Top

Published in:

30-10-2021

Opinions About Abortion Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ohio

Authors: Mikaela H. Smith, Abigail Norris Turner, Payal Chakraborty, Robert B. Hood, Danielle Bessett, Maria F. Gallo, Alison H. Norris

Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Issue 3/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Introduction

Most studies investigating abortion attitudes use nationally representative data, leaving a need for studies of variation within a state. This study investigates abortion opinion among women in Ohio, a state with restrictive abortion policies, as well as how individual-level characteristics are associated with abortion opinions.

Methods

Data comes from the Ohio Survey of Women, which was administered from October 2018 to June 2019 to women aged 18–44 years in Ohio (n = 2529; analytic n = 2356). From six questions capturing abortion opinion, we developed a composite measure indicating whether respondents felt “supportive,” “unsupportive,” or “mixed” toward abortion. We examined correlates of abortion opinions using multinomial logistic regression, with “mixed” as the reference category. We applied survey weights in all analyses so that the results are representative of our population as a whole (Ohio women aged 18–44).

Results

Fifty-three percent of respondents were supportive of abortion, with 30% offering mixed views and 17% being unsupportive. Most sociodemographic variables were inconsistent in their significance. Independents (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30–0.65) and Democrats (OR: 0.23, CI: 0.14–0.39) were significantly less likely to be unsupportive versus mixed than Republicans. Democrats (OR: 0.4.54, CI: 3.17–6.79) were more likely to be supportive than mixed compared to Republicans, as were those with some other political affiliation (OR: 3.38, CI: 1.89–6.04). Compared to those who never attend religious services, those who attend once per week or more were significantly more likely to be unsupportive than mixed (OR: 3.54, CI: 2.04–6.13), and less likely to be supportive than mixed (OR: 0.33, CI: 0.19–0.55). Additionally, Protestants (OR: 0.62, CI: 0.39–0.97), other Christians (OR: 0.33, CI: 0.39–0.57), and those of other denominations (OR: 0.47, CI: 0.24–0.93) were less likely than those unaffiliated with a religious denomination to be supportive than mixed. Knowing someone who had an abortion or having had one oneself increased odds of being supportive over mixed (OR: 2.16, CI: 1.64–2.84), while being from rural Appalachia decreased odds of being supportive (OR: 0.70, CI: 0.50–0.97). Black respondents were more likely to feel mixed compared to white respondents, having lower odds of being both unsupportive (OR: 0.23, CI: 0.10–0.55) and supportive (OR: 0.55, CI: 0.34–0.91) than mixed.

Conclusions

Overall, a majority of women of reproductive age in Ohio were supportive of abortion, with political affiliation and religious service attendance correlating with abortion opinion.

Policy Implications

The relatively high amount of support for abortion in Ohio highlights an inconsistency between opinion and Ohio’s restrictive legislative landscape.

previous article The Biopsychosocial Model and the Sex-Positive Approach: an Integrative Perspective for Sexology and General Health Care

next article Associations Between Sex Education Types and Sexual Behaviors Among Female Adolescents: a Secondary Data Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2019

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adamczyk, A., Kim, C., & Dillon, L. (2020). Examining public opinion about abortion: a mixed-methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 920–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12351CrossRef

Altshuler, A. L., Gerns Storey, H. L., & Prager, S. W. (2015). Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media. Contraception, 91(3), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.009CrossRefPubMed

Astbury-Ward, E., Parry, O., & Carnwell, R. (2012). Stigma, abortion, and disclosure: findings from a qualitative study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(12), 3137–3147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02604.xCrossRefPubMed

Bartkowski, J. P., Ramos-Wada, A. I., Ellison, C. G., & Acevedo, G. A. (2012). Faith, race-ethnicity, and public policy preferences: Religious schemas and abortion attitudes among U.S. Latinos. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01645.xCrossRef

Bennett, T. (2002). Reproductive health care in the rural United States. JAMA, 287(1), 112–112. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.1.112-JMS0102-6-1CrossRefPubMed

