Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Polymer Bulletin
Published in: Polymer Bulletin 1/2023

23-01-2022 | Review Paper

Point-of-care detection assay based on biomarker-imprinted polymer for different cancers: a state-of-the-art review

Authors: Nazia Tarannum, Deepak Kumar, Sandeep G. Surya, Pierre Dramou

Published in: Polymer Bulletin | Issue 1/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Selective and sensitive biomolecule detection plays an important role in many systems. Although natural recognition elements have high affinity to their target molecules. The molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) has numerous advantages, such as easy preparation, cost-effectiveness, and high stability, selectivity, and affinity toward the template. The quality of the MIPs can be changed with different combinations of experimental conditions and interaction mechanisms. They especially present fundamentally novel abilities in the control of biomolecule concentrations. Due to the need to detect important biomolecules, the applications of MIPs in diagnostics field are growing fast. The amalgamation of biomarker as target molecule with MIPs could resolve several challenges in the early detection of different cancers. Early diagnosis of cancer generally increases the chances for successful treatment by focusing on detecting symptomatic patients. Detecting cancer disease at an early stage is one of the most important challenge faced by medical fraternity and researchers for better survival rate of cancer patients. This review aims at giving a critical perspective related to significant recent achievements in cancer detection based on biomarkers-imprinted polymer. Here, different cancers and the biomarker for their detection are reported and several MIPs prepared along with limit of detection and application in real sample have been discussed on the basis of literature review. It can be concluded that the use of biomarker-based MIPs for early detection of cancer improves the efficiency of point-of-care medical application of the disease. The conclusions and future perspectives are summarized at the end of the review.

Graphical abstract

next article A comprehensive review on polymer matrix composites: material selection, fabrication, and application

