Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2020

15-05-2019 | Original research

Reactive Chameleon: A Method to Mimic Conversation Partner’s Body Sway for a Robot

Authors: Ryosuke Hasumoto, Kazuhiro Nakadai, Michita Imai

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 1/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Along with improvements in information processing capabilities and development of machine learning, research that robots provide services instead of people is progressing. In order to raise satisfaction with the service provided by the robot, it is important to build a robot that makes it easy for people to talk and can get a good impression from people. In human–human interaction, mimicking the conversation partner’s motion is one of the factors that influence the impression from the conversation partner. The influence coming from the mimicking in the interaction is called the “chameleon effect”. As the chameleon effect, it is known that a person unconsciously mimics interaction partner’s nonverbal behavior, in addition, it is also known that a good impression can be obtained from the interaction partner by consciously mimicking the partner’s nonverbal behavior without being noticed. Previous studies have shown that the chameleon effect occurs also even in human–robot interaction by mimicking interaction partner’s nonverbal behavior, and interaction partner has good impression on the robot. However, considering the conversation scene, there are problems with the method verified in the previous research when robots mimic interaction partner’s nonverbal behavior. The first problem is that the robot cannot perform gestures using its arms and head at the same time as mimicking nonverbal behavior during conversation. The second problem is that the conversation partner may notice that the robot mimics his/her nonverbal behavior during the conversation. In this thesis, we propose “Reactive Chameleon”, a method to generate body sway for a robot that based mimicking a conversation partner’s body sway. Reactive Chameleon designed for a robot to get a good impression from the conversation partner by chameleon effect without disturbing robot gestures. In Reactive Chameleon, the volume of the mimicking is dynamically adjusted to the conversation partner and the adjusted robot’s sway merged with robot’s own body sway for the conversation partner not to notice that robot mimics his/her body sway. We conducted an experiment to verify that the impression that the participant has toward the robot is affected by having a conversation with a robot that mimics a participant’s body sway. Results of the experiment show that the robot that imitates body sway with Reactive Chameleon got high evaluation from the conversation partner by chameleon effect.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Bailenson JN, Yee N, Patel K, Beall AC (2005) Detecting digital chameleons. Comput Hum Behav 24:66–87CrossRef Bailenson JN, Yee N, Patel K, Beall AC (2005) Detecting digital chameleons. Comput Hum Behav 24:66–87CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bailenson JN, Yee N (2005) Digital chameleons: automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychol Sci 16(10):814–819CrossRef Bailenson JN, Yee N (2005) Digital chameleons: automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychol Sci 16(10):814–819CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bartneck C, Croft E, Kulic D (2008) Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. Metrics for HRI workshop, Technical report, vol 471, pp 37–44 Bartneck C, Croft E, Kulic D (2008) Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. Metrics for HRI workshop, Technical report, vol 471, pp 37–44
4.
go back to reference Brščić D, Ikeda T, Kanda T (2017) Do you need help? A robot providing information to people who behave atypically. IEEE Trans Robot 33(2):500–506CrossRef Brščić D, Ikeda T, Kanda T (2017) Do you need help? A robot providing information to people who behave atypically. IEEE Trans Robot 33(2):500–506CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cappella JN, Planalp S (1981) Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: interspeaker influence. Hum Commun Res 7(2):117–132CrossRef Cappella JN, Planalp S (1981) Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: interspeaker influence. Hum Commun Res 7(2):117–132CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chartrand TL, Lakin JL (2013) The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annu Rev Psychol 64:285–308CrossRef Chartrand TL, Lakin JL (2013) The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annu Rev Psychol 64:285–308CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893CrossRef Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fuente LA, Ierardi H, Pilling M, Crook NT (2015) Influence of upper body pose mirroring in human–robot interaction. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp 214–223 Fuente LA, Ierardi H, Pilling M, Crook NT (2015) Influence of upper body pose mirroring in human–robot interaction. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp 214–223
9.
go back to reference Hale J, Hamilton AFDC (2016) Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Sci Rep 6:1–11CrossRef Hale J, Hamilton AFDC (2016) Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Sci Rep 6:1–11CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hsee CK, Hatfield E, Carlson JG, Chemtob C (1990) The effect of power on susceptibility to emotional contagion. Cogn Emot 4(4):327–340CrossRef Hsee CK, Hatfield E, Carlson JG, Chemtob C (1990) The effect of power on susceptibility to emotional contagion. Cogn Emot 4(4):327–340CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Ishida T (2001) Psychological analysis on human–robot interaction. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2001. Proceedings 2001 ICRA, vol 4. IEEE, pp 4166–4173 Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Ishida T (2001) Psychological analysis on human–robot interaction. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2001. Proceedings 2001 ICRA, vol 4. IEEE, pp 4166–4173
