Top

Quality & Quantity

Published in:

09-02-2018

Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?

Authors: M. Teresa Anguera, Angel Blanco-Villaseñor, José Luis Losada, Pedro Sánchez-Algarra, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 6/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The literature on mixed methods and multimethods has burgeoned over the last 20 years, and researchers from a growing number and diversity of fields have progressively embraced these approaches. However, rapid growth in any movement inevitably gives rise to gaps or shortcomings, such as “identity crises” or divergent conceptual views. Although some authors draw a clear and sometimes opinionated distinction between mixed methods and multimethods, for others, they are synonymous. The concepts underlying both terms therefore have become blurred and generated much confusion. The aim of this article is to explore the origins of the confusion, describe our view of mixed methods and multimethod studies, and by doing so, help to clearly delineate the two concepts. The authors have presented their opinion of how these terms and concepts should be distinguished and call for a constructive debate of the issues involved in the mixed methods and multimethod literature. This is a way truly to propel the field forward.

previous article A global food–energy–water nexus with heterogeneity, non-stationarity and cross-sectional dependence

next article An evaluation of beauty and hair care education at vocational schools

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Anguera, M.T.: Observational typology. Qual. Quant. 13(6), 449–484 (1979)

Anguera, M.T.: Observational methods (general). In: Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment, vol. 2, pp. 632–637. Sage, London (2003)

Anguera, M.T., Hernández-Mendo, A.: Avances en estudios observacionales de Ciencias del Deporte desde los mixed methods (advances in mixed methods observational studies in sports sciences). Cuad. Psicol. Dep. 16(1), 17–30 (2016)

Anguera, M.T., Izquierdo, C.: Methodological approaches in human communication: from complexity of perceived situation to data analysis. In: Riva, G., Anguera, M.T., Wiederhold, B.K., Mantovani, F. (eds.) From Communication to Presence. Cognition, Emotions and Culture Towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience, pp. 203–222. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

Anguera, M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L.: Diseños observacionales, cuestiones clave en el proceso de la metodología observacional [observational designs, key issues in the process of observational methodology]. Metod. Cienc. Comport. 3(2), 135–160 (2001)

Anguera, M.T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., Sánchez-Algarra, P.: Mixed methods en actividad física y deporte (mixed methods in physical activity and sport). Rev. Psicol. Dep. 23(1), 123–130 (2014)

Anguera, M.T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., Sánchez-Algarra, P., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: The specificity of observational studies in physical activity and sports sciences: moving forward in mixed methods research and proposals for achieving quantitative and qualitative symmetry. Front. Psychol. 8, 2196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02196 CrossRef

Anguera, M.T., Portell, M., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete-Chaves, S.: Indirect observation in everyday contexts: concepts and methodological guidelines within a mixed methods framework. Front. Psychol. 9, 13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00013 CrossRef

Archibald, M.M.: Investigator triangulation: a collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research? J. Mix. Methods Res. 10(3), 228–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092 CrossRef

Archibald, M.M., Radil, A.I., Zhang, X., Hanson, W.E.: Current mixed methods practices in qualitative research: a content analysis of leading journals. Int. J. Qual. Methods 14(2), 5–33 (2015)CrossRef

Bakeman, R., Gottman, J.M.: Applying observational methods: a systematic view. In: Osofsky, J.D. (ed.) Handbook of Infant Development, 2nd edn, pp. 818–853. Wiley, New York (1987)

Bakeman, R., Gottman, J.M.: Observing Interaction. Introduction to Sequential Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)CrossRef

Bazeley, P.: Editorial: integrating data analyses in mixed method research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 3(3), 203–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334443 CrossRef

Bazeley, P.: Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. Am. Behav. Sci. 56(6), 814–828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426330 CrossRef

Bazeley, P.: Writing up multimethod and mixed methods research for diverse audiences. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 296–313. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Bazeley, P., Kemp, L.: Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 6(1), 55–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811419514 CrossRef

Bergman, M.M.: Multimethod research and mixed methods research: old wine in new bottles? J. Mix. Methods Res. 1(1), 101–104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906291429 CrossRef

Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L., Anguera, M.T.: Analytic techniques in observational designs in environment–behavior relation. Medio Ambient Comport. Hum. 4(2), 111–126 (2003)

Borkan, J.M.: Mixed methods studies: a foundation for primary care research. Ann. Fam. Med. 2, 4–6 (2004)CrossRef

Brewer, J., Hunter, A.: Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles. Sage, Newbury Park (1989)

Brewer, J., Hunter, A.: Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)CrossRef

Burns, K.K., Bellows, M., Eigenseher, C., Jackson, K., Gallivan, J., Rees, J.: Exploring patient engagement practices and resources within a health care system: applying a multi-phased mixed methods knowledge mobilization approach. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approach. 8(2), 233–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/18340806.2014.11082063 CrossRef

Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959)CrossRef

Christ, T.W.: Book review: the oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. J. Mix. Methods Res. 10(2), 207–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815622704 CrossRef

Cook, T.D.: Postpositivism critical multiplism. In: Shortlan, R.L., Mark, M.M. (eds.) Social Science and Social Policy, pp. 21–62. Sage, Beverly Hills (1985)

Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Rand Mc Nally, Chicago (1979)

Creswell, J.W.: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2015)

Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)

Creswell, J.W., Tashakkori, A.: Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. J. Mix. Meth. Res. 1(2), 107–111 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298644 CrossRef

Creswell, J.W., Tashakkori, A.: How do research manuscripts contribute to the literature on mixed methods? J. Mix. Meth. Res. 2(2), 115–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808315361 CrossRef

Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., Hanson, W.E.: Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 209–240. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

Denzin, N.K.: The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

Fassnacht, G.: Theory and Practice of Observing Behaviour. Academic Press, New York (1982)

Fetters, M.D., Freshwater, D.: Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. J. Mix. Methods Res. 9(3), 203–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687 CrossRef

Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A., Creswell, J.W.: Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: principles and practices. Health Serv. Res. 48(6 Pt. 2), 2134–2156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 CrossRef

Fowler, F.J.: Survey Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)

Galt, K.A.: SPSS text analysis for surveys 2.1 and qualitative and mixed methods analysis. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2(3), 284–286 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808317830 CrossRef

Gibbs, G.R.: Atlas.ti software to assist with the qualitative analysis of data. J. Mix. Methods Res. 1(1), 103–104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906291490 CrossRef

Greene, J.C.: Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? J. Mix. Methods Res. 2(1), 7–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969 CrossRef

Greene, J.C.: Preserving distinctions within the multimethod and mixed methods research merger. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 606–615. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Guetterman, T.C.: What distinguishes a novice from an expert mixed methods researcher? Qual. Quant. 51, 377–398 (2017)CrossRef

Hesse-Biber, S.N.: Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. Guilford Press, New York (2010)

Hesse-Biber, S.N.: Introduction: navigating a turbulent research landscape: working the boundaries, tensions, diversity, and contradictions of multimethod and mixed methods inquiry. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. xxxiii–liii. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)CrossRef

Hesse-Biber, S.N., Rodriguez, D., Frost, N.A.: Qualitatively driven approach to multimethod and mixed methods research. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 3–20. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)CrossRef

Hillyard, S.: New Frontiers in Ethnography. Bingley, Emerald (2010)CrossRef

Holstein, J.A., Gubrium, J.F.: Phenomenology, etnomethodology, and interpretative practice. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 262–272. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

Hunter, A., Brewer, J.: Designing multimethod research. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 185–205. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015a)

Hunter, A., Brewer, J.: Conundrums of multimethod resarch. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 616–623. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015b)

Johnson, R.B.: Dialectical pluralism and mixed research. Am. Behav. Sci. 56(6), 751–754 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212442494 CrossRef

Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 CrossRef

Kerlinger, F.N.: Foundations of Behavioral Research: Educational, Psychological and Sociological Inquiry. Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York (1973)

Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Foreward to Ernest Greenwood, Experimental Sociology. King’s Crown Press, New York (1945)

Lee, R.M.: Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000)

Leeman, J., Voils, C.I., Sandelowski, M.: Conducting mixed methods literature reviews: synthesizing the evidence needed to develop and implement complex social and health interventions. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 167–184. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Levitt, H.M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J.W., Frost, D.M., Josselson, R., Suárez-Orozco, C.: Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. Am. Psychol. 73(1), 26–46 (2018)CrossRef

Mark, M.M.: Mixed and multimethods in predominantly quantitative studies, especially experiments and quasi-experiments. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 21–41. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Maxwell, J., Chmiel, M., Rogers, S.E.: Designing integration in multimethod and mixed methods research. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 223–239. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Mertens, D.: Publishing mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 5(1), 3–6 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810390217 CrossRef

Molina-Azorín, J.F., Fetters, M.D.: Mixed methods research prevalence studies: field-specific studies on the state of the art of mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 10(2), 123–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816636707 CrossRef

Morales-Sánchez, V., Pérez-López, V., Anguera, M.T.: Tratamiento metodológico de la observación indirecta en la gestión de organizaciones deportivas (indirect observational methodology in managing sports services). Rev. Psicol. Dep. 23(1), 201–207 (2014)

Morse, J.M.: Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 189–208. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

Morse, J.M.: Procedures and practice of mixed method design. Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In: Taskakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd edn, pp. 339–352. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)CrossRef

Morse, J.M.: Issues in qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs: walking through a mixed-method project. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 206–222. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Morse, J., Cheek, J.: Introducing qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs. Qual. Health Res. 25(6), 731–733 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315583299 CrossRef

