Top

Published in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

42. Public Acceptance

Authors : Kenshi Itaoka, Aya Saito, Kazunari Sasaki

Published in: Hydrogen Energy Engineering

Publisher: Springer Japan

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter describes public acceptance of hydrogen energy, including sociopolitical acceptance, community acceptance, and market acceptance. Methodologies for quantitative assessment are explained. An overview on public acceptance study in various countries is given for fuel cell systems and hydrogen station.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Business Model Analysis of Hydrogen Energy

next chapter Numerical Analysis of the Optimal Distribution of Hydrogen Filling Stations

Wüstenhagena R, Wolsinkb M, Bürera MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept 35(5):2683–2691

Ricci M, Bellaby P, Flynn R (2008) What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(21):5868–5880CrossRef

Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRef

Gupta N, Fischer AR, Frewer LJ (2011) Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review. Public Underst Sci, 0963662510392485

O’Garra T, Mourato S, Pearson P (2007) Public acceptability of hydrogen fuel cell transport and associated refuelling infrastructures. In: Flynn R, Bellaby P (eds) Risk and the public acceptance of new technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 126–153CrossRef

Roche MY, Mourato S, Fischedick M, Pietzner K, Viebahn P (2010) Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: a review of the evidence and methodological implications. Energy Policy 38:5301–5310CrossRef

Powell RA, Single HM (1996) Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 8(5):499–504CrossRef

Morgan DL (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, LondonCrossRef

10.

Xiong C, Li D, Jin L (2008) Draft consensus building in hall for workshop of meta-synthetic engineering. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 13(1):45–49CrossRef

11.

Mizuho Information and Research Institute (2008) Suiso shakaijuyousei ni kansuru chousa (Hydrogen’s social acceptance research) (in Japanese)

12.

Mizuho Information and Research Institute (2009) Nenryoudenchi, suiso ni kansuru shakaijuyouseichousa (PEFC, Hydrogen’s social acceptance research) (in Japanese)

13.

Zimmer R (2011) Full steam ahead? Hydrogen Technology between Technological Vision and Public Acceptance

14.

Huijts NMA, Van Wee B (2015) The evaluation of hydrogen fuel stations by citizens: the interrelated effects of socio-demographic, spatial and psychological variables. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(33):10367–10381

15.

Tarigan AKM, Bayer SB, Langhelle O, Thesen G (2012) Estimating determinants of public acceptance of hydrogen vehicles and refuelling stations in greater Stavanger. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(7):6063–6673CrossRef

16.

O’Garra T, Mourato S, Pearson P (2008) Investigating attitudes to hydrogen refueling facilities and the social cost to local residents. Energy Policy 36(6):2074–2085CrossRef

17.

Huijts NMA, Molin EJE, Van Wee B (2014) Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: a structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework. J Environ Psychol 38:153–166CrossRef

18.

Horii H, Okumura N, Kawakami A, Maeda S, Tezuka T (2014) Efforts on the public acceptance improvement of FCV and hydrogen stations (in Japanese). J Hydrog Energy Syst Soc Jpn 39(3):177–180

19.

Martina E, Shaheena SA, Lipmanc TE, Lidicker JR (2009) Behavioral response to hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and refueling: results of California drive clinics. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(20):8670–8680CrossRef

20.

Lienkamp H, Rasatogi A (2012) Achievements and lessons learnt in the EU Project Zero Regio, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, PP2201–2210, Transport Research Arena, Europe

21.

Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29CrossRef

22.

IAP2 (International Association for Public Participation) (2014) IAP2’s Public Participation Spectrum

23.

Cooper C, Truett T, Schmoyer RL (2006) The U.S. department of energy hydrogen baseline survey: assessing knowledge and opinions about hydrogen technology. In: Abstracts of WHEC 16, Lyon, France, 13–16 June 2006

24.

Schmoyer RL, Truett T, Cooper C (2006) Results of the 2004 knowledge and opinions surveys for the baseline knowledge assessment of the U.S. department of energy hydrogen program. In: Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy

25.

Bzostek R, Rogers A (2014) Oslo +20: reassessing the role of confidence building measures. Soc Sci J 51(2):250–259CrossRef

26.

Shogakukan (2015) Degital daigisen. https://kotobank.jp/word/%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%97%E5%AE%B9%E6%80%A7-681590. Date of access: 28 Dec 2015

27.

Higher Education Funding Council for England: Beacons for Public Engagement (2006)

28.

Goodfellow EM (1980) Public relations and promotion: a few ideas for group practices. Gr Pract J 29(9):5–7, 26

29.

U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Best practice for: public outreach and education for carbon storage projects

30.

Dowler E, Bauer MW, Green J, Gasperoni G (2006) Assessing public perceptions: issues and methods. In: Dora Carlos (ed) Health, hazard and public debate: lessons for risk communication from the BSE/CJD Saga. WHO, Geneva, pp 40–60

31.

Väntänen A, Marttunen M (2005) Public involvement in multi-objective water level regulation development projects—evaluating the applicability of public involvement methods. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(3):281–304CrossRef

32.

Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25(1):3–29CrossRef

33.

Zimmer R, Welke J (2012) Let’s go green with hydrogen! The general public’s perspective. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:17502–17508CrossRef

Title: Public Acceptance
Authors: Kenshi Itaoka
Aya Saito
Kazunari Sasaki
Publisher: Springer Japan
Book: Hydrogen Energy Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56040-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-4-431-56042-5

Copyright Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56042-5_42