Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Earth Science Informatics 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Research Article

Sensitivity analysis of a GIS-based model: A case study of a large semi-arid catchment

Authors: Manel Mosbahi, Sihem Benabdallah, Mohamed Rached Boussema

Published in: Earth Science Informatics | Issue 3/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Water resource and hydrologic modeling studies are intrinsically related to spatial processes of hydrologic cycle. Due to generally sparse data, and high rainfall variability, the accurate prediction of water availability in complex semi-arid catchment depends to a great extent on how well spatial input data describe realistically the relevant characteristics. The Geographic Information System (GIS) provides the framework within which spatially distributed data are collected and used to prepare model input files. Despite significant recent developments in distributed hydrologic modeling, the over-parameterization is usually a critical issue that can complicate calibration process. Sensitivity analysis methods reducing the number of parameters to be adjusted during calibration are important for simplifying the use of these models. The objective of this paper is to perform a sensitivity analysis for flow in a semi-arid catchment (1,491 km2), located in northwestern of Tunisia, using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The simulation results revealed that among eight selected parameters, curve number (CN2), soil evaporation compensation factor (ESCO), soil available water capacity (SOL_AWC) and threshold depth of water in the shallow aquifer required for return flow (GWQMN) were found to be the most sensitive parameters. Calibration of hydrology, facilitated by the sensitivity analysis, was performed for the period 2001 through 2003. Results of calibration showed that the model accurately predict runoff and performed well with a monthly Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0,78, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0,85 and a percent of bias (PBIAS) equal to −13,22 %.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the prealpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413–430CrossRef Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the prealpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413–430CrossRef
go back to reference Aouissi J, Benabdallah S, Chabaane ZL, Cudennec C (2014) Modelling water quality to improve agricultural practices and land management in a Tunisian catchment using the soil and water assessment tool. J Environ Qual 43:18–25CrossRef Aouissi J, Benabdallah S, Chabaane ZL, Cudennec C (2014) Modelling water quality to improve agricultural practices and land management in a Tunisian catchment using the soil and water assessment tool. J Environ Qual 43:18–25CrossRef
go back to reference Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM, Engel BA (2006) Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(2):513–528CrossRef Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM, Engel BA (2006) Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(2):513–528CrossRef
go back to reference Arnold JG, Williams JR, Maidment DR (1995) Continuous-time water and sediment routing model for large basins. J Hydraul Eng 121(2):171–183CrossRef Arnold JG, Williams JR, Maidment DR (1995) Continuous-time water and sediment routing model for large basins. J Hydraul Eng 121(2):171–183CrossRef
go back to reference Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model Dev J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89 Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model Dev J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89
go back to reference Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration and validation. T ASABE 55(4):1491–1508CrossRef Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration and validation. T ASABE 55(4):1491–1508CrossRef
go back to reference Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Donigian AS, Johanson RC (1997) Hydrological simulation program - FORTRAN (HSPF): User’s manual for release 11. EPA/600/R-97/080. U.S. EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, 755p. Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Donigian AS, Johanson RC (1997) Hydrological simulation program - FORTRAN (HSPF): User’s manual for release 11. EPA/600/R-97/080. U.S. EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, 755p.
go back to reference Bilondi MP, Abbaspour KC, Ghahraman B (2013) Application of three different calibration uncertainty analysis methods in a semi-distributed rainfall-runoff model application. Middle East J Sci Res 15(9):1255–1263 Bilondi MP, Abbaspour KC, Ghahraman B (2013) Application of three different calibration uncertainty analysis methods in a semi-distributed rainfall-runoff model application. Middle East J Sci Res 15(9):1255–1263
go back to reference Bouraoui F, Benabdallah S, Jrad A, Bidoglio G (2005) Application of the SWAT model on the Medjerda river basin (Tunisia). Phys Chem Earth 30:497–507CrossRef Bouraoui F, Benabdallah S, Jrad A, Bidoglio G (2005) Application of the SWAT model on the Medjerda river basin (Tunisia). Phys Chem Earth 30:497–507CrossRef
go back to reference Chahinian N, Tournoud MG, Perrin JL, Picot B (2011) Flow and nutrient transport in intermittent rivers: a modeling case-study on the V’ene river using SWAT 2005. Hydrol Sci J 56:268–287CrossRef Chahinian N, Tournoud MG, Perrin JL, Picot B (2011) Flow and nutrient transport in intermittent rivers: a modeling case-study on the V’ene river using SWAT 2005. Hydrol Sci J 56:268–287CrossRef
