik zur Prozessoptimierung beim automatisierten elastischen Kleben großflächiger Bauteile. Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich
13.
go back to reference Schmitt R, Schönberg A, Lamers C, Demeester F (2011) Global referencing systems and their contribution to a versatile production Schmitt R, Schönberg A, Lamers C, Demeester F (2011) Global referencing systems and their contribution to a versatile production
15.
go back to reference Werner J (2009) Methode zur roboterbasierten förderbandsynchronen Fließmontage am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Utz, Munich Werner J (2009) Methode zur roboterbasierten förderbandsynchronen Fließmontage am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Utz, Munich
Metadata
Title
Model Predictive Control Approach for assembling Large Components in Motion
Authors
C. Storm
A. Schönberg
R. H. Schmitt
Publication date
31-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Production Engineering / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Electronic ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0717-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Production Engineering 2/2017 Go to the issue

Premium Partners