Top

Contemporary Problems of Ecology

Published in:

01-12-2022

Monitoring Conservation of Forest in Protected Areas using Remote Sensing Change Detection Approach: a Review

Authors: Wendy Miranda-Castro, Rosa Acevedo-Barrios, Milton Guerrero

Published in: Contemporary Problems of Ecology | Issue 6/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Deforestation and fragmentation threaten biodiversity owing to their impacts on many species. To prevent and minimise the problem, protected areas have been created with the aim of conserving biodiversity, and parts of continental territories have been designated for this purpose. However, these areas are not exempt from forest loss and can be directly and indirectly disturbed by surrounding territories, natural disasters, climate, and human actions. In addition, the management quality of many protected areas is unknown. Thus, forest change detection using remote sensing data has been implemented as an approach to assess forest loss in conservation areas, since it generates spatio-temporal information about the protected forest area, which can then be used to improve forest management and decision making. This article reviews the approaches that have been implemented to study forest changes in protected areas.

previous article Taxonomical and Ecological and Geographical Characteristics of Algae in the Khutinsky Nature Reserve (Republic of Tyva, Russia)

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adhikari, S., Southworth, J., and Nagendra, H., Understanding forest loss and recovery: a spatiotemporal analysis of land change in and around Bannerghatta National Park, India, J. Land Use Sci., 2015, vol. 10, pp. 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2014.920425CrossRef

Bayarsaikhan, U., Boldgiv, B., Kim, K.-R., et al., (2009) Change detection and classification of land cover at Hustai National Park in Mongolia, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., vol. 11, pp. 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2009.03.004CrossRef

Bologna, M. and Aquino, G., Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis, Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10, p. 7631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6CrossRef

Borrelli, P., Modugno, S., Panagos, P., et al., Detection of harvested forest areas in Italy using Landsat imagery, Appl. Geogr., 2014, vol. 48, pp. 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.005CrossRef

Boutin, S., Haughland, D.L., Schieck, J., et al., A new approach to forest biodiversity monitoring in Canada, For. Ecol. Manage., 2009, vol. 258, pp. S168–S175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.024CrossRef

Bozkaya, A.G., Balcik, F.B., Goksel, C., and Esbah, H., Forecasting land-cover growth using remotely sensed data: a case study of the Igneada protection area in Turkey, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2015, vol. 187, p. 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4322-zCrossRef

Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., et al., Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines, Science, 2010, vol. 328, pp. 1164 –1168.CrossRef

Carlson, M., Browne, D., and Callaghan, C., Application of land-use simulation to protected area selection for efficient avoidance of biodiversity loss in Canada’s western boreal region, Land Use Policy, 2019, vol. 82, pp. 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.015CrossRef

Cheţan, M.A., Dornik, A., and Urdea, P., Analysis of recent changes in natural habitat types in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania), using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imagery (1986–2015), Appl. Geogr., 2018, vol. 97, pp. 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.06.007CrossRef

10.

Chughtai, A.H., Abbasi, H., and Karas, I.R., A review on change detection method and accuracy assessment for land use land cover, Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2021, vol. 22, p. 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100482CrossRef

11.

Craigie, I.D., Baillie, J.E.M., Balmford, A., et al., Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas, Biol. Conserv., 2010, vol. 143, pp. 2221–2228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.007CrossRef

12.

Crooks, K.R. and Sanjayan, M., Connectivity Conservation, Cambridge University, 2006.CrossRef

13.

Curtis, P.G., Slay, C.M., Harris, N.L., et al., Classifying drivers of global forest loss, Science, 2018, vol. 361, pp. 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445CrossRef

14.

Da Ponte, E., Roch, M., Leinenkugel, P., et al., Paraguay’s Atlantic Forest cover loss – Satellite-based change detection and fragmentation analysis between 2003 and 2013, Appl. Geogr., 2017, vol. 79, pp. 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.005CrossRef

15.

Damnyag, L., Saastamoinen, O., Blay, D., et al., Sustaining protected areas: Identifying and controlling deforestation and forest degradation drivers in the Ankasa Conservation Area, Ghana. Biol. Conserv., 2013, vol. 165, pp. 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.024CrossRef

16.

Desrochers, A., Tardif, J., and Mazerolle, M.J., Use of Large Clear-Cuts by Wilson’s Warbler in an Eastern Canadian Boreal Forest – Utilisation de vastes parterres de coupe totale par la Paruline à calotte noire dans une forêt boréale de l’Est du Canada, Avian Conserv. Ecol., 2012, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00521-070201CrossRef

17.

