Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1/2010

01-02-2010

Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design

Author: John Lawrence Bencze

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 1/2010

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Future elementary school teachers often lack self-efficacy for teaching science and technology. They are particularly anxious about encouraging children to carry-out student-directed, open-ended scientific inquiry and/or technological design projects. Moreover, because this often also is the case with practising elementary school teachers, it is difficult for student–teachers to gain practical experience facilitating student-led project work during practicum sessions. To provide student–teachers with expertise and motivation for promoting student-directed, open-ended project work, therefore, a group of future elementary teachers were taken through a constructivism-informed ‘apprenticeship’ during their university-based teaching methods course and then invited to make project work the subject of the action research that they were required to complete during their practicum. In this paper, successes that one student–teacher (out of 78 studied) experienced in promoting student-directed, open-ended technological design projects are reported. Although she judged children’s designs to be modestly successful, data indicate that her self-efficacy for promoting project work increased significantly. Analyses of qualitative data collected during the methods course and practicum also indicate that aspects of the curriculum, teachers, students and milieu appeared to contribute to this success. Such findings suggest that teacher educators should focus on helping future elementary teachers to develop expertise and motivation that would enable and encourage children to conduct technological design projects before conducting scientific inquiries. Such a tack may be the most pragmatic—and, arguably, epistemologically-sound—approach for helping ‘science- and technology-phobic’ student–teachers to move from the periphery to the core of practices in science and technology education.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In this paper, it is assumed that fields of science and technology often are co-dependent and, to a degree, comparable (Bencze 2001; Gardner 1991; Roth 2001). Accordingly, wherever student-teachers mention the term ‘science’, it is assumed that that may involve technology, as well. It is apparent that student-teachers in this study tended to use the term ‘science’ as a short-form for ‘science and technology’.
 
2
Since 1998, science and technology education have been integrated into one course, ‘Science and Technology’ (MoET 1998), in each of grades one through eight in Ontario. Each course has five units, corresponding to the five ‘strands’ that apply across all elementary grades. These strands are: Life Systems, Matter and Materials, Energy and Control, Structures and Mechanisms and Early and Space Systems. For each unit, teachers are required to address ‘Expectations’ (outcomes/objectives) in three domains; i.e., Concepts (e.g., laws, theories and inventions), Skills (e.g., for inquiry and design) and Relationships (e.g., amongst Science, Technology, Society and Environment).
 
3
Although all student-teachers were required (by programme coordinators) to complete an action research project during their second-term practicum, they could choose to do so for any subject or topic of interest to them — and, consequently, could not be required to focus on promoting student-led science inquiry and/or technological design projects.
 
4
Colleen’s successes with promotion of student-led project work is provided here before factors that appeared to enable such successes so that the context for the latter (influencing factors) may be understood by readers.
 
