Skip to main content
Top
Published in: NanoEthics 2/2016

30-06-2016 | Introduction

Nanoscale-Technologies as Subjects of Responsible Research and Innovation

Authors: Stephan Lingner, John Weckert

Published in: NanoEthics | Issue 2/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

The term “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) has been central in European research and innovation policy in the current decade although less so in other countries, for example in the USA and Australia. It comprises aims such as established methods of technology reflection, for example technology assessment and practical ethics, among others. However, RRI claims a specificity with respect to dealing with the inevitably disruptive potential of “creative destruction,” which is the essence of innovation in the Schumpeterian sense. The obvious tension between competitive vs. social values of innovation as well as its unwanted or uncertain side-effects gives reason for corresponding responsibility deliberations. Related societal risks and uncertain outcomes of innovation are therefore subjects of attempts to assess and balance opportunities and risks of realizing new options with emerging technologies. Additionally, there are just expectations of the taxpayers for relevant as well as acceptable research and innovation that has been publicly funded; corresponding benefits should thus be in the interest of society. Moreover, responsible conduct of innovation can be also prudent for the actors because public acceptance of new technologies can be seen as a prerequisite for marketable products and services and thus for economic benefits and amortization of investments. In such cases, the impetuses of the sellers and the demand-side might even convergence to some extent. …

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In the final paper of the special section, Weckert et al. use it as referring only to a particular society.
 
2
Cf the discussion of societal desirability of Schroeder et al. in the first paper of the special section.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grunwald A (2011) Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7:9–31 Grunwald A (2011) Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7:9–31
2.
go back to reference Stilgoe J, Owen R, MacNaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9):1568–1580CrossRef Stilgoe J, Owen R, MacNaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9):1568–1580CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74CrossRef Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lingner S (2015) Exploring ‘responsibility’ in research and innovation. In: Bowman DM, Dijkstra A, Fautz C, Guivant J, Konrad K, Van Lente H, Woll S (eds) Practices of innovation and responsibility: insights from methods, governance and action. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 99–110 Lingner S (2015) Exploring ‘responsibility’ in research and innovation. In: Bowman DM, Dijkstra A, Fautz C, Guivant J, Konrad K, Van Lente H, Woll S (eds) Practices of innovation and responsibility: insights from methods, governance and action. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 99–110
5.
go back to reference ProGReSS (2016) Promoting global responsible research and social and scientific innovation. Coordination and Support Action of the European Commission (grant no. 321400). http://www.progressproject.eu Accessed 2 June 2016 ProGReSS (2016) Promoting global responsible research and social and scientific innovation. Coordination and Support Action of the European Commission (grant no. 321400). http://​www.​progressproject.​eu Accessed 2 June 2016
6.
go back to reference Coles D, Engelhard M, Han B, Kumar A, Laas K, Ladikas M, Lin R, Schroeder D, Srinivas R, van Niekerk J, Walker M, Weckert J (2014) RRI country requirements matrix ‐ Nanotechnology, synthetic biology, ICT. Report for FP7 Project “ProGReSS”. http://www.progressproject.eu Accessed 2 June 2016 Coles D, Engelhard M, Han B, Kumar A, Laas K, Ladikas M, Lin R, Schroeder D, Srinivas R, van Niekerk J, Walker M, Weckert J (2014) RRI country requirements matrix ‐ Nanotechnology, synthetic biology, ICT. Report for FP7 Project “ProGReSS”. http://​www.​progressproject.​eu Accessed 2 June 2016
7.
go back to reference Zwart H, Landeweerd L, van Rooij A (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10:1–19CrossRef Zwart H, Landeweerd L, van Rooij A (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10:1–19CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nanoscale-Technologies as Subjects of Responsible Research and Innovation
Authors
Stephan Lingner
John Weckert
Publication date
30-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
NanoEthics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0269-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

NanoEthics 2/2016 Go to the issue