Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality & Quantity 3/2019

20-10-2018

Predicting general election outcomes: campaigns and changing voter knowledge at the 2017 general election in England

Authors: Ron Johnston, Todd Hartman, Charles Pattie

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is a growing literature suggesting that the result for each constituency at British general elections can be predicted using ‘citizen forecasts’ obtained through voter surveys. This may be true for the majority of constituencies where the result at previous contests was a substantial majority for one party’s candidates: few ‘safe seats’ change hands. But is it true in the marginal constituencies, where elections are won and lost? Analysis of such ‘citizen forecast’ data for the Labour-Conservative marginal constituencies in 2017 indicates not. Although respondents were aware of the seats’ relative marginality and of general trends in party support during the campaign, they could not separate out those that were eventually lost by each party from those that were won again, even in seats where the elected party won comfortably.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The exit poll conducted for the country’s main TV stations was remarkably successful and predicting to allocation of seats, however: Curtice et al. (2017).
 
2
Interestingly, this argument runs counter to that of Achen and Bartels (2016, 277) who stress ‘the sheer magnitude of most people’s ignorance about politics’.
 
3
Scotland and Wales are omitted from the analyses because of the important presence of nationalist parties there, notably in Scotland where the SNP won 56 of the 59 seats in 2015 and 35 in 2017. Northern Ireland was not covered by the BES.
 
4
Elsewhere in the United Kingdom the main focus was on the number of seats that might change hands in Scotland as a result of a decline in support for the Scottish National Party: because of the very different pattern of party competition there, we have looked separately at what happened in Scotland (Johnston et al. 2019).
 
5
Early responders were those interviewed between 5 and 12 May, inclusive; Early-Mid responders were interviewed between 13 and 22 May; Mid-Late responders between 23 and 30 May; and Late responders between 31 May and 7 June.
 
6
One of the 533 constituencies was excluded since that being defended by the incumbent Speaker was, following convention, not contested by either of the two main parties.
 
7
Few correctly predicted that the Green party would win again in the seat its candidate held at both the 2010 and 2015 general elections: the mean score for a Conservative win in Brighton Pavilion in 2017 was 41 and for Labour 51.
 
8
In each survey, respondents were asked whether they had been contacted by any of the parties in the preceding four weeks.
 
9
They may of course also suggest under-specified models, but exploration identified no others that made substantial, readily interpreted, contributions to the ‘explanations’. In addition, the wide range of values for the dependent variable (1–100) suggests that there may be a great deal of measurement error: one person expecting a party almost certainly to win may give a score of 85 whereas another may give 95. The larger the measurement error the larger the standard errors of estimates and hence smaller the likelihood of finding a significant relationship (see Blackwell et al. 2017); the significant relationships reported here are thus very likely conservative and we can be relatively confident that we have identified ‘real’ relationships.
 
10
Several other variables were included in exploratory regressions, such as UKIP’s performance in the 2015 election and whether it fielded a candidate in the constituency in 2017: none were significant. Interactions between the variables included in the regressions were also explored, again with insignificant outcomes.
 
11
In all of these analyses we use any contact with the party as the independent variable. Such contact may be little more than receipt of a leaflet through the door and it has been argued (e.g. Pattie and Johnston 2003, 2012) that personal contact—on the doorstep or in the street, for example—provides a better indicator of the party seeking to inform and convince. However, exploration with alternative definitions of contact provided no substantially different results.
 