Morse, J.M., Niehaus, L.: Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)

Newman, I., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Hitchcock, J.H.: Using the general lineal model to facilitate the full integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis: the potential to improve prediction ad theory building and testing. Gen. Linear Model J. 4(1), 12–28 (2015)

Nigras, K.: Spreadsheet software can facilitate mixed methods research—using old tools in a new context! J. Mix. Methods Res. 1(3), 297–299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807301250 CrossRef

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Hitchcock, J.H.: Advanced mixed analysis approaches. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 275–295. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Slate, J.R., Leech, N.L., Collins, K.M.T.: Conducting mixed analyses: a general typology. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approach. 1, 4–17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.1.1.4 CrossRef

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B., Collins, K.M.T.: Assessing legitimation in mixed research: a new framework. Qual. Quant. 45, 1253–1271 (2011)CrossRef

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Frels, R.K., Collins, K.M.T., Leech, N.L.: Conclusion: a four phase model for teaching and learning mixed research. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approach. 7(1), 133–156 (2013)CrossRef

Plano Clark, V.L., Badiee, M.: Research questions in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd edn, pp. 275–304. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)CrossRef

Plano Clark, V.L., Ivankova, N.V.: Mixed Methods Research: A Practical Guide to the Field. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2016)CrossRef

Portell, M., Anguera, M.T., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete, S.: Guidelines for reporting evaluations based on observational methodology. Psicothema 27, 283–289 (2015a). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.276 CrossRef

Portell, M., Anguera, M.T., Hernández-Mendo, A., Jonsson, G.K.: Quantifying biopsychosocial aspects in everyday contexts: an integrative methodological approach from the behavioral sciences. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 8, 153–160 (2015b). https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S82417 CrossRef

Salmons, J.E.: Conducting multimethod and mixed methods research online. In: Hesse-Biber, S.N., Johnson, R.B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, pp. 522–547. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Sánchez-Algarra, P., Anguera, M.T.: Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives. Qual. Quant. 47(2), 1237–1257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9764-6 CrossRef

Sandelowski, M.: Tables or tableaux? Writing and reading mixed methods studies. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 321–350. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

Sandelowski, M.: Metasynthesis of qualitative research. In: Cooper, H. (ed.) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, pp. 19–36. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2012)CrossRef

Sandelowski, M.: Unmixing mixed-methods research. Res. Nurs. Health 37, 3–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21570 CrossRef

Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J.: Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer, New York (2007)

Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., Knafl, G.: On quantitizing. J. Mix. Methods Res. 3, 208–222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334210 CrossRef

Sandelowski, M., Voils, C., Leeman, J., Crandell, J.: Mapping the mixed methods research synthesis terrain. J. Mix. Methods Res. 6, 317–331 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811427913 CrossRef

Sandelowski, M., Leeman, J., Knafl, K., Crandell, J.: Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. J. Adv. Nurs. 69, 1428–1437 (2013a). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12000 CrossRef

Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., Crandell, J., Leeman, J.: Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative research findings. In: Beck, C.T. (ed.) Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Nursing Research, pp. 347–356. Routledge, New York (2013b)

Sorensen, A.: Use of QSR NVivo 7 qualitative analysis software for mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2(1), 106–110 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309082 CrossRef

Stange, K.C., Crabtree, B.F., Miller, W.L.: Publishing multimethod research. Ann. Fam. Med. 4, 292–294 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.615 CrossRef

Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Grounded theory methodology. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 273–285. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C.: Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C.: Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C.: Putting the human back in “Human Research Methodology”: the researcher in mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 4(4), 271–277 (2010a). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382532 CrossRef

Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.): The Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010b)

Teddie, C., Tashakkori, A.: A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Res. Sch. 13(1), 12–28 (2006)

Teddie, C., Tashakkori, A.: Foundations of Mixed Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)

Teddie, C., Tashakkori, A.: Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddie, C. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd edn, pp. 1–41. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)

Webb, E.T., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., Sechrest, L., Grove, J.B.: Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1966)

Title: Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?
Authors: M. Teresa Anguera
Angel Blanco-Villaseñor
José Luis Losada
Pedro Sánchez-Algarra
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
Publication date: 09-02-2018
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Quality & Quantity / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0700-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Two-side face of knowledge building using scientometric analysis

The place attachment experience regarding the disabled people: the typology of coffee shops

Gender as a moderator of the relationship between Facebook® addiction and self-efficacy for learning in a college sample: the mediating effect of deliberative belief

The impact of women’s education and employment on their empowerment: an empirical evidence from household level survey

Empirical evaluation of educational interactive systems

Qualitative analysis of the process of restoring social esteem by the women with multiple sclerosis

Premium Partner