5
Legitimate Peripheral Participation is a phrase that refers to relatively simple and safe activities in which newcomers to a field are encouraged to participate before, eventually, becoming experts — and, therefore, able to conduct activities that are considered to be at the ‘core’ of practices in that field.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRef Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, R. D. (1997). The science methods course in the context of the total teacher education experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 269–282.CrossRef Anderson, R. D. (1997). The science methods course in the context of the total teacher education experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 269–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
go back to reference Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453.CrossRef Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453.CrossRef
go back to reference Bencze, J. L. (2000a). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 847–865.CrossRef Bencze, J. L. (2000a). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 847–865.CrossRef
go back to reference Bencze, J. L. (2000b). Procedural apprenticeship in school science: Constructivist enabling of connoisseurship. Science Education, 84(6), 727–739.CrossRef Bencze, J. L. (2000b). Procedural apprenticeship in school science: Constructivist enabling of connoisseurship. Science Education, 84(6), 727–739.CrossRef
go back to reference Bencze, J. L. (2001). ‘Technoscience’ education: Empowering citizens against the tyranny of school science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 273–298.CrossRef Bencze, J. L. (2001). ‘Technoscience’ education: Empowering citizens against the tyranny of school science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 273–298.CrossRef
go back to reference Bencze, L., Di Giuseppe, M., Hodson, D., Pedretti, E., Serebrin, L., & Decoito, I. (2003). Paradigmic road blocks in elementary school science ‘reform’: Reconsidering nature-of-science teaching within a rational-realist milieu. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(5), 285–308.CrossRef Bencze, L., Di Giuseppe, M., Hodson, D., Pedretti, E., Serebrin, L., & Decoito, I. (2003). Paradigmic road blocks in elementary school science ‘reform’: Reconsidering nature-of-science teaching within a rational-realist milieu. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(5), 285–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Bencze, L., & Upton, L. (2006). Being your own role model for improving self-efficacy: An elementary teacher self-actualizes through drama-based science teaching. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(3), 207–226.CrossRef Bencze, L., & Upton, L. (2006). Being your own role model for improving self-efficacy: An elementary teacher self-actualizes through drama-based science teaching. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(3), 207–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Broadfoot, P. (1992). Teaching and the challenge of change: Educational research in relation to teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 15(1/2), 45–52. Broadfoot, P. (1992). Teaching and the challenge of change: Educational research in relation to teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 15(1/2), 45–52.
go back to reference Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
go back to reference Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.CrossRef Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, S., Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001). April). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle. Collins, S., Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001). April). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
go back to reference Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the inquiring mind: The challenge for school science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the inquiring mind: The challenge for school science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
go back to reference Dakers, J. R. (2005). The hegemonic behaviorist cycle. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 111–126.CrossRef Dakers, J. R. (2005). The hegemonic behaviorist cycle. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 111–126.CrossRef
go back to reference Davies, D. (2003). Pragmatism, pedagogy and philosophy: A model of thought and action in action in primary technology and science teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 207–221.CrossRef Davies, D. (2003). Pragmatism, pedagogy and philosophy: A model of thought and action in action in primary technology and science teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 207–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Department for Education, Employment [DfEE]. (1999). Science: The national curriculum for England. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Department for Education, Employment [DfEE]. (1999). Science: The national curriculum for England. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
go back to reference Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2 nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2 nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Gardner, P. L. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329–347.CrossRef Gardner, P. L. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329–347.CrossRef
go back to reference Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 791–806.CrossRef Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 791–806.CrossRef
go back to reference Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1990). Ethnographic principles in practice. London: Routledge. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1990). Ethnographic principles in practice. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 93–105.CrossRef Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 93–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Helms, J. V., & Carlone, H. B. (1999). Science education and the commonplaces of science. Science Education, 83(2), 233–245.CrossRef Helms, J. V., & Carlone, H. B. (1999). Science education and the commonplaces of science. Science Education, 83(2), 233–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
go back to reference Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 121–140.CrossRef Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 121–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17. Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
go back to reference Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Layton, D. (1993). Technology’s challenge to science education. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press. Layton, D. (1993). Technology’s challenge to science education. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
go back to reference Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem-solving investigations: What do we mean and how can we use them? School Science Review, 71(256), 63–72. Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem-solving investigations: What do we mean and how can we use them? School Science Review, 71(256), 63–72.
go back to reference Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond the design process: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 117–128.CrossRef Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond the design process: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 117–128.CrossRef
go back to reference McMurtry, J. (1991). Education and the market model. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 25(2), 209–217.CrossRef McMurtry, J. (1991). Education and the market model. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 25(2), 209–217.CrossRef
go back to reference McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81–101.CrossRef McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Ministry of Education, Training [MoET]. (1998). The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8: Science and technology. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Ministry of Education, Training [MoET]. (1998). The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8: Science and technology. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
go back to reference National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
go back to reference Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (Eds.). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (Eds.). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
go back to reference Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 49–74). Greenwich, CN: JAL. Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 49–74). Greenwich, CN: JAL.
go back to reference Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.CrossRef Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.CrossRef
go back to reference Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882.CrossRef Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1–24.CrossRef Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know”. Science Education, 80(5), 535–560.CrossRef Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know”. Science Education, 80(5), 535–560.CrossRef
go back to reference Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities for learning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 35–49.CrossRef Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities for learning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 35–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevenson, J. (2004). Developing technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 5–19.CrossRef Stevenson, J. (2004). Developing technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 5–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.CrossRef Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design
Author
John Lawrence Bencze
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9063-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1/2010 Go to the issue

Premium Partner