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
2.
3.
"Defining Cancer", National Cancer Institute, Retrieved 28 March 2018
4.
5.
Ravalli A, Marrazza G (2015) Gold and magnetic nanoparticles-based electrochemical biosensors for cancer biomarker determination. J. Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:3307–3319
6.
7.
Piletsky SS, Piletska E, Poblocka M, Macip S (2021) Snapshot imprinting: rapid identification of cancer cell surface proteins and epitopes using molecularly imprinted polymers. Nano Today 41:101304
8.
9.
Wulff G, Gross T, Schonfeld R (1997) Enzyme models based on molecularly imprinted polymers with strong esterase activity. Chem Int Ed 36:1962–1964
10.
Verma A, Nakade H, Simard JM, Rotello VM (2004) Recognition and stabilization of peptide α-helices using templatable nanoparticle receptors. J Am Chem Soc 126:10806–10807
11.
Aubin-Tam ME, Hamad-Schifferli K (2005) Langmuir, gold nanoparticle− cytochrome C complexes: the effect of nanoparticle ligand charge on protein structure. J Am Chem 21:12080–12084
12.
Cabaleiro-Lago C, Quinlan-Pluck F, LynchI Lindman S, Minogue AM et al (2008) Inhibition of amyloid β protein fibrillation by polymeric nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 130:15437–15443
13.
Hoshino Y, Urakami T et al (2009) Design of synthetic polymer nanoparticles that capture and neutralize a toxic peptide. Small 5:1562–1568
14.
Haupt K (2003) Peer reviewed: molecularly imprinted polymers: the next generation. Anal Chem 75:376A-383A
15.
Zimmerman A, Lemcoff SC, Gabriel N (2004) Synthetic hosts via molecular imprinting—are universal synthetic antibodies realistically possible. Commun Chem 1:5–14
16.
17.
Halvorsen TG, McKitterick N, Monika Kish, Reubsaet L (2021) Affinity capture in bottom-up protein analysis–overview of current status of proteolytic peptide capture using antibodies and molecularly imprinted polymers. Anal Chim Acta 1182:338714
18.
Saylan Y, Yılmaz F et al (2017) Molecular imprinting of macromolecules for sensor applications. Sensors 17:898
19.
Osman B, Uzun L, Be A¸ Sirli N, Denizli F (2013) Microcontact imprinted surface plasmon resonance sensor for myoglobin detection. Sci Eng C 33:3609–3614
20.
Sari E, Üzek R et al (2018) Prism coupler-based sensor system for simultaneous screening of synthetic glucocorticosteroid as doping control agent. Sens Actuat B Chem 260:432–444
21.
Mathew D, Thomasa B, Devaky KS (2018) Biomimetic recognition and peptidase activities of transition state analogue imprinted chymotrypsin mimics. React Funct Polym 124:121
22.
Toorisakaa E, Uezua K, Gotoa M, Furusaki S (2003) A molecularly imprinted polymer that shows enzymatic activity. Biochem Eng J 14:85–91
23.
Yang X, Dong X, Zhang K, Yang F, Guo Z (2016) A molecularly imprinted polymer as an antibody mimic with affinity for lysine acetylated peptides. J Mater Chem B 4:920–928s
24.
Wang P, Sun X, Su X, Wang T (2016) Advancements of molecularly imprinted polymers in the food safety field. Analyst 141:3540–3553
25.
Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Razavi N (2015) Application of molecularly-imprinted polymers in solid-phase microextraction techniques. Trend Anal Chem 73:81–90
26.
Iskierko Z, Checinska A et al (2017) Molecularly imprinted polymer based extended-gate field-effect transistor chemosensors for phenylalanine enantioselective sensing. J Mater Chem C 5:969–977
27.
Sener G, Ozgur E et al (2013) Rapid real-time detection of procalcitonin using a microcontact imprinted surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Analyst 138:6422–6428
28.
Büyüktiryaki S, Say R, Denizli A, Ersöz A (2017) A phosphoserine imprinted nanosensor for detection of cancer antigen 125. Talanta 167:172–180
29.
Ansari S, Karimi M (2017) Recent configurations and progressive uses of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers for drug analysis. Talanta 167:470–485
30.
Ansari S, Karimi M (2017) Novel developments and trends of analytical methods for drug analysis in biological and environmental samples by molecularly imprinted polymers. Trend Anal Chem 89:146–162
31.
Sari E, Üzek R, Duman M, Denizli A (2018) Detection of ciprofloxacin through surface plasmon resonance nanosensor with specific recognition sites. J Biomater Sci-Polym E 11:1302–1318
32.
Kitayama Y, Isomura M (2018) Gas-stimuli-responsive molecularly imprinted polymer particles with switchable affinity for target protein. Chem Comm 54:2538–2541
33.
Sunayama H, Kitayama Y, Takeuchi T (2017) Regulation of protein-binding activities of molecularly imprinted polymers via post-imprinting modifications to exchange functional groups within the imprinted cavity. Mol Recognit 31:1–6
34.
