Skip to main content
Top

2009 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Ontology Engineering Methodology

Authors : York Sure, Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer

Published in: Handbook on Ontologies

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Summary

In this chapter we present a methodology for introducing and maintaining ontology based knowledge management applications into enterprises with a focus on Knowledge Processes and Knowledge Meta Processes. While the former process circles around the usage of ontologies, the latter process guides their initial set up.We illustrate our methodology by an example from a case study on skills management. The methodology serves as a scaffold for Part B “Ontology Engineering” of the handbook. It shows where more specific concerns of ontology engineering find their place and how they are related in the overall process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
3
Thanks to Urs Gisler, Valentin Schoeb and Patrick Shann from Swiss Life for their efforts during the ontology modelling.
 
4
OntoWeb, a European thematic network, see http://​www.​ontoweb.​org for further information.
 
5
EU Integrated Project NeOn Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies, see www.​neon-project.​org for further information.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference A. Abecker, A. Bernardi, K. Hinkelmann, O. Kuehn, and M. Sintek. Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):40–48, 1998.CrossRef A. Abecker, A. Bernardi, K. Hinkelmann, O. Kuehn, and M. Sintek. Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):40–48, 1998.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference J. C. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, and A. Gómez-Pérez. WebODE: A scalable workbench for ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP) Oct. 21–23, 2001, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2001. J. C. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, and A. Gómez-Pérez. WebODE: A scalable workbench for ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP) Oct. 21–23, 2001, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2001.
3.
go back to reference M. Bonifacio, T. Franz, and S. Staab. A Four-Layer Model for Information Technology Support of Knowledge Management, chapter 6. Advances in Management Information Systems. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 2008. M. Bonifacio, T. Franz, and S. Staab. A Four-Layer Model for Information Technology Support of Knowledge Management, chapter 6. Advances in Management Information Systems. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 2008.
4.
5.
go back to reference T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge – How organisations manage what they know. Havard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998. T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge – How organisations manage what they know. Havard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998.
6.
go back to reference J. Davies, D. Fensel, and F. van Harmelen, editors. On-To-Knowledge: Semantic Web enabled Knowledge Management. Wiley, New York, 2002. J. Davies, D. Fensel, and F. van Harmelen, editors. On-To-Knowledge: Semantic Web enabled Knowledge Management. Wiley, New York, 2002.
7.
go back to reference R. Dieng, O. Corby, A. Giboin, and M. Ribiere. Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3):567–598, 1999.CrossRef R. Dieng, O. Corby, A. Giboin, and M. Ribiere. Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3):567–598, 1999.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference A. M. Fairchild. Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, pages 3173–3180, 2002. A. M. Fairchild. Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, pages 3173–3180, 2002.
9.
go back to reference M. Fernández-López. Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. CEUR, Aachen, Germany, 1999. M. Fernández-López. Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. CEUR, Aachen, Germany, 1999.
10.
go back to reference M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. Euzenat, A. Gangemi, Y. Kalfoglou, D. M. Pisanelli, M. Schorlemmer, G. Steve, L. Stojanovic, G. Stumme, and Y. Sure. A survey on methodologies for developing, maintaining, integrating, evaluating and reengineering ontologies. OntoWeb deliverable 1.4, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002. M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. Euzenat, A. Gangemi, Y. Kalfoglou, D. M. Pisanelli, M. Schorlemmer, G. Steve, L. Stojanovic, G. Stumme, and Y. Sure. A survey on methodologies for developing, maintaining, integrating, evaluating and reengineering ontologies. OntoWeb deliverable 1.4, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002.
11.
go back to reference M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. P. Sierra, and A. P. Sierra. Building a chemical ontology using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment. Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 1999. M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. P. Sierra, and A. P. Sierra. Building a chemical ontology using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment. Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 1999.
12.