Dolman, P., Biodiversity and ethics, in Environmental Science for Environmental Management, Prentice Hall Harlow, 2000, pp 119–148.

18.

Dudley, N., Shadie, P., and Stolton, S., Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on Recognising Protected Areas and Assigning Management Categories and Governance Types, Gland: IUCN, 2013.

19.

Dutta, K., Reddy, C.S., Sharma, S., and Jha, C.S., Quantification and monitoring of forest cover changes in Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India (1920–2012), Curr. Sci., 2016, vol. 110, pp. 508–520.CrossRef

20.

Finlayson, C.M., The Wetland Book: II: Distribution, Description, and Conservation, Finlayson, C.M., Milton, G.R., Prentice, R.C., and Davidson, N.C., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag, 2018, pp. 93–108.

21.

Foody, G.M., Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sens. Environ., 2002, vool. 80, pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4

22.

Gambo, J., Mohd Shafri, H.Z., Shaharum, N.S.N., et al., Monitoring and predicting land use-land cover (LULC) Changes within and around Krau Wildlife Reserve (KWR) protected area in Malaysia using multi-temporal landsat data, Geoplanning J. Geomatics Plan, 2018, vol. 5, p. 17. https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.5.1.17-34CrossRef

23.

Gao, T., Hedblom, M., Emilsson, T., and Nielsen, A.B., The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator, For. Ecol. Manage., 2014, vol. 330, pp. 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.007CrossRef

24.

Geldmann, J., Barnes, M., Coad, L., et al., Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines, Biol. Conserv., 2013, vol. 161, pp. 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018CrossRef

25.

Geldmann, J., Coad, L., Barnes, M., et al., Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: A global analysis, Biol. Conserv., 2015, vol. 191, pp. 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.029CrossRef

26.

Ghofrani, Z., Mokhtarzade, M., Reza Sahebi, M., and Beykikhoshk, A., Evaluating coverage changes in national parks using a hybrid change detection algorithm and remote sensing, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 2014, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 083646. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.8.083646CrossRef

27.

Gilani, H., Shrestha, H.L., Murthy, M.S.R., et al., Decadal land cover change dynamics in Bhutan, J. Environ. Manage., 2015, vol. 148, pp. 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.014CrossRef

28.

Gitelson, A.A. and Merzlyak, M.N., Signature Analysis of leaf reflectance spectra: algorithm development for remote sensing of chlorophyll, J. Plant Physiol., 1996, vol. 148, pp. 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80284-7CrossRef

29.

Glenn, E.P., Huete, A.R., Nagler, P.L., and Nelson, S.G., Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape, Sensors, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2136–2160.CrossRef

30.

Gómez, C., White, J.C., and Wulder, M.A., Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 2016, vol. 116, pp. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.008CrossRef

31.

González-Roglich, M., Southworth, J., and Branch, L.C., The role of private lands for conservation: Land cover change analysis in the Caldenal savanna ecosystem, Argentina, Appl. Geogr., 2012, vol. 34, pp. 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.002CrossRef

32.

Griffiths, P., Kuemmerle, T., Baumann, M., et al., Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites, Remote Sens. Environ., 2014, vol. 151, pp. 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022CrossRef

33.

Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052–e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052CrossRef

34.

Halaj, J., Ross, D.W., and Moldenke, A.R., Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies, Oikos, 2000, vol. 90, pp. 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900114.xCrossRef

35.

Hamer, D. and Herrero, S., Grizzly bear food and habitat in the front ranges of Banff National Park, Alberta, Int. Conf. Bear Res. Manage., 1987,vol. 7, pp. 199–213.

36.

He, K.S., Rocchini, D., Neteler, M., and Nagendra, H., Benefits of hyperspectral remote sensing for tracking plant invasions, Diversity Distrib., 2011, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00761.xCrossRef

37.

Hooper, D.U., Adair, E.C., Cardinale, B.J., et al., A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change, Nature, 2012, vol. 486, pp. 105–108CrossRef

38.

Huang, C., Kim S., Altstatt, A., et al., Rapid loss of Paraguay’s Atlantic forest and the status of protected areas — A Landsat assessment, Remote Sens. Environ., 2007, vol. 106, pp. 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.016CrossRef

39.

Huang, C., Kim, S., Song, K., et al., Assessment of Paraguay’s forest cover change using Landsat observations, Glob. Planet Change, 2009, vol. 67, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.12.009CrossRef

40.