Jia M, Zhang Z, Li J, Ma X, Chen L, Yang X (2018) Molecular imprinting technology for microorganism analysis. Trend Anal Chem 106:190–201
35.
Li L, Chen L, Zhang H, Yang Y, Liu X, Chen Y (2016) Temperature and magnetism bi-responsive molecularly imprinted polymers: Preparation, adsorption mechanism and properties as drug delivery system for sustained. Mater Sci Eng C 61:158–168
36.
Ansari S (2017) Application of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer as a versatile and highly selective tool in food and environmental analysis: recent developments and trends. Trend Anal Chem 90:89–106
37.
Goradel NH, Mirzaei H, Sahebkar A et al (2018) Biosensors for the detection of environmental and urban pollutions. J Cell Biochem 119:207–212
38.
Bhalla N, Jolly P, Formisano N, Estrela P (2016) Introduction to biosensors. Essays Biochem 60:1–8
39.
Hasseb AA, Ghani NTA, Shehab OR (2022) Application of molecularly imprinted polymers for electrochemical detection of some important biomedical markers and pathogens. Curr Opin Electrochem 31:100848
40.
41.
Mostafa AM, Barton SJ, Wren SP, Barker J (2021) Review on molecularly imprinted polymers with a focus on their application to the analysis of protein biomarkers. Trends Anal Chem 144:116431
42.
Erdossy J, Horvath V, Yarman A, Scheller FW, Gyurcsanyi RE (2016) Electrosynthesized molecularly imprinted polymers for protein recognition. Trends Anal Chem 79:179–190
43.
Malitesta C, Mazzotta E, Picca RA, Poma A, Chianella I, Piletsky SA (2012) MIP sensors—the electrochemical approach. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402:1827–1846
44.
Sharma PS, Pietrzyk-Le A, D’Souza F, Kutner W (2012) Electrochemically synthesized polymers in molecular imprinting for chemical sensing. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:3177–3204
45.
Crapnell RD, Dempsey-Hibbert NC, Peeters M, Tridentec A, Banks CE (2020) Molecularly imprinted polymer based electrochemical biosensors: overcoming the challenges of detecting vital biomarkers and speeding up diagnosis. Talanta Open 2:100018
46.
Cowen T, Karim K, Piletsky S (2016) Computational approaches in the design of synthetic receptors—a review. Anal Chim Acta 936:62–74
47.
48.
Williams Street, Cancer Facts & Figure (2019) American Society 29
49.
50.
"Breast Cancer" NCI (1980) January, Archived from the original on 25 June 2014, Retrieved 29 June 2014
51.
American Cancer Society (2005) Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2005–2006 (PDF) Archived from original (PDF) on 13 June, Retrieved 26 April 2007
52.
Boyle P, Levin B (2008) World cancer report. International Agency for Research on Cancer 2008
53.
A Jemal Cancer Facts and Figures (2004) ACS, 2004
54.
55.
56.
Ranjan P, Parihar A, Jain S, Kumar N, Dhand C (2020) Biosensor-based diagnostic approaches for various cellular biomarkers of breast cancer: a comprehensive review. Anal Biochem 610:113996
57.
58.
Toms JR (2004) Cancer research UK. Cancer Stats Monograph 2004. Cancer Research UK, London
59.
60.
World Cancer Report (2014) World Health Organization. 2014. Chapter 5.12. ISBN 978-9283204299, Archived from the original on 2016-09-19
61.
GBD (2015) Mortality and causes of death collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 cause of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016388(10053):1459–1544. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(16)310121
62.
GBD (2015) Disease and injury incidence and prevalence collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1545–1602. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(16)31678-6
63.
What are the risk factors for ovarian cancer? www.​cancer.​org. 2016-02-04, Archived from the original on 17 May 2016, Retrieved 18 May 2016
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
Menon U, Jacobs IJ (2000) Recent developments in ovarian cancer screening. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 12(1):39–42
69.
70.
71.
72.
Natali PG, Nicotra MR, Sures I et al (1992) Expression of c-kit receptor in normal and transformed human nonlymphoid tissues. Cancer Res 52(22):6139–43
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
Diab HMH, Smith HG, Jensen KK (2021) The current role of blood-based biomarkers in surgical decision-making in patients with localised pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 154:73–81
80.
Karimpour M, Ravanbakhsh R, Maydanchi M, Rajabi A, Azizi F, Saber A (2021) Cancer driver gene and non-coding RNA alterations as biomarkers of brain metastasis in lung cancer: a review of the literature. Biomed Pharmacother. 143:112190
81.
Zhou S, Yang Y, Wu Y, Liu S (2021) Multiplexed profiling of biomarkers in extracellular vesicles for cancer diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Anal Chim Acta 1175:338633
82.
