Top

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Published in:

25-10-2021 | Critical Review

Recent progress and evolution of coolant usages in conventional machining methods: a comprehensive review

Authors: Gary Wong Ang Kui, Sumaiya Islam, Moola Mohan Reddy, Neamul Khandoker, Vincent Lee Chieng Chen

Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Issue 1-2/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper reviews recent progress and applications of usage of cutting fluids in conventional machining processes. In addition to reviewing the various conventional and advanced cooling techniques during machining, the paper also discusses the use of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in several types on metals such as steel, aluminum, alloy, and titanium alloys. Due to the toxicity of conventional cutting fluid resulting in ecological problems, the demand for environmentally friendly cutting fluid is rising. Therefore, natural vegetable oil is chosen as potential replacement as an environmentally friendly cutting fluid which fulfills the important aspects of biodegradability and sustainability. Application of vegetable oil-based cutting fluids under MQL techniques are also discussed. Moreover, the potential of palm oil as biodegradable and environmentally friendly natural vegetable oil-based metal-working fluids in MQL are reviewed.

previous article Announcement of the B. John Davies Prize for the best paper published in IJAMT in 2020

next article Damage study of fiber-reinforced composites drilled by abrasive waterjet —challenges and opportunities

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Bruni C, Forcellese A, Gabrielli F, Simoncini M (2006) Effect of the lubrication-cooling technique, insert technology and machine bed material on the workpart surface finish and tool wear in finish turning of AISI 420B. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(12):1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.09.007CrossRef

Liew PJ, Shaaroni A, Sidik NAC, Yan J (2017) An overview of current status of cutting fluids and cooling techniques of turning hard steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 114:380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.077CrossRef

Salimi-Yasar H, Zeinali Heris S, Shanbedi M (2017) Influence of soluble oil-based TiO2 nanofluid on heat transfer performance of cutting fluid. Tribol Int 112:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.004CrossRef

Padmini R, Vamsi Krishna P, Krishna Mohana Rao G (2016) Effectiveness of vegetable oil based nanofluids as potential cutting fluids in turning AISI 1040 steel. Tribol Int 94:490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.10.006CrossRef

Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(6):435–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010CrossRef

An Q, Cai C, Zou F, Liang X, Chen M (2020) Tool wear and machined surface characteristics in side milling Ti6Al4V under dry and supercritical CO2 with MQL conditions. Tribol Int 151:106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106511CrossRef

Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR (2016) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod 127:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.146CrossRef

Roy S, Kumar R, Kumar Sahoo A, Kumar Das R (2019) A brief review on effects of conventional and nano particle based machining fluid on machining performance of minimum quantity lubrication machining. Mater Today Proc 18:5421–5431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.571CrossRef

Balan ASS, Vijayaraghavan L, Krishnamurthy R, Kuppan P, Oyyaravelu R (2016) An experimental assessment on the performance of different lubrication techniques in grinding of Inconel 751. J Adv Res 7(5):709–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.08.002CrossRef

10.

Sakkaki M, Sadegh Moghanlou F, Vajdi M, Pishgar F, Shokouhimehr M, Shahedi Asl M (2019) The effect of thermal contact resistance on the temperature distribution in a WC made cutting tool. Ceram Int 45(17, Part A):22196–22202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.241CrossRef

11.

Geng D, Lu Z, Yao G, Liu J, Li Z, Zhang D (2017) Cutting temperature and resulting influence on machining performance in rotary ultrasonic elliptical machining of thick CFRP. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 123:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.008CrossRef

12.

Vishnu AV, Kumar PJ, Ramana MV (2018) Comparison among dry, flooded and MQL conditions in machining of EN 353 steel alloys-an experimental investigation. Mater Today Proc 5(11, Part 3):24954–24962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.296CrossRef

13.

Analytical search results for “MQL, Cutting Fluids, Machining, Vegetable Oil” (2021), Scopus (www.scopus.com), Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands (accessed September 1^st, 2021).

14.

Sreejith PS, Ngoi BKA (2000) Dry machining – machining of the future. J Mater Process Technol 101:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00445-3CrossRef

15.

Ezugwu, C., Okonkwo, U., Sinebe, J., & Okokpujie, I. (2016). Stability analysis of model regenerative chatter of milling process using first order least square full discretization method.

16.

Goindi GS, Sarkar P (2017) Dry machining: a step towards sustainable machining – challenges and future directions. J Clean Prod 165:1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.235CrossRef

17.

Bermudo C, Trujillo FJ, Herrera M, Sevilla L (2017) Parametric analysis of the ultimate tensile strength in dry machining of UNS A97075 alloy. Proc Manuf 13:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.012CrossRef

18.

Yang Y-K, Shie J-R, Huang C-H (2006) Optimization of dry machining parameters for high-purity graphite in end-milling process. Mater Manuf Process 21(8):832–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602550600728141CrossRef

19.

Pattnaik SK, Bhoi NK, Padhi S, Sarangi SK (2018) Dry machining of aluminum for proper selection of cutting tool: tool performance and tool wear. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0307-0CrossRef

20.

