Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Learning & Behavior 2/2017

05-08-2016

Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task

Authors: Antonio A. Artigas, Jose Prados

Published in: Learning & Behavior | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In two experiments, rats were given intermixed or blocked preexposure to two similar compound stimuli, AX and BX. Following preexposure, conditioning trials took place in which AX (Experiment 1) or a novel compound stimulus NX (Experiment 2) was paired with a food-unconditioned stimulus in an appetitive Pavlovian preparation. Animals that were given alternated preexposure showed lower generalization from AX to BX (Experiment 1) and from NX to a new compound, ZX (Experiment 2), than animals that were given blocked preexposure, a perceptual learning and a perceptual learning transfer effect, respectively.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Our analysis develops the argument put forward by McLaren and Mackintosh (2000, p. 226) about the sampling process in the perceptual learning effect reported by Gibson and Walk (1956). In this study, rats showed enhanced discrimination learning between black geometrical figures (circle and triangle) that had been continuously exposed in the home cage of the animals. According to McLaren and Mackintosh, even when exposed to one such stimulus (rather than both of them simultaneously), the animals would be more likely to process the obvious common elements (black color) than the less salient distinctive geometric features (only evident from particular perspectives), leading to differential sampling of the common and the unique elements. In these experiments, using very different preexposure procedures, only intermixed preexposure would be likely to result in differential sampling; in the blocked condition, equal salience of A and X (a white noise and a tone) would result in equivalent sampling of their elements.
 
