Skip to main content
Top

2008 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

On Group Decision Making, Consensus Reaching, Voting and Voting Paradoxes under Fuzzy Preferences and a Fuzzy Majority: A Survey and some Perspectives

Authors : Janusz Kacprzyk, Sławomir Zadrożny, Mario Fedrizzi, Hannu Nurmi

Published in: Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Group decision making, as meant in this chapter, is the following choice problem which proceeds in a multiperson setting. There is a group of individuals (decisionmakers, experts, ...) who provide their testimonies concerning an issue in question. These testimonies are assumed here to be individual preference relations over some set of option (alternatives, variants, ...). The problem is to find a solution, i.e. an alternative or a set of alternatives, from among the feasible ones, which best reflects the preferences of the group of individuals as a whole. We will survey main developments in group decision making under fuzziness. First, we will briefly outline some basic inconsistencies and negative results of group decision making and social choice, and show how they can be alleviated by some plausible modifications of underlying assumptions, mainly by introducing fuzzy preference relations and, to a lesser extent, a fuzzy majority. Then, we will concentrate on how to derive solutions under individual fuzzy preference relations, and a fuzzy majority equated with a fuzzy linguistic quantifier (e.g., most, almost all, ...) and dealt with in terms of a fuzzy logic based calculus of linguistically quantified statements or via the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators. We will briefly mention that one of solution concepts proposed can be a prototype for a wide class of group decision making choice functions. Then, we will discuss a related issue of how to define a “soft” degree of consensus in the group under individual fuzzy preference relations and a fuzzy majority. Finally, we will show how fuzzy preferences can help alleviate some voting paradoxes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Metadata
Title
On Group Decision Making, Consensus Reaching, Voting and Voting Paradoxes under Fuzzy Preferences and a Fuzzy Majority: A Survey and some Perspectives
Authors
Janusz Kacprzyk
Sławomir Zadrożny
Mario Fedrizzi
Hannu Nurmi
Copyright Year
2008
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73723-0_14

Premium Partner