Deshpande S, Deshpande Y (2019) A review on cooling systems used in machining processes. Mater Today Proc 18:5019–5031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.496CrossRef

21.

Galanis, N., Manolakos, D., & Vaxevanidis, N. (2008). Comparison between dry and wet machining of stainless steel.

22.

Kerrigan K, Scaife RJ (2018) Wet vs dry CFRP drilling: influence of cutting fluid on tool performance. Proced CIRP 77:315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.024CrossRef

23.

Songmene V, Zaghbani I, Kientzy G (2018) Machining and machinability of tool steels: effects of lubrication and machining conditions on tool wear and tool life data. Proced CIRP 77:505–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.252CrossRef

24.

Revuru RS, Zhang JZ, Posinasetti NR (2020) Comparative performance studies of turning 4140 steel with TiC/TiCN/TiN-coated carbide inserts using MQL, flooding with vegetable cutting fluids, and dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(1):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05378-8CrossRef

25.

Siva Surya M, Shalini M, Sridhar A (2017) Multi-response optimization on en19 steel using grey relational analysis through dry & wet machining. Mater Today Proc 4(2, Part A):2157–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.062CrossRef

26.

Diniz AE, Micaroni R (2007) Influence of the direction and flow rate of the cutting fluid on tool life in turning process of AISI 1045 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.04.003CrossRef

27.

Ravi S, Pradeep Kumar M (2011) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the end milling of hardened steel. Cryogenics 51(9):509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2011.06.006CrossRef

28.

Butola R, Jitendrakumar V, Ali P, Khanna V (2017) Effect on surface properties of mild steel during dry turning & wet turning on lathe. Mater Today Proc 4(8):7892–7902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.125CrossRef

29.

Okokpujie IP, Bolu CA, Ohunakin OS, Akinlabi ET, Adelekan DS (2019) A review of recent application of machining techniques, based on the phenomena of CNC machining operations. Proc Manuf 35:1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.056CrossRef

30.

Sankar MR, Choudhury SK (2015) Experimental study and modeling of machining with dry compressed air, flood and minimum quantity cutting fluid cooling techniques. Proced CIRP 31:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.089CrossRef

31.

Senevirathne SWMAI, Punchihewa HKG (2017) Comparison of tool life and surface roughness with MQL, flood cooling, and dry cutting conditions with P20 and D2 steel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 244:012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/244/1/012006CrossRef

32.

Peng R, Jiang H, Tang X, Huang X, Xu Y, Hu Y (2019) Design and performance of an internal-cooling turning tool with micro-channel structures. J Manuf Process 45:690–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.08.011CrossRef

33.

Chen B, Xiong F, Tang H, He L, Hu S (2020) Effect of cooling method on small diameter blind-hole drilling of new β-type dental Ti-Zr-Nb alloy. J Manuf Process 59:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.013CrossRef

34.

MPSystems (Producer). (2021). Understanding high pressure coolant system. Retrieved from https://www.mp-systems.net/high-medium-pressure-coolant-systems/benefits-of-hpc-systems/

35.

Kaynak Y, Gharibi A, Yılmaz U, Köklü U, Aslantaş K (2018) A comparison of flood cooling, minimum quantity lubrication and high pressure coolant on machining and surface integrity of titanium Ti-5553 alloy. J Manuf Process 34:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.003CrossRef

36.

Stolf P, Paiva JM, Ahmed YS, Endrino JL, Goel S, Veldhuis SC (2019) The role of high-pressure coolant in the wear characteristics of WC-Co tools during the cutting of Ti–6Al–4V. Wear 440-441:203090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.203090CrossRef

37.

Tamil Alagan N, Hoier P, Beno T, Klement U, Wretland A (2020) Coolant boiling and cavitation wear – a new tool wear mechanism on WC tools in machining Alloy 718 with high-pressure coolant. Wear 452-453:203284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203284CrossRef

38.

Lu Z, Zhang D, Zhang X, Peng Z (2020) Effects of high-pressure coolant on cutting performance of high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 279:116584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116584CrossRef

39.

Fang Z, Obikawa T (2020) Influence of cutting fluid flow on tool wear in high-pressure coolant turning using a novel internally cooled insert. J Manuf Process 56:1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.028CrossRef

40.

Nasr G, Soltantarzeh M, Davoodi B, Hajaliakbari A (2020) Assessment of tool wear mechanisms in high-pressure jet-assisted turning process of a nickel-based superalloy. Wear 460-461:203454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203454CrossRef

41.

Sandeep Reddy AV, Ajay Kumar S, Jagadesh T (2020) The Influence of graphite, MoS2 and Blasocut lubricant on hole and chip geometry during peck drilling of aerospace alloy. Mater Today Proc 24:690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.323CrossRef

42.

Tomala A, Hernandez S, Rodriguez Ripoll M, Badisch E, Prakash B (2014) Tribological performance of some solid lubricants for hot forming through laboratory simulative tests. Tribol Int 74:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.02.008CrossRef

43.

