Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality & Quantity 4/2017

12-05-2016

Quality and quantity in the innovation process of firms: a statistical approach

Authors: Massimiliano Agovino, Luigi Aldieri, Antonio Garofalo, Concetto Paolo Vinci

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 4/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to construct a technological index to measure the efficiency level of firms, in such a way that it takes into account simultaneously both the quantity and quality of scientific research. To this end, we use a statistical approach based on fuzzy theory. We explore data for 682 international firms relative to three economic areas, namely the USA, Japan and Europe. Data concerning firms’ patents were obtained from the European Patent Office. We implement a statistical analysis based on fuzzy theory through three steps: (1) choice of the variables; (2) construction of the membership function (mf); (3) calculation of the weights associated with each mf; (4) aggregation of the mf.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
<<It is not strictly necessary from a technical point of view that highly collinear variables be excluded. For instance, if two perfectly collinear variables were included in the composite, with weights w1 and w2, then the particular dimension of performance which they measure will be included in the composite with the weight (w1 + w2). This is not problematic if the weights have been chosen correctly>> (Jacobs et al. 2004, pp. 34–35).
 
2
The choice of the proper number of principal components takes place on the basis of three criteria which take into account their explanatory power. First we consider a number of principal components which take into account at least 95 % of the variance of each of the k initial variables, which imposes a minimal threshold; second, we keep all the principal components whose eigenvalue is larger than 1; third, we observe the screen plot of the eigen values as a function of the number of principal components; as eigenvalues are obtained in decreasing order, the graph will show a decreasing curve, with a kink in correspondence to the proper number of principal components. In particular, on the basis of the results of the analysis, we choose two principal components.
 
