Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2020

31-10-2019 | Original Paper

Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture

Authors: Dumitru Cebrucean, Viorica Cebrucean, Ioana Ionel

Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Issue 1/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions into the atmosphere, and these emissions can be effectively reduced by improving the efficiency of the plants, co-firing sustainably grown biomass and applying carbon capture and storage technologies. In this study, the energy and environmental performances of both subcritical (SubC) and supercritical (SC) pulverized coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and integrated with an advanced amine-based postcombustion CO2 capture system were evaluated and compared. The impact of biomass (hybrid poplar) addition was investigated at different co-firing ratios varying up to 30% on a heat input basis. All plant configurations were modeled and simulated with Aspen Plus process simulation software. The results show that the use of a SC steam cycle has a positive impact on the energy and environmental performance of the investigated plants, improving the efficiency by 2.4% points and reducing the total fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by 6% in comparison to those of the SubC cases. Biomass co-firing has a negative impact on the energy performance of plants while significantly reducing fossil-based carbon emissions. The reduction of net CO2 emissions is almost proportional to the biomass percentage in the feed. At 30% biomass co-firing, the net plant efficiency is reduced by approx. 1% point, while the net CO2 emissions are 28% lower than those in coal-fired only plants. The introduction of CO2 capture has a major impact both on the emissions generated and on the energy efficiency. Depending on the plant type and co-firing ratio used, the net plant efficiencies are 8.7–9.3% points lower than those of non-capture cases. The net CO2 emissions achieve negative values when carbon is captured from the biomass co-firing plants.