Bolzendahl, C., & Brooks, C. (2005). Polarization, secularization, or differences as usual? The denominational cleavage in U.S. social attitudes since the 1970s. Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00004.xCrossRef

Boudreaux, M., & Rendall, M. S. (2019). Statewide survey of women of reproductive age in Delaware and Maryland. DelCAN Initiative Evaluation. https://popcenter.umd.edu/delcaneval/survey

Bruce, T. C. (2020). Efficacy, distancing, and reconciling: religion and race in Americans’ abortion attitudes. Religions, 11(9), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090475CrossRef

Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103CrossRef

Choose Well. (2021). About. https://www.choosewellsc.org/about

Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., Wilcox, W. C., & Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: Public opinion and the politics of abortion. Westview Press.

Cowan, S. K., Wu, L. L., Makela, S., & England, P. (2016). Alternative estimates of lifetime prevalence of abortion from indirect survey questioning methods. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(4), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e11216CrossRefPubMed

Fried, A. (1988). Abortion politics as symbolic politics: an investigation into belief systems. Social Science Quarterly, 69(1), 137–154.

Gallo, M. F., Casterline, J. B., Chakraborty, P., Norris, A., Bessett, D., & Norris Turner, A. (2021). Passage of abortion ban and women’s accurate understanding of abortion legality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.009CrossRefPubMed

Gallup, Inc. (2019). Abortion. Gallup.Com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/Abortion.aspx

Guttmacher Institute. (2019). State Facts About Abortion Ohio. 2.

Guttmacher Institute. (2021). State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-funding-abortion-under-medicaid

Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: change or continuity? Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/4153084CrossRef

Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2003). Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: a review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600410CrossRef

Jerman, J., Jones, R. K., & Onda, T. (2016). Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008 (p. 29). Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014

Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017). Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014. American Journal of Public Health, 107(12), 1904–1909. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jozkowski, K. N., & Crawford, B. (2014). Examining the complexity of abortion attitudes in the United States: The development and psychometric assessment of the Abortion Complexity Scale.

Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., Turner, R. C., & Lo, W.-J. (2019). Knowledge and sentiments of Roe v Wade in the wake of justice Kavanaugh’s nomination to the U.S. supreme court. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2CrossRef

Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2018). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4CrossRef

Kavanaugh, M. L., Bessett, D., Littman, L. L., & Norris, A. (2013). Connecting knowledge about abortion and sexual and reproductive health to belief about abortion restrictions: findings from an online survey. Women’s Health Issues, 23(4), e239–e247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.003CrossRefPubMed

Lantz, P. M. (2019). State laws restricting abortion: the need to document their impact. The Milbank Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lara, D., Holt, K., Peña, M., & Grossman, D. (2015). Knowledge of abortion laws and services among low-income women in three United States cities. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 17(6), 1811–1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0147-zCrossRefPubMed

Luks, S., & Salamone, M. (2008). Ch4: Abortion. In N. Persily & P. J. Egan (Eds.), Public opinion and constitutional controversy (pp. 80–107). Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Malone, C. (2018). Americans haven’t changed their mind much on abortion, but they have on other cultural issues. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/planned-parenthood-had-a-turbulent-decade-but-that-hasnt-changed-americans-views-of-it/

Martins, S. L., Starr, K. A., Hellerstedt, W. L., & Gilliam, M. L. (2016). Differences in Family planning services by rural–urban geography: survey of title X–supported clinics in Great Plains and Midwestern States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e7116CrossRefPubMed

McGowan, M. L., Norris, A. H., & Bessett, D. (2020). Care churn: why keeping clinic doors open isn’t enough to ensure access to abortion. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(6), 508–510. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2013466CrossRefPubMed

Moseson, H., Massaquoi, M., Dehlendorf, C., Bawo, L., Dahn, B., Zolia, Y., Vittinghoff, E., Hiatt, R. A., & Gerdts, C. (2015). Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the list experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(6), 1951–1958. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

NARAL Pro-Choice America. (2020). State Laws: Ohio. NARAL Pro-Choice America. https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/state-law/ohio/

