Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Networks
Published in: Wireless Networks 3/2015

01-04-2015

Performance analysis of V2V dynamic anchor position-based routing protocols

Authors: Mohammad Reza Jabbarpour, Alireza Marefat, Ali Jalooli, Rafidah Md Noor, Rashid Hafeez Khokhar, Jaime Lloret

Published in: Wireless Networks | Issue 3/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recently, vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have received more attention in both academic and industry settings. One of the challenging issues in this domain is routing protocols. VANETs’ unique characteristics such as high mobility with the constraint of road topology, fast network topology changes, frequently disconnected networks, and time-sensitive data exchange makes it difficult to design an efficient routing protocol for routing data in vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications. Designing routing protocols for V2V commutations are more challenging due to the absence of infrastructure nodes in the communication procedure. They become even more challenging, when they get benefit from dynamic anchor computation method in which the anchor nodes (junctions or basic nodes for routing) are dynamic in their routing procedure. Position-based routing protocols have been proven to be superior and outperform the other protocols since there is no requirement to establish and save a route between source and destination during the routing process which is suitable for dynamic nature of vehicular networks. In this paper, the performance of V2V dynamic anchor position-based routing protocols, which are proposed for the most challenging condition of packet routing in VANET, are investigated and evaluated under two different scenarios (i.e. various vehicle densities and velocities) through NS-2. The obtained results are then illustrated based on average delay, packet delivery ratio and routing overhead as routing performance indicators. Our objective is to provide a quantitative assessment of the applicability of these protocols in different vehicular scenarios. The comparison provided in this paper makes the research contribution of this survey paper quite higher than a regular survey paper only with explanations.
previous article Inter-domain mobility support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 using overlap function of mobile access gateway
next article Experimental validation of a reinforcement learning based approach for a service-wise optimisation of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Jalooli, A., Shaghaghi, E., Jabbarpour, M.R., Md Noor, R., Yeo, H., & Jung, J.J. (2014). Intelligent advisory speed limit dedication in highway using VANET. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 629412.
2.
Jalooli, A., Hussin, N., Noor, R.M, & Jung, J.J. (2014). Public alerts on landslide natural disaster using vehicular communications. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​969864.
3.
Vasilakos, A.V. (2008). Special issue: Ambient Intelligence. Information Sciences, 178(3), 585–587.
4.
Sattari, M. R. J., Noor, R. M., & Ghahremani, S. (2013). Dynamic congestion control algorithm for vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 7(3), 95–108.
5.
Cheng, X., Wang, C.-X., Laurenson, D. I., Salous, S., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2009). An adaptive geometry-based stochastic model for non-isotropic MIMO mobile-to-mobile channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(9), 4824–4835.CrossRef
6.
Li, M., Li, Z., & Vasilakos, A.V. (2013). A survey on topology control in wireless sensor networks: Taxonomy, comparative study, and open issues. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(12), 2538–2557.
7.
Cheng, X., Wang, C.X., Laurenson, D.I., Salous, S., Vasilakos, A.V. (2011). New deterministic and stochastic simulation models for non isotropic scattering mobile to mobile Rayleigh fading channels. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 11(7), 829–842.
8.
Jiang, D., & Delgrossi, L. (2008). IEEE 802.11 p: Towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (pp. 2036–2040). VTC Spring 2008.
9.
Lloret, J., Canovas, A., Catalá, A., & Garcia, M. (2013). Group-based protocol and mobility model for VANETs to offer internet access. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(3), 1027–1038.CrossRef
10.
