Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

20. Risk Assessment Using Group Elicitation: Case Study on Start-up of a New Logistics System

Authors : Markus Porthin, Tony Rosqvist, Susanna Kunttu

Published in: Elicitation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents a risk assessment for the start-up of a new logistics system within the pulp and paper manufacturer Stora Enso. The risk assessment was realised as a structured expert elicitation workshop using a computerised group support system. Experts representing different parts of the logistics system were invited to a one-day workshop to assess risks concerning the system start-up. The main topics of the workshop were hazard identification, risk estimation and risk control. Each identified risk scenario was assessed with regard to its likelihood and three consequence types related to logistics: timeliness, product quality and information quality. The top priority risks were identified and risk controls were outlined.
The computerised group support system made the workshop more efficient due to the possibility of simultaneous inputs from all participants to a shared environment, versatile processing possibilities of the inputs, voting features with instant results and automated documentation. An essential factor for the success of the workshop was thorough preparation in cooperation between the analysts and the problem owner. Each step of the workshop process was specified and special attention was given to ensure the elicitation questions were clear and unambiguous.
The risk assessment resulted in a prioritised list of realistic risk scenarios for the start-up of the logistics system and control ideas for the most important risks. The results helped the company structure their work to ensure a problem free start-up. In addition, the workshop participants found it valuable to meet representatives from other parts of the logistics chain.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Here the term likelihood is used instead of probability, because the elicitation was done using a 1–5 scale whereas probability per definition is a number between 0 and 1. However, probabilities were used in the definition of the likelihood scale (Table 20.1).
 
Literature
go back to reference Arena M, Arnaboldi M, Azzone G (2010) The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Acc Organ Soc 35:659–675CrossRef Arena M, Arnaboldi M, Azzone G (2010) The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Acc Organ Soc 35:659–675CrossRef
go back to reference Cooke RM (1991) Experts in uncertainty; opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford Cooke RM (1991) Experts in uncertainty; opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford
go back to reference Duijne F, van Aken D, Schouten EG (2008) Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment. Saf Sci 46:245–254CrossRef Duijne F, van Aken D, Schouten EG (2008) Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment. Saf Sci 46:245–254CrossRef
go back to reference Hopkin P (2014) Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London Hopkin P (2014) Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London
go back to reference ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management–principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management–principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference Weatherall A, Hailstones F (2002) Risk identification and analysis using a group support system (GSS). In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences Weatherall A, Hailstones F (2002) Risk identification and analysis using a group support system (GSS). In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences
go back to reference Weatherall A, Nunamaker JF (2000) Getting results with electronic meetings. Chandlers Ford, UK, EMSL Weatherall A, Nunamaker JF (2000) Getting results with electronic meetings. Chandlers Ford, UK, EMSL
Metadata
Title
Risk Assessment Using Group Elicitation: Case Study on Start-up of a New Logistics System
Authors
Markus Porthin
Tony Rosqvist
Susanna Kunttu
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_20