Sudheerkumar N, Sammaiah P, Rao KV, Sneha M, Ashok CH (2015) Influence of nano solid lubricant emulsions on surface roughness of mild steel when machining on lathe machine. Mater Today Proc 2(9, Part A):4413–4420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.10.042CrossRef

44.

Gunda RK, Narala SKR (2016) Tribological studies to analyze the effect of solid lubricant particle size on friction and wear behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Surf Coat Technol 308:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.06.092CrossRef

45.

Tiwari A, Makhesana MA, Patel KM, Mawandiya BK (2020) Experimental investigations on the applicability of solid lubricants in processing of AISI 4140 steel. Mater Today Proc 26:2921–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.603CrossRef

46.

Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Morphology of surface generated by end milling AL6061-T6 using molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanolubrication in end milling machining. J Clean Prod 66:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.048CrossRef

47.

Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S, Jakša G (2016) Effect of the type, size and concentration of solid lubricants on the tribological properties of the polymer PEEK. Wear 364-365:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.06.013CrossRef

48.

Sterle L, Kalin M, Pušavec F (2018) Performance evaluation of solid lubricants under machining-like conditions. Proced CIRP 77:401–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.299CrossRef

49.

Sartori S, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2018) Solid lubricant-assisted minimum quantity lubrication and cooling strategies to improve Ti6Al4V machinability in finishing turning. Tribol Int 118:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.10.010CrossRef

50.

Ravi S, Gurusamy P (2020) Experimental studies on the effect of LN2 cooling on the machining of tool steel. Mater Today Proc 33:3292–3296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.734CrossRef

51.

Zindani D, Kumar K (2020) A brief review on cryogenics in machining process. SN Appl Sci 2(6):1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2899-5CrossRef

52.

Shokrani A, Al-Samarrai I, Newman ST (2019) Hybrid cryogenic MQL for improving tool life in machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 43:229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.006CrossRef

53.

Dhar N, Islam S, Paul S (2006) Wear behavior of uncoated carbide inserts under dry, wet and cryogenic cooling conditions in turning C-60. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 28. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782006000200003

54.

Biček M, Dumont F, Courbon C, Pušavec F, Rech J, Kopač J (2012) Cryogenic machining as an alternative turning process of normalized and hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol 212(12):2609–2618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.07.022CrossRef

55.

Kaynak Y, Karaca HE, Noebe RD, Jawahir IS (2013) Tool-wear analysis in cryogenic machining of NiTi shape memory alloys: a comparison of tool-wear performance with dry and MQL machining. Wear 306(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.05.011CrossRef

56.

Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.12.002CrossRef

57.

Jawahir IS, Attia H, Biermann D, Duflou J, Klocke F, Meyer D et al (2016) Cryogenic manufacturing processes. CIRP Ann 65(2):713–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.007CrossRef

58.

Khare SK, Agarwal S (2017) Optimization of machining parameters in turning of AISI 4340 steel under cryogenic condition using taguchi technique. Proced CIRP 63:610–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.166CrossRef

59.

Devaraju A, Kishan V (2018) Influence of cryogenic cooling (liquid nitrogen) on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 2014-T6 aluminum alloy. Mater Today Proc 5(1, Part 1):1585–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.250CrossRef

60.

Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2018) Effect of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel: a comparison with MQL, wet, dry machining. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 21:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.02.004CrossRef

61.

Damir A, Sadek A, Attia H (2018) Characterization of machinability and environmental impact of cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Proced CIRP 69:893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.070CrossRef

62.

Danish M, Ginta TL, Abdul Rani AM, Carou D, Davim JP, Rubaiee S, Ghazali S (2019) Investigation of surface integrity induced on AZ31C magnesium alloy turned under cryogenic and dry conditions. Proc Manuf 41:476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.035CrossRef

63.

Kumar D, Gururaja S, Jawahir IS (2020) Machinability and surface integrity of adhesively bonded Ti/CFRP/Ti hybrid composite laminates under dry and cryogenic conditions. J Manuf Process 58:1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.064CrossRef

64.

Fernandes MEP, de Melo ACA, de Oliveira AJ, Chesman C (2020) Hard turning of AISI D6 tool steel under dry, wet and cryogenic conditions: an economic investigation aimed at achieving a sustainable machining approach. Cleaner Eng Technol 1:100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100022CrossRef

65.

Stampfer B, Golda P, Schießl R, Maas U, Schulze V (2020) Cryogenic orthogonal turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111(1):359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06105-zCrossRef

66.

Wang F, Wang Y (2020) Research on milling hole of AFRP based on cryogenic cooling processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(11–12):5277–5287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05057-8CrossRef

67.

Ezugwu E, Wang Z (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Technol 68:262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)00030-1CrossRef

68.

Garcia MV, Lopes JC, Diniz AE, Rodrigues AR, Volpato RS, Sanchez LE d A et al (2020) Grinding performance of bearing steel using MQL under different dilutions and wheel cleaning for green manufacture. J Clean Prod 257:120376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120376CrossRef

69.

