1 Introduction
Month |
T (°C) | TM (°C) | Tm (°C) |
R (mm) | RM (mm) | Rm (mm) | RMd (mm) |
H (%) | DR | DF |
I
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
January | 11.7 | 17.0 | 6.3 | 22.8 | 82.0 | 0.0 | 54.8 | 67 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 181.2 |
February | 12.3 | 17.6 | 7.1 | 22.1 | 95.1 | 0.0 | 40.5 | 66 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 180.3 |
March | 14.2 | 19.6 | 8.9 | 23.0 | 79.7 | 0.2 | 32.8 | 65 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 226.9 |
April | 16.1 | 21.3 | 10.9 | 28.7 | 91.7 | 1.2 | 40.8 | 63 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 247.0 |
May | 19.1 | 24.1 | 14.1 | 27.8 | 88.7 | 0.0 | 42.1 | 64 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 277.4 |
June | 22.9 | 27.8 | 18.1 | 11.9 | 56.8 | 0.0 | 45.1 | 63 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 302.3 |
Juliet | 25.5 | 30.3 | 20.7 | 3.8 | 41.3 | 0.0 | 27.5 | 65 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 330.1 |
August | 26.0 | 30.8 | 21.2 | 6.8 | 39.5 | 0.0 | 36.4 | 67 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 303.9 |
September | 23.5 | 28.5 | 18.5 | 55.5 | 309.3 | Imperceptible | 270.2 | 69 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 249.9 |
October | 19.7 | 24.9 | 14.5 | 47.4 | 271.1 | 0.1 | 220.2 | 70 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 216.7 |
November | 15.4 | 20.5 | 10.3 | 35.9 | 117.0 | 0.0 | 68.3 | 69 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 173.4 |
December | 12.6 | 17.7 | 7.4 | 25.4 | 170.9 | 0.6 | 119.8 | 68 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 163.8 |
Year | 18.3 | 23.3 | 13.2 | 311.1 | 653.1 | 108.9 | 270.2 | 66 | 37.5 | 0.9 | 2850.9 |
2 Lithological Setting of the Study Area
2.1 General Framework
2.2 Characterization of Rock Mass Jointing
3 Methodology
3.1 General Overview
3.2 Intact Rock Mineralogy
3.3 Assessment of Fragment Size Distributions After the Slake Durability Test
Roundness |
R1 The edges of the fragments appear similar to before the test cycles, or show slightly blunted edges |
R2 The edges of the fragments appear completely blunt or lightly rounded. The initial appearance of the fragment may still be noted | |
R3 The fragments show a rounded shape. The initial shape of the particle is not visible | |
Variation in number of fragments |
Increasing The number of fragments increases significantly from one cycle to the next |
Equal The number of fragments is largely constant from one cycle to the next. Small pieces occasionally break off from the corners of the largest fragments and very occasionally a large fragment breaks into two medium sized fragments | |
Reducing The number of fragments reduces significantly from one cycle to the next | |
Fragment size |
Large fragments (L) The entire sample is composed of large fragments, with occasional smaller fragments |
Small fragments (S) The sample is composed primarily of small fragments | |
Mixture of large and small fragments (M) The sample is composed of a mixture of fragments of different sizes, which may or may not be rounded |
Compact samples | |
Type C1 | R3 type roundness of fragments from the first to the last cycle. Initial increase in number of fragments of different sizes (M), maintaining or reducing the number of fragments throughout the test cycles. Fragments of differing size (M) present |
Type C2 | Initial R2 type roundness, changing to R3 from the second or occasionally the third cycle. Initial increase in number of fragments of differing size (M), with the number of fragments constant or decreasing throughout subsequent cycles. Fragments of differing size (M) present |
