Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Setting the Stage: Board Busyness as a Matter of Modern Banking Context

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter provides readers some fundamental knowledge about the multiple directorships of boards and directors related theories which include the reputation and busyness hypotheses. Multiple directorships are not only observed as a positive indicator for the benefits of directors but also as a negative sign for the risks of directors being stretched thin. The reputation and busyness hypotheses explain such positive and negative signs of board busyness, respectively. In addition, researchers and students can understand why board busyness could be a matter of modern banking context and update some empirical evidence on the effects of multiple board appointments of directors in the banking sector.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Adams, R., and H. Mehran, 2003. Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies?. SSRN. Adams, R., and H. Mehran, 2003. Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies?. SSRN.
go back to reference Adams, R.B., and H. Mehran. 2012. Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 21 (2): 243–267.CrossRef Adams, R.B., and H. Mehran. 2012. Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 21 (2): 243–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Ahn, S., P. Jiraporn, and Y.S. Kim. 2010. Multiple directorships and acquirer returns. Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (9): 2011–2026.CrossRef Ahn, S., P. Jiraporn, and Y.S. Kim. 2010. Multiple directorships and acquirer returns. Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (9): 2011–2026.CrossRef
go back to reference Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425–455.CrossRef Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Andres, D.P., and E. Vallelado. 2008. Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance 32 (12): 2570–2580.CrossRef Andres, D.P., and E. Vallelado. 2008. Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance 32 (12): 2570–2580.CrossRef
go back to reference Bai, G., and E. Elyasiani. 2013. Bank stability and managerial compensation. Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (3): 799–813.CrossRef Bai, G., and E. Elyasiani. 2013. Bank stability and managerial compensation. Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (3): 799–813.CrossRef
go back to reference Beasley, M.S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review 71: 443–465. Beasley, M.S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review 71: 443–465.
go back to reference Booth, J.R., and D.N. Deli. 1996. Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (1): 81–104.CrossRef Booth, J.R., and D.N. Deli. 1996. Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (1): 81–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Booth, J.R., M.M. Cornett, and H. Tehranian. 2002. Boards of directors, ownership, and regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance 26 (10): 1973–1996.CrossRef Booth, J.R., M.M. Cornett, and H. Tehranian. 2002. Boards of directors, ownership, and regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance 26 (10): 1973–1996.CrossRef
go back to reference Brickley, J.A., J.S. Linck, and J.L. Coles. 1999. What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 52 (3): 341–377.CrossRef Brickley, J.A., J.S. Linck, and J.L. Coles. 1999. What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 52 (3): 341–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, W.O., and M.T. Maloney. 1999. Exit, voice, and the role of corporate directors: Evidence from acquisition performance. Available at SSRN 160308. Brown, W.O., and M.T. Maloney. 1999. Exit, voice, and the role of corporate directors: Evidence from acquisition performance. Available at SSRN 160308.
go back to reference Burt, R.S. 1997. A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks 19 (4): 355–373.CrossRef Burt, R.S. 1997. A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks 19 (4): 355–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Carpenter, M.A., and J.D. Westphal. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 639–660.CrossRef Carpenter, M.A., and J.D. Westphal. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 639–660.CrossRef
go back to reference Cashman, G.D., S.L. Gillan, and C. Jun. 2012. Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (12): 3248–3259.CrossRef Cashman, G.D., S.L. Gillan, and C. Jun. 2012. Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (12): 3248–3259.CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravarty, S., and L.G. Rutherford. 2017. Do busy directors influence the cost of debt? An examination through the lens of takeover vulnerability. Journal of Corporate Finance 43: 429–443.CrossRef Chakravarty, S., and L.G. Rutherford. 2017. Do busy directors influence the cost of debt? An examination through the lens of takeover vulnerability. Journal of Corporate Finance 43: 429–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Chou, T.K., and H.L. Feng. 2018. Multiple directorships and the value of cash holdings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, pp. 1–37. Chou, T.K., and H.L. Feng. 2018. Multiple directorships and the value of cash holdings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, pp. 1–37.