Sterle L, Mallipeddi D, Krajnik P, Pušavec F (2020) The influence of single-channel liquid CO2 and MQL delivery on surface integrity in machining of Inconel 718. Proced CIRP 87:164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.032CrossRef

70.

Özbek O, Saruhan H (2020) The effect of vibration and cutting zone temperature on surface roughness and tool wear in eco-friendly MQL turning of AISI D2. J Mater Res Technol 9(3):2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.010CrossRef

71.

Tunc LT, Gu Y, Burke MG (2016) Effects of minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface integrity in robotic milling of austenitic stainless steel. Proced CIRP 45:215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.337CrossRef

72.

Barczak LM, Batako ADL, Morgan MN (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):977–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.07.005CrossRef

73.

Fratila D (2009) Evaluation of near-dry machining effects on gear milling process efficiency. J Clean Prod 17(9):839–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.010CrossRef

74.

Patole PB, Kulkarni VV (2018) Optimization of process parameters based on surface roughness and cutting force in MQL turning of AISI 4340 using nano fluid. Mater Today Proc 5(1, Part 1):104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.060CrossRef

75.

Ekinovic S, Prcanovic H, Begovic E (2015) Investigation of influence of MQL machining parameters on cutting forces during MQL turning of carbon steel St52-3. Proc Eng 132:608–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.538CrossRef

76.

Tai BL, Stephenson DA, Furness RJ, Shih AJ (2014) Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in automotive powertrain machining. Proced CIRP 14:523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.044CrossRef

77.

Kochumman J, Satishkumar S, Dinakaran D, Rao V (2014) Influence of different cooling methods on drill temperature in drilling GFRP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6280-yCrossRef

78.

Dhar NR, Islam MW, Islam S, Mithu MAH (2006) The influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel. J Mater Process Technol 171(1):93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.047CrossRef

79.

Rahim EA, Dorairaju H (2018) Evaluation of mist flow characteristic and performance in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) machining. Measurement 123:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.015CrossRef

80.

Bai X, Zhou F, Li C, Dong L, Lv X, Yin Q (2020) Physicochemical properties of degradable vegetable-based oils on minimum quantity lubrication milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(9–10):4143–4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04695-xCrossRef

81.

Saberi A, Rahimi AR, Parsa H, Ashrafijou M, Rabiei F (2016) Improvement of surface grinding process performance of CK45 soft steel by minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique using compressed cold air jet from vortex tube. J Clean Prod 131:728–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.104CrossRef

82.

Iturbe A, Hormaetxe E, Garay A, Arrazola PJ (2016) Surface integrity analysis when machining Inconel 718 with conventional and cryogenic cooling. Proced CIRP 45:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.095CrossRef

83.

Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production – part I: application on machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18(2):174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.010CrossRef

84.

Zaman PB, Dhar NR (2019) Design and evaluation of an embedded double jet nozzle for MQL delivery intending machinability improvement in turning operation. J Manuf Process 44:179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.047CrossRef

85.

Park K-H, Olortegui-Yume J, Yoon M-C, Kwon P (2010) A study on droplets and their distribution for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(9):824–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.05.001CrossRef

86.

Abdul Sani AS, Rahim EA, Sharif S, Sasahara H (2019) Machining performance of vegetable oil with phosphonium- and ammonium-based ionic liquids via MQL technique. J Clean Prod 209:947–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.317CrossRef

87.

Hadad M, Sadeghi B (2013) Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy. J Clean Prod 54:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.011CrossRef

88.

Paturi UMR, Maddu YR, Maruri RR, Narala SKR (2016) Measurement and analysis of surface roughness in WS2 solid lubricant assisted minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) turning of Inconel 718. Proced CIRP 40:138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.082CrossRef

89.

Sarıkaya M, Güllü A (2014) Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. J Clean Prod 65:604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.040CrossRef

90.

Guerra AJ, Ciurana J (2019) Minimum quantity lubrication in fibre laser processing for permanent stents manufacturing. Proc Manuf 41:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.036CrossRef

91.

Tai B, Stephenson D, Furness R, Shih A (2017) Minimum quantity lubrication for sustainable machining. In: Abraham MA (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 477–485CrossRef

92.

Kirkhorn L, Gutnichenko O, Bihagen S, Ståhl J-E (2018) Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with carbon nanostructured additives in sheet metal forming. Proc Manuf 25:375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.106CrossRef

93.

Esmaeili H, Adibi H, Rezaei SM (2019) An efficient strategy for grinding carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide composite using minimum quantity lubricant. Ceram Int 45(8):10852–10864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.163CrossRef

94.

Stephenson DA, Hughey E, Hasham AA (2019) Air flow and chip removal in minimum quantity lubrication drilling. Proc Manuf 34:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.171CrossRef

95.

Qin X, Liu W, Li S, Tong W, Ji X, Meng F et al (2019) A comparative study between internal spray cooling and conventional external cooling in drilling of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(9):4581–4592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04330-9CrossRef

96.