Islam, K., Jashimuddin, M., Nath, B., and Nath, T.K., Land use classification and change detection by using multi-temporal remotely sensed imagery: The case of Chunati wildlife sanctuary, Bangladesh, Egypt J. Remote Sens. Space Sci., 2018, vol. 21, pp. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.12.005CrossRef

41.

Jackson, R.D. and Huete, A.R., Interpreting vegetation indices, Prev. Vet. Med., 1991, vol. 11, pp. 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2CrossRef

42.

Jackson, B., Decker Sparks, J.L., Brown, C., and Boyd, D.S., Understanding the co-occurrence of tree loss and modern slavery to improve efficacy of conservation actions and policies, Conserv. Sci. Pract., 2020, vol. 2, p. e183. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.183CrossRef

43.

Jayanthi, M., Thirumurthy, S., Nagaraj, G., et al., Spatial and temporal changes in mangrove cover across the protected and unprotected forests of India, Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci., 2018, vol. 213, pp. 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.016CrossRef

44.

Jones, K.R., Venter, O., Fuller, R.A., et al., One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure, Science, 2018, vol. 360, pp. 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9565CrossRef

45.

Joseph, S., Blackburn, G.A., et al., Monitoring conservation effectiveness in a global biodiversity hotspot: the contribution of land cover change assessment, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2009, vol. 158, p. 169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0571-4CrossRef

46.

Juffe-Bignoli, D., Burgess, N.D., Bingham, H., et al., Protected Planet Report 2014, Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2014.

47.

Jung, H.-C., Lee, D.-K., Jeon, S.-W., and Song, W.-K., Analysis of deforestation patterns in the Baekdudaegan preservation area using land cover classification and change detection techniques; the feasibility of restoration, Landscape Ecol. Eng., 2005, vol. 1, pp. 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-005-0027-8CrossRef

48.

Kamlun, K.U., Bürger Arndt, R., and Phua, M.-H., Monitoring deforestation in Malaysia between 1985 and 2013: Insight from South-Western Sabah and its protected peat swamp area, Land Use Policy, 2016, vol. 57, pp. 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.011CrossRef

49.

Karlson, M. and Ostwald, M., Remote sensing of vegetation in the Sudano-Sahelian zone: A literature review from 1975 to 2014, J. Arid Environ., 2016, vol. 124, pp. 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.08.022CrossRef

50.

Kintz, D.B., Young, K.R., and Crews-Meyer, K.A., Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a National Park in the Tropical Andes, Environ. Manage., 2006, vol. 38, pp. 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9CrossRef

51.

Kislov, D.E. and Korznikov, K.A., Automatic windthrow detection using very-high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning, Remote Sens., 2020, vol. 12, p. 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071145CrossRef

52.

Knorn, J., Kuemmerle, T., Radeloff, V.C., et al., Forest restitution and protected area effectiveness in post-socialist Romania, Biol. Conserv., 2012, vol. 146, pp. 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.020CrossRef

53.

Kusimi, J.M., Characterizing land disturbance in Atewa Range Forest Reserve and Buffer Zone, Land Use Policy, 2015, vol. 49, pp. 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.020CrossRef

54.

Lamba, A., Cassey, P., Segaran, R.R., and Koh, L.P., Deep learning for environmental conservation, Curr. Biol., 2019, vol. 29, pp. R977–R982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.016CrossRef

55.

Laurance, W.F., Useche, C.D., Rendeiro, J., et al., Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas, Nature, 2012, vol. 489, pp. 290–294.CrossRef

56.

Li, Y., Peng, C., Chen, Y., et al., A Deep Learning Method for Change Detection in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2019, vol. 57, pp. 5751–5763. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2901945CrossRef

57.

Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., and Fischer, J., General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation, Biol. Conserv., 2006, vol. 131, pp. 433–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006. 02.019CrossRef

58.

Liu, J., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z., et al., Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas, Science, 2001, vol. 292, pp. 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058104CrossRef

59.

Lossou, E., Owusu-Prempeh, N., and Agyemang, G., Monitoring Land Cover changes in the tropical high forests using multi-temporal remote sensing and spatial analysis techniques, Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2019, vol. 16, p. 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100264CrossRef

60.

Lu, D. and Weng, Q., A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance, Int. J. Remote Sens., 2007, vol. 28, pp. 823–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600746456CrossRef

61.

Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., and Moran, E., Change detection techniques, Int. J. Remote Sens, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 2365–2401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139863CrossRef

62.

Lung, T. and Schaab, G., A comparative assessment of land cover dynamics of three protected forest areas in tropical eastern Africa, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2010, vol. 161, pp. 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0766-3CrossRef

63.

Ma, L., Jones, C.T., Groesch, T.D., et al., Solution structure of dengue virus capsid protein reveals another fold, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, vol. 101, pp. 3414–3419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0305892101CrossRef

64.

Main-Knorn, M., Cohen, W.B., Kennedy, R.E., et al., Monitoring coniferous forest biomass change using a Landsat trajectory-based approach, Remote Sens. Environ., 2013, vol. 139, pp. 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.010CrossRef

65.

Marinelli, D., Paris, C., and Bruzzone, L., A novel approach to 3-D change detection in multitemporal LiD-AR data acquired in forest areas, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2018, vol. 56, pp. 3030–3046. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2789660CrossRef

66.

Marinelli, D., Paris, C., and Bruzzone, L., An approach to tree detection based on the fusion of multitemporal LiDAR data, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2019, vol. 16, pp. 1771–1775. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2908314CrossRef

67.

Meli Fokeng, R., Gadinga Forje, W., Meli Meli, V., and Nyuyki Bodzemo, B., Multi-temporal forest cover change detection in the Metchie-Ngoum Protection Forest Reserve, West Region of Cameroon, Egypt J. Remote Sens. Space Sci., 2020, vol. 23, pp. 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.12.002CrossRef

68.

Meliadis, I., Platis, P., Ainalis, A., and Meliadis, M., Monitoring and analysis of natural vegetation in a Special Protected Area of Mountain Antichasia—Meteora, central Greece, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2010, vol. 163, pp. 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0849-1CrossRef

69.

Montibeller, B., Kmoch, A., Virro., H, et al., Increasing fragmentation of forest cover in Brazil’s Legal Amazon from 2001 to 2017, Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10, p. 5803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62591-xCrossRef

70.

Morand, S. and Lajaunie, C., Outbreaks of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases are associated with changes in forest cover and oil palm expansion at global scale, Front. Vet. Sci., 2021, vol. 8, p. 230CrossRef

71.

Mouat, D.A., Mahin, G.G., and Lancaster, J., Remote sensing techniques in the analysis of change detection, Geocarto Int., 1993, vol. 8, pp. 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049309354407CrossRef

72.

Mugagga, F., Kakembo, V., and Buyinza, M., Land use changes on the slopes of Mount Elgon and the implications for the occurrence of landslides, CATENA, 2012, vol. 90, pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.004CrossRef

73.

Mutanga, O., Adam, E., and Cho, M.A., High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2012, vol. 18, pp. 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.012CrossRef

74.

Nagelkerken, I., Blaber, S.J.M., Bouillon, S., et al., The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review, Aquat. Bot., 2008, vol. 89, pp. 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUABOT.2007.12.007CrossRef

75.

Nagendra, H., Lucas, R., Honrado, J.P., et al., Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats, Ecol. Indic., 2013, vol. 33, pp. 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.014CrossRef

76.

Noordermeer, L., Økseter, R., Ørka, H.O., et al., Classifications of Forest change by using bitemporal airborne laser scanner data, Remote Sens., 2019, vol. 11, p. 2145.CrossRef

77.

O’Connell, C. and Keppel, G., Deep tree hollows: important refuges from extreme temperatures, Wildl. Biol., 2016, vol. 22, pp. 305–310. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00210CrossRef

78.

Okyay, U., Telling, J., Glennie, C.L., and Dietrich, W.E., Airborne lidar change detection: An overview of Earth sciences applications, Earth-Sci. Rev., 2019, vol. 198, p. 102929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102929CrossRef

79.

Olofsson, P., Foody, G.M., Stehman, S.V., and Woodcock, C.E., Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation, Remote Sens. Environ., 2013, vol. 129, pp. 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.031CrossRef

80.

Olofsson, P., Foody, G.M., Herold, M., et al., Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change, Remote Sens. Environ., 2014, vol. 148, pp. 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015CrossRef

81.

Ozanne, C.M.P., Anhuf, D., Boulter, S.L., et al., Biodiversity meets the atmosphere: a global view of forest canopies, Science, 2003, vol. 301, pp. 183–186.CrossRef

82.

