Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues

Authors : Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter

Published in: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents a target language for representing arguments mined from natural language. The key features are the connection between possible reasons and possible claims and recursive embedding of such connections. Given a base of these arguments and counterarguments mined from texts or dialogues, we want be able combine them, deconstruct them, and to analyse them (for instance to check whether the set is inconsistent). To address these needs, we propose a formal language for representing reasons and claims, and a framework for inferencing with the arguments and counterarguments in this formal language.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
\(-^{(1)}\) denotes a single occurrence of the hyphen and \(-^{(0)}\) the absence of it.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Generating abstract arguments: a natural language approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’12), pp. 454–461. IOS Press (2012) Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Generating abstract arguments: a natural language approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’12), pp. 454–461. IOS Press (2012)
2.
go back to reference Florou, E., Konstantopoulos, S., Koukourikos, A., Karampiperis, P.: Argument extraction for supporting public policy formulation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pp. 49–54. ACL (2013) Florou, E., Konstantopoulos, S., Koukourikos, A., Karampiperis, P.: Argument extraction for supporting public policy formulation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pp. 49–54. ACL (2013)
3.
go back to reference Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Nat. Intell. 7(1), 1–31 (2013)CrossRef Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Nat. Intell. 7(1), 1–31 (2013)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Green, N., Ashley, K., Litman, D., Reed, C., Walker, V. (eds.).: Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014) Green, N., Ashley, K., Litman, D., Reed, C., Walker, V. (eds.).: Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014)
5.
go back to reference Aharoni, E., Polnarov, A., Lavee, T., Hershcovich, D., Levy, R., Rinott, R., Gutfreund, D., Slonim, N.: A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014) Aharoni, E., Polnarov, A., Lavee, T., Hershcovich, D., Levy, R., Rinott, R., Gutfreund, D., Slonim, N.: A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014)
6.
go back to reference Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Computational Linguistics (COLING) (2014) Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Computational Linguistics (COLING) (2014)
7.
go back to reference Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games. Artific. Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games. Artific. Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
go back to reference Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRef Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63–101 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63–101 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
go back to reference García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4(1–2), 95–138 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4(1–2), 95–138 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
go back to reference Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 5(1), 1–31 (2010) Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 5(1), 1–31 (2010)
12.
go back to reference Black, E., Hunter, A.: A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes. J. Logic Comput. 22(1), 55–78 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Black, E., Hunter, A.: A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes. J. Logic Comput. 22(1), 55–78 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
go back to reference Apothéloz, D.: The function of negation in argumentation. J. Pragmatics 19, 23–38 (1993)CrossRef Apothéloz, D.: The function of negation in argumentation. J. Pragmatics 19, 23–38 (1993)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang, L., Cardie, C.: Improving agreement and disagreement identification in online discussions with a socially-tuned sentiment lexicon. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (2014) Wang, L., Cardie, C.: Improving agreement and disagreement identification in online discussions with a socially-tuned sentiment lexicon. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (2014)
15.
go back to reference Kraus, S., Lehmann, S., Magidor, D.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167–207 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Kraus, S., Lehmann, S., Magidor, D.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167–207 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
go back to reference Tarski, A.: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1956). Traslated by (Woodger., J. H) Tarski, A.: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1956). Traslated by (Woodger., J. H)
Metadata
Title
Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues
Authors
Leila Amgoud
Philippe Besnard
Anthony Hunter
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_6

Premium Partner