Dhar NR, Ahmed MT, Islam S (2007) An experimental investigation on effect of minimum quantity lubrication in machining AISI 1040 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(5):748–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.017CrossRef

97.

Shukla A, Kotwani A, Unune DR (2020) Performance comparison of dry, flood and vegetable oil based minimum quantity lubrication environments during CNC milling of aluminium 6061. Mater Today Proc 21:1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.060CrossRef

98.

Niketh S, Samuel GL (2018) Drilling performance of micro textured tools under dry, wet and MQL condition. J Manuf Process 32:254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.02.012CrossRef

99.

Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2014) Hard turning using HiPIMS-coated carbide tools: wear behavior under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Measurement 55:536–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.002CrossRef

100.

Naresh Babu M, Anandan V, Muthukrishnan N, Santhanakumar M (2019) End milling of AISI 304 steel using minimum quantity lubrication. Measurement 138:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.064CrossRef

101.

Bonfá MM, Costa DS, Sales WF, Amorim FL, Maia LHA, Machado LR (2019) Evaluation of tool life and workpiece surface roughness in turning of AISI D6 hardened steel using PCBN tools and minimum quantity of lubricant (MQL) applied at different directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(1–4):971–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03619-zCrossRef

102.

Muaz M, Choudhury SK (2019) Experimental investigations and multi-objective optimization of MQL-assisted milling process for finishing of AISI 4340 steel. Measurement 138:557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.048CrossRef

103.

Tomaz ÍV, Pardal JM, Fonseca MC (2019) Influence of minimum quantity lubrication in the surface quality of milled maraging steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(9):4301–4311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04262-4CrossRef

104.

Mishra RR, Sahoo AK, Panda A, Kumar R, Das D, Routara BC (2020) MQL machining of high strength steel: a case study on surface quality characteristic. Mater Today Proc 26:2616–2618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.552CrossRef

105.

Praveen B, Mohan Reddy NM, Akshay Kumar Y, Subash R (2021) Investigating the effect of minimum quantity lubrication on surface finish of EN 47 steel material. Mater Today Proc 38:3253–3257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.728CrossRef

106.

Choudhury, S., & Dhar, N. (2008). Effect of minimum quantity of lubricant on tool wear and job dimension and finish in turning AISI 4140 steel.

107.

Saha S, Deb S, Bandyopadhyay PP (2020) An analytical approach to assess the variation of lubricant supply to the cutting tool during MQL assisted high speed micromilling. J Mater Process Technol 285:116783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116783CrossRef

108.

Uysal A, Demiren F, Altan E (2015) Applying minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method on milling of martensitic stainless steel by using nano MoS2 reinforced vegetable cutting fluid. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:2742–2747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.384CrossRef

109.

Gupta A, Kumar R, Kumar H, Garg H (2020) Comparative performance of pure vegetable oil and Al2O3 based vegetable oil during MQL turning of AISI 4130. Mater Today Proc 28:1662–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.019CrossRef

110.

Kedare SB, Borse DR, Shahane PT (2014) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface roughness of mild steel of 15HRC on universal milling machine. Procedia Mater Sci 6:150–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.018CrossRef

111.

Lai Z, Wang C, Zheng L, Huang W, Yang J, Guo G, Xiong W (2020) Adaptability of AlTiN-based coated tools with green cutting technologies in sustainable machining of 316L stainless steel. Tribol Int 148:106300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106300CrossRef

112.

Sreejith PS (2008) Machining of 6061 aluminium alloy with MQL, dry and flooded lubricant conditions. Mater Lett 62(2):276–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.019CrossRef

113.

Biermann D, Iovkov I, Blum H, Rademacher A, Taebi K, Suttmeier FT, Klein N (2012) Thermal aspects in deep hole drilling of aluminium cast alloy using twist drills and MQL. Proced CIRP 3:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.043CrossRef

114.

Chatha SS, Pal A, Singh T (2016) Performance evaluation of aluminium 6063 drilling under the influence of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 137:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.139CrossRef

115.

Islam S, Khandoker N, Izham M, Azizi T, Debnath S (2017) Development of a low cost MQL setup for turning operations. MATEC Web Conf 95:10004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179510004CrossRef

116.

Kannan C, Varun Chaitanya CH, Padala D, Reddy L, Ramanujam R, Balan ASS (2020) Machinability studies on aluminium matrix nanocomposite under the influence of MQL. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, 1507-1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.068

117.

Zhu Z, He B, Chen J (2020) Evaluation of tool temperature distribution in MQL drilling of aluminum 2024-T351. J Manuf Process 56:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.029CrossRef

118.

Abas M, Sayd L, Akhtar R, Khalid QS, Khan AM, Pruncu CI (2020) Optimization of machining parameters of aluminum alloy 6026-T9 under MQL-assisted turning process. J Mater Res Technol 9(5):10916–10940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.071CrossRef

119.

Cagan SC, Venkatesh B, Buldum BB (2020) Investigation of surface roughness and chip morphology of aluminum alloy in dry and minimum quantity lubrication machining. Mater Today Proc 27:1122–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.547CrossRef

120.