Whaiduzzaman, M., Sookhak, M., Gani, A., Buyya, R. (2014). A survey on vehicular cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 40, 325–344.
11.
Bilal, S. M., Khan, S. U., Madani, S. A., Nazir, B., Othman, M. (2014). Road oriented traffic information system for vehicular ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 77(4), 2497–2515.
12.
Cho, K.-H., & Ryu, M.-W. (2012). A survey of greedy routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks. Smart CR, 2(2), 125–137.
13.
Sharef, B. T., Alsaqour, R. A., & Ismail, M. (2014). Vehicular communication ad hoc routing protocols: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 40, 363–396.CrossRef
14.
Ghafoor, K. Z., Mohammed, M. A., Lloret, J., Bakar, K. A., & Zainuddin, Z. M. (2013). Routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks: Survey and research challenges. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 5(4), 39–83.CrossRef
15.
Perkins, C.E., & Royer, E.M. (1999). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceeding of Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile computing systems and applications, WMCSA’99 (pp. 90–100).
16.
Johnson, D.B., & Maltz, D.A. (1996). Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In Mobile computing (pp. 153–181). Heidelberg: Springer.
17.
Liu, G., Lee, B-S., Seet, B-C., Foh, C-H., Wong, K-J., & Lee, K-K. (2004). A routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications. In Information networking. networking technologies for broadband and mobile networks (Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 134–143, Vol. 3090). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
18.
Füßler, H., Mauve, M., Hartenstein, H., Käsemann, M., & Vollmer, D. (2003). Mobicom poster: Location-based routing for vehicular ad-hoc networks. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 7(1), 47–49.CrossRef
19.
Hui, F. (2005). A survey on the characterization of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks routing solutions. In ECS (pp. 1–15).
20.
Jabbarpour, M. R., Md Noor, R., Khokhar, R. H., & Ke, C.-H. (2014). Cross-layer congestion control model for urban vehicular environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 44, 1–16.CrossRef
21.
Khokhar, R.H., Zia, T., Ghafoor, K.Z., Lloret, J., Shiraz, M. (2013). Realistic and Efficient Radio Propagation Model for V2X Communications. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, 7(8). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-04283-1.
22.
Fonseca, A., & Vazão, T. (2013). Applicability of position-based routing for VANET in highways and urban environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(3), 961–973.CrossRef
23.
Nikumbh, M. D., & Bhoi, M. A. (2013). A survey of positioned based routing protocol in VANET. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), 3(2), 1015–1018.
24.
da Silva Camões, A. R. (2013). Geographic location and routing in vehicular networks. Master, tecnicolisboa.
25.
Raw, R. S., & Das, S. (2011). Performance comparison of Position based routing Protocols in vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) Communication. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(1), 435–444.
26.
Hassan, A. N., Abdullah, A. H., Sheet, D. K., & Qureshi, K. N. (2014). Comparison of position based routing protocols of vehicular AD HOC network. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(3), 341–345.
27.
He, G. (2002). Destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV) protocol. Networking Laboratory: Helsinki University of Technology.
28.
Karp, B., & Kung, H-T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 243–254). ACM.
29.
Gerls, M. (2002). Fisheye State Routing (FSR) for Ad Hoc Networks. Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-fsr-03 txt.
30.
Clausen, T., Jacquet, P., Adjih, C., Laouiti, A., Minet, P., Muhlethaler, P., Qayyum, A., & Viennot, L. (2003). Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR).
31.
Attar, A., Tang, H., Vasilakos, A. V., Yu, F. R., & Leung, V. C. (2012). A survey of security challenges in cognitive radio networks: solutions and future research directions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(12), 3172–3186.CrossRef
32.
Park, V., & Corson, M.S. (1997). Temporally-ordered routing algorithm (TORA) version 1 functional specification. Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-00. Txt.
33.
Namboodiri, V., Agarwal, M., & Gao, L. (2004). A study on the feasibility of mobile gateways for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks (pp. 66–75). ACM.