Type C3 | Fragments show R2 roundness until the third cycle, occasionally the second. From the fourth or last cycle the roundness type is R3. In the two first cycles the number of fragments of differing size (M) increases, which is maintained or reduces throughout the following cycles. Habitually during the last or fourth cycle, the smallest fragments tend to disappear, leaving a type L sample |
Type C4 | R2 type roundness is observed from the first cycle until the fourth, without any increase in the number of fragments, with these being large (L). Occasionally small fragments are generated which tend to disappear in the subsequent cycles. During the fifth cycle the fragments show a more rounded shape (R2 or R3) with very blunt edges |
Type C5 | Samples retain their initial number of fragments, which have a similar size (L), throughout the five cycles. Occasionally small fragments break off from the corners, or even larger fragments. The roundness of the fragments is type R1 until the third or fourth cycle, and type R2 in the last or last two cycles |
Type C6 | The samples retain the same number of fragments, and of similar size (L) throughout the five cycles of the Slake Durability Test. Occasionally, small fragments break off from the corners. The roundness of the fragments is type R1 in all cycles, although on occasion R2 roundness is observed during the last cycle |
Laminated samples These samples show very limited roundness, as they tend to fracture into flat fragments which slide within the drum | |
Type L1 | Extensive fracturing during the first cycle, into fragments of differing sizes (M), with type R2 roundness observed in the largest fragments and R3 roundness in small- and intermediate-sized fragments. Throughout the following cycles the number of particles of differing sizes (M) is constant or reduces, and the number of fragments with R3 roundness increases |
Type L2 | During the first cycle very little fracturing is observed, but during the second cycle a greater degree of fracturing is observed, producing fragments of differing size (M), with an R2 type roundness. During subsequent cycles, the number of fragments of differing size is constant or reduces. From the third or fourth cycle some fragments with type R3 roundness are observed |
Type L3 | Fracturing into fragments of differing sizes (M) is observed during the first two cycles, although the initial large fragments predominate, showing R1 roundness. Throughout subsequent cycles the number of particles of differing sizes (M) is constant or reduces, with the smaller fragments tending to disappear, resulting in a type L sample. From the fourth or fifth cycle R2 roundness is observed |
Type L4 | Throughout the first two cycles some small fragments are produced, which are maintained or tend to disappear. However, the large initial samples predominate (L–M or L), showing R1 roundness. From the third cycle until the final cycle mixed roundness is observed, with some fragments showing type R1 and others R2 |
Poorly cemented samples The poorly cemented calcarenite samples behaved in a distinct manner, as rounding of the original fragments was predominant as opposed to fragmentation | |
Type R | Fragments show type R3 roundness throughout all cycles. The number of large particles (L) is maintained after each cycle, although a reduction in diameter is observed |