Javidikia M, Sadeghifar M, Songmene V, Jahazi M (2020) Effect of turning environments and parameters on surface integrity of AA6061-T6: experimental analysis, predictive modeling, and multi-criteria optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110(9–10):2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06027-wCrossRef

121.

Braga DU, Diniz AE, Miranda GWA, Coppini NL (2002) Using a minimum quantity of lubricant (MQL) and a diamond coated tool in the drilling of aluminum–silicon alloys. J Mater Process Technol 122(1):127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01249-3CrossRef

122.

Khan MMA, Mithu MAH, Dhar NR (2009) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J Mater Process Technol 209(15):5573–5583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.014CrossRef

123.

Joshi KK, Kumar R, Anurag (2018) An experimental investigations in turning of Incoloy 800 in dry, MQL and flood cooling conditions. Proc Manuf 20:350–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.051CrossRef

124.

Gutnichenko O, Bushlya V, Bihagen S, Ståhl J-E (2018) Influence of GnP additive to vegetable oil on machining performance when MQL-assisted turning Alloy 718. Proc Manuf 25:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.091CrossRef

125.

de Oliveira D, Gomes MC, da Silva MB (2020) Influence of cutting fluid application frequency on the surface quality of micromilled slots on Inconel 718 alloy. Proc Manuf 48:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.082CrossRef

126.

Nagaraj A, Uysal A, Jawahir IS (2020) An Investigation of process performance when drilling carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite under dry, cryogenic and MQL environments. Proc Manuf 43:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.165CrossRef

127.

Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M, Şirin Ş (2020) Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and cryoMQL. J Mater Res Technol 9(2):2079–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.069CrossRef

128.

Ni C, Zhu L (2020) Investigation on machining characteristics of TC4 alloy by simultaneous application of ultrasonic vibration assisted milling (UVAM) and economical-environmental MQL technology. J Mater Process Technol 278:116518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116518CrossRef

129.

Zahoor S, Abdul-Kader W, Ishfaq K (2020) Sustainability assessment of cutting fluids for flooded approach through a comparative surface integrity evaluation of IN718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111(1):383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06130-yCrossRef

130.

Kaynak Y, Robertson SW, Karaca HE, Jawahir IS (2015) Progressive tool-wear in machining of room-temperature austenitic NiTi alloys: the influence of cooling/lubricating, melting, and heat treatment conditions. J Mater Process Technol 215:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.015CrossRef

131.

Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2016) Performance of water-based TiO2 nanofluid during the minimum quantity lubrication machining of aluminium alloy, AA6061-T6. J Clean Prod 135:1623–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.015CrossRef

132.

Marques A, Guimarães C, da Silva RB, da Penha Cindra Fonseca M, Sales WF, Machado ÁR (2016) Surface integrity analysis of Inconel 718 after turning with different solid lubricants dispersed in neat oil delivered by MQL. Proc Manuf 5:609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.050CrossRef

133.

Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Li B, Wang Y, Yang M et al (2016) Experimental study on the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the lubricating property of nanofluids for MQL grinding of Ni-based alloy. J Mater Process Technol 232:100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.031CrossRef

134.

Viswanathan R, Ramesh S, Subburam V (2018) Measurement and optimization of performance characteristics in turning of Mg alloy under dry and MQL conditions. Measurement 120:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.018CrossRef

135.

Rahim EA, Sasahara H (2011) A study of the effect of palm oil as MQL lubricant on high speed drilling of titanium alloys. Tribol Int 44(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.10.032CrossRef

136.

Le Coz G, Marinescu M, Devillez A, Dudzinski D, Velnom L (2012) Measuring temperature of rotating cutting tools: application to MQL drilling and dry milling of aerospace alloys. Appl Therm Eng 36:434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.10.060CrossRef

137.

Ni C, Zhu L, Yang Z (2019) Comparative investigation of tool wear mechanism and corresponding machined surface characterization in feed-direction ultrasonic vibration assisted milling of Ti–6Al–4V from dynamic view. Wear 436-437:203006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.203006CrossRef

138.

Davis B, Schueller JK, Huang Y (2015) Study of ionic liquid as effective additive for minimum quantity lubrication during titanium machining. Manuf Lett 5:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2015.04.001CrossRef

139.

Venkata Ramana M (2017) Optimization and influence of process parameters on surface roughness in turning of titanium alloy under different lubricant conditions. Mater Today Proc 4(8):8328–8335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.176CrossRef

140.

Qin S, Li Z, Guo G, An Q, Chen M, Ming W (2016) Analysis of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for different coating tools during turning of TC11 titanium alloy. Materials 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9100804

141.

Khatri A, Jahan MP (2018) Investigating tool wear mechanisms in machining of Ti-6Al-4V in flood coolant, dry and MQL conditions. Proc Manuf 26:434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.051CrossRef

142.