34.
Patel, V. J., & Anuradha, P. G. (2012). A review on routing overhead in broadcast based protocol on VANET. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 2(5), 109–113.
35.
Beijar, N. (2002). Zone routing protocol (ZRP). Finland: Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology.
36.
Nikaein, N., Bonnet, C., & Nikaein, N. (2001). Harp-hybrid ad hoc routing protocol. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST) (pp 56–67).
37.
Mauve, M., Widmer, J., & Hartenstein, H. (2001). A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Network, 15(6), 30–39.CrossRef
38.
Krishna, P., Vaidya, N. H., Chatterjee, M., & Pradhan, D. K. (1997). A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 27(2), 49–64.CrossRef
39.
Song, T., Xia, W., Song, T., Shen, L. (2010). A cluster-based directional routing protocol in VANET. In 12th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT) (pp. 1172–1175).
40.
Zeng, Y., Xiang, K., Li, D., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.CrossRef
41.
Spyropoulos, T., Rais, R. N., Turletti, T., Obraczka, K., & Vasilakos, A. (2010). Routing for disruption tolerant networks: Taxonomy and design. Wireless Networks, 16(8), 2349–2370.CrossRef
42.
Vasilakos, A. V., Zhang, Y., & Spyropoulos, T. (2012). Delay tolerant networks: Protocols and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
43.
Aquino, R., & Edwards, A. (2006). A reactive location routing algorithm with cluster-based flooding for inter-vehicle communication. Computación y Sistemas, 9(4), 297–313.
44.
Wang, T., & Wang, G. (2010). TIBCRPH: traffic infrastructure based cluster routing protocol with handoff in VANET. In 19th Annual IEEE Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (WOCC) (pp. 1–5).
45.
Kihl, M., Sichitiu, M., & Joshi, H.P. (2008). Design and evaluation of two geocast protocols for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Journal of Internet Engineering, 2(1), 127–135.
46.
Allal, S., & Boudjit, S. (2012). Geocast routing protocols for vanets: Survey and guidelines. In Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS) (pp. 323–328).
47.
Ghafoor, K. Z., Abu Bakar, K., Lloret, J., Khokhar, R. H., & Lee, K. C. (2013). Intelligent beaconless geographical forwarding for urban vehicular environments. Wireless Networks, 19(3), 345–362.CrossRef
48.
Ibrahim, K., Weigle, M.C., & Abuelela, M. (2009). p-IVG: Probabilistic inter-vehicle geocast for dense vehicular networks. In IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2009. (pp 1–5).
49.
Park, S., Lee, E., Park, H., Lee, H., & Kim, S.-H. (2010). Mobile geocasting to support mobile sink groups in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 14(10), 939–941.CrossRef
50.
Chaurasia, N., Sharma, S., & Soni, D. (2011). Review study of routing protocols and versatile challenges of MANET. International Journal, 1(2), 150–157.
51.
Kihl, M., Sichitiu, M., Ekeroth, T., & Rozenberg, M. (2007) Reliable geographical multicast routing in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In Wired/wireless internet communications (Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 315–325, Vol. 4517). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
52.
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-W., & Lee, S.-L. (2010). A mobicast routing protocol in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 15(1), 20–35.CrossRefMathSciNet
53.
Junhai, L., Liu, X., & Danxia, Y. (2008). Research on multicast routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks. Computer Networks, 52(5), 988–997.CrossRefMATH
54.
Li, P., Guo, S., Yu, S., & Vasilakos, A.V. (2012). CodePipe: An opportunistic feeding and routing protocol for reliable multicast with pipelined network coding. In INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE (pp. 100–108).
55.
Yen, Y.-S., Chao, H.-C., Chang, R.-S., & Vasilakos, A. (2011). Flooding-limited and multi-constrained QoS multicast routing based on the genetic algorithm for MANETs. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(11), 2238–2250.CrossRef
56.
Royer, E.M. (2000). Multicast ad hoc on-demand distance vector (MAODV) routing. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-maodv-00 txt.
57.
Jetcheva, J.G., & Johnson, D.B. (2001). Adaptive demand-driven multicast routing in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing (pp. 33–44). ACM.
58.
