Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1-2/2022

01-02-2022 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Modeling and monitoring the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding based on vision measurement and the gene expression programming (GEP) algorithm

Authors: Lijuan Ren, Nina Wang, Wanjing Pang, Yongchang Li, Guangpeng Zhang

Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Issue 1-2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Accurately predicting the material removal rate (MRR) in belt grinding is challenging because of the randomly distributed multiple cutting edges, flexible contact, and continuous wear of the abrasive grains, undermining the ability to achieve the expected machining requirements for belt grinding using the planned parameters. With the development of sensing technology, big data, and intelligent algorithms, online identification methods for material removal through sensing signals have gained traction. A vision-based material removal monitoring method in the belt grinding process was investigated by adopting the gene expression programming (GEP) algorithm. First, the relationship between the grinding parameters and MRR was investigated through a series of experiments. Second, methods of image shooting distance calibration and automatic image segmentation were established. Furthermore, the definition and quantification method of 11 features related to the color, texture, and energy of spark images are described, based on which the features are extracted. Then, the optimal feature subset was determined by analyzing the fluctuation degree and correlation with MRR by computing the coefficient of variation of the features and Pearson’s coefficient of features and MRR, respectively. Finally, a continuous function model including the selected features was obtained using the GEP method. The predicted results and testing time were compared with those of other methods such as LightGBM, convolutional neural network (CNN), support vector regression (SVR), and BP neural network. The results show that the MRR prediction model based on the GEP algorithm can obtain explicit function expressions and is highly effective in predicting accuracy and test time, which is of utmost significance for accurate and efficient acquisition of MRR data online.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang TT, Zou L, Wan QH, Zhang XH, Li YJ, Huang Y (2021) A high-precision prediction model of surface roughness in abrasive belt flexible grinding of aero-engine blade. J Manuf Process 66:364–375CrossRef Wang TT, Zou L, Wan QH, Zhang XH, Li YJ, Huang Y (2021) A high-precision prediction model of surface roughness in abrasive belt flexible grinding of aero-engine blade. J Manuf Process 66:364–375CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pandiyan V, Tjahjowidodo T, Samy M (2016) In-process surface roughness estimation model for compliant abrasive belt machining process. Procedia Cirp 46:254–257CrossRef Pandiyan V, Tjahjowidodo T, Samy M (2016) In-process surface roughness estimation model for compliant abrasive belt machining process. Procedia Cirp 46:254–257CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Li LF, Feng HJ, Chen HB, Chen XQ (2021) A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process 68:1–12CrossRef Li LF, Feng HJ, Chen HB, Chen XQ (2021) A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process 68:1–12CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhe H, Li JY, Liu YM, Wang WY (2021) Investigation of conditions leading to critical transitions between abrasive belt wear modes for rail grinding. Wear 484–485(1–2):204048 Zhe H, Li JY, Liu YM, Wang WY (2021) Investigation of conditions leading to critical transitions between abrasive belt wear modes for rail grinding. Wear 484–485(1–2):204048
5.
go back to reference Wang G, Wang Y, Xu Z (2009) Modeling and analysis of the material removal depth for stone polishing. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2453–2463CrossRef Wang G, Wang Y, Xu Z (2009) Modeling and analysis of the material removal depth for stone polishing. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2453–2463CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhe H, Li JY, Liu YM, Wang WX (2021) Investigation of conditions leading to critical transitions between abrasive belt wear modes for rail grinding. Wear 484–485(1–2):204048 Zhe H, Li JY, Liu YM, Wang WX (2021) Investigation of conditions leading to critical transitions between abrasive belt wear modes for rail grinding. Wear 484–485(1–2):204048
7.
go back to reference Yang ZY, Chu Y, Xu XH, Huang HJ, Zhu DH, Yan SJ, Ding H (2021) Prediction and analysis of material removal characteristics for robotic belt grinding based on single spherical abrasive grain model. Int J Mech Sci 190:106005 Yang ZY, Chu Y, Xu XH, Huang HJ, Zhu DH, Yan SJ, Ding H (2021) Prediction and analysis of material removal characteristics for robotic belt grinding based on single spherical abrasive grain model. Int J Mech Sci 190:106005
8.
go back to reference Ren X, Cabaravdic M, Zhang X, Kuhlenk TB (2007) A local process model for simulation of robotic belt grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):962–970CrossRef Ren X, Cabaravdic M, Zhang X, Kuhlenk TB (2007) A local process model for simulation of robotic belt grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):962–970CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hammann G (1998) Modellierung des Abtragsverhaltens elastischer robot-ergefuehrter Schleifwerkzeuge, PhD Thesis, University Stuggart Hammann G (1998) Modellierung des Abtragsverhaltens elastischer robot-ergefuehrter Schleifwerkzeuge, PhD Thesis, University Stuggart
