Top

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Published in:

23-10-2019

Monitoring of a machining process using kernel principal component analysis and kernel density estimation

Authors: Wo Jae Lee, Gamini P. Mendis, Matthew J. Triebe, John W. Sutherland

Published in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing | Issue 5/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Tool wear is one of the consequences of a machining process. Excessive tool wear can lead to poor surface finish, and result in a defective product. It can also lead to premature tool failure, and may result in process downtime and damaged components. With this in mind, it has long been desired to monitor tool wear/tool condition. Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is proposed as an effective and efficient method for monitoring the tool condition in a machining process. The KPCA-based method may be used to identify faults (abnormalities) in a process through the fusion of multi-sensor signals. The method employs a control chart monitoring approach that uses Hotelling’s T²-statistic and Q-statistic to identify the faults in conjunction with control limits, which are computed by kernel density estimation (KDE). KDE is a non-parametric technique to approximate a probability density function. Four performance metrics, abnormality detection rate, false detection rate, detection delay, and prediction accuracy, are employed to test the reliability of the monitoring system and are used to compare the KPCA-based method with PCA-based method. Application of the proposed monitoring system to experimental data shows that the KPCA based method can effectively monitor the tool wear.

previous article Effective automatic defect classification process based on CNN with stacking ensemble model for TFT-LCD panel

next article Towards defect monitoring for metallic additive manufacturing components using phased array ultrasonic testing

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics,2(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101.CrossRef

Abellan-Nebot, J. V., & Subirón, R. F. (2010). A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,47, 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2191-8.CrossRef

Agogino, A., & Goebel, K. (2007). Milling data set. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository. https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/#milling.

Amami, R., Ben Ayed, D., & Ellouze, N. (2013). Practical selection of SVM supervised parameters with different feature representations for vowel recognition. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications,7(9), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.4156/jdcta.vol7.issue9.50.CrossRef

Chen, S.-L., & Jen, Y. W. (2000). Data fusion neural network for tool condition monitoring in CNC milling machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,40(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00066-8.CrossRef

Chen, Q., Wynne, R. J., Goulding, P., & Sandoz, D. (2000). The application of principal component analysis and kernel density estimation to enhance process monitoring. Control Engineering Practice,8, 531–543.CrossRef

Cho, S., Binsaeid, S., & Asfour, S. (2010). Design of multisensor fusion-based tool condition monitoring system in end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,46(5–8), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2110-z.CrossRef

Choi, S. W., Lee, C., Lee, J., Hyun, J., & Lee, I. (2005). Fault detection and identification of nonlinear processes based on kernel PCA. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,75, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.05.001.CrossRef

Dimla, D. E. (2002). The correlation of vibration signal features to cutting tool wear in a metal turning operation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,19(10), 705–713.CrossRef

Dutta, S., Pal, S. K., & Sen, R. (2018). Tool condition monitoring in turning by applying machine vision. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,138(5), 051008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031770.CrossRef

ISO 3685. (1977). Tool-life testing with single-point turning tools. Geneva: ISO.

Jiang, Q., & Yan, X. (2013). Weighted kernel principal component analysis based on probability density estimation and moving window and its application in nonlinear chemical process monitoring. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,127, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.06.013.CrossRef

Ketelaere, B., Hubert, M., & Schmitt, E. (2015). Overview of PCA-based statistical process-monitoring methods for time-dependent, high-dimensional data. Journal of Quality Technology,47(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2015.11918137.CrossRef

Kothuru, A., Nooka, S. P., & Liu, R. (2018). Application of audible sound signals for tool wear monitoring using machine learning techniques in end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,95(9–12), 3797–3808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1460-1.CrossRef

Kurada, S., & Bradley, C. (1997). A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Computers in Industry,34(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-3615(96)00075-9.CrossRef

Lee, W. J., Mendis, G. P., & Sutherland, J. W. (2019). Development of an intelligent tool condition monitoring system to identify manufacturing tradeoffs and optimal machining conditions. Procedia Manufacturing,33, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.031.CrossRef

Lee, J. M., Yoo, C. K., Choi, S. W., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & Lee, I. B. (2004). Nonlinear process monitoring using wavelet kernel principal component analysis. Chemical Engineering Science,59, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223652.CrossRef

Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2017). Points of significance: Principal component analysis. Nature Methods,14(7), 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4346.CrossRef

Li, X. (2001). Detection of tool flute breakage in end milling using feed-motor current signatures. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics,6, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1109/3516.974863.CrossRef

Li, X., & Yuan, Z. (1998). Tool wear monitoring with wavelet packet transform fuzzy clustering method. Wear,219(2), 145–154.CrossRef

Mesina, O. S., & Langari, R. (2000). A neuro-fuzzy system for tool. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,123(2), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1363599.CrossRef

Qehaja, N., & Kyçyku, A. (2017). Tool life modeling based on cutting parameters and work material hardness in turning process. In Scientific proceedings of XIV international congress, IV (pp. 278–281).

Samuel, R. T., & Cao, Y. (2014). Fault detection in a multivariate process based on kernel PCA and kernel density estimation. In 20th international conference on automation and computing (Vol. 4, pp. 165–174). https://doi.org/10.1109/iconac.2014.6935477.

Scholkopf, B., Smola, A., & Muller, K. R. (1997). Kernel principal component analysis. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks,1327, 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017467.CrossRef

Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K.-R. (1998). Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation,10(5), 1299–1319. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017467.CrossRef

Segreto, T., Simeone, A., & Teti, R. (2013). Multiple sensor monitoring in nickel alloy turning for tool wear assessment via sensor fusion. Procedia CIRP,12, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.016.CrossRef

Silverman, B. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef

Twardowski, P., Legutko, S., Krolczyk, G. M., & Hloch, S. (2015). Investigation of wear and tool life of coated carbide and cubic boron nitride cutting tools in high speed milling. Advances in Mechanical Engineering,7(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015590216.CrossRef

Vanhatalo, E., Kulahci, M., & Bergquist, B. (2017). On the structure of dynamic principal component analysis used in statistical process monitoring. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,167(February), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.05.016.CrossRef

Wang, Q. (2014). Kernel principal component analysis and its applications in face recognition and active shape models. In CoRR. arXiv:1207.3538.

Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Xie, Q., & Xu, Y. (2019). A new tool wear monitoring method based on multi-scale PCA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,30(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1235-9.CrossRef

Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Kumara, S., & Gao, R. X. (2018). Cloud-based parallel machine learning for tool wear prediction. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,140(4), 041005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038002.CrossRef

Yu, J. (2012). Machine tool condition monitoring based on an adaptive gaussian mixture model. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,134(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006093.CrossRef

Zhang, X., Gao, H., & Xu, M. (2016). On-line tool condition monitoring based on PCA and integrated neural networks for cold blast machining operation. In International conference on applied mechanics and materials engineering. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtmse/ammme2016/6891.

Title: Monitoring of a machining process using kernel principal component analysis and kernel density estimation
Authors: Wo Jae Lee
Gamini P. Mendis
Matthew J. Triebe
John W. Sutherland
Publication date: 23-10-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0956-5515
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8145
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01504-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

A novel learning-based feature recognition method using multiple sectional view representation

Towards defect monitoring for metallic additive manufacturing components using phased array ultrasonic testing

Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0

Image synthesis in contrast MRI based on super resolution reconstruction with multi-refinement cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks

Effective automatic defect classification process based on CNN with stacking ensemble model for TFT-LCD panel

Formal modeling of cyber-physical resource scheduling in IIoT cloud environments

Premium Partners