Negahdary M (2020) Aptamers in nanostructure-based electrochemical biosensors for cardiac biomarkers and cancer biomarkers: a review. Biosens Bioelectron 152:112018
83.
84.
Palchetti I (2014) Affinity biosensors for tumor-marker analysis. Bioanalysis 6(24):3417–3435
85.
Lu L, Katsaros D, de la Longrais IA, Sochirca O, Yu H (2007) Hypermethylation of let-7a-3 in epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with low insulin-like growth factor-II expression and favorable prognosis. Cancer Res 67:10117–10122
86.
Calin GA, Ferracin M, Cimmino A, Leva GD, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Iorio MV et al (2005) A MicroRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 353:1793–1801
87.
Roldo C, Missiaglia E, Hagan JP, Falconi M, Capelli P, Bersani S et al (2006) MicroRNA expression abnormalities in pancreatic endocrine and acinar tumors are associated with distinctive pathologic features and clinical behavior. J Clin Oncol 24:4677–4684
88.
Chan SH, Wu CW, Li AF, Chi CW, Lin WC (2008) miR-21 MicroRNA expression in human gastric carcinomas and its clinical association. Anticancer Res 28:907–911
89.
Li W, Xie L, He X, Li J et al (2008) Diagnostic and prognostic implications of microRNAs in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 123:1616–1622
90.
Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S et al (2004) Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative. Survival Cancer Res 64:3753–3756
91.
Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T, Zhou X et al (2008) Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non–small cell lung cancer survival. J Clin Invest 118:2600–2608
92.
Yanaihara N, Aplen NC, Bowmen E et al (2006) Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell 9(3):189–198
93.
Ciafre SA, Galardi S, Mangiola A et al (2005) Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commum 334(4):1351–1358
94.
Murakami Y, Yasuda T, Saigo K et al (2006) Comprehensive analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues. Oncogene 225(17):2537–2545
95.
Iorio MV, Ferracin CV, Liu CG et al (2005) MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 65(16):7065–7070
96.
Mattie MD, Benz CC, Bowers J et al (2006) Optimized high-throughput microRNA expression profiling provides novel biomarker assessment of clinical prostate and breast cancer biopsies. Mol Cancer 5:24
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM, Mills GB, Simone C, Fishman DA, Kohn EC, Liotta LA (2002) Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 359:572–577
102.
103.
104.
Zhou H, Kantor AB, Becker CHA (2020) Differential metabolic profiling for biomarker discovery. Spriger, pp 137–157
105.
Kaspar H, Dettmer K, Gronwald W, Oefner P (2008) Automated GC–MS analysis of free amino acids in biological fluids. J Chromatogr B. 870:222–232
106.
107.
Nautiyal R, Dahiya P, Dahiya A (2019) Different approaches of ANN for detection of cancer. IJRTE 7(6):2277–3878
108.
109.
Armstrong CL, Hunter JV, Ledakis GE, Cohen B, Tallent EM, Goldstein BH, Tochner Z, Lustig R, Judy KD, Pruitt A, Mollman JE, Stanczak EM, Jo MY, Than TL, Phillips P (2002) Late cognitive and radiographic changes related to radiotherapy-initial prospective findings. Neurol 59:40–48
110.
111.
Jentzmik F, Stephan C, Miller K, Schrader M, Erbersdobler A, Kristiansen G, Lein M, Jung K (2010) Sarcosine in urine after digital rectal examination fails as a marker in prostate cancer detection and identification of aggressive tumours. Eur Urol 58:12–18
112.
113.
Ciledag N, Kaygusuz H, Satin B, Aktas E, Imamoglu FGB Aribas BK (2016) The advantages and limitations of ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid Cancer Adv Diagnos Ther. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5772/​64407
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
Martelanc M, Ziberna L, Passamonti S, Franko M (2014) Direct determination of free bilirubin in serum at sub-nanomolar levels. Anal Chim Acta 809:174–182
125.
Lu C, Song G, Lin JM, Huie CW (2007) Enhancement in sample preconcentration by the on-line incorporation of cloud point extraction to flow injection analysis inside the chemiluminescence cell and the determination of total serum bilirubin. Anal Chim Acta 590:159–165
126.
Tang D, Yuan R, Chai Y (2008) Quartz crystal microbalance immunoassay for carcinoma antigen 125 based on gold nanowire-functionalized biomimetic interface. Analyst 133(7):933–938
127.
128.
Dai Yan F, Chen J, Ju H (2003) Reagentless amperometric immunosensors based on direct electrochemistry of horseradish peroxidase for determination of carcinoma antigen-125. Anal Chem 75(20):5429–5434
129.