Patel, A., Latifi, M., Souza, A.B., Xavier, F.A., Celestino, J., & Oliveira, F.D. (2013). Stable multicast trees based on Ant Colony optimization for vehicular Ad Hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), IEEE Computer Society (pp. 101–106).
59.
Laouiti, A., Jacquet, P., Minet, P., Viennot, L., Clausen, T., & Adjih, C. (2003) Multicast optimized link state routing. INRIA research report RR–4721.
60.
Lee, S.-J., Su, W., & Gerla, M. (2002). On-demand multicast routing protocol in multihop wireless mobile networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 7(6), 441–453.CrossRef
61.
Tian, K., Zhang, B., Mouftah, H., Zhao, Z., & Ma, J. (2009). Destination-driven on-demand multicast routing protocol for wireless ad hoc networks. In ICC’09 IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2009 (pp. 1–5).
62.
Tonguz, O. K., Wisitpongphan, N., & Bai, F. (2010). DV-CAST: A distributed vehicular broadcast protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(2), 47–57.CrossRef
63.
Nekovee, M., & Bogason, B.B. (2007). Reliable and effcient information dissemination in intermittently connected vehicular adhoc networks. In IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference (pp. 2486–2490). VTC2007-Spring.
64.
Maia, G., Aquino, A.L., Viana, A., Boukerche, A., & Loureiro, A.A. (2012). HyDi: A hybrid data dissemination protocol for highway scenarios in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the second ACM international symposium on Design and analysis of intelligent vehicular networks and applications (pp. 115–122). ACM.
65.
Nakorn, N.N., & Rojviboonchai, K. (2010). DECA: Density-aware reliable broadcasting in vehicular ad hoc networks. In 2010 International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics Computer Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON) (pp. 598–602).
66.
Zhou, L., Chao, H.-C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Joint forensics-scheduling strategy for delay-sensitive multimedia applications over heterogeneous networks. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 29(7), 1358–1367.CrossRef
67.
Yao, Y., Cao, Q., & Vasilakos, A.V. (2013). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), 2013 (pp. 182–190).
68.
Lochert, C., Hartenstein, H., Tian, J., Fussler, H., Hermann, D., & Mauve, M. (2003). A routing strategy for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003 (pp. 156–161).
69.
Käsemann, M., Füßler, H., Hartenstein, H., & Mauve, M. (2002). A reactive location service for mobile ad hoc networks. Citeseer.
70.
Chen, J-C. (2003). Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm. Journal of Formalized Mathematics 15.
71.
Seet, B-C., Liu, G., Lee, B-S., Foh, C-H., Wong, K-J., Lee, K-K. (2004). A-STAR: A mobile ad hoc routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications. In NETWORKING 2004. Networking technologies, services, and protocols; performance of computer and communication networks; mobile and wireless communications (pp. 989–999). New York: Springer.
72.
Gong, J., Xu, C-Z., & Holle, J. (2007). Predictive directional greedy routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. In IEEE 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2007. ICDCSW’07 (pp. 2–2).
73.
Ding, Y., Wang, C., & Xiao, L. (2007). A static-node assisted adaptive routing protocol in vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks. ACM (pp. 59–68).
74.
Borsetti, D., & Gozalvez, J. (2010) Infrastructure-assisted geo-routing for cooperative vehicular networks. In IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC) (pp. 255–262).
75.
Cianfrani, A., Eramo, V., Listanti, M., Polverini, M., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2012). An OSPF-integrated routing strategy for QoS-aware energy saving in IP backbone networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 9(3), 254–267.CrossRef
76.
Luo, J., Gu, X., Zhao, T., & Yan, W. (2010). A mobile infrastructure based VANET routing protocol in the urban environment. In IEEE 2010 International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing (CMC) (pp. 432–437).
77.
Xiang, L., Luo, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON) (pp. 46–54).
78.
Cheng, H., Xiong, N., Vasilakos, A. V., Tianruo Yang, L., Chen, G., & Zhuang, X. (2012). Nodes organization for channel assignment with topology preservation in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(5), 760–773.CrossRef
79.