Literature
go back to reference Achen, C.H., Bartels, L.M.: Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)CrossRef Achen, C.H., Bartels, L.M.: Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)CrossRef
go back to reference Allen, N.: Gambling with the electorate. In: Allen, N., Bartle, J. (eds.) None Past the Post: Britain at the Polls, 2017, pp. 1–33. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2018)CrossRef Allen, N.: Gambling with the electorate. In: Allen, N., Bartle, J. (eds.) None Past the Post: Britain at the Polls, 2017, pp. 1–33. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2018)CrossRef
go back to reference Blackwell, M., Honaker, J., King, G.: A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: overview and applications. Sociol. Methods Res. 46, 303–341 (2017)CrossRef Blackwell, M., Honaker, J., King, G.: A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: overview and applications. Sociol. Methods Res. 46, 303–341 (2017)CrossRef
go back to reference Curtice, J.: A return to normality? How the electoral system operated. In: Geddes, A., Tonge, J. (eds.) The British General Election of 2015, pp. 25–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015) Curtice, J.: A return to normality? How the electoral system operated. In: Geddes, A., Tonge, J. (eds.) The British General Election of 2015, pp. 25–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
go back to reference Curtice, J.: How the electoral system failed to deliver—again. In: Tonge, J., Leiston-Bandira, C., Wilks-Heeg, S. (eds.) The British General Election of 2018, pp. 29–45. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018) Curtice, J.: How the electoral system failed to deliver—again. In: Tonge, J., Leiston-Bandira, C., Wilks-Heeg, S. (eds.) The British General Election of 2018, pp. 29–45. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
go back to reference Curtice, J., Fisher, S., Kuha, J., Mellon, J.: Focus: on the 2017 Exit Poll—another surprise, another success. Discover Society, 5 July 2017: focus-on-the-2017-exit-poll-another-surprise-another-success (2017) Curtice, J., Fisher, S., Kuha, J., Mellon, J.: Focus: on the 2017 Exit Poll—another surprise, another success. Discover Society, 5 July 2017: focus-on-the-2017-exit-poll-another-surprise-another-success (2017)
go back to reference Denver, D.: The results: how Britain voted. In: Tonge, J., Leiston-Bandira, C., Wilks-Heeg, S. (eds.) The British General Election of 2018, pp. 8–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018) Denver, D.: The results: how Britain voted. In: Tonge, J., Leiston-Bandira, C., Wilks-Heeg, S. (eds.) The British General Election of 2018, pp. 8–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
go back to reference Graefe, A.: Accuracy of vote expectation surveys in forecasting elections. Publ. Opin. Q. 78, 204–232 (2014)CrossRef Graefe, A.: Accuracy of vote expectation surveys in forecasting elections. Publ. Opin. Q. 78, 204–232 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Gudgin, G., Taylor, P.J.: Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organisation of Elections. Pion, London (1979). reprinted 1979—Colchester: ECPR Press Gudgin, G., Taylor, P.J.: Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organisation of Elections. Pion, London (1979). reprinted 1979—Colchester: ECPR Press
go back to reference Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J., Dorling, D., Rossiter, D.J.: From Votes to Seats: the Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2001) Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J., Dorling, D., Rossiter, D.J.: From Votes to Seats: the Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2001)
go back to reference Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J.: Money and Electoral Politics: Local Parties and Funding in General Elections. The Policy Press, Bristol (2014)CrossRef Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J.: Money and Electoral Politics: Local Parties and Funding in General Elections. The Policy Press, Bristol (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J., Hartman, T.K.: Local knowledge, local learning and predicting election outcomes: voter assessments of likely party success in Scotland’s constituencies at the 2015 and 2017 general elections. Scott. Aff. (2019) Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J., Hartman, T.K.: Local knowledge, local learning and predicting election outcomes: voter assessments of likely party success in Scotland’s constituencies at the 2015 and 2017 general elections. Scott. Aff. (2019)
go back to reference Johnston, R.J., Rossiter, D.J., Hartman, T., Pattie, C.J., Manley, D., Jones, K.: Are we going to win in that seat? An exploration of constituency-level estimates at the 2017 British general election. Int. J. Mark. Res. 60, 463–483 (2018)CrossRef Johnston, R.J., Rossiter, D.J., Hartman, T., Pattie, C.J., Manley, D., Jones, K.: Are we going to win in that seat? An exploration of constituency-level estimates at the 2017 British general election. Int. J. Mark. Res. 60, 463–483 (2018)CrossRef
go back to reference Leiter, D., Murr, A., Ramirez, E.R., Stegmaier, M.: Social networks and citizen forecasting; the more friends the better. Int. J. Forecast. 34, 235–248 (2018)CrossRef Leiter, D., Murr, A., Ramirez, E.R., Stegmaier, M.: Social networks and citizen forecasting; the more friends the better. Int. J. Forecast. 34, 235–248 (2018)CrossRef
go back to reference Lewis-Beck, M.S., Skalaban, A.: Citizen forecasting: can voters see into the future? Br. J. Polit. Sci. 36, 617–634 (1989) Lewis-Beck, M.S., Skalaban, A.: Citizen forecasting: can voters see into the future? Br. J. Polit. Sci. 36, 617–634 (1989)
go back to reference Lewis-Beck, M.S., Stegmaier, M.: Citizen forecasting: can UK voters see the future? Elect. Stud. 30, 264–268 (2011)CrossRef Lewis-Beck, M.S., Stegmaier, M.: Citizen forecasting: can UK voters see the future? Elect. Stud. 30, 264–268 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Murr, A.E.: ‘Wisdom of crowds’? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens’ local expectations. Elect. Stud. 30, 771–783 (2011)CrossRef Murr, A.E.: ‘Wisdom of crowds’? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens’ local expectations. Elect. Stud. 30, 771–783 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Murr, A.E.: The wisdom of crowds: applying Condorcet’s jury theorem to forecasting US Presidential Elections. Int. J. Forecast. 31, 916–929 (2015b)CrossRef Murr, A.E.: The wisdom of crowds: applying Condorcet’s jury theorem to forecasting US Presidential Elections. Int. J. Forecast. 31, 916–929 (2015b)CrossRef
go back to reference Murr, A.E.: The wisdom of crowds: what do citizens forecast for the 2015 British general election? Elect. Stud. 41, 283–288 (2016)CrossRef Murr, A.E.: The wisdom of crowds: what do citizens forecast for the 2015 British general election? Elect. Stud. 41, 283–288 (2016)CrossRef
go back to reference Pattie, C.J., Johnston, R.J.: Hanging on the telephone? Doorstep and telephone canvassing at the British General Election of 1997. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 33, 303–322 (2003)CrossRef Pattie, C.J., Johnston, R.J.: Hanging on the telephone? Doorstep and telephone canvassing at the British General Election of 1997. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 33, 303–322 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference Pattie, C.J., Johnston, R.J.: The growing impact of telephone political canvassing at the 2005 British General Election. Int. J. Mark. Res. 54, 49–70 (2012)CrossRef Pattie, C.J., Johnston, R.J.: The growing impact of telephone political canvassing at the 2005 British General Election. Int. J. Mark. Res. 54, 49–70 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Shipman, T.: Fall Out. A Year of Political Mayhem. William Collins, London (2017) Shipman, T.: Fall Out. A Year of Political Mayhem. William Collins, London (2017)
go back to reference Stiers, D., Dassonneville, R.: Affect versus cognition: wishful thinking on election day. An analysis using exit poll data from Belgium. Int. J. Forecast. 34, 199–215 (2018)CrossRef Stiers, D., Dassonneville, R.: Affect versus cognition: wishful thinking on election day. An analysis using exit poll data from Belgium. Int. J. Forecast. 34, 199–215 (2018)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting general election outcomes: campaigns and changing voter knowledge at the 2017 general election in England
Authors
Ron Johnston
Todd Hartman
Charles Pattie
Publication date
20-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0819-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Quality & Quantity 3/2019 Go to the issue