Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction: Basics, History, and Overview Read chapter Read first chapter

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Planning Remote Multi-airport Control—Design and Evaluation of a Controller-Friendly Assistance System

Authors : Rodney Leitner, Astrid Oehme

Published in: Virtual and Remote Control Tower

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A number of research projects aim at air traffic control independent from the controller’s location and his outside view. In the context of one of these projects—VICTOR (Virtual Control Tower Research Studies), which was initiated by the German air navigation service provider Deutsche Flugsicherung (DFS), a completely new concept of Aerodrome Remote Control Center (ARCC) was investigated. In contrast to previous approaches, the ARCC-concept broadened the monitoring and controlling capabilities of the tower controller towards several airports at the same time. It thereby created new requirements for air traffic control, i.e. an eminent need for planning the air traffic flow of multiple airports. For this additional task the concept of a planning tool was developed, taking into consideration a user-centered approach, the guidelines for usable interfaces and a well perceived user experience. Following these Human Factors standards, our planning tool was developed to be useful and ensure safe handling, but also to look and feel good. For its evaluation, an analytical inspection method, i.e. heuristic evaluation, has been used as well as a questionnaire assessing the aesthetics of the graphical user interface. Eight usability experts assessed the tool, taking notes of any peculiarities and usability problems and carrying out the associated severity-rating. With the help of this methodology, 56 issues were identified and corrected. Furthermore, results from additional qualitative statements of the experts for development and optimisation of the user interface were subsequently used for re-design. In terms of looks, the planning tool scored above average in aesthetics ratings. This chapter briefly introduces the tool and its design, and subsequently focuses on our evaluation procedure and results.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Designing and Evaluating a Fusion of Visible and Infrared Spectrum Video Streams for Remote Tower Operations
next chapter The Certification Processes of Multiple Remote Tower Operations for Single European Sky
Literature
Baumann, K., & Lanz, H. (1998). Mesch-Maschine-Schnittstellen elektronischer Geräte. Springer.CrossRef
Bergner, J., König, C., Hofmann, T., & Ebert, H. (2009). An integrated arrival and departure display for the tower controller. In Proceedings of 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Hilton Head, SC, USA.
DIN EN ISO 9241-11:1999-01. Teil 11: Leitsätze an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit. Beuth-Verlag.
DIN EN ISO 9241-110:2008-09. Teil 110: Grundsätze der Dialoggestaltung. Beuth-Verlag.
DIN EN ISO 9241-210:2010-06. Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme. Beuth-Verlag.
EU. Regulation (EC) No. 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 on the provision of air navigation services in the single European sky (the service provision Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union No. L 96/10, 31.03.2004 (p. 10).
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Kluwer.CrossRef
Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience—A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25, 91–97.CrossRef
Hirschfeld, G., & Thielsch, M. T. (2015). Establishing meaningful cut points for online user ratings. Ergonomics, 58(2), 310–320.CrossRef
Karat, C.-M. (1994). A comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 203–233). Wiley.
Karat, C., Campbell, R., & Fliegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett, G. Lynch (Eds.), Proceedings of ACM CHI‘92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 397–404). ACM.
Karrer, K., Glaser, C., Clemens, C., & Bruder, C. (2009). Technikaffinität erfassen - der Fragebogen TA-EG. Der Mensch Im Mittelpunkt Technischer Systeme, 8, 196–201.
Lehr, A. T. (2011). Lernen am Computer. Reihe Technologie-gestütztes Lernen, Band 1-2011 (Steinbeis-Edition).
Leitner, R., & Jürgensohn, T. (2014a). Entwicklung einer grafischen Benutzeroberfläche zur Fernüberwachung mehrerer Flughäfen. In A. Wendemuth, M. Jipp, A. Kluge, & D. Söffker (Eds.), 3. Interdisziplinärer Workshop Kognitive Systeme: Mensch, Teams, Systeme und Automaten, 25–27 März 2014, Magdeburg.
Leitner, R., & Jürgensohn, T. (2014b). MasterMAN - Assistenzsystem zur Fernüberwachung von Flughäfen im Multi-Airport-Betrieb. In Grandt, M., Schmerwitz, S. (Eds.), 56. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Luftund Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth e.V.: Der Mensch zwischen Automatisierung, Kompetenz und Verantwortung, 14./15.Oktober 2014, Ottobrunn.
Leitner, R., Oehme, A., & Schulz-Rückert, D. (2011). Planning multi-airport traffic control—requirements and design implications. Reflexionen und Visionen der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion—Aus der Vergangenheit lernen, Zukunft gestalten.-9. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, Berlin, 5(7).
Lindgaard, G., & Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast we call user Satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15, 429–452.CrossRef
Moshagen, M., Musch, J., & Göritz, A. S. (2009). A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance. Ergonomics, 52, 1311–1320.CrossRef
Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25–62). Wiley.
Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding Usability Problems Through Heuristic Evaluation. In Proceedings ACM CHI’92 Conference, S. 373–380. 3. -7. Mai, Monterey, CA.
Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI’93 Conference, 24–29 April, Amsterdam, Niederlande (pp. 206–213).
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings ACM CHI’90 Conference, 1–5 April, Seattle, WA (pp. 249–256).
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
Oehme, A., Leitner, R., & Wittbrodt, N. (2013). Challenges of multiple airport control—Experimental investigation of a multiairport control concept. In D. Harris (Ed.), Aviation psychology and applied human factors (pp. 1–8). Hogrefe.
Oehme, A., & Schulz-Rückert, D. (2010). Distant air traffic control for regional airports. In 11th IFAC-Symposium: Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems, Valencienne, France (Vol. 11(1), pp. 141–145).
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
Sarodnick, F., & Brau, H. (2011). Methoden der Usability Evaluation (2 Überarbeitete Auflage). Verlag Hans Huber.
Shneiderman, B. (2002). User interface design (3rd Auflage). (Deutsche Ausgabe). mitp-Verlag.
Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (5th ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Somervell, J., & McCrickard, D. S. (2005). Better discount evaluation: Illustrating how critical parameters support heuristic creation. Interacting with Computers, 17(5), 592–612.CrossRef
Tan, W.-S., Liu, D., & Bishu, R. (2009). Web evaluation: Heuristic evaluation vs. user testing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 621–627.CrossRef
Thielsch, M. T., & Moshagen, M. (2011). Erfassung visueller Ästhetik mit dem VisAWI. Usability Professionals, 260–265.
Thüring, M., & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics, and emotions in human-technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253–264.CrossRef
Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2008). Measuring the user experience. Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann.
Virzi, R. A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 34(4), 457–468.
Wilson, C. (2014). User interface inspection methods: A user-centered design method. Morgan Kaufmann.
Woolrych, A., & Cockton, G. (2001). Why and when five test users aren’t enough. In Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 Conference, 10–14 September, Lille, Frankreich (Vol. 2, pp. 105–108).
Metadata
Title
Planning Remote Multi-airport Control—Design and Evaluation of a Controller-Friendly Assistance System
Authors
Rodney Leitner
Astrid Oehme
Copyright Year
2022
Book
Virtual and Remote Control Tower

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93649-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-93650-1

Copyright Year: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93650-1_20

Premium Partner

    Image Credits