4 Slake Behaviour Classification: Potential Degradation Index (PDI)
Class | PDI | Maximum % Passing 12.5 (P12.5) | Slake behaviour Patterns (Table 2) | Field weathering profile (Cano and Tomás 2015) | Id2
| Lithotypes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Very low | ≤1.5 | ≥50 | Type C1 | FHIJK | 34–61 | Sheet marls (1), soft marls (3), calcareous marls–marls (1), sheet silty marls (1) |
2. Low | 1.5–3 | 50–23 | Type C2 | FHIJK | 75–93 | Sheet silty marls (4), calcareous marls–marls (6), poorly cem. thin bedding calc. (1), Thin bedding silty calc. (1), silty calcareous marls (1) |
Type R | AB (poorly cemented samples | |||||
Type L1 | LM (laminated samples) | |||||
3. Medium | 3–5.5 | 23–11.5 | Type C3 | FHIJK | 87–95 | Thin bedding calcarenites (L) (3), calcareous marls–marls (14), marly limestones (2), soft calcareous mélange (1), silty marls (3), silty calcareous marls (2), thin bedding calcarenites (C) (1), thin bedding silty calc. (1) |
EFG | ||||||
Type C4 | AC | |||||
Type L2 | LM (laminated samples) | |||||
4. Medium–high | 5.5–8 | 11.5–7.3 | Type C4 | EFG | 94–97 | Calcareous marls–marls (5), calcareous debrites (1), Marly limestones (8), thin bedding calc. (L) (2), thin bedding calc. (C) (1), silty marls (2), thick bedding calc. (1) |
FHIJK | ||||||
Type C5 | AC | |||||
Type L3 | LM (laminated samples) | |||||
5. High | 8–15 | 7.3–3.6 | Type C5 | EFG | 97–99 | Slightly marly limestones (15), marly limestones (2), silty calcareous marls (1), calcareous mélange (3), thin bedding calc. (L) (1), thin bedding calc. (C) (5), Silty marls (1), Thick bedding calc. (1) |
Type C6 | AC | |||||
Type L4 | LM (laminated samples) | |||||
6. Very high | >15 | <3.6 | Type C6 | NW-A | 98–100 | Slightly marly limestones (10), thin bedding calc. (L) (1), thick bedding calc. (9), thin bedding calc. (C) (1), calcareous mélange (1) |
AC | ||||||
EFG | ||||||
LM |
5 Field Weathering Characterization
6 Results, Analysis and Discussion
Mineralogy and classes of durability → | Cb (%) | Phy (%) | Qtz (%) | Very low (PDI ≤ 1.5) | Low (PDI: 1.5–3) | Medium (PDI: 3–5.5) | Medium–high (PDI: 5.5–8) | High (PDI: 8–15) | Very high (PDI > 15) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thick bedding calcarenites | 92.5 ± 4.2 | 5.4 ± 3.0 | 2.1 ± 1.6 |
C5
|
C6
|
C6
| |||
Slightly marly limestones | 82.9 ± 3.2 | 12.5 ± 2.5 | 4.6 ± 1.2 |
C5
|
C6
| ||||
Calcareous mélange | 87.5 ± 2.4 | 9.3 ± 1.9 | 3.2 ± 0.6 |
C5–C6
|
C6
| ||||
Thin bedding calcarenites (C) | 78.3 ± 5.4 | 14.7 ± 3.7 | 7.0 ± 2.5 |
C4
|
–
|
C5
|
C6
| ||
Thin bedding calcarenites (L) | 72.1 ± 9.8 | 18.5 ± 7.2 | 3.3 ± 2.3 |
C3–L2
|
L3
|
L4
|
C6
| ||
Calcareous debrites | 84.8 ± 0.0 | 11.2 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 0.0 |
–
| |||||
Marly limestones | 79.0 ± 2.6 | 15.3 ± 2.4 | 5.7 ± 0.7 |
C2–C3
|
C4
|
C5
| |||
Silty calcareous marls | 82.4 ± 3.9 | 12.7 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 1.9 |
C2
|
C3
|
C4
| |||
Silty marls | 74.7 ± 3.1 | 17.8 ± 2.6 | 7.6 ± 0.7 |
–
|
–
|
–
| |||
Calcareous marls–marls | 75.0 ± 3.2 | 17.5 ± 2.6 | 7.5 ± 1.1 |
C1
|
C2
|
C3
|
C4
| ||
Soft calcareous mélange | 84.2 ± 0.0 | 11.7 ± 0.0 | 4.2 ± 0.0 |
C3
| |||||
Thin bedding silty calc. | 70.0 ± 11.7 | 20.0 ± 9.7 | 10.1 ± 2.1 |
L1
|
C3
| ||||
Sheet silty marls | 68.5 ± 6.8 | 21.4 ± 6.6 | 10 ± 1.4 |
C1
|
C2
| ||||
Poorly cem. thin bedding calc. | 74.7 ± 0.0 | 19 ± 0.0 | 6.4 ± 0.0 |
R
| |||||
Soft marls | 75.4 ± 3.8 | 16.7 ± 3.0 | 7.7 ± 0.9 |
C1
| |||||
Sheet marls | 75.7 ± 3.7 | 16.9 ± 2.5 | 6.5 ± 0.0 |
C1
|