Nash, E. (2019). A surge in bans on abortion as early as six weeks, before most people know they are pregnant. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/03/surge-bans-abortion-early-six-weeks-most-people-know-they-are-pregnant

Nash, E. (2020). Ohio as a window into recent US trends on abortion access and restrictions. American Journal of Public Health, 110(8), 1115–1116. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (1999). Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.xCrossRefPubMed

Norris, A. H., Chakraborty, P., Lang, K., Hood, R. B., Hayford, S. R., Keder, L., Bessett, D., Smith, M. H., Hill, B. J., Broscoe, M., Norwood, C., & McGowan, M. L. (2020). Abortion access in Ohio’s changing legislative context, 2010–2018. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305706CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pew Research Center. (2015). Pew Research Center 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study. http://www.pewforum.org/dataset/pew-research-center-2014-u-s-religious-landscape-study/

Pew Research Center. (2017). Public opinion on abortion. In Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project. http://www.pewforum.org/2017/01/11/public-opinion-on-abortion-2/

Policy Surveillance Program. (2019). State Abortion Laws. LawAtlas. http://lawatlas.org/datasets/abortion-laws

Rye, B. J., & Underhill, A. (2020). Pro-choice and pro-life are not enough: an investigation of abortion attitudes as a function of abortion prototypes. Sexuality & Culture, 24(6), 1829–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09723-7CrossRef

Sedgh, G., & Keogh, S. C. (2019). Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence. Reproductive Health, 16(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0702-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shellenberg, K. M., Moore, A. M., Bankole, A., Juarez, F., Omideyi, A. K., Palomino, N., Sathar, Z., Singh, S., & Tsui, A. O. (2011). Social stigma and disclosure about induced abortion: results from an exploratory study. Global Public Health, 6(sup1), S111–S125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2011.594072CrossRefPubMed

Siegel, L. G., & Greenhouse, L. (2011). Before (and after) Roe v. Wade: new questions about backlash. The Yale Law Journal, 120, 2028–2087.

Smith, M. H., Callahan, J., Chakraborty, P., Foster, A., Gyuras, H., Chettri, S., Bessett, D., & Norris, A. H. (2021). Sentiment among patients seeking abortion care in a Midwestern clinic [Roundtable]. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Virtual.

Smith, T. W. (1990). Classifying protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511614CrossRef

Stetzer, E., & Burge, R. P. (2016). Reltrad coding problems and a new repository. Politics and Religion, 9(1), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048315000929CrossRef

Sullins, D. P. (1999). Catholic/Protestant trends on abortion: convergence and polarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387757CrossRef

Wetstein, M. E., & Albritton, R. B. (1995). Effects of public opinion on abortion policies and use in the American states. Publius: the Journal of Federalism, 25(4), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038227CrossRef

White, K., Potter, J. E., Stevenson, A. J., Fuentes, L., Hopkins, K., & Grossman, D. (2016). Women’s knowledge of and support for abortion restrictions in Texas: findings from a statewide representative survey. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(4), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wilcox, C. (1992). Race, religion, region and abortion attitudes. Sociological Analysis, 53(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711632CrossRef

Title: Opinions About Abortion Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ohio
Authors: Mikaela H. Smith
Abigail Norris Turner
Payal Chakraborty
Robert B. Hood
Danielle Bessett
Maria F. Gallo
Alison H. Norris
Publication date: 30-10-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1868-9884
Electronic ISSN: 1553-6610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00638-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Policy Implications

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Examining the Relationship Between Roe v. Wade Knowledge and Sentiment Across Political Party and Abortion Identity

Abortion Patient Experiences with Protestors While Accessing Care in Mississippi

Associations Between Sex Education Types and Sexual Behaviors Among Female Adolescents: a Secondary Data Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2019

Client-Centered Care Coordination (C4™) for HIV/STI Prevention: a Theoretical, Conceptual, and Methodological Overview—HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 073

Development and Psychometric Properties of an Instrument for the Assessment of Assertiveness in Sexual Relations

Sexuality Research and Social Policy Welcome Letter