Literature
go back to reference Artigas, A. A., & Prados, J. (2014). Perceptual learning transfer: Salience of the common element as a factor contributing to the intermixed/blocked effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 419–424. Artigas, A. A., & Prados, J. (2014). Perceptual learning transfer: Salience of the common element as a factor contributing to the intermixed/blocked effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 419–424.
go back to reference Artigas, A. A., Sansa, J., Blair, C. A. J., Hall, G., & Prados, J. (2006). Enhanced discrimination between flavor stimuli: Roles of salience modulation and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 173–177.PubMed Artigas, A. A., Sansa, J., Blair, C. A. J., Hall, G., & Prados, J. (2006). Enhanced discrimination between flavor stimuli: Roles of salience modulation and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 173–177.PubMed
go back to reference Artigas, A. A., Sansa, J., & Prados, J. (2006). The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: Do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 471–481.CrossRefPubMed Artigas, A. A., Sansa, J., & Prados, J. (2006). The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: Do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 471–481.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Atkinson, R. C., & Estes, W. K. (1963). Stimulus sampling theory. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121–168). New York: Wiley. Atkinson, R. C., & Estes, W. K. (1963). Stimulus sampling theory. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121–168). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Blair, C. A. J., & Hall, G. (2003). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 39–48.PubMed Blair, C. A. J., & Hall, G. (2003). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 39–48.PubMed
go back to reference Contel, D. M., Sansa, J., Artigas, A. A., & Prados, J. (2011). Salience modulation and associative inhibition interaction: Short but not long exposure to similar stimuli protects the salience of the unique elements. Behavioural Processes, 86, 21–29.CrossRefPubMed Contel, D. M., Sansa, J., Artigas, A. A., & Prados, J. (2011). Salience modulation and associative inhibition interaction: Short but not long exposure to similar stimuli protects the salience of the unique elements. Behavioural Processes, 86, 21–29.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dwyer, D. M., Hodder, K. I., & Honey, R. C. (2004). Perceptual learning in humans: Role of preexposure schedule, feedback and discrimination assay. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 245–259.CrossRef Dwyer, D. M., Hodder, K. I., & Honey, R. C. (2004). Perceptual learning in humans: Role of preexposure schedule, feedback and discrimination assay. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 245–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Estes, W. K. (1959). The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology, a study of science (Vol. 2, pp. 380–491). New York: McGraw-Hill. Estes, W. K. (1959). The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology, a study of science (Vol. 2, pp. 380–491). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1956). The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49, 239–242.CrossRefPubMed Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1956). The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49, 239–242.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hall, G. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 43–55.CrossRef Hall, G. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 43–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Hall, G., Blair, C. A. J., & Artigas, A. A. (2006). Associative activation of stimulus representations restores lost salience: Implications for perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 145–155.PubMed Hall, G., Blair, C. A. J., & Artigas, A. A. (2006). Associative activation of stimulus representations restores lost salience: Implications for perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 145–155.PubMed
go back to reference Honey, R. C. (1990). Stimulus generalization as a function of stimulus novelty and familiarity in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 178–184.PubMed Honey, R. C. (1990). Stimulus generalization as a function of stimulus novelty and familiarity in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 178–184.PubMed
go back to reference Honey, R. C., & Bateson, P. (1996). Stimulus comparison and perceptual learning: Further evidence and evaluation from an imprinting procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 259–269. Honey, R. C., & Bateson, P. (1996). Stimulus comparison and perceptual learning: Further evidence and evaluation from an imprinting procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 259–269.
go back to reference Honey, R. C., Bateson, P., & Horn, G. (1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 83–103. Honey, R. C., Bateson, P., & Horn, G. (1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 83–103.
go back to reference Lavis, Y., & Mitchell, C. J. (2006). Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: An investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2083–2101.CrossRefPubMed Lavis, Y., & Mitchell, C. J. (2006). Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: An investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2083–2101.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243.CrossRef Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243.CrossRef
go back to reference Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRef Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRef
go back to reference Mackintosh, N. J., Kaye, H., & Bennett, C. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297–322. Mackintosh, N. J., Kaye, H., & Bennett, C. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297–322.
go back to reference McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246.CrossRef McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell, C., & Hall, G. (2014). Can theories of animal discrimination explain perceptual learning in humans? Psychological Bulletin, 140, 283–307.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell, C., & Hall, G. (2014). Can theories of animal discrimination explain perceptual learning in humans? Psychological Bulletin, 140, 283–307.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mitchell, C., Nash, S., & Hall, G. (2008). The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 237–242.PubMed Mitchell, C., Nash, S., & Hall, G. (2008). The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 237–242.PubMed
go back to reference Mondragon, E., & Hall, G. (2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavor aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 153–169. Mondragon, E., & Hall, G. (2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavor aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 153–169.
go back to reference Mondragon, E., & Murphy, R. A. (2010). Perceptual learning in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure: Analysis of the effectiveness of the common element. Behavioural Processes, 83, 247–256.CrossRefPubMed Mondragon, E., & Murphy, R. A. (2010). Perceptual learning in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure: Analysis of the effectiveness of the common element. Behavioural Processes, 83, 247–256.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mundy, M. E., Honey, R. C., & Dwyer, D. M. (2007). Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 124–138.PubMed Mundy, M. E., Honey, R. C., & Dwyer, D. M. (2007). Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 124–138.PubMed
go back to reference Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.CrossRefPubMed Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pearce, J. M., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2010). Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. In C. J. Mitchell & M. E. Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and associative learning: From brain to behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pearce, J. M., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2010). Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. In C. J. Mitchell & M. E. Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and associative learning: From brain to behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Prados, J., Artigas, A. A., & Sansa, J. (2007). Preexposure effects in the spatial domain: Dissociation between latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 115–123.PubMed Prados, J., Artigas, A. A., & Sansa, J. (2007). Preexposure effects in the spatial domain: Dissociation between latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 115–123.PubMed
go back to reference Prados, J., Chamizo, V. D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). Latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a swimming-pool navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 37–44.PubMed Prados, J., Chamizo, V. D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). Latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a swimming-pool navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 37–44.PubMed
go back to reference Prados, J., Hall, G., & Leonard, S. (2004). Dissociation between the Espinet and perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning. Behavioural Processes, 65, 221–229.CrossRefPubMed Prados, J., Hall, G., & Leonard, S. (2004). Dissociation between the Espinet and perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning. Behavioural Processes, 65, 221–229.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 164–182.CrossRefPubMed Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 164–182.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task
Authors
Antonio A. Artigas
Jose Prados
Publication date
05-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Learning & Behavior / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1543-4494
Electronic ISSN: 1543-4508
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0245-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Learning & Behavior 2/2017 Go to the issue