Rahman SS, Ashraf MZI, Amin AKMN, Bashar MS, Ashik MFK, Kamruzzaman M (2019) Tuning nanofluids for improved lubrication performance in turning biomedical grade titanium alloy. J Clean Prod 206:180–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.150CrossRef

143.

da Silva LR, da Silva OS, dos Santos FV, Duarte FJ, Veloso GV (2019) Wear mechanisms of cutting tools in high-speed turning of Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(1–4):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03519-2CrossRef

144.

Xu J, Ji M, Chen M, el Mansori M (2020) Experimental investigation on drilling machinability and hole quality of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks under different cooling conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(5–6):1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05742-8CrossRef

145.

Khaliq W, Zhang C, Jamil M, Khan AM (2020) Tool wear, surface quality, and residual stresses analysis of micro-machined additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V under dry and MQL conditions. Tribol Int 151:106408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106408CrossRef

146.

Liu N, Zou X, Yuan J, Wu S, Chen Y (2020) Performance evaluation of castor oil-ethanol blended coolant under minimum quantity lubrication turning of difficult-to-machine materials. J Manuf Process 58:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.058CrossRef

147.

Raina A, Anand A (2018) Lubrication performance of synthetic oil mixed with diamond nanoparticles: effect of concentration. Mater Today Proc 5(9, Part 3):20588–20594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.438CrossRef

148.

Lopes JC, Ventura CEH, de Fernandes L, Tavares AB, LEA S, de Mello HJ et al (2019) Application of a wheel cleaning system during grinding of alumina with minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(1):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3174-4CrossRef

149.

De Oliveira D, Da ds, R. B., & Gelamo, R. V. (2019) Influence of multilayer graphene platelet concentration dispersed in semi-synthetic oil on the grinding performance of Inconel 718 alloy under various machining conditions. Wear 426-427:1371–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.114CrossRef

150.

Rajeshkumar N, Ramesh S (2020) Design & optimization of machining parameters of minimum quantity lubrication in milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.474

151.

de Moraes DL, Garcia MV, Lopes JC, Ribeiro FSF, de Angelo Sanchez LE, Foschini CR, de Mello HJ, Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC (2019) Performance of SAE 52100 steel grinding using MQL technique with pure and diluted oil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105(10):4211–4223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04582-5CrossRef

152.

Shashidhara YM, Jayaram SR (2010) Vegetable oils as a potential cutting fluid—an evolution. Tribol Int 43(5):1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.065CrossRef

153.

Ozcelik B, Kuram E, Huseyin Cetin M, Demirbas E (2011) Experimental investigations of vegetable based cutting fluids with extreme pressure during turning of AISI 304L. Tribol Int 44(12):1864–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.07.012CrossRef

154.

Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071CrossRef

155.

Davoodi B, Tazehkandi AH (2014) Experimental investigation and optimization of cutting parameters in dry and wet machining of aluminum alloy 5083 in order to remove cutting fluid. J Clean Prod 68:234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.056CrossRef

156.

Aydin, S. (2017). Application of quantitative real-time PCR for microbial community analysis in environmental researchCrossRef

157.

Wakabayashi T, Suda S, Inasaki I, Terasaka K, Musha Y, Toda Y (2007) Tribological action and cutting performance of MQL media in machining of aluminum. CIRP Ann 56(1):97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.025CrossRef

158.

Kamata Y, Obikawa T (2007) High speed MQL finish-turning of Inconel 718 with different coated tools. J Mater Process Technol 192-193:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.052CrossRef

159.

Mahadi MA, Choudhury IA, Azuddin M, Nukman Y (2017) Use of boric acid powder aided vegetable oil lubricant in turning AISI 431 steel. Proc Eng 184:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.077CrossRef

160.

Agrawal SM, Patil NG (2018) Experimental study of non edible vegetable oil as a cutting fluid in machining of M2 Steel using MQL. Proc Manuf 20:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.030CrossRef

161.

Ghatge DA, Ramanujam R, Reddy BS, Vignesh M (2018) Improvement of machinability using eco-friendly cutting oil in turning duplex stainless steel. Mater Today Proc 5(5, Part 2):12303–12310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.208CrossRef

162.

Singh H, Sharma VS, Singh S, Dogra M (2019) Nanofluids assisted environmental friendly lubricating strategies for the surface grinding of titanium alloy: Ti6Al4V-ELI. J Manuf Process 39:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.004CrossRef

163.

Singaravel B, Shekar KC, Reddy GG, Prasad SD (2020) Experimental investigation of vegetable oil as dielectric fluid in Electric discharge machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Ain Shams Eng J 11(1):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.07.010CrossRef

164.

Awale AS, Vashista M, Khan Yusufzai MZ (2020) Multi-objective optimization of MQL mist parameters for eco-friendly grinding. J Manuf Process 56:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.069CrossRef

165.

Munhoz MR, Dias LG, Breganon R, Ribeiro FSF, de Souza Gonçalves JF, Hashimoto EM, da Silva Júnior CE (2020) Analysis of the surface roughness obtained by the abrasive flow machining process using an abrasive paste with oiticica oil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(11–12):5061–5070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04920-7CrossRef

166.