Meyer TE, Fox SD, Issaq HJ, Xu X, Chu LW, Veenstra TD, Hsing AW (2011) A reproducible and high-throughput HPLC/MS method to separate sarcosine from α-and β-alanine and to quantify sarcosine in human serum and urine. Anal Chem 83:5735–5740
130.
Zhang C, Bai W, Yang Z (2016) A novel photoelectrochemical sensor for bilirubin based on porous transparent TiO2 and molecularly imprinted polypyrrole. Electrochim Acta 187:451–456
131.
Çiçek C, Yilmaz F, Özgür E, Yavuz H, Denizli A (2016) Molecularly imprinted quartz crystal microbalance sensor (QCM) for bilirubin detection. Chemosensors 4:21
132.
Rebelo TSCR, Santos C, Costa-Rodrigues J, Fernandes MH, Noronha JP, Sales MGF (2014) Novel prostate specific antigen plastic antibody designed with charged binding sites for an improved protein binding and its application in a biosensor of potentiometric transduction. Electrochim Acta 132:142–150
133.
134.
Mahony OJ, Molinelli A, Nolan K, Smyth MR, Mizaikoff B (2005) Towards the rational development of molecularly imprinted polymers: 1H NMR studies on hydrophobicity and ion-pair interactions as driving forces for selectivity. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1884–1893
135.
Xu D, Zhu W, Wang C, Tian T, Cui J, Li J (2014) Molecularly imprinted photonic polymers as sensing elements for the creation of cross-reactive sensor arrays. Chem Eur J 20:16620–16625
136.
137.
Gorgannezhad L, Umer M, Islam MN, Nguyen NT, Shiddiky MJA (2018) Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies. Lab Chip 18:1174
138.
Li X, Ye M, Zhang W, Tan D, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Yang X, Guo Z (2019) Liquid biopsy of circulating tumor DNA and biosensor applications. Biosens Bioelectron 126:596
139.
Chen F, Wang X, Cao X, Zhao Y (2017) Accurate electrochemistry analysis of circulating methylated DNA from clinical plasma based on paired-end tagging and amplifications. Anal Chem 89:10468
140.
De Planell-saguer M, Celina M (2013) Detection methods for microRNAs in clinic practice. Clin Biochem 46:869–878
141.
Iorio MV, Croce CM (2012) MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med 4:143
142.
Tian T, Wang J, Zhou X (2015) A review: microRNA detection methods. Org Biomol Chem 13(8):2226–2238
143.
Azimzadeh M, Rahaie M, Nasirizadeh N, Ashtari K, Naderi-manesh H (2016) An electrochemical nanobiosensor for plasma miRNA-155, based on graphene oxide and gold nanorod, for early detection of breast cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 77:99
144.
Tran HV, Piro B, Reisberg S, Tran LD, Duc HT, Pham MC (2013) Label-free and reagentless electrochemical detection of microRNAs using a conducting polymer nanostructured by carbon nanotubes: application to prostate cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 49:164
145.
Wu X, Chai Y, Yuan R, Su H, Han J (2013) A novel label-free electrochemical microRNA biosensor using Pd nanoparticles as enhancer and linker. Analyst 138(4):1060
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
Menon U, Jacobs I (2000) Tumor markers. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 165–82
151.
152.
153.
154.
Badgwell D, Lu Z, Cole L (2007) Urinary mesothelin provides greater sensitivity for early stage ovarian cancer than serum mesothelin, urinary hCG free beta subunit and urinary hCG beta core fragment. Gynecol Oncol 106:490–497
155.
Niemi RJ, Roine AN, Häkkinen MR (2017) Urinary polyamines as biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27:1360–1366
156.
Mok SC, Chao J, Skates S (2001) Prostasin, a potential serum marker for ovarian cancer: identification through microarray technology. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1458–1464
157.
Sedlaczek P, Frydecka I, Gabryś M, van Dalen A, Einarsson R, Harłozińska A (2002) Comparative analysis of CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor α levels in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 95:1886–1893
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
Moein MM, Javanbakht M, Karimi M, Adergani BA, Rehim MA (2015) Three-phase molecularly imprinted sol-gel based hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for enrichment and selective determination of a tentative lung cancer biomarker. J Chromatogr B995–996:38–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jchromb.​2015.​05.​005CrossRef
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
Moreira FTC, Ferreira MJMS, Puga JRT, Sales MGF (2016) Screen-printed electrode produced by printed-circuit board technology, application to cancer biomarker detection by means of plastic antibody as sensing material. Sens Actuators B Chem 223:927–935
174.
175.
176.
Rossetti C, Świtnicka-Plak M, Halvorsen1 TG, Peter Cormack AG, Sellergren B, Reubsaet L (2017) Automated protein biomarker analysis: on-line extraction of clinical samples by molecularly imprinted polymers. Sci Rep 7:44298. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​srep44298
