Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
What Is an Ontology? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2009 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Ontology Engineering Methodology

verfasst von : York Sure, Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer

Erschienen in: Handbook on Ontologies

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Summary

In this chapter we present a methodology for introducing and maintaining ontology based knowledge management applications into enterprises with a focus on Knowledge Processes and Knowledge Meta Processes. While the former process circles around the usage of ontologies, the latter process guides their initial set up.We illustrate our methodology by an example from a case study on skills management. The methodology serves as a scaffold for Part B “Ontology Engineering” of the handbook. It shows where more specific concerns of ontology engineering find their place and how they are related in the overall process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Ontologies and Rules
Nächstes Kapitel Ontology Engineering and Evolution in a Distributed World Using DILIGENT
Fußnoten
3
Thanks to Urs Gisler, Valentin Schoeb and Patrick Shann from Swiss Life for their efforts during the ontology modelling.
 
4
OntoWeb, a European thematic network, see http://​www.​ontoweb.​org for further information.
 
5
EU Integrated Project NeOn Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies, see www.​neon-project.​org for further information.
 
Literatur
1.
A. Abecker, A. Bernardi, K. Hinkelmann, O. Kuehn, and M. Sintek. Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):40–48, 1998.CrossRef
2.
J. C. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, and A. Gómez-Pérez. WebODE: A scalable workbench for ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP) Oct. 21–23, 2001, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2001.
3.
M. Bonifacio, T. Franz, and S. Staab. A Four-Layer Model for Information Technology Support of Knowledge Management, chapter 6. Advances in Management Information Systems. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 2008.
4.
T. Buzan. Use your head. BBC Books, 1974.
5.
T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge – How organisations manage what they know. Havard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998.
6.
J. Davies, D. Fensel, and F. van Harmelen, editors. On-To-Knowledge: Semantic Web enabled Knowledge Management. Wiley, New York, 2002.
7.
R. Dieng, O. Corby, A. Giboin, and M. Ribiere. Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3):567–598, 1999.CrossRef
8.
A. M. Fairchild. Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, pages 3173–3180, 2002.
9.
M. Fernández-López. Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. CEUR, Aachen, Germany, 1999.
10.
M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. Euzenat, A. Gangemi, Y. Kalfoglou, D. M. Pisanelli, M. Schorlemmer, G. Steve, L. Stojanovic, G. Stumme, and Y. Sure. A survey on methodologies for developing, maintaining, integrating, evaluating and reengineering ontologies. OntoWeb deliverable 1.4, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002.
11.
M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, J. P. Sierra, and A. P. Sierra. Building a chemical ontology using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment. Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 1999.
12.
A. Gómez-Pérez. A framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems with Application, 11(4):519–529, 1996.CrossRef
13.
A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernandéz-López, O. Corcho, T. T. Ahn, N. Aussenac-Gilles, S. Bernardos, V. Christophides, O. Corby, P. Crowther, Y. Ding, R. Engels, M. Esteban, F. Gandon, Y. Kalfoglou, G. Karvounarakis, M. Lama, A. López, A. Lozano, A. Magkanaraki, D. Manzano, E. Motta, N. Noy, D. Plexousakis, J. A. Ramos, and Y. Sure. Technical roadmap. OntoWeb deliverable 1.1.2, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002.
14.
T. R. Gruber. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6):907–928, 1995.CrossRef
15.
N. Guarino and C. Welty. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61–65, 2002.CrossRef
16.
Peter Haase, Frank van Harmelen, Zhisheng Huang, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, and York Sure. A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins, and M. A. Musen, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), volume 3729 of LNCS, pages 353–367. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
17.
P. Haase, J. Vlker, and Y. Sure. Management of dynamic knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5):97–107, 2005.CrossRef
18.
R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71ff, January–February 1992.
19.
T. Lau and Y. Sure. Introducing ontology-based skills management at a large insurance company. In Proceedings of the Modellierung 2002, pages 123–134, Tutzing, Germany, March 2002.
20.
A. Léger, H. Akkermans, M. Brown, J.-M. Bouladoux, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, A. Gómez-Pérez, S. Handschuh, A. Hegarty, A. Persidis, R. Studer, Y. Sure, V. Tamma, and B. Trousse. Successful scenarios for ontology-based applications. OntoWeb deliverable 2.1, France Télécom R&D, 2002.
21.
A. Léger, Y. Bouillon, M. Bryan, R. Dieng, Y. Ding, M. Fernandéz-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, P. Ecoublet, A. Persidis, and Y. Sure. Best practices and guidelines. OntoWeb deliverable 2.2, France Télécom R&D, 2002.
22.
D. O’Leary. Using AI in knowledge management: Knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3):34–39, 1998.CrossRef
23.
D. O’Leary and R. Studer. Knowledge management: An interdisciplinary approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1), 2001.
24.
H. S. Pinto, S. Staab, and C. Tempich. Diligent: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. In ECAI, pages 393–397, 2004.
25.
G. Probst, K. Romhardt, and S. Raub. Managing Knowledge. Wiley, New York, 1999.
26.
G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. van de Velde, and B. Wielinga. Knowledge Engineering and Management – The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
27.
S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1):26–34, 2001.
28.
S. Staab and H. Stuckenschmidt, editors. Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. Springer, Berlin, 2006.
29.
L. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, B. Motik, and N. Stojanovic. User-driven ontology evolution management. In A. Gómez-Pérez and V. R. Benjamins, editors, Proc. of EKAW-2002, volume 2473 of LNCS, pages 285–300, Siguenza, Spain. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
30.
L. Stojanovic. Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut AIFB, D-76128 Karlsruhe, 2004.
31.
M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, G. Aguado de Cea, C. Buil, K. Dellschaft, M. Fernández-López, A. García, A. Gómez-Pérez, G. Herrero, E. Montiel-Ponsoda, M. Sabou, B. Villazon-Terrazas, and Z. Yufei. Neon methodology for building contextualized ontology networks. Technical report, NeOn Deliverable D5.4.1, February 2008.
32.
Y. Sure, M. Erdmann, J. Angele, S. Staab, R. Studer, and D. Wenke. OntoEdit: Collaborative ontology development for the semantic web. In I. Horrocks and J. A. Hendler, editors, Proc. of International Semantic Web Conference 2002, volume 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 221–235, Sardinia, Italy, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
33.
Y. Sure, S. Staab, and J. Angele. OntoEdit: Guiding ontology development by methodology and inferencing, volume 2519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 1205–1222, University of California, Irvine, USA, 2002. Springer, Berlin, 2002.
34.
Y. Sure and R. Studer. On-To-Knowledge Methodology – Final version. On-To-Knowledge deliverable 18, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, 2002.
35.
C. Tempich, E. Simperl, M. Luczak, H. S. Pinto, and R. Studer. Argumentation-based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6):52–59, 2007.CrossRef
36.
M. Uschold and M. Grueninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Sharing and Review, 11(2), 1996.
37.
M. Uschold and M. King. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95, Montreal, Canada, 1995.
38.
M. Uschold, M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgios. The enterprise ontology. Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1):31–89, 1998.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ontology Engineering Methodology
verfasst von
York Sure
Steffen Staab
Rudi Studer
Copyright-Jahr
2009
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Handbook on Ontologies

Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70999-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-540-92673-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2009

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_6