12.
go back to reference Kanoh M, Yukio Oida Y, Nomura AA, Konagaya Y, Ihara K, Shimizu T, Kimura K (2011) Examination of practicability of communication robot-assisted activity program for elderly people. J Robot Mechatron 23(1):3CrossRef Kanoh M, Yukio Oida Y, Nomura AA, Konagaya Y, Ihara K, Shimizu T, Kimura K (2011) Examination of practicability of communication robot-assisted activity program for elderly people. J Robot Mechatron 23(1):3CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kimoto M, Iio T, Shiomi M, Tanev I, Shimohara K, Hagita N (2017) Gender effects on lexical alignment in human-robot interaction. EEJ Trans Electron Info Syst 137(12):1625–1632 Kimoto M, Iio T, Shiomi M, Tanev I, Shimohara K, Hagita N (2017) Gender effects on lexical alignment in human-robot interaction. EEJ Trans Electron Info Syst 137(12):1625–1632
14.
go back to reference LaFrance M, Broadbent M (1976) Group rapport: posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group Organ Stud 1(3):328–333CrossRef LaFrance M, Broadbent M (1976) Group rapport: posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group Organ Stud 1(3):328–333CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lakin JL, Jefferis VE, Cheng CM, Chartrand TL (2003) The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. J Nonverb Behav 27(3):145–162CrossRef Lakin JL, Jefferis VE, Cheng CM, Chartrand TL (2003) The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. J Nonverb Behav 27(3):145–162CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maddux WW, Mullen E, Galinsky AD (2008) Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:461468CrossRef Maddux WW, Mullen E, Galinsky AD (2008) Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:461468CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mehrabian A (1968) Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. J Consult Clin Psychol 32(3):296CrossRef Mehrabian A (1968) Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. J Consult Clin Psychol 32(3):296CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Michalowski MP, Simmons R, Kozima H (2009) Rhythmic attention in child–robot dance play. In: The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009. IEEE, pp 816–821 Michalowski MP, Simmons R, Kozima H (2009) Rhythmic attention in child–robot dance play. In: The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009. IEEE, pp 816–821
19.
go back to reference Neumann R, Strack F (2000) “Mood contagion”: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(2):211CrossRef Neumann R, Strack F (2000) “Mood contagion”: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(2):211CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Niwa S, Maruno S (2010) Development of a scale to assess the depth of self-disclosure. Jpn J Pers 18(3):196–209 Niwa S, Maruno S (2010) Development of a scale to assess the depth of self-disclosure. Jpn J Pers 18(3):196–209
21.
go back to reference Okazaki S, Hirotani M, Koike T, Bosch-Bayard J, Takahashi HK, Hashiguchi M, Sadato N (2015) Unintentional interpersonal synchronization represented as a reciprocal visuo-postural feedback system: a multivariate autoregressive modeling approach. PloS One 10(9):e0137126CrossRef Okazaki S, Hirotani M, Koike T, Bosch-Bayard J, Takahashi HK, Hashiguchi M, Sadato N (2015) Unintentional interpersonal synchronization represented as a reciprocal visuo-postural feedback system: a multivariate autoregressive modeling approach. PloS One 10(9):e0137126CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2013) To err is human (-like): effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. Int J Soc Robot 5(3):313–323CrossRef Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2013) To err is human (-like): effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. Int J Soc Robot 5(3):313–323CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shimada M, Yamauchi K, Minato T, Ishiguro H, Itakura S (2008) Studying the influence of the chameleon effect on humans using an android. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2008. IROS 2008. IEEE, pp. 767–772 Shimada M, Yamauchi K, Minato T, Ishiguro H, Itakura S (2008) Studying the influence of the chameleon effect on humans using an android. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2008. IROS 2008. IEEE, pp. 767–772
24.
go back to reference Stevens CJ et al (2016) Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human–agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!. Comput Cogn Sci 2(1):1CrossRef Stevens CJ et al (2016) Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human–agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!. Comput Cogn Sci 2(1):1CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tatsukawa K, Nakano T, Ishiguro H, Yoshikawa Y (2016) Eyeblink synchrony in multimodal human–android interaction. Sci Rep 6:39718CrossRef Tatsukawa K, Nakano T, Ishiguro H, Yoshikawa Y (2016) Eyeblink synchrony in multimodal human–android interaction. Sci Rep 6:39718CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, Van Knippenberg A (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol Sci 15(1):71–74CrossRef Van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, Van Knippenberg A (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol Sci 15(1):71–74CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reactive Chameleon: A Method to Mimic Conversation Partner’s Body Sway for a Robot
Authors
Ryosuke Hasumoto
Kazuhiro Nakadai
Michita Imai
Publication date
15-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00557-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partners