go back to reference Chaplot V (2005) Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment and NO3-N loads predictions. J Hydrol 312:207–222CrossRef Chaplot V (2005) Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment and NO3-N loads predictions. J Hydrol 312:207–222CrossRef
go back to reference Chaplot V, Saleh A, Jaynes DB (2005) Effect of the accuracy of spatial rainfall information on the modeling of water, sediment, and NO3–N loads at the watershed level. J Hydrol 312:223–234CrossRef Chaplot V, Saleh A, Jaynes DB (2005) Effect of the accuracy of spatial rainfall information on the modeling of water, sediment, and NO3–N loads at the watershed level. J Hydrol 312:223–234CrossRef
go back to reference Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS (2005) Effect of data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol Process 19(3):621–628CrossRef Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS (2005) Effect of data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol Process 19(3):621–628CrossRef
go back to reference Cho J, Bosch D, Lowrance R, Strickland T, Vellidis G (2009) Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. T Am Soc Agr Biol Eng 52(5):1545–1555 Cho J, Bosch D, Lowrance R, Strickland T, Vellidis G (2009) Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. T Am Soc Agr Biol Eng 52(5):1545–1555
go back to reference Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of streamflow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24:1133–1148CrossRef Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of streamflow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24:1133–1148CrossRef
go back to reference Fadil A, Rhinane H, Kaoukaya A, Kharchaf Y, Bachir OA (2011) Hydrologic modeling of the bouregreg watershed (morocco) using GIS and SWAT model. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:279–289 Fadil A, Rhinane H, Kaoukaya A, Kharchaf Y, Bachir OA (2011) Hydrologic modeling of the bouregreg watershed (morocco) using GIS and SWAT model. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:279–289
go back to reference Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM, Volpi E, Fiori A (2013) Hydrological analysis of the upper Tiber river basin, central Italy: a watershed modelling approach. Hydrol Process 27:2339–2351CrossRef Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM, Volpi E, Fiori A (2013) Hydrological analysis of the upper Tiber river basin, central Italy: a watershed modelling approach. Hydrol Process 27:2339–2351CrossRef
go back to reference Francos A, Elorza FJ, Bouraoui F, Bidoglio G, Galbiati L (2003) Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behavior in hydrological studies at the catchment scale. Real Eng Syst Safe 79(2):205–218CrossRef Francos A, Elorza FJ, Bouraoui F, Bidoglio G, Galbiati L (2003) Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behavior in hydrological studies at the catchment scale. Real Eng Syst Safe 79(2):205–218CrossRef
go back to reference Gao Y, Zhang H, Xu G (2012) Analysis on effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on runoff modeling in xixi watershed of jinjiang basin. Appl Mech Mater 212–213:151–154CrossRef Gao Y, Zhang H, Xu G (2012) Analysis on effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on runoff modeling in xixi watershed of jinjiang basin. Appl Mech Mater 212–213:151–154CrossRef
go back to reference Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. T ASABE 50(4):1211–1250CrossRef Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. T ASABE 50(4):1211–1250CrossRef
go back to reference Gong Y, Shen Z, Liu R, Wang X, Chen T (2010) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. J Hydrol Eng 15(12):1070–1074CrossRef Gong Y, Shen Z, Liu R, Wang X, Chen T (2010) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. J Hydrol Eng 15(12):1070–1074CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrologic Eng 4(2):135–143CrossRef Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrologic Eng 4(2):135–143CrossRef
go back to reference Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop Evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1:96–99CrossRef Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop Evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1:96–99CrossRef
go back to reference Hawkins RH, Ward TJ, Woodward DE, Van Mullem JA (2009) Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. ASCE, Reston Hawkins RH, Ward TJ, Woodward DE, Van Mullem JA (2009) Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. ASCE, Reston
go back to reference Holvoet K, van Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Phys Chem Earth 30:518–526CrossRef Holvoet K, van Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Phys Chem Earth 30:518–526CrossRef
go back to reference Jha M, Gassman WP, Secchi S, Gu R, Arnold J (2004) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment and nutrient predictions. J Am Water Resour As 40(3):811–825CrossRef Jha M, Gassman WP, Secchi S, Gu R, Arnold J (2004) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment and nutrient predictions. J Am Water Resour As 40(3):811–825CrossRef
go back to reference Krause P (2002) Quantifying the impact of land use changes on the water balance of large catchments using the J2000 model. Phys Chem Earth 27:663–673CrossRef Krause P (2002) Quantifying the impact of land use changes on the water balance of large catchments using the J2000 model. Phys Chem Earth 27:663–673CrossRef
go back to reference Krysanova V, Wechsung F, Arnold J, Srinivasan R, Williams J (2000) PIK Report Nr. 69 “SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model), User Manual”, 239 p. Krysanova V, Wechsung F, Arnold J, Srinivasan R, Williams J (2000) PIK Report Nr. 69 “SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model), User Manual”, 239 p.