Pereira, H.M., Leadley, P.W., Proenca, V., et al., Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century, Science, 2010, vol. 330, pp. 1496–1501. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196624CrossRef

83.

Pettorelli, N., Vik, J.O., Mysterud, A., et al., Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2005, vol. 20, pp. 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011CrossRef

84.

Phua, M.H., Tsuyuki, S., Furuya, N., and Lee, J.S., Detecting deforestation with a spectral change detection approach using multitemporal Landsat data: A case study of Kinabalu Park, Sabah, Malaysia, J. Environ. Manage., 2008, vol. 88, pp. 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.011CrossRef

85.

Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Abell, R., et al., The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection, Science, 2014, vol. 344, pp. 1246752–1246752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752CrossRef

86.

Potapov, P.V., Turubanova, S.A., Hansen, M.C., et al., Quantifying forest cover loss in Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2000–2010, with Landsat ETM+ data, Remote Sens. Environ., 2012, vol. 122, pp. 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.027CrossRef

87.

Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, S., and Gupta, N., Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka, J. Environ. Manage., 2018, vol. 206, pp. 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.001CrossRef

88.

Rasuly, A., Naghdifar, R., and Rasoli, M., Detecting of Arasbaran forest changes applying image processing procedures and GIS techniques, in Procedia Environmental Sciences, Elsevier, 2010, pp. 454–464.

89.

Reddy, C.S., Saranya, K.R.L., Jha, C.S., et al., Earth observation data for habitat monitoring in protected areas of India, Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2017, vol. 8, pp. 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.08.004CrossRef

90.

Redowan, M., Akter, S., and Islam, N., Analysis of forest cover change at Khadimnagar National Park, Sylhet, Bangladesh, using Landsat TM and GIS data, J. For. Res., 2014, vol. 25, pp. 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0467-9CrossRef

91.

Richards, J.A., Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.CrossRef

92.

Rutledge, D.T., Landscape Indices as Measures of the Effects of Fragmentation: Can Pattern Reflect Process?, Wellington: Department of Conservation, 2003.

93.

Sánchez-Reyes, U.J., Niño-Maldonado, S., Barrientos-Lozano, L., and Treviño-Carreón, J., Assessment of land use-cover changes and successional stages of vegetation in the natural protected area altas cumbres, Northeastern Mexico, using landsat satellite imagery, Remote Sens., 2017, vol. 9, p. 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070712CrossRef

94.

Santos, T. and Tellería, J.L., Pérdida y fragmentación del hábitat: efecto sobre la conservación de las especies, Ecosistemas, 2006, vol. 15, pp. 3–12.

95.

Satish, K.V., Saranya, K.R.L., Reddy, C.S., et al., Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920–2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, vol. 186, pp. 8125–8140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3991-3CrossRef

96.

Scharsich, V., Mtata, K., Hauhs, M., et al., Analysing land cover and land use change in the Matobo National Park and surroundings in Zimbabwe, Remote Sens. Environ., 2017, vol. 194, pp. 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.037CrossRef

97.

Serna-Chavez, H.M., Kissling, W.D., Veen, L.E., et al., Spatial scale dependence of factors driving climate regulation services in the Americas, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 2018, vol. 27, pp. 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12743CrossRef

98.

Shaharum, N.S.N, Shafri, H.Z.M., Gambo, J., and Abidin, F.A.Z., Mapping of Krau Wildlife Reserve (KWR) protected area using Landsat 8 and supervised classification algorithms, Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2018, vol. 10, pp. 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.01.002CrossRef

99.

Sieber, A., Kuemmerle, T., Prishchepov, A.V., et al., Landsat-based mapping of post-Soviet land-use change to assess the effectiveness of the Oksky and Mordovsky protected areas in European Russia, Remote Sens. Environ., 2013, vol. 133, pp. 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.021CrossRef

100.

Singh, M., Griaud, C., and Collins, C.M., An evaluation of the effectiveness of protected areas in Thailand, Ecol. Indic., 2021, vol. 125, p. 107536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107536CrossRef

101.

Souza, C.M., Siqueira, J.V., Sales, M.H., et al., Ten-year landsat classification of deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon, Remote Sens., 2013, vol. 5, pp. 5493–5513. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5115493CrossRef

102.

Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., et al., Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures, J. Biogeogr., 2004, vol. 31, pp. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.xCrossRef

103.

Tittensor, D.P., Walpole, M., Hill, S.L.L., et al., A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets, Science, 2014, vol. 346, pp. 241–244.CrossRef

104.