3
See Moncada Paternò Castello et al. (2009) for more details.
 
4
See Maraut et al. (2008) for the methodology used for the construction of REGPAT.
 
5
Please contact Helene.DERNIS@oecd.org to download the REGPAT database.
 
6
Sources for exchange rates and deflators are EUROSTAT.
 
7
Low [0, 1412.581], medium (1412.581, 2825.162] and high (2825.162, 25651].
 
8
Low [0, 742.0396], medium (742.0396, 1484.0792] and high (1484.0792, 59243].
 
Literature
go back to reference Aldieri, L.: Technological and geographical proximity effects on knowledge spillovers: evidence from the US patent citations. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 20(6), 597–607 (2011)CrossRef Aldieri, L.: Technological and geographical proximity effects on knowledge spillovers: evidence from the US patent citations. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 20(6), 597–607 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Aldieri, L.: Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 22(8), 807–819 (2013)CrossRef Aldieri, L.: Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 22(8), 807–819 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Aldieri, L.: Overlap citation proximity within the triad: evidence from US and European patent citations. Rivista di PoliticaEconomica 4, 157–170 (2015) Aldieri, L.: Overlap citation proximity within the triad: evidence from US and European patent citations. Rivista di PoliticaEconomica 4, 157–170 (2015)
go back to reference Aldieri, L., Cincera, M.: Geographic and technological R&D spillover within the triad: micro evidence from US patents. J. Technol. Transf. 34(2), 196–211 (2009)CrossRef Aldieri, L., Cincera, M.: Geographic and technological R&D spillover within the triad: micro evidence from US patents. J. Technol. Transf. 34(2), 196–211 (2009)CrossRef
go back to reference Bar, T., Leiponen, A.: A measure of technological distance. Econ. Lett. 116(3), 457–459 (2012)CrossRef Bar, T., Leiponen, A.: A measure of technological distance. Econ. Lett. 116(3), 457–459 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Benner, M., Waldfogel, J.: Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res. Policy 37(9), 1556–1567 (2008)CrossRef Benner, M., Waldfogel, J.: Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res. Policy 37(9), 1556–1567 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Brandolini, A., D’Alessio, G.: Measuring well-being in the functioning space. Banca d’Italia, mimeo, Rome, Italy (1998) Brandolini, A., D’Alessio, G.: Measuring well-being in the functioning space. Banca d’Italia, mimeo, Rome, Italy (1998)
go back to reference Cerioli, A., Zani, S.: A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (eds.) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, pp. 272–284. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1990)CrossRef Cerioli, A., Zani, S.: A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (eds.) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, pp. 272–284. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1990)CrossRef
go back to reference Chiappero Martinetti, E.: A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108, 207–239 (2000) Chiappero Martinetti, E.: A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108, 207–239 (2000)
go back to reference Cheli, B., Lemmi, A.: A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Econ. Notes 24(1), 115–134 (1995) Cheli, B., Lemmi, A.: A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Econ. Notes 24(1), 115–134 (1995)
go back to reference Cincera, M.: Firms’ productivity growth and R&D spillovers: an analysis of alternative technological proximity measures. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14(8), 657–682 (2005)CrossRef Cincera, M.: Firms’ productivity growth and R&D spillovers: an analysis of alternative technological proximity measures. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14(8), 657–682 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Duguet, E., MacGarvie, M.: How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14(5), 375–393 (2005)CrossRef Duguet, E., MacGarvie, M.: How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14(5), 375–393 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Feldmann, H.: Technological unemployment in industrial countries. J. Evolut. Econ. 23(5), 1099–1126 (2013)CrossRef Feldmann, H.: Technological unemployment in industrial countries. J. Evolut. Econ. 23(5), 1099–1126 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Freudenberg, M.: Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD STI Working Paper no. 16 (2003) Freudenberg, M.: Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD STI Working Paper no. 16 (2003)
go back to reference Griffith, R., Harrison, R., Van Reenen, J.: How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on UK firms as a Test of technology sourcing. Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 1859–1875 (2006)CrossRef Griffith, R., Harrison, R., Van Reenen, J.: How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on UK firms as a Test of technology sourcing. Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 1859–1875 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Griliches, Z.: Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econ. Lit. 28(4), 1661–1707 (1990) Griliches, Z.: Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econ. Lit. 28(4), 1661–1707 (1990)
go back to reference Jacobs, R., Smith, P., Goddard, M.: Measuring performance: an examination using composite performance indicators. University of York, Centre for Health Economics Technical Paper no. 29 (2004) Jacobs, R., Smith, P., Goddard, M.: Measuring performance: an examination using composite performance indicators. University of York, Centre for Health Economics Technical Paper no. 29 (2004)
go back to reference Jaffe, A.B.: Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Am. Econ. Rev. 76(5), 984–1001 (1986) Jaffe, A.B.: Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Am. Econ. Rev. 76(5), 984–1001 (1986)
go back to reference Jaffe, A.B.: Characterizing the ‘Technological Position’ of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Res. Policy 18, 87–97 (1989)CrossRef Jaffe, A.B.: Characterizing the ‘Technological Position’ of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Res. Policy 18, 87–97 (1989)CrossRef
go back to reference Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R.: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q. J. Econ. 108, 577–598 (1993)CrossRef Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R.: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q. J. Econ. 108, 577–598 (1993)CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, C.I.: Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 220–239 (2002)CrossRef Jones, C.I.: Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 220–239 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Lelli, S.: Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets theory: assessing the influence of different techniques on sen's functioning approach. CES Discussion Paper Series, 01.21. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2001) Lelli, S.: Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets theory: assessing the influence of different techniques on sen's functioning approach. CES Discussion Paper Series, 01.21. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2001)
go back to reference Lin, B., Long, H.: A stochastic frontier analysis of energy efficiency of China’s chemical industry. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 235–244 (2015)CrossRef Lin, B., Long, H.: A stochastic frontier analysis of energy efficiency of China’s chemical industry. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 235–244 (2015)CrossRef
go back to reference Malerba, F., Mancusi, M.L., Montobbio, F.: Innovation, international R&D Spillovers and the sectoral heterogeneity of knowledge flows. Rev. World Econ. 149(4), 697–722 (2013)CrossRef Malerba, F., Mancusi, M.L., Montobbio, F.: Innovation, international R&D Spillovers and the sectoral heterogeneity of knowledge flows. Rev. World Econ. 149(4), 697–722 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., Guellec, D.: The OECD REGPAT database: a presentation. OECD STI Working Papers, 2008/02 (2008) Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., Guellec, D.: The OECD REGPAT database: a presentation. OECD STI Working Papers, 2008/02 (2008)
go back to reference Maurseth, P.B., Verspagen, B.: Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citation analysis. Scand. J. Econ. 104(4), 531–545 (2002)CrossRef Maurseth, P.B., Verspagen, B.: Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citation analysis. Scand. J. Econ. 104(4), 531–545 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Meagher, K., Rogers, M.: Network density and R&D spillovers. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 237–260 (2004)CrossRef Meagher, K., Rogers, M.: Network density and R&D spillovers. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 237–260 (2004)CrossRef
go back to reference Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Ciupagea, C., Smith, K., Tübke, A., Tubbs, M.: Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance, Seville, Spain. IPTS Working Paper on Corporate R&D and Innovation, vol. 11 (2009) Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Ciupagea, C., Smith, K., Tübke, A., Tubbs, M.: Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance, Seville, Spain. IPTS Working Paper on Corporate R&D and Innovation, vol. 11 (2009)
go back to reference Ornaghi, C.: Spillovers in product and process innovation: evidence from manufacturing firms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 24, 349–380 (2006)CrossRef Ornaghi, C.: Spillovers in product and process innovation: evidence from manufacturing firms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 24, 349–380 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Sena, V., Higon, D.A.: Productivity, R&D spillovers and educational attainment. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 76(1), 1–23 (2014)CrossRef Sena, V., Higon, D.A.: Productivity, R&D spillovers and educational attainment. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 76(1), 1–23 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Terleckyj, N.E.: Effects of R&D on the productivity growth of industries: an exploratory study. National Planning Association, Washington, DC (1974) Terleckyj, N.E.: Effects of R&D on the productivity growth of industries: an exploratory study. National Planning Association, Washington, DC (1974)
go back to reference Zani S., Milioli M.A., Morlini, I.: Fuzzy composite indicators: an application for measuring customer satisfaction. Atti del XVL Convegno della Società Italiana di Statistica, Padova, 16–18 June (2010) Zani S., Milioli M.A., Morlini, I.: Fuzzy composite indicators: an application for measuring customer satisfaction. Atti del XVL Convegno della Società Italiana di Statistica, Padova, 16–18 June (2010)
go back to reference Zani S., Milioli M.A., Morlini I.: Fuzzy methods and satisfaction indices. In: Kennett R.S., Salini S. (eds.) Modern Analysis of Customer Surveys, pp: 439–456. Wiley, New York (2011) Zani S., Milioli M.A., Morlini I.: Fuzzy methods and satisfaction indices. In: Kennett R.S., Salini S. (eds.) Modern Analysis of Customer Surveys, pp: 439–456. Wiley, New York (2011)
Metadata
Title
Quality and quantity in the innovation process of firms: a statistical approach
Authors
Massimiliano Agovino
Luigi Aldieri
Antonio Garofalo
Concetto Paolo Vinci
Publication date
12-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0353-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Quality & Quantity 4/2017 Go to the issue

Premium Partner