Top

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Published in:

22-11-2023

Principals’ attitudes towards on-site school evaluations: contribution to sustained school reform

Author: Pablo Bezem

Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Issue 4/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Test-based accountability offers schools limited guidance on informing sustained reforms, whereas on-site school evaluations provide broader and more nuanced evidence. In order to transform inspection feedback into long-term reforms, school leaders’ attitudes towards these evaluations are critical. Relying on organizational change theory, this study examines principals’ beliefs regarding school inspection feedback effectiveness and appropriateness as well as their readiness to implement changes. A large US district that has experimented with such school inspection serves as the case study. The results demonstrate the principals’ strong positive attitudes towards inspection, and these attitudes are associated with sustained change. But, because the accountability framework did not center on inspection, principals were ambivalent about implementing specific changes. This study highlights the tensions involved in incorporating on-site, expert evaluations in test-based accountability systems.

previous article Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of school climate: the role of principals’ leadership style in organizational quality

next article Accountability in the evaluation of teacher effectiveness: views of teachers and administrators

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.927369CrossRef

Armenakis, A., Bernerth, J., Pitts, J., & Walker, H. (2007). Organizational Change Recipients’ Beliefs Scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307303654CrossRef

Armenakis, A., & Harris, S. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879079CrossRef

Armenakis, A., Harris, S., Cole, M., Fillmer, L., & Self, D. (2007). A top management team’s reactions to organizational transformation: The diagnostic benefits of five key change sentiments. Journal of Change Management, 7(3–4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701771014CrossRef

Barber, M. (2005). The virtue of accountability: System redesign, inspection, and incentives in the era of informed professionalism. Journal of Education, 185(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205740518500102CrossRef

Behnke, K., & Steins, G. (2017). Principals’ reactions to feedback received by school inspection: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9275-7CrossRef

Bezem, P., Piezunka, A., & Jacobsen, R. (2022). School inspectors’ decision-making: evidence from a comparative perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2129073

Bitan, K., Haep, A., & Steins, G. (2014). School inspections still in dispute – An exploratory study of school principals’ perceptions of school inspections. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.958199CrossRef

Brimblecombe, N., Shaw, M., & Ormston, M. (1996). Teachers’ intention to change practice as a result of Ofsted school inspections. Educational Management & Administration, 24(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X9602400401CrossRef

Case, P., Case, S., & Catling, S. (2000). Please Show You’re Working: A Critical Assessment of the Impact of OFSTED Inspection onPrimary Teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 605–621.CrossRef

Cole, M. S., Harris, S., & Bernerth, J. B. (2006). Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(5), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610677963CrossRef

Daly, A. J. (2009). Rigid response in an age of accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 168–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330499CrossRef

De Vries, H., Elliott, M. N., Kanouse, D. E., & Teleki, S. S. (2008). Using pooled kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods, 20(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317166CrossRef

de Wolf, I., & Janssens, F. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701366207CrossRef

Dedering, K., & Müller, S. (2011). School improvement through inspections? First empirical insights from Germany. Journal of Educational Change, 12(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9151-9CrossRef

Ehren, M. (2016). In M. Ehren (Ed.), Methods and modalities of effective school inspections. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9CrossRef

Ehren, M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools—Describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4CrossRef

Ehren, M., Perryman, J., & Shackleton, N. (2015a). School effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement - An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 26(2), 296–327.CrossRef

Ehren, M., Perryman, J., & Shackleton, N. (2015b). Setting expectations for good education: How Dutch school inspections drive improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 296–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.936472CrossRef

Ehren, M., & Visscher, A. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.xCrossRef

Ehren, M., & Visscher, A. (2008). The relationships between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00400.xCrossRef

Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. Ch. 8. In Handbooks of the economics of education, Hanushek, E., Machin, S., & Woessmann, L. (Eds.) vol. 3, Elsevier, 383–421.

Figlio, D. N., & Ladd, H. F. (2014). School accountability and student achievement. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 194–210). Routledge.