Graphic abstract

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bostick D, Stoffregen T, Rigby S (2017) Final techno-economic analysis of 550 MWe supercritical PC power plant with CO2 capture using the Linde-BASF advanced PCC technology. DE-FE0007453, January 2017 Bostick D, Stoffregen T, Rigby S (2017) Final techno-economic analysis of 550 MWe supercritical PC power plant with CO2 capture using the Linde-BASF advanced PCC technology. DE-FE0007453, January 2017
go back to reference Chapel DG, Mariz CL, Ernest J (1999) Recovery of CO2 from flue gases: commercial trends. In: Canadian society of chemical engineers annual meeting, 4–6 October 1999, Saskatchewan, Canada Chapel DG, Mariz CL, Ernest J (1999) Recovery of CO2 from flue gases: commercial trends. In: Canadian society of chemical engineers annual meeting, 4–6 October 1999, Saskatchewan, Canada
go back to reference Cormos AM, Dinca C, Cormos CC (2018) Energy efficiency improvements of post-combustion CO2 capture based on reactive gas-liquid absorption applied for super-critical circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) power plants. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20(6):1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1560-0 CrossRef Cormos AM, Dinca C, Cormos CC (2018) Energy efficiency improvements of post-combustion CO2 capture based on reactive gas-liquid absorption applied for super-critical circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) power plants. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20(6):1311–1321. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10098-018-1560-0 CrossRef
go back to reference IEA (2007) Fossil fuel-fired power generation: case studies of recently constructed coal- and gas-fired power plants. OECD/IEA, Paris IEA (2007) Fossil fuel-fired power generation: case studies of recently constructed coal- and gas-fired power plants. OECD/IEA, Paris
go back to reference IEA (2010) Energy technology perspectives: scenarios and strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris IEA (2010) Energy technology perspectives: scenarios and strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris
go back to reference IEA (2012a) World energy outlook. OECD/IEA, Paris IEA (2012a) World energy outlook. OECD/IEA, Paris
go back to reference IEA (2012b) Technology roadmap: high-efficiency, low-emissions coal-fired power generation. OECD/IEA, Paris IEA (2012b) Technology roadmap: high-efficiency, low-emissions coal-fired power generation. OECD/IEA, Paris
go back to reference IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017. Highlights. OECD/IEA, Paris IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017. Highlights. OECD/IEA, Paris
go back to reference IEA CCC (2015a) Emission standards: USA. IEA Clean Coal Centre, October 2015 IEA CCC (2015a) Emission standards: USA. IEA Clean Coal Centre, October 2015
go back to reference IEA CCC (2015b) Emission standards: United Kingdom. IEA Clean Coal Centre, September 2015 IEA CCC (2015b) Emission standards: United Kingdom. IEA Clean Coal Centre, September 2015
go back to reference IEA CCC (2015c) Emission standards: Canada. IEA Clean Coal Centre, July 2015 IEA CCC (2015c) Emission standards: Canada. IEA Clean Coal Centre, July 2015
go back to reference IEA-ETSAP, IRENA (2013) Biomass co-firing. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA Technology Brief E21, January 2013 IEA-ETSAP, IRENA (2013) Biomass co-firing. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA Technology Brief E21, January 2013
go back to reference IPCC (2006) Chapter 2: Stationary combustion. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 2: energy. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama IPCC (2006) Chapter 2: Stationary combustion. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 2: energy. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama
go back to reference IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference IRENA (2018) Renewable power generation costs in 2017. IRENA, Abu Dhabi IRENA (2018) Renewable power generation costs in 2017. IRENA, Abu Dhabi
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Stoffregen T, Clausen I, Sieder G (2012) Techno-economic analysis of 550 MWe subcritical PC power plant with CO2 capture. DE-FE0007453, May 2012 Jovanovic S, Stoffregen T, Clausen I, Sieder G (2012) Techno-economic analysis of 550 MWe subcritical PC power plant with CO2 capture. DE-FE0007453, May 2012
go back to reference Kohl AL, Nielsen RB (1997) Gas purification, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston Kohl AL, Nielsen RB (1997) Gas purification, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston
go back to reference Nalbandian H (2009) NOx control for coal-fired power plant. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/157, October 2009 Nalbandian H (2009) NOx control for coal-fired power plant. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/157, October 2009
go back to reference NETL (2008) Pulverized coal oxycombustion power plants. Volume 1: bituminous coal to electricity. DOE/NETL-2007/1291, Revision 2, August 2008 NETL (2008) Pulverized coal oxycombustion power plants. Volume 1: bituminous coal to electricity. DOE/NETL-2007/1291, Revision 2, August 2008
go back to reference NETL (2012a) Greenhouse gas reductions in the power industry using domestic coal and biomass. Volume 2: pulverized coal plants. DOE/NETL-2012/1547, February 2012 NETL (2012a) Greenhouse gas reductions in the power industry using domestic coal and biomass. Volume 2: pulverized coal plants. DOE/NETL-2012/1547, February 2012
go back to reference NETL (2012b) Current and future technologies for power generation with post-combustion carbon capture. DOE/NETL-2012/1557, March 2012 NETL (2012b) Current and future technologies for power generation with post-combustion carbon capture. DOE/NETL-2012/1557, March 2012
go back to reference NETL (2013) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants. Volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. DOE/NETL-2010/1397, Revision 2a, September 2013 NETL (2013) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants. Volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. DOE/NETL-2010/1397, Revision 2a, September 2013
go back to reference NETL (2015) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants. Volume 1a: bituminous coal (PC) and natural gas to electricity. DOE/NETL-2015/1723, Revision 3, July 2015 NETL (2015) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants. Volume 1a: bituminous coal (PC) and natural gas to electricity. DOE/NETL-2015/1723, Revision 3, July 2015
go back to reference Spliethoff H (2010) Power generation from solid fuels. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Spliethoff H (2010) Power generation from solid fuels. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
go back to reference Tenaska (2012) Final front-end engineering and design study report. Report to the Global CCS Institute, January 2012 Tenaska (2012) Final front-end engineering and design study report. Report to the Global CCS Institute, January 2012
go back to reference van Loo S, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, London van Loo S, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, London
go back to reference Wiatros-Motyka M (2016) An overview of HELE technology deployment in the coal power plant fleets of China, EU, Japan and USA. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/273, December 2016 Wiatros-Motyka M (2016) An overview of HELE technology deployment in the coal power plant fleets of China, EU, Japan and USA. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/273, December 2016
Metadata
Title
Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
Authors
Dumitru Cebrucean
Viorica Cebrucean
Ioana Ionel
Publication date
31-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Electronic ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01774-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 1/2020 Go to the issue