177.
178.
179.
Viswanathan S, Ran IC, Ribeiro S, Delerue-Matos C (2012) Molecular imprinted nanoelectrodes for ultra-sensitive detection of ovarian cancer marker. Biosens Bioelectron 33:179–183
180.
Tang P, Wang Y, He F (2020) Electrochemical sensor based on super-magnetic metal–organic framework@ molecularly imprinted polymer for Sarcosine detection in urine. J Saudi Chem Soc 24:620–630
181.
Abbasya L, Mohammadzadehd A, Hasanzadehh M, Razmi N (2020) Development of a reliable bioanalytical method based on prostate specific antigen trapping on the cavity of molecular imprinted polymer towards sensing of PSA using binding affinity of PSA-MIP receptor: a novel biosensor. J Pharm Biomed Anal 188:113447. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jpba.​2020.​113447CrossRef
182.
Rebelo TSCR, Noronha JP, Galesio M, Santos H, Diniz M, Sales MGF, Fernandes MH, Rodrigues JC (2016) Testing the variability of PSA expression by different human prostate cancer cell lines by means of a new potentiometric device employing molecularly antibody assembled on grapheme surface. Mater Sci Eng 59:1069–1078. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​msec.​2015.​11.​032
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
Dejous C, Hallil H, Raimbault V, Lachaud JL, Plano B, Delepee R, Favetta P, Agrofoglio L, Rebiere D (2016) Love acoustic waev-based devices and molecularly-imprinted polymer as versatile sensors for electronic nose or tongue for cancer monitoring. Sensor. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​s16060915CrossRef
193.
194.
195.
Riad N, Younes MD, Gross JL, Deheinzeln D Follow–up in lungs cancer. How often and for what purpose
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
Heppner GH (1984) Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 44(6):2259–65
205.
Nowell PC (1986) Mechanisms of tumor progression. Cancer Res 46(5):2203–2207
206.
Tang P, Wang Y, He F (2020) Electrochemical sensor based on super-magnetic metal–organic framework molecularly imprinted polymer for Sarcosine detection in urine. J Saudi Chem Soc 24:620–630
207.
Saeki T, Takano E, Sunayama H, Kamon Y, Horikawa R, Kitayama Y, Takeuchi T (2020) Signalling molecular recognition nanocavities with multiple functional groups prepared by molecular imprinting and sequential post-imprinting modifications for prostate cancer biomarker glycoprotein detection. J Mater Chem B 6:66. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1039/​d0tb00685hCrossRef
208.
Tang XS, Li F, Jia J, Yang C, Liu W, Jin B, Wang XY, Gao RX, He DL, Guo P (2017) Synthesis of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers with excellent biocompatibility for the selective separation and inhibition of testosterone in prostate cancer cells. Int J Nanomed 12:2979–2993. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2147/​IJN.​S133009CrossRef
209.
210.
211.
212.
Cooper GM (1992) Elements of human cancer. Boston Jones and Bartlett Publishers16: ISBN 978-0-86720-191-8
213.
Taylor, Elizabeth J (2000) Philadelphia Saunders 1184: ISBN 0721662544
214.
215.
216.
217.
Patra S, Roy E, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2015) Imprinted ZnO nanostructure-based electrochemical sensing of calcitonin: a clinical marker for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Anal Chim Acta 853:271–284
218.
Ertürk G, Hedström M, Tümer MA, Denizli A (2015) Real-time prostate-specific antigen detection with prostate-specific antigen imprinted capacitive biosensors. Anal Chim Acta 891:120–129
219.
Jolly P, Tamboli V, Harniman RL, Estrela P, Allender CJ, Bowen JL (2016) Aptamer–MIP hybrid receptor for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of prostate specific antigen. Biosens Bioelectron 75:188–195
220.
Patra S, Roy E, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2015) Nano-iniferter based imprinted sensor for ultra trace level detection of prostate-specific antigen in both men and women. Biosens Bioelectron 66:1–10
221.
Ertürk G, Özen H, Tümer MA, Mattiasson B, Denizli A (2016) Microcontact imprinting based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for real-time and ultrasensitive detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) from clinical samples. Sens Actuators B Chem 224:823–832
222.
Sharma PS, Wojnarowicz A, Sosnowska M, Benincori T, Noworyta K, D’Souza F, Kutner W (2016) Potentiometric chemosensor for neopterin, a cancer biomarker, using an electrochemically synthesized molecularly imprinted polymer as the recognition unit. Biosens Bioelectron 77:565–572
223.