Chanes De Souza M, Wiesner HM, Kuche Y, Polte J, de Oliveira Gomes J, Uhlmann E (2019) Influence of the fatty acid profile on the lubricating film formation in micro-milling process on 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(1–2):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04625-xCrossRef

167.

Fernando WLR, Sarmilan N, Wickramasinghe KC, Herath HMCM, Perera GIP (2020) Experimental investigation of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) of coconut oil based metal working fluid. Mater Today Proc 23:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.079CrossRef

168.

Lal Virdi R, Singh Chatha S, Singh H (2020) Performance evaluation of Inconel 718 under vegetable oils based nanofluids using minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Mater Today Proc 33:1538–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.802CrossRef

169.

Khunt CP, Makhesana MA, Patel KM, Mawandiya BK (2020) Performance assessment of vegetable oil-based minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in drilling. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.741

170.

Deiab I, Raza SW, Pervaiz S (2014) Analysis of lubrication strategies for sustainable machining during turning of titanium Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Proced CIRP 17:766–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.112CrossRef

171.

Rao CM, Rao SS, Herbert MA (2018) Development of novel cutting tool with a micro-hole pattern on PCD insert in machining of titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 36:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.028CrossRef

172.

Gaurav G, Sharma A, Dangayach GS, Meena ML (2020) Assessment of jojoba as a pure and nano-fluid base oil in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) hard-turning of Ti–6Al–4V: a step towards sustainable machining. J Clean Prod 272:122553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122553CrossRef

173.

Loh SK (2017) The potential of the Malaysian oil palm biomass as a renewable energy source. Energy Convers Manag 141:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.081CrossRef

174.

Umar MS, Urmee T, Jennings P (2018) A policy framework and industry roadmap model for sustainable oil palm biomass electricity generation in Malaysia. Renew Energy 128:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.060CrossRef

175.

Tan C-P, Nehdi IA (2012) 13 - the physicochemical properties of palm oil and its components. In: Lai O-M, Tan C-P, Akoh CC (eds) Palm oil. AOCS Press, pp 377–391CrossRef

176.

Monthly Palm Oil Trade Statistics 2020. (2021). Malaysian Palm Oil Council. http://mpoc.org.my/monthly-palm-oil-trade-statistics-2020/

177.

Masjuki HH, Maleque MA, Kubo A, Nonaka T (1999) Palm oil and mineral oil based lubricants—their tribological and emission performance. Tribol Int 32(6):305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00052-3CrossRef

178.

Syahrullail S, Zubil BM, Azwadi CSN, Ridzuan MJM (2011) Experimental evaluation of palm oil as lubricant in cold forward extrusion process. Int J Mech Sci 53(7):549–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.05.002CrossRef

179.

Razak DM, Syahrullail S, Yahya A, Mahmud N, Hashim NLS, Nugroho K (2013) Lubrication on the curve surface structure using palm oil and mineral oil. Proc Eng 68:607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.228CrossRef

180.

Shomchoam B, Yoosuk B (2014) Eco-friendly lubricant by partial hydrogenation of palm oil over Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Ind Crop Prod 62:395–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.022CrossRef

181.

Abdollah MFB, Amiruddin H, Jamallulil AD (2020) Experimental analysis of tribological performance of palm oil blended with hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles as an environment-friendly lubricant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(9–10):4183–4191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04906-5CrossRef

182.

Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X et al (2017) Comparative evaluation of the lubricating properties of vegetable-oil-based nanofluids between frictional test and grinding experiment. J Manuf Process 26:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.001CrossRef

183.

Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M (2016) Grinding temperature and energy ratio coefficient in MQL grinding of high-temperature nickel-base alloy by using different vegetable oils as base oil. Chin J Aeronaut 29(4):1084–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.10.012CrossRef

184.

Sen B, Mia M, Mandal UK, Mondal SP (2020) Synergistic effect of silica and pure palm oil on the machining performances of Inconel 690: a study for promoting minimum quantity nano doped-green lubricants. J Clean Prod 258:120755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120755CrossRef

185.

Sen B, Gupta MK, Mia M, Mandal UK, Mondal SP (2020) Wear behaviour of TiAlN coated solid carbide end-mill under alumina enriched minimum quantity palm oil-based lubricating condition. Tribol Int 148:106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106310CrossRef

Title: Recent progress and evolution of coolant usages in conventional machining methods: a comprehensive review
Authors: Gary Wong Ang Kui
Sumaiya Islam
Moola Mohan Reddy
Neamul Khandoker
Vincent Lee Chieng Chen
Publication date: 25-10-2021
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Issue 1-2/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08182-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2022

The study of machine learning for wire rupture prediction in WEDM

Numerical and experimental investigation of orthogonal cutting of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK)

Force model for complex profile tool in broaching Inconel 718

Effect of Co and Fe contents on the microstructure and corrosion behaviour of heat-treated Ni-Fe-Co superalloys in 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution

Thermal finite element modeling of the laser beam welding of tailor welded blanks through an equivalent volumetric heat source

Optimization solution of vertical rolling force using unified yield criterion

Premium Partners