go back to reference A. Gómez-Pérez. A framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems with Application, 11(4):519–529, 1996.CrossRef A. Gómez-Pérez. A framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems with Application, 11(4):519–529, 1996.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernandéz-López, O. Corcho, T. T. Ahn, N. Aussenac-Gilles, S. Bernardos, V. Christophides, O. Corby, P. Crowther, Y. Ding, R. Engels, M. Esteban, F. Gandon, Y. Kalfoglou, G. Karvounarakis, M. Lama, A. López, A. Lozano, A. Magkanaraki, D. Manzano, E. Motta, N. Noy, D. Plexousakis, J. A. Ramos, and Y. Sure. Technical roadmap. OntoWeb deliverable 1.1.2, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002. A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernandéz-López, O. Corcho, T. T. Ahn, N. Aussenac-Gilles, S. Bernardos, V. Christophides, O. Corby, P. Crowther, Y. Ding, R. Engels, M. Esteban, F. Gandon, Y. Kalfoglou, G. Karvounarakis, M. Lama, A. López, A. Lozano, A. Magkanaraki, D. Manzano, E. Motta, N. Noy, D. Plexousakis, J. A. Ramos, and Y. Sure. Technical roadmap. OntoWeb deliverable 1.1.2, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002.
14.
go back to reference T. R. Gruber. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6):907–928, 1995.CrossRef T. R. Gruber. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6):907–928, 1995.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference N. Guarino and C. Welty. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61–65, 2002.CrossRef N. Guarino and C. Welty. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61–65, 2002.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Peter Haase, Frank van Harmelen, Zhisheng Huang, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, and York Sure. A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins, and M. A. Musen, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), volume 3729 of LNCS, pages 353–367. Springer, Berlin, 2005. Peter Haase, Frank van Harmelen, Zhisheng Huang, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, and York Sure. A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins, and M. A. Musen, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), volume 3729 of LNCS, pages 353–367. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
17.
go back to reference P. Haase, J. Vlker, and Y. Sure. Management of dynamic knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5):97–107, 2005.CrossRef P. Haase, J. Vlker, and Y. Sure. Management of dynamic knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5):97–107, 2005.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71ff, January–February 1992. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71ff, January–February 1992.
19.
go back to reference T. Lau and Y. Sure. Introducing ontology-based skills management at a large insurance company. In Proceedings of the Modellierung 2002, pages 123–134, Tutzing, Germany, March 2002. T. Lau and Y. Sure. Introducing ontology-based skills management at a large insurance company. In Proceedings of the Modellierung 2002, pages 123–134, Tutzing, Germany, March 2002.
20.
go back to reference A. Léger, H. Akkermans, M. Brown, J.-M. Bouladoux, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, A. Gómez-Pérez, S. Handschuh, A. Hegarty, A. Persidis, R. Studer, Y. Sure, V. Tamma, and B. Trousse. Successful scenarios for ontology-based applications. OntoWeb deliverable 2.1, France Télécom R&D, 2002. A. Léger, H. Akkermans, M. Brown, J.-M. Bouladoux, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, A. Gómez-Pérez, S. Handschuh, A. Hegarty, A. Persidis, R. Studer, Y. Sure, V. Tamma, and B. Trousse. Successful scenarios for ontology-based applications. OntoWeb deliverable 2.1, France Télécom R&D, 2002.
21.
go back to reference A. Léger, Y. Bouillon, M. Bryan, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, P. Ecoublet, A. Persidis, and Y. Sure. Best practices and guidelines. OntoWeb deliverable 2.2, France Télécom R&D, 2002. A. Léger, Y. Bouillon, M. Bryan, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, P. Ecoublet, A. Persidis, and Y. Sure. Best practices and guidelines. OntoWeb deliverable 2.2, France Télécom R&D, 2002.
22.
go back to reference D. O’Leary. Using AI in knowledge management: Knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):34–39, 1998.CrossRef D. O’Leary. Using AI in knowledge management: Knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):34–39, 1998.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference D. O’Leary and R. Studer. Knowledge management: An interdisciplinary approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1), 2001. D. O’Leary and R. Studer. Knowledge management: An interdisciplinary approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1), 2001.
24.
go back to reference H. S. Pinto, S. Staab, and C. Tempich. Diligent: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. In ECAI, pages 393–397, 2004. H. S. Pinto, S. Staab, and C. Tempich. Diligent: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. In ECAI, pages 393–397, 2004.
25.
go back to reference G. Probst, K. Romhardt, and S. Raub. Managing Knowledge. Wiley, New York, 1999. G. Probst, K. Romhardt, and S. Raub. Managing Knowledge. Wiley, New York, 1999.
26.