Dejous C, Hallil H, Raimbault V, Lachaud JL, Plano B, Delépée R, Favetta P, Agrofoglio L, Rebière D (2016) Love acoustic wave-based devices and molecularly-imprinted polymers as versatile sensors for electronic nose or tongue for cancer monitoring. Sensors 16:915
224.
Martins GV, Marques AC, Fortunato E, Sales MGF (2016) 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) biomarker detection down to picoMolar level on a plastic antibody film. Biosens Bioelectron 86:225–234
225.
Karfa P, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2016) Retracted Article: a battle between spherical and cube-shaped Ag/AgCl nanoparticle modified imprinted polymer to achieve femtogram detection of alpha-feto protein. J Mater Chem B 4:5534–5547
226.
Karfa P, Roy E, Patra S, Kumar D, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2016) A fluorescent molecularly-imprinted polymer gate with temperature and pH as inputs for detection of alpha-fetoprotein. Biosens Bioelectron 78:454–463
227.
Fu ZF, Yan F, Liu H, Yang ZJ, Ju HX (2008) Channel-resolved multianalyte immunosensing system for flow-through chemiluminescent detection of α-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen. Biosens Bioelectron 23:1063–1069
228.
Jin H, Wang X, Xin TB, Gao P, Lin JM, Liang SX (2008) Microplate chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for the quantitative evaluation of carbohydrate antigen 72–4 in human serum. Chin Sci Bull 53:2958–2963
229.
Li H, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Lau C, Lu J (2010) Combination of quantum dot fluorescence with enzyme chemiluminescence for multiplexed detection of lung cancer biomarkers. Anal Methods 2:1236–1242
230.
Liu YM, Zheng YL, Cao JT, Chen YH, Li FR (2008) Sensitive detection of tumor marker CA15-3 in human serum by capillary electrophoretic immunoassay with chemiluminescence detection. J Sep Sci 31:1151–1155
231.
Wang X, Lin JM, Ying XT (2007) Evaluation of carbohydrate antigen 50 in human serum using magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay. Anal Chim Acta 598:261–267
232.
Sorouraddin MH, Iranifam M, Imani-Nabiyyi A (2009) Determination of penicillin V potassium in pharmaceuticals and spiked human urine by chemiluminescence. Cent Eur J Chem 7:143–147
233.
Tsukagoshi K, Jinno N, Nakajima R (2005) Development of a micro total analysis system incorporating chemiluminescence detection and application to detection of cancer markers. Anal Chem 77:1684–1688
234.
Zhang QY, Chen H, Lin Z, Lin JM (2011) Chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay based on magnetic nanoparticles for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma marker glypican-3. JPA 1:166–174
235.
Tang P, Wang Y, He F (2020) Electrochemical sensor based on super-magnetic metal–organic framework@ molecularly imprinted polymer for Sarcosine detection in urine. J Saudi Chem Soc 24(8):620–630
236.
Saek T (2020) Signalling molecular recognition nanocavities with multiple functional groups prepared by molecular imprinting and sequential post-imprinting modifications for prostate cancer biomarker glycoprotein detection. J Mater Chem B 8:7987–7993
237.
Sheydaei O (2020) Rapid and selective diagnose of Sarcosine in urine samples as prostate cancer biomarker by mesoporous imprinted polymeric nanobeads modified electrode. Sens Actuators B Chem 309:127559
238.
Metadata
Title
Point-of-care detection assay based on biomarker-imprinted polymer for different cancers: a state-of-the-art review
Authors
Nazia Tarannum
Deepak Kumar
Sandeep G. Surya
Pierre Dramou
Publication date
23-01-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Polymer Bulletin / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0170-0839
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04085-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Polymer Bulletin 1/2023 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Preparation of UV-LED curable antifouling and flame retardant superhydrophobic coatings for polyethylene terephthalate surface protection

Correction

Correction to: Study on the ternary phase diagram of synthesized cellulose/mixed solvents/water system: influence of crystallinity on dissolution

Original Paper

Green synthesis, characterisation and antibacterial activity studies of new multifunctional nano polymeric material, which may have multidimensional application in water purification

Original Paper

The effect of end group and graphene on dielectric properties and thermal degradation of poly(benzyl methacrylate) prepared by ATRP method

Original Paper

Synthesis and properties of poly(silylene bis(ethynylphenoxy)diphenylsulfone)

Review Paper

A comprehensive review on polymer matrix composites: material selection, fabrication, and application

Premium Partners

    Image Credits