Tsai, Y.H., Stow, D., An, L., et al., Monitoring land-cover and land-use dynamics in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Appl. Geogr., 2019, vol. 111, p. 102077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102077CrossRef

105.

Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., et al., Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 306–314.CrossRef

106.

Twongyirwe, R., Bithell, M., Richards, K.S., and Rees, W.G., Three decades of forest cover change in Uganda’s Northern Albertine Rift Landscape, Land Use Policy, 2015, vol. 49, pp. 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.013CrossRef

107.

Valožić, L. and Cvitanović, M., Mapping the Forest change: using landsat imagery in forest transition analysis within the medvednica protected area, Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik, 2011, vol. 73, pp. 245–255. https://doi.org/10.21861/HGG.2011.73.01.16CrossRef

108.

Vastaranta, M., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., et al., Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update, Can. J. Remote Sens., 2013, vol. 39, pp. 382–395. https://doi.org/10.5589/m13-046CrossRef

109.

Venter, O., Magrach, A., Outram, N., et al., Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions, Conserv. Biol., 2018, vol. 32, pp. 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12970CrossRef

110.

Wagner, F.H., Sanchez, A., Tarabalka, Y., et al., Using the U-net convolutional network to map forest types and disturbance in the Atlantic rainforest with very high resolution images, Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv., 2019, vol. 5, pp. 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.111CrossRef

111.

Watson, J.E.M., Dudley, N., Segan, D.B., and Hockings, M., The performance and potential of protected areas, Nature, 2014, vol. 515, pp. 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947CrossRef

112.

Willis, K.S., Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas, Biol. Conserv., 2015, vol. 182, pp. 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.12.006CrossRef

113.

Wilson, M.C., Chen, X.-Y., Corlett, R.T., et al., Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges, Landscape Ecol., 2016, vol. 31, pp. 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0312-3CrossRef

114.

Wulder, M.A., Han, T., White, J.C., et al., Integrating profiling LIDAR with Landsat data for regional boreal forest canopy attribute estimation and change characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 2007, vol. 110, pp. 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.002CrossRef

115.

Xie, Y., Sha, Z., and Yu, M., Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review, J. Plant Ecol., 2008, vol. 1, pp. 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005CrossRef

116.

Xue, J. and Su, B., Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications, J. Sensors, 2017, vol. 2017, p. 1353691. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691CrossRef

117.

Yen, P., Ziegler, S., Huettmann, F., and Onyeahialam, A.I., Change detection of forest and habitat resources from 1973 to 2001 in Bach Ma National Park, Vietnam, using remote sensing imagery, Int. For. Rev., 2005, vol. 7, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.7.1.1.64163CrossRef

118.

Young, N.E., Evangelista, P.H., Mengitsu, T., and Leisz, S., Twenty-three years of forest cover change in protected areas under different governance strategies: A case study from Ethiopia’s southern highlands, Land Use Policy, 2020, vol. 91, p. 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104426CrossRef

119.

Zhang, H., Gong, M., Zhang, P., et al., Feature-level change detection using deep representation and feature change analysis for multispectral imagery, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2016, vol. 13, pp. 1666–1670. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2016.2601930CrossRef

120.

Zhu, Z., Change detection using landsat time series: A review of frequencies, preprocessing, algorithms, and applications, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 2017, vol. 130, pp. 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.06.013CrossRef

Title: Monitoring Conservation of Forest in Protected Areas using Remote Sensing Change Detection Approach: a Review
Authors: Wendy Miranda-Castro
Rosa Acevedo-Barrios
Milton Guerrero
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: Pleiades Publishing
Published in: Contemporary Problems of Ecology / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1995-4255
Electronic ISSN: 1995-4263
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425522060154

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Odonata (Insecta) Larvae as the Second Intermediate Hosts of the Trematodes of Genus Plagiorchis in the Basin of Chany Lake, Western Siberia

Bird Fauna and Community of Northern Taiga in Central Siberia

Changes in the Ground Beetle and Darkling Beetle Communities (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Tenebrionidae) in the Mountain Hollows of the Tuva and Altai Republics over 60 Years: A Trend or a Fluctuation?

The First Information about the Phytoplankton and Ecological State of the Vasyugan River (Tomsk Oblast)

Postfire Recovery of a Broad-Leaved Forest in Submountain Dagestan

Dependence of Phenorhythms of North American Maples on the Meteorological Parameters in the Southern Urals (Ufa)