Pan, H-Y., Jan, R-H., Jeng, A.A-K., Chen, C., & Tseng, H-R. (2011) Mobile gateway routing for vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Asia Pacific wireless communication symposium (APWCS 2011).
80.
Granelli, F., Boato, G., & Kliazovich, D. (2006). MORA: A movement-based routing algorithm for vehicle ad hoc networks. In IEEE Workshop on Automotive Networking and Applications (AutoNet 2006), San Francisco, USA.
81.
Menouar, H., Lenardi, M., & Filali, F. (2007). Movement prediction-based routing (MOPR) concept for position-based routing in vehicular networks. In 66th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC-2007 Fall 2007 (pp. 2101–2105).
82.
Menouar, H., Lenardi, M., & Filali, F. (2006). An intelligent movement-based routing for VANETs. In ITS world congress, London.
83.
Menouar, M., Lenardi, M., & Filali, F. (2005). A movement prediction based routing protocol for vehicle-to-vehicle communications. Communications, 21, 07–2005.
84.
Wei, G., Ling, Y., Guo, B., Xiao, B., Vasilakos, A.V. (2011) Prediction-based data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Combining grey model and Kalman filter. Computer Communications, 34(6), 793–802.
85.
Luo, Y., Zhang, W., & Hu, Y. (2010). A new cluster based routing protocol for VANET. In IEEE Second International Conference on Networks Security Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing (NSWCTC) (pp. 176–180).
86.
Raw, R.S., & Lobiyal, D. (2010). B-MFR routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. In IEEE International Conference on Networking and Information Technology (ICNIT) (pp. 420–423).
87.
Stojmenovic, I., Ruhil, A. P., & Lobiyal, D. (2006). Voronoi diagram and convex hull based geocasting and routing in wireless networks. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 6(2), 247–258.CrossRef
88.
Prasanth, K., Duraiswamy, K., Jayasudha, K., & Chandrasekar, C. (2009). Edge node based greedy routing for VANET with constant bit rate packet transmission. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 2(4), 14–19.
89.
Wang, X., Vasilakos, A. V., Chen, M., Liu, Y., & Kwon, T. T. (2012). A survey of green mobile networks: Opportunities and challenges. Mobile Networks and Applications, 17(1), 4–20.CrossRef
90.
Brahmi, N., Boussedjra, M., Mouzna, J., & Bayart, M. (2009). Adaptative movement aware routing for vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World Wirelessly (pp. 1310–1315). New York: ACM.
91.
Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 12–18.CrossRef
92.
Behrisch, M., Bieker, L., Erdmann, J., & Krajzewicz, D. (2011). Sumo-simulation of urban mobility-an overview. In SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation (pp. 55–60).
93.
Baumgart, I., Heep, B., & Krause, S. (2007). OverSim: A flexible overlay network simulation framework. In IEEE Global Internet Symposium (pp. 79–84).
94.
Martinez, F. J., Toh, C.-K., Cano, J.-C., Calafate, C. T., & Manzoni, P. (2011). A street broadcast reduction scheme (SBR) to mitigate the broadcast storm problem in VANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 56(3), 559–572.CrossRef
95.
Youssef, M., Ibrahim, M., Abdelatif, M., Chen, L., & Vasilakos, A. (2013). Routing metrics of cognitive radio networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 92–109.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance analysis of V2V dynamic anchor position-based routing protocols
Authors
Mohammad Reza Jabbarpour
Alireza Marefat
Ali Jalooli
Rafidah Md Noor
Rashid Hafeez Khokhar
Jaime Lloret
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Networks / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0825-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Wireless Networks 3/2015 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A new quality of service aware multi-channel multi-interface link layer protocol for wireless mesh networks

OriginalPaper

Inter-domain mobility support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 using overlap function of mobile access gateway

OriginalPaper

An energy management method of sensor nodes for environmental monitoring in Amazonian Basin

OriginalPaper

Throughput-fairness optimization in energy-limited user-relay wireless networks

OriginalPaper

Upper bounds for the min–max and min–sum cost online problems in wireless ad hoc networks

OriginalPaper

An optimization algorithm for the minimum k-connected m-dominating set problem in wireless sensor networks