go back to reference Coles, J.L., N.D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329–356.CrossRef Coles, J.L., N.D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329–356.CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, E., and H. Uzun. 2012. Directors with a full plate: The impact of busy directors on bank risk. Managerial Finance 38 (6): 571–586.CrossRef Cooper, E., and H. Uzun. 2012. Directors with a full plate: The impact of busy directors on bank risk. Managerial Finance 38 (6): 571–586.CrossRef
go back to reference Core, J.E., R.W. Holthausen, and D.F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3): 371–406.CrossRef Core, J.E., R.W. Holthausen, and D.F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3): 371–406.CrossRef
go back to reference Cornett, M.M., J.J. McNutt, and H. Tehranian. 2009. Corporate governance and earnings management at large US bank holding companies. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (4): 412–430.CrossRef Cornett, M.M., J.J. McNutt, and H. Tehranian. 2009. Corporate governance and earnings management at large US bank holding companies. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (4): 412–430.CrossRef
go back to reference Cotter, J.F., A. Shivdasani, and M. Zenner. 1997. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics 43 (2): 195–218.CrossRef Cotter, J.F., A. Shivdasani, and M. Zenner. 1997. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics 43 (2): 195–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57–74.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Elyasiani, E., and L. Zhang. 2015. Bank holding company performance, risk, and “busy” board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance 60: 239–251.CrossRef Elyasiani, E., and L. Zhang. 2015. Bank holding company performance, risk, and “busy” board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance 60: 239–251.CrossRef
go back to reference Falato, A., D. Kadyrzhanova, and U. Lel. 2014. Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? Journal of Financial Economics 113 (3): 404–426.CrossRef Falato, A., D. Kadyrzhanova, and U. Lel. 2014. Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? Journal of Financial Economics 113 (3): 404–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Faleye, O., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2011. The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics 101 (1): 160–181.CrossRef Faleye, O., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2011. The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics 101 (1): 160–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288–307.CrossRef Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288–307.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and M.C. Jensen. 1983a. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301–325.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and M.C. Jensen. 1983a. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301–325.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1983b. Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 327–349.CrossRef ———. 1983b. Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 327–349.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferris, S.P., M. Jagannathan, and A.C. Pritchard. 2003. Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance 58 (3): 1087–1111.CrossRef Ferris, S.P., M. Jagannathan, and A.C. Pritchard. 2003. Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance 58 (3): 1087–1111.CrossRef
go back to reference Fich, E.M., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance 61 (2): 689–724.CrossRef Fich, E.M., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance 61 (2): 689–724.CrossRef
go back to reference Field, L., M. Lowry, and A. Mkrtchyan. 2013. Are busy boards detrimental? Journal of Financial Economics 109 (1): 63–82.CrossRef Field, L., M. Lowry, and A. Mkrtchyan. 2013. Are busy boards detrimental? Journal of Financial Economics 109 (1): 63–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Forbes, D.P., and F.J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 489–505.CrossRef Forbes, D.P., and F.J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 489–505.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilson, S.C. 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 355–387.CrossRef Gilson, S.C. 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 355–387.CrossRef
go back to reference Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.CrossRef Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.CrossRef
go back to reference Harford, J. 2003. Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (1): 51–83.CrossRef Harford, J. 2003. Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (1): 51–83.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, I.C., and K. Shimizu. 2004. Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies 41 (5): 775–798.CrossRef Harris, I.C., and K. Shimizu. 2004. Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies 41 (5): 775–798.CrossRef
go back to reference Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986–1014.CrossRef Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986–1014.CrossRef
go back to reference Haunschild, P.R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 564–592.CrossRef Haunschild, P.R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 564–592.CrossRef
go back to reference Haunschild, P.R., and C.M. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 815–844.CrossRef Haunschild, P.R., and C.M. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 815–844.CrossRef
go back to reference Hauser, R. 2018. Busy directors and firm performance: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 128 (1): 16–37.CrossRef Hauser, R. 2018. Busy directors and firm performance: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 128 (1): 16–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Hillman, A.J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 383–396.CrossRef Hillman, A.J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 383–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackling, B., and S. Johl. 2009. Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (4): 492–509.CrossRef Jackling, B., and S. Johl. 2009. Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (4): 492–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, D., and F. Fang. 2014. CEO networks and bank risk taking. Banking and Finance Review. Jackson, D., and F. Fang. 2014. CEO networks and bank risk taking. Banking and Finance Review.
go back to reference Jiraporn, P., Y.S. Kim, and W.N. Davidson III. 2008. Multiple directorships and corporate diversification. Journal of Empirical Finance 15 (3): 418–435.CrossRef Jiraporn, P., Y.S. Kim, and W.N. Davidson III. 2008. Multiple directorships and corporate diversification. Journal of Empirical Finance 15 (3): 418–435.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiraporn, P., M. Singh, and C.I. Lee. 2009. Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (5): 819–828.CrossRef Jiraporn, P., M. Singh, and C.I. Lee. 2009. Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (5): 819–828.CrossRef
go back to reference John, T.A., and K. John. 1993. Top-management compensation and capital structure. The Journal of Finance 48 (3): 949–974.CrossRef John, T.A., and K. John. 1993. Top-management compensation and capital structure. The Journal of Finance 48 (3): 949–974.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S.N., and D. Reishus. 1990. Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 389–410.CrossRef Kaplan, S.N., and D. Reishus. 1990. Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 389–410.CrossRef
go back to reference Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics 41 (1): 275–304.CrossRef Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics 41 (1): 275–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Kutubi, S.S., K. Ahmed, and H. Khan. 2018. Bank performance and risk-taking—Does directors’ busyness matter? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 50: 184–199.CrossRef Kutubi, S.S., K. Ahmed, and H. Khan. 2018. Bank performance and risk-taking—Does directors’ busyness matter? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 50: 184–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Lahsasna, A. 2010. Introduction to fatwa, Shariah supervision & governance in Islamic finance. CERT Publications Sdn. Bhd. Lahsasna, A. 2010. Introduction to fatwa, Shariah supervision & governance in Islamic finance. CERT Publications Sdn. Bhd.
