Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Measurement Techniques 3/2023

12-06-2023

Results of Pilot Comparisons of Amplitude–Phase Calibrations of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19

Authors: A. E. Isaev, C. Yi, A. N. Matveev, J. Guanghui, B. I. Khatamtaev, W. Shiquan, N. G. Shcherblyuk

Published in: Measurement Techniques | Issue 3/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Initiated by COOMET TC 1.2 "Acoustics, Ultrasound, Vibration," bilateral pilot comparisons of amplitude– phase calibrations of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19 between the Hangzhou Research Institute of Applied Acoustics (HAARI) and the Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering (pilot laboratory) are described. Characteristics of reference hydrophones, data on standard facilities and calibration methods, results of calibrations, and assessments of reference levels of comparisons are provided. The results of comparisons are discussed. The problems that influenced the results of comparisons are mentioned. The correctness of the measurement methods used by the participants of the comparisons, including the method of calculating the frequency dependence of the argument of hydrophone complex sensitivity on the experimental frequency dependence of the modulus of its sensitivity, has been confirmed. The results of the pilot comparisons were found to be satisfactory. When discussing the results of comparisons at the COOMET TC 1.2 meeting, it was proposed to conduct additional comparisons of the results of amplitude–phase calibrations in an expanded composition of participants. The results obtained allow verifying the correctness of the adopted new technical solutions, working out methods for performing measurements and post-processing of the data obtained, identifying and numerically assessing sources of uncertainty, and also establishing previously unaccounted sources of uncertainty when improving primary standards.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
IEC 60565-1-2020. Underwater Acoustics. Hydrophones. Hydrophones Calibration. Part 1: Procedures for Free-Field Hydrophones Calibration.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, A. D. Thompson, et al., Technique for the Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10 to 600 kHz Using a Heterodyne Interferometer and an Acoustically Compliant Membrane, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118, No. 5, 3110–3116 (2005).ADSCrossRef P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, A. D. Thompson, et al., Technique for the Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10 to 600 kHz Using a Heterodyne Interferometer and an Acoustically Compliant Membrane, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118, No. 5, 3110–3116 (2005).ADSCrossRef
2.
go back to reference P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, and A. D. Thompson, The Calibration of Hydrophones by a Novel Optical Technique in the Frequency Range 10 kHz to 600 kHz, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. "Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results" (2005). P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, and A. D. Thompson, The Calibration of Hydrophones by a Novel Optical Technique in the Frequency Range 10 kHz to 600 kHz, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. "Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results" (2005).
3.
go back to reference G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).ADSCrossRef G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).ADSCrossRef
4.
go back to reference G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012). G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012).
5.
go back to reference L. D. Luker and A. L. Van Buren, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 70, No. 2, 516–519 (1981).ADSCrossRef L. D. Luker and A. L. Van Buren, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 70, No. 2, 516–519 (1981).ADSCrossRef
6.
go back to reference A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G. Shcherblyuk, Measurement of the Sensitivity Phase–Frequency Characteristics of Hydrophones by the Reciprocity Method, Meas. Tech., 56, No. 6, 706–711 (2013).CrossRef A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G. Shcherblyuk, Measurement of the Sensitivity Phase–Frequency Characteristics of Hydrophones by the Reciprocity Method, Meas. Tech., 56, No. 6, 706–711 (2013).CrossRef
7.
go back to reference A. E. Isaev and B. I. Khatamtaev, Determination of the Hydrophone Phase–Frequency Response by its Amplitude–Frequency Response, Meas. Tech., 64, No. 7, 580–585 (2021).CrossRef A. E. Isaev and B. I. Khatamtaev, Determination of the Hydrophone Phase–Frequency Response by its Amplitude–Frequency Response, Meas. Tech., 64, No. 7, 580–585 (2021).CrossRef
8.
go back to reference G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012). G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012).
9.
go back to reference G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).ADSCrossRef G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).ADSCrossRef
10.
go back to reference A. E. Isaev, Y. Chen, A. N. Matveev, et al., COOMET 786/RU-a/19: Results of Pilot Comparisons of Hydrophones Amplitude–Phase Free-Field Calibrations in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz, Al'manakh Sovr. Metrol., 32, No. 4, 151–168 (2022). A. E. Isaev, Y. Chen, A. N. Matveev, et al., COOMET 786/RU-a/19: Results of Pilot Comparisons of Hydrophones Amplitude–Phase Free-Field Calibrations in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz, Al'manakh Sovr. Metrol., 32, No. 4, 151–168 (2022).
Metadata
Title
Results of Pilot Comparisons of Amplitude–Phase Calibrations of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19
Authors
A. E. Isaev
C. Yi
A. N. Matveev
J. Guanghui
B. I. Khatamtaev
W. Shiquan
N. G. Shcherblyuk
Publication date
12-06-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Measurement Techniques / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0543-1972
Electronic ISSN: 1573-8906
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02212-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Measurement Techniques 3/2023 Go to the issue