10.
go back to reference Zhang XQ, Chen HB, Xu JJ, Song XF, Wang JW, Chen XQ (2018) A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Mater Process Technol 260:9–19CrossRef Zhang XQ, Chen HB, Xu JJ, Song XF, Wang JW, Chen XQ (2018) A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Mater Process Technol 260:9–19CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Huang YM (2018) Modelling and investigation of material removal profile for computer controlled ultra-precision polishing. Precis Eng 55:144–153CrossRef Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Huang YM (2018) Modelling and investigation of material removal profile for computer controlled ultra-precision polishing. Precis Eng 55:144–153CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rabinowicz E, Tanner RI (1966) Friction and wear of materials. J Appl Mech 33(2):479CrossRef Rabinowicz E, Tanner RI (1966) Friction and wear of materials. J Appl Mech 33(2):479CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cabaravdic, Kuhlenköetter B (2005) Belt grinding processes optimization. Mo Metal loberfläche 4:44–47 Cabaravdic, Kuhlenköetter B (2005) Belt grinding processes optimization. Mo Metal loberfläche 4:44–47
14.
go back to reference Pandiyan V, Caesarendra W, Tjahjowidodo T, Praveen G (2017) Predictive modelling and analysis of process parameters on material removal characteristics in abrasive belt grinding process. Appl Sci 4:363CrossRef Pandiyan V, Caesarendra W, Tjahjowidodo T, Praveen G (2017) Predictive modelling and analysis of process parameters on material removal characteristics in abrasive belt grinding process. Appl Sci 4:363CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pandiyan V, Shevchik S, Wasmer K, Castagne S, Tjahjowidodo T (2020) Modelling and monitoring of abrasive finishing processes using artificial intelligence techniques: a review. J Manuf Process 57:114–135CrossRef Pandiyan V, Shevchik S, Wasmer K, Castagne S, Tjahjowidodo T (2020) Modelling and monitoring of abrasive finishing processes using artificial intelligence techniques: a review. J Manuf Process 57:114–135CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gao K, Chen H, Zhang X, Ren X, Chen J, Chen X (2019) A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:217–232CrossRef Gao K, Chen H, Zhang X, Ren X, Chen J, Chen X (2019) A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:217–232CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Wang F, Huang YM (2019) A new in-process material removal rate monitoring approach in abrasive belt grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):2715–2726CrossRef Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Wang F, Huang YM (2019) A new in-process material removal rate monitoring approach in abrasive belt grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):2715–2726CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang NN, Zhang GP, Ren LJ, Pang WJ (2021) Vision and sound fusion-based material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using improved LightGBM algorithm. J Manuf Process 66:281–292CrossRef Wang NN, Zhang GP, Ren LJ, Pang WJ (2021) Vision and sound fusion-based material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using improved LightGBM algorithm. J Manuf Process 66:281–292CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rajmohan B, Radhakrishnan V (1994) On the possibility of process monitoring in grinding by spark intensity measurements. J Manuf Sci Eng 116(1):124–129 Rajmohan B, Radhakrishnan V (1994) On the possibility of process monitoring in grinding by spark intensity measurements. J Manuf Sci Eng 116(1):124–129
20.
go back to reference Rajmohan B, Radhakrishnan V (1992) A study on the thermal aspects of chips in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 32(4):563–569CrossRef Rajmohan B, Radhakrishnan V (1992) A study on the thermal aspects of chips in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 32(4):563–569CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ferreira C (2001) Gene Expression Programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129MathSciNetMATH Ferreira C (2001) Gene Expression Programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129MathSciNetMATH
22.
go back to reference Wang NN, Zhang GP, Pang WJ, Ren LJ, Wang YP (2021) Novel monitoring method for material removal rate considering quantitative wear of abrasive belts based on LightGBM learning algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114(11–12):1–13CrossRef Wang NN, Zhang GP, Pang WJ, Ren LJ, Wang YP (2021) Novel monitoring method for material removal rate considering quantitative wear of abrasive belts based on LightGBM learning algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114(11–12):1–13CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modeling and monitoring the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding based on vision measurement and the gene expression programming (GEP) algorithm
Authors
Lijuan Ren
Nina Wang
Wanjing Pang
Yongchang Li
Guangpeng Zhang
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Issue 1-2/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08822-z

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2022

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1-2/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partners