Gray, C., & Gardner, J. (1999). The impact of school inspections. Oxford Review of Education, 25(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/030549899103928CrossRef

Gray, A. (2014). Supporting school improvement: the role of inspectorates across Europe. In Brussel: The Standing International Conference of Inspectorates.

Grimolizzi-Jensen, C. J. (2018). Organizational change: Effect of motivational interviewing on readiness to change. Journal of Change Management, 18(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1349162CrossRef

Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474CrossRef

Holt, D., Armenakis, A., Feild, H., & Harris, S. (2007). Readiness for organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295CrossRef

Husfeldt, V. (2011). Wirkungen und wirksamkeit der externen schulevaluation; uberblick zum stand der forschung [The impact of school inspection - Does it really work? State of research]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-011-0204-5CrossRef

Jacob, B. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: the impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004CrossRef

Jones, K., Tymms, P., Kemethofer, D., O’Hara, J., McNamara, G., Huber, S., Myrberg, E., Skedsmo, G., & Greger, D. (2017). The unintended consequences of school inspection: The prevalence of inspection side-effects in Austria, the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499CrossRef

Klerks, M. (2012). The effect of school inspections: a systematic review. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from http://janbri.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ORD-paper-2012-Review-Effect-School-Inspections-MKLERKS.pdf

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254CrossRef

Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up. Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Lewin, A. Y., & Minton, J. W. (1986). Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Science, 32(5), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.514CrossRef

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2011). The logic of appropriateness. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0024CrossRef

Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., & Hough, H. (2017). Learning from early adopters in the new accountability era: Insights from California’s CORE waiver districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16688064CrossRef

Munoz-Chereau, B., Hutchinson, J., & Ehren, M. (2022). ‘Stuck’ schools: Can below good Ofsted inspections prevent sustainable improvement? Education Policy Institute.

Ólafsdóttir, B., Jónasson, J. T., Sigurðardóttir, A. K., & Aspelund, T. (2022). The mechanisms by which external school evaluation in Iceland influences internal evaluation and school professionals’ practices. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2076376CrossRef

Penninckx, M., & Vanhoof, J. (2015). Insights gained by schools and emotional consequences of school inspections. A review of evidence. School Leadership & Management, 35(5), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2015.1107036CrossRef

Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Exploring and explaining the effects of being inspected. Educational Studies, 40(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.930343CrossRef

Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Effects and side effects of Flemish school inspection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570305

Perryman, J. (2007). Inspection and emotion. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640701372418CrossRef

Perryman, J. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 611–631.CrossRef

Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783. https://doi.org/10.2307/259206CrossRef

Pond, S., Armenakis, A., & Green, S. (1984). The importance of employee expectations in organizational diagnosis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638402000207CrossRef

Quintelier, A., De Maeyer, S., & Vanhoof, J. (2020). The role of feedback acceptance and gaining awareness on teachers’ willingness to use inspection feedback. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09325-9CrossRef

Ryan, K. E., Gandha, T., & Ahn, J. (2013). School self-evaluation and inspection for improving U.S. schools? Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved July 11, 2018 from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/school-self-evaluation.

Stiglitz, J. (2000). Economics of the public sector (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Timmermans, A. C., de Wolf, I. F., Bosker, R. J., & Doolaard, S. (2015). Risk-based educational accountability in Dutch primary education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9212-yCrossRef

UNESCO. (2017). Accountability in education: meeting our commitments. Paris: UNESCO.CrossRef

Visscher, A. J., & Coe, R. (2003). School performance feedback systems: Conceptualisation, analysis, and reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.14.3.321.15842CrossRef

Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67CrossRef

Title: Principals’ attitudes towards on-site school evaluations: contribution to sustained school reform
Author: Pablo Bezem
Publication date: 22-11-2023
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Electronic ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09418-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Assessing learning gaps and gains?

Accountability in the evaluation of teacher effectiveness: views of teachers and administrators

Large-scale diagnostic assessment in first-year university students: pre- and transpandemic comparison

Correction to: Principals may inflate teacher evaluation scores to achieve important goals

Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of school climate: the role of principals’ leadership style in organizational quality

School closure policies and student reading achievement: evidence across countries

Premium Partner