Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2020

27-04-2020

Operationalizing Optimization in a Middle School Virtual Engineering Internship

Authors: Ryan Montgomery, Eric Greenwald, Samuel Crane, Ari Krakowski, Jacqueline Barber

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

New national science standards have elevated attention to student performance with a core set of science and engineering practices, yet guidance about how to assess these practices is only just emerging in the literature. This is particularly true for the set of engineering design–focused concepts and practices articulated in the Next Generation Science Standards’ (NGSS) Engineering, Technology, and Application of Science (ETS) standards. In this work, we present a model of student cognition for assessing student facility with the engineering design practice of optimization. We operationalize this model of cognition within a set of engineering-focused units for middle school, framed as Virtual Engineering Internships (VEIs). To operationalize the engineering design practice of optimization within our VEIs, we first broke optimization down into two more specific sub-behaviors: exploration and systematicity. We then designed metrics that provide evidence of those behaviors and would be observable given student clickstream data from a digital design tool. We normalized these metrics based on the obtained distributions from a research trial. We discuss the existing correlations between these behaviors and metrics.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Apedoe, X., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41(4), 773–791.CrossRef Apedoe, X., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41(4), 773–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Baxter, G. P., Elder, A. D., & Glaser, R. (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 133–140.CrossRef Baxter, G. P., Elder, A. D., & Glaser, R. (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 133–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett, R. E., Persky, H., Weiss, A., & Jenkins, F. (2010). Measuring problem solving with technology: a demonstration study for NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(8). Bennett, R. E., Persky, H., Weiss, A., & Jenkins, F. (2010). Measuring problem solving with technology: a demonstration study for NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(8).
go back to reference Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90.CrossRef Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, N. J. S., & Wilson, M. (2011). A model of cognition: the missing cornerstone of assessment. Educational Psychological Review, 23(2), 221–234.CrossRef Brown, N. J. S., & Wilson, M. (2011). A model of cognition: the missing cornerstone of assessment. Educational Psychological Review, 23(2), 221–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C. D., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133 081004-1-11. Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C. D., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133 081004-1-11.
go back to reference Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.CrossRef Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.CrossRef
go back to reference Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22–39. Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22–39.
go back to reference Gobert, J., Sao Pedro, M., Raziuddin, J., & Baker, R. S. (2013). From log files to assessment metrics for science inquiry using educational data mining. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 521–563. Gobert, J., Sao Pedro, M., Raziuddin, J., & Baker, R. S. (2013). From log files to assessment metrics for science inquiry using educational data mining. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 521–563.
go back to reference Hammond, K. J. (1989). Case-based planning: Viewing planning as a memory task. Academic Press. Hammond, K. J. (1989). Case-based planning: Viewing planning as a memory task. Academic Press.
go back to reference Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.CrossRef Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.CrossRef Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.CrossRef
go back to reference Kruger, C., & Cross, N. (2006). Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies, 27(5), 527–548.CrossRef Kruger, C., & Cross, N. (2006). Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies, 27(5), 527–548.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Development and validation of a multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326–2357.CrossRef Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Development and validation of a multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326–2357.CrossRef
go back to reference Marples, D. L. (1961). The decisions of engineering design. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2, 55–71.CrossRef Marples, D. L. (1961). The decisions of engineering design. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2, 55–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Mehalik, M., & Schunn, C. (2007). What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 519. Mehalik, M., & Schunn, C. (2007). What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 519.
go back to reference Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
go back to reference NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
go back to reference Pellegrino, J. W., Wilson, M. R., Koenig, J. A., & Beatty, A. S. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. National Academies Press. Pellegrino, J. W., Wilson, M. R., Koenig, J. A., & Beatty, A. S. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. National Academies Press.
go back to reference Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the validity of instructionally relevant assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81.CrossRef Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the validity of instructionally relevant assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 9.CrossRef Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 9.CrossRef
go back to reference Quellmalz, E. S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2009). Technology and testing. Science, 323(5910), 75–79.CrossRef Quellmalz, E. S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2009). Technology and testing. Science, 323(5910), 75–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363–393.CrossRef Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363–393.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.CrossRef Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.CrossRef
go back to reference Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882.CrossRef Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882.CrossRef
go back to reference Serrano-Laguna, Á., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203–209.CrossRef Serrano-Laguna, Á., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347–362.CrossRef Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347–362.CrossRef
go back to reference Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167.CrossRef Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Vieira, C., Goldstein, M. H., Purzer, Ş., & Magana, A. J. (2016). Using learning analytics to characterize student experimentation strategies in the context of engineering design. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 291–317.CrossRef Vieira, C., Goldstein, M. H., Purzer, Ş., & Magana, A. J. (2016). Using learning analytics to characterize student experimentation strategies in the context of engineering design. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 291–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Vieira, C., Magana, A. J., & Purzer, S. (2017). Identifying engineering students’ design practices using process data. In Proceedings of 2017 research in engineering education symposium (REES). Bogotá-Colombia. Vieira, C., Magana, A. J., & Purzer, S. (2017). Identifying engineering students’ design practices using process data. In Proceedings of 2017 research in engineering education symposium (REES). Bogotá-Colombia.
go back to reference Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., & Hazzard, E. (2014). Time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 218–230. Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., & Hazzard, E. (2014). Time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 218–230.
Metadata
Title
Operationalizing Optimization in a Middle School Virtual Engineering Internship
Authors
Ryan Montgomery
Eric Greenwald
Samuel Crane
Ari Krakowski
Jacqueline Barber
Publication date
27-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09826-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partners