Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Marketing Letters 3/2007

01-09-2007

Nonverbal cues-based first impressions: Impression formation through exposure to static images

Author: Rebecca Walker Naylor

Published in: Marketing Letters | Issue 3/2007

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Consumers often make judgments about service providers based solely on their photograph (e.g., on a billboard, on the Internet) before interacting with them face-to-face. This first impression is important for marketers to understand because it influences service provider selection and evaluation. This research explores the nature and subsequent influence of initial judgments made from static images. The results of two studies indicate that (1) judgments based on nonverbal cues can be surprisingly accurate, particularly of personality traits relevant to the domain in which the target is being judged, and (2) initial nonverbal cues-based judgments influence subsequent judgments of a target’s actions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The extant research on static images has focused on judgments of personality and character traits (e.g., honesty, intelligence, health, etc.). Our research is the first, to our knowledge, to examine the accuracy of judgments of an unknown target’s job performance made on the basis of static images.
 
2
The photographs used in this research contain physical appearance cues (of which general physical attractiveness is one element) and static representations of some kinesic cues (facial expression and eye gaze).
 
3
All photographs and performance measures used were obtained with permission from the targets.
 
4
To ensure true thin-slice judgments, participants in each study were also asked if they had ever seen or met the target before the study. No participants indicated that they had seen or met the targets before.
 
5
The reader may note that some relatively large correlations in Tables 1 and 2 are not statistically significant. This is because, following Ambady and Rosenthal (1993), targets are used as the unit of analysis rather than judges (participants). Because correlations were computed across judges, study 1A has an n of five targets (financial consultants) and study 1B an n of six targets (professors) vs an n corresponding to the number of participants. This analysis resulted in three degrees of freedom in the financial consultant study and four degrees of freedom in the professor study. The critical value for r at three degrees of freedom (at the p < 0.05 level) is a correlation of 0.878. The critical value for r at four degrees of freedom (at the p < 0.05 level) is .811.
 
6
Both Cohen’s d (reported in the text) and r 2 (reported in Tables 1 and 2) are indicators of the large effect sizes found in both studies 1A and 1B.
 
7
Although the paragraph was originally used by Srull and Wyer (1979) in a category accessibility study, we elected to use it here because it was designed to be ambiguous in regards to a specific personality trait. Because the target’s purported actions in the paragraph can be interpreted as either hostile or not, judgments made by participants of the target’s hostility are primarily influenced by the perceivers’ initial nonverbal cues-based impression rather than by cues in the written paragraph.
 
Literature
go back to reference Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.CrossRef Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgment accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 32 (pp. 201–271) San Diego: Academic. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgment accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 32 (pp. 201–271) San Diego: Academic.
go back to reference Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 518–529.CrossRef Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 518–529.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.CrossRef Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.CrossRef Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.CrossRef
go back to reference Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming Impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming Impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Berry, D. S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the Physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266–279.CrossRef Berry, D. S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the Physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Berry, D. S., & Finch Wero, J. L. (1993). Accuracy in face perception: A view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497–520.CrossRef Berry, D. S., & Finch Wero, J. L. (1993). Accuracy in face perception: A view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497–520.CrossRef
go back to reference Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.CrossRef Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Bonoma, T. V., & Felder, L. C. (1977). Nonverbal communication in marketing: Toward a communicational analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 169–180.CrossRef Bonoma, T. V., & Felder, L. C. (1977). Nonverbal communication in marketing: Toward a communicational analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 169–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: McGraw-Hill. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986). Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 221–233.CrossRef Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986). Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 221–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Hulbert, J., & Capon, N. (1972). Interpersonal communication in marketing: An overview. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 27–34.CrossRef Hulbert, J., & Capon, N. (1972). Interpersonal communication in marketing: An overview. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 27–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2005). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing. Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2005). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
go back to reference Lachman, S. J., & Bass, A. R. (1985). A direct experiment of halo effect. Journal of Psychology, 119, 535–540.CrossRef Lachman, S. J., & Bass, A. R. (1985). A direct experiment of halo effect. Journal of Psychology, 119, 535–540.CrossRef
go back to reference Leigh, T. W., & Summers, J. O. (2002). An initial evaluation of industrial buyers’ impressions of salespersons’ nonverbal cues. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 22, 41–53. Leigh, T. W., & Summers, J. O. (2002). An initial evaluation of industrial buyers’ impressions of salespersons’ nonverbal cues. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 22, 41–53.
go back to reference Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for the unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450–456.CrossRef Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for the unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Nowicki, S. Jr., & Duke, M. P. (2000). Nonverbal receptivity: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy (DANVA). In J. A. Hall & F. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahawah: Erlbaum. Nowicki, S. Jr., & Duke, M. P. (2000). Nonverbal receptivity: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy (DANVA). In J. A. Hall & F. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahawah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.CrossRef Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Hold, Rinehart, and Winston. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Hold, Rinehart, and Winston.
go back to reference Schul, P. L., & Lamb, C. W. (1982). Decoding nonverbal and vocal communications: A laboratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10, 154–164.CrossRef Schul, P. L., & Lamb, C. W. (1982). Decoding nonverbal and vocal communications: A laboratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10, 154–164.CrossRef
go back to reference Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRef Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRef
go back to reference Srull, T. K., & Wyer R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.CrossRef Srull, T. K., & Wyer R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.CrossRef
go back to reference Stewart, D. W., Hecker, S., & Graham, J. L. (1987). It’s more than what you say: Assessing the influences of nonverbal communication in marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 4, 303–322. Stewart, D. W., Hecker, S., & Graham, J. L. (1987). It’s more than what you say: Assessing the influences of nonverbal communication in marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 4, 303–322.
go back to reference Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29.CrossRef Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajonc, R. B. (1963). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9(2), 1–27.CrossRef Zajonc, R. B. (1963). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9(2), 1–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175.CrossRef Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123–131.CrossRef Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123–131.CrossRef
go back to reference Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 238–249.CrossRef Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 238–249.CrossRef
go back to reference Zebrowitz, L. A., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 167–185.CrossRef Zebrowitz, L. A., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 167–185.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nonverbal cues-based first impressions: Impression formation through exposure to static images
Author
Rebecca Walker Naylor
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Marketing Letters / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Electronic ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-007-9010-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Marketing Letters 3/2007 Go to the issue