go back to reference G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. van de Velde, and B. Wielinga. Knowledge Engineering and Management – The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1999. G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. van de Velde, and B. Wielinga. Knowledge Engineering and Management – The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
27.
go back to reference S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1):26–34, 2001. S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1):26–34, 2001.
28.
go back to reference S. Staab and H. Stuckenschmidt, editors. Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. Springer, Berlin, 2006. S. Staab and H. Stuckenschmidt, editors. Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. Springer, Berlin, 2006.
29.
go back to reference L. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, B. Motik, and N. Stojanovic. User-driven ontology evolution management. In A. Gómez-Pérez and V. R. Benjamins, editors, Proc. of EKAW-2002, volume 2473 of LNCS, pages 285–300, Siguenza, Spain. Springer, Berlin, 2002. L. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, B. Motik, and N. Stojanovic. User-driven ontology evolution management. In A. Gómez-Pérez and V. R. Benjamins, editors, Proc. of EKAW-2002, volume 2473 of LNCS, pages 285–300, Siguenza, Spain. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
30.
go back to reference L. Stojanovic. Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut AIFB, D-76128 Karlsruhe, 2004. L. Stojanovic. Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut AIFB, D-76128 Karlsruhe, 2004.
31.
go back to reference M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, G. Aguado de Cea, C. Buil, K. Dellschaft, M. Fernández-López, A. García, A. Gómez-Pérez, G. Herrero, E. Montiel-Ponsoda, M. Sabou, B. Villazon-Terrazas, and Z. Yufei. Neon methodology for building contextualized ontology networks. Technical report, NeOn Deliverable D5.4.1, February 2008. M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, G. Aguado de Cea, C. Buil, K. Dellschaft, M. Fernández-López, A. García, A. Gómez-Pérez, G. Herrero, E. Montiel-Ponsoda, M. Sabou, B. Villazon-Terrazas, and Z. Yufei. Neon methodology for building contextualized ontology networks. Technical report, NeOn Deliverable D5.4.1, February 2008.
32.
go back to reference Y. Sure, M. Erdmann, J. Angele, S. Staab, R. Studer, and D. Wenke. OntoEdit: Collaborative ontology development for the semantic web. In I. Horrocks and J. A. Hendler, editors, Proc. of International Semantic Web Conference 2002, volume 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 221–235, Sardinia, Italy, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002. Y. Sure, M. Erdmann, J. Angele, S. Staab, R. Studer, and D. Wenke. OntoEdit: Collaborative ontology development for the semantic web. In I. Horrocks and J. A. Hendler, editors, Proc. of International Semantic Web Conference 2002, volume 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 221–235, Sardinia, Italy, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
33.
go back to reference Y. Sure, S. Staab, and J. Angele. OntoEdit: Guiding ontology development by methodology and inferencing, volume 2519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 1205–1222, University of California, Irvine, USA, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002. Y. Sure, S. Staab, and J. Angele. OntoEdit: Guiding ontology development by methodology and inferencing, volume 2519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 1205–1222, University of California, Irvine, USA, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
34.
go back to reference Y. Sure and R. Studer. On-To-Knowledge Methodology – Final version. On-To-Knowledge deliverable 18, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, 2002. Y. Sure and R. Studer. On-To-Knowledge Methodology – Final version. On-To-Knowledge deliverable 18, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, 2002.
35.
go back to reference C. Tempich, E. Simperl, M. Luczak, H. S. Pinto, and R. Studer. Argumentation-based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6):52–59, 2007.CrossRef C. Tempich, E. Simperl, M. Luczak, H. S. Pinto, and R. Studer. Argumentation-based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6):52–59, 2007.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference M. Uschold and M. Grueninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Sharing and Review, 11(2), 1996. M. Uschold and M. Grueninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Sharing and Review, 11(2), 1996.
37.
go back to reference M. Uschold and M. King. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95, Montreal, Canada, 1995. M. Uschold and M. King. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95, Montreal, Canada, 1995.
38.
go back to reference M. Uschold, M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgios. The enterprise ontology. Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1):31–89, 1998.CrossRef M. Uschold, M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgios. The enterprise ontology. Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1):31–89, 1998.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ontology Engineering Methodology
Authors
York Sure
Steffen Staab
Rudi Studer
Copyright Year
2009
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_6

Premium Partner