go back to reference Laflen JM, Lane LJ, Foster JR (1991) WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):34–38 Laflen JM, Lane LJ, Foster JR (1991) WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):34–38
go back to reference Lin S, Jing C, Chaplot V et al (2010) Effect of DEM resolution on SWAT outputs of runoff, sediment and nutrients. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7:4411–4435CrossRef Lin S, Jing C, Chaplot V et al (2010) Effect of DEM resolution on SWAT outputs of runoff, sediment and nutrients. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7:4411–4435CrossRef
go back to reference Liu YB (2004) Development and application of a GIS-based hydrological model for flood prediction and watershed management. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Liu YB (2004) Development and application of a GIS-based hydrological model for flood prediction and watershed management. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
go back to reference Morgan RPC (2001) A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised morga-Morgan finney model. Catena 44(4):305–322CrossRef Morgan RPC (2001) A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised morga-Morgan finney model. Catena 44(4):305–322CrossRef
go back to reference Moriasi DN, Arnold J, Van Liew MW, Binger RL, Harmel RD, Veith T (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 50(3):885–900 Moriasi DN, Arnold J, Van Liew MW, Binger RL, Harmel RD, Veith T (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 50(3):885–900
go back to reference Mosbahi M, Benabdallah S, Boussema MR (2009) Influence des données d’entrée du modèle SWAT sur la quantification des pertes en sol dans un bassin versant semi-aride en Tunisie. Le J De L’eau L’Environ 13–14:84–91 Mosbahi M, Benabdallah S, Boussema MR (2009) Influence des données d’entrée du modèle SWAT sur la quantification des pertes en sol dans un bassin versant semi-aride en Tunisie. Le J De L’eau L’Environ 13–14:84–91
go back to reference Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil water assessment tool theoretical document, version 2000, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, Texas, 506 p Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil water assessment tool theoretical document, version 2000, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, Texas, 506 p
go back to reference Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and Water Assessment Tool, theoretical documentation version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Texas Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and Water Assessment Tool, theoretical documentation version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Texas
go back to reference Ouessar MP, Bruggeman A, Abdelli F, Mohtar R (2006) Use of SWAT model for the assessment of land use changes in an arid watershed of Southeast Tunisia. 14th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Water Management and Soil Conservation in Semi-Arid Environments. Marrakech, Morocco, May 14–19, 2006 Ouessar MP, Bruggeman A, Abdelli F, Mohtar R (2006) Use of SWAT model for the assessment of land use changes in an arid watershed of Southeast Tunisia. 14th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Water Management and Soil Conservation in Semi-Arid Environments. Marrakech, Morocco, May 14–19, 2006
go back to reference Pilgrim DH, Chapman TG, Doran DG (1988) Problems of rainfall-runoff modeling in arid and semi-arid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33(4):379–400CrossRef Pilgrim DH, Chapman TG, Doran DG (1988) Problems of rainfall-runoff modeling in arid and semi-arid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33(4):379–400CrossRef
go back to reference Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, New York Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Santhi C, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Williams JR (2006) A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas. Environ Model Softw 21:1141–1157CrossRef Santhi C, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Williams JR (2006) A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas. Environ Model Softw 21:1141–1157CrossRef
go back to reference Schuol J, Abbaspour KC (2007) Using monthly weather statistics to generate daily data in a SWAT model application to west africa. Ecol Model 201:301–311CrossRef Schuol J, Abbaspour KC (2007) Using monthly weather statistics to generate daily data in a SWAT model application to west africa. Ecol Model 201:301–311CrossRef
go back to reference Sellami H, La Jeunesse I, Benabdallah S, Baghdadi N, Vanclooster M (2013) Uncertainty analysis in model parameters regionalization: a case study involving the SWAT model in Mediterranean catchments (southern France). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10:4951–5011CrossRef Sellami H, La Jeunesse I, Benabdallah S, Baghdadi N, Vanclooster M (2013) Uncertainty analysis in model parameters regionalization: a case study involving the SWAT model in Mediterranean catchments (southern France). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10:4951–5011CrossRef
go back to reference Singh VP, Woolhiser DA (2002) Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. J Hydrol Eng 7:270–292CrossRef Singh VP, Woolhiser DA (2002) Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. J Hydrol Eng 7:270–292CrossRef
go back to reference Spruill CA, Workman SR, Taraba JL (2000) Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. T ASAE 43(6):1431–1439CrossRef Spruill CA, Workman SR, Taraba JL (2000) Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. T ASAE 43(6):1431–1439CrossRef
go back to reference USDA-SCS (1972) National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology Section 4, Chapter 4-10. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC USDA-SCS (1972) National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology Section 4, Chapter 4-10. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC
go back to reference Van Griensven A, Francos A, Bauwens W (2002) Sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. Water Sci Technol 45(5):321–328 Van Griensven A, Francos A, Bauwens W (2002) Sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. Water Sci Technol 45(5):321–328
go back to reference Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23CrossRef Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23CrossRef
go back to reference Westervelt JD (2002) Geographic information systems and agent-based modelling. In: Gimblett HR (ed) Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–103 Westervelt JD (2002) Geographic information systems and agent-based modelling. In: Gimblett HR (ed) Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–103
go back to reference White KL, Chaubey I (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J Am Water Resour As 41(5):1077–1089CrossRef White KL, Chaubey I (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J Am Water Resour As 41(5):1077–1089CrossRef
go back to reference Williams JR, Berndt HD (1977) Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 20:1100–1104CrossRef Williams JR, Berndt HD (1977) Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 20:1100–1104CrossRef
go back to reference Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD (1989) AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44:168–173 Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD (1989) AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44:168–173
Metadata
Title
Sensitivity analysis of a GIS-based model: A case study of a large semi-arid catchment
Authors
Manel Mosbahi
Sihem Benabdallah
Mohamed Rached Boussema
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Earth Science Informatics / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1865-0473
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0481
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0176-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Earth Science Informatics 3/2015 Go to the issue

Premium Partner