go back to reference Lang, J.R., and D.E. Lockhart. 1990. Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns. Academy of Management Journal 33 (1): 106–128.CrossRef Lang, J.R., and D.E. Lockhart. 1990. Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns. Academy of Management Journal 33 (1): 106–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Lei, A.C., and J. Deng. 2014. Do multiple directorships increase firm value? Evidence from independent directors in Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 25 (2): 121–181.CrossRef Lei, A.C., and J. Deng. 2014. Do multiple directorships increase firm value? Evidence from independent directors in Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 25 (2): 121–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Linck, J.S., J.M. Netter, and T. Yang. 2009. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. The Review of Financial Studies 22 (8): 3287–3328.CrossRef Linck, J.S., J.M. Netter, and T. Yang. 2009. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. The Review of Financial Studies 22 (8): 3287–3328.CrossRef
go back to reference Mace, M. 1986. Directors: Myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Mace, M. 1986. Directors: Myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Macey, J., and M. O’hara. 2003. The corporate governance of banks. Economic Policy Review, 9(1). Macey, J., and M. O’hara. 2003. The corporate governance of banks. Economic Policy Review, 9(1).
go back to reference Mehran, H., and L. Mollineaux. 2012. Corporate governance of financial institutions. Annual Review of Financial Economics 4 (1): 215–232.CrossRef Mehran, H., and L. Mollineaux. 2012. Corporate governance of financial institutions. Annual Review of Financial Economics 4 (1): 215–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Mehran, H., A. Morrison, and J. Shapiro. 2011. Corporate governance and banks: What have we learned from the financial crisis?. FRB of New York Staff Report. Mehran, H., A. Morrison, and J. Shapiro. 2011. Corporate governance and banks: What have we learned from the financial crisis?. FRB of New York Staff Report.
go back to reference Miwa, Y., and J.M. Ramseyer. 2000. Corporate governance in transitional economies: lessons from the prewar Japanese cotton textile industry. The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 171–203.CrossRef Miwa, Y., and J.M. Ramseyer. 2000. Corporate governance in transitional economies: lessons from the prewar Japanese cotton textile industry. The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 171–203.CrossRef
go back to reference Mizruchi, M.S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 271–298.CrossRef Mizruchi, M.S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 271–298.CrossRef
go back to reference O’hara, M. 1983. A dynamic theory of the banking firm. The Journal of Finance 38 (1): 127–140.CrossRef O’hara, M. 1983. A dynamic theory of the banking firm. The Journal of Finance 38 (1): 127–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Palmer, D.A., P.D. Jennings, and X. Zhou. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 100–131. Palmer, D.A., P.D. Jennings, and X. Zhou. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 100–131.
go back to reference Pathan, S. 2009. Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (7): 1340–1350.CrossRef Pathan, S. 2009. Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (7): 1340–1350.CrossRef
go back to reference Pathan, S., and R. Faff. 2013. Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (5): 1573–1589.CrossRef Pathan, S., and R. Faff. 2013. Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (5): 1573–1589.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 218–228. Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 218–228.
go back to reference Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
go back to reference Pi, L., and S.G. Timme. 1993. Corporate control and bank efficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance 17 (2–3): 515–530.CrossRef Pi, L., and S.G. Timme. 1993. Corporate control and bank efficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance 17 (2–3): 515–530.CrossRef
go back to reference Safiullah, M., and A. Shamsuddin. 2019. Risk-adjusted efficiency and corporate governance: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Corporate Finance 55: 105–140.CrossRef Safiullah, M., and A. Shamsuddin. 2019. Risk-adjusted efficiency and corporate governance: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Corporate Finance 55: 105–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Sharma, V. 2011. Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (4): 1001–1015.CrossRef Sharma, V. 2011. Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (4): 1001–1015.CrossRef
go back to reference Shivdasani, A. 1993. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 (1–3): 167–198.CrossRef Shivdasani, A. 1993. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 (1–3): 167–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Shivdasani, A., and D. Yermack. 1999. CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance 54 (5): 1829–1853.CrossRef Shivdasani, A., and D. Yermack. 1999. CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance 54 (5): 1829–1853.CrossRef
go back to reference Sierra, G.E., E. Talmor, and J.S. Wallace. 2006. An examination of multiple governance forces within bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Services Research 29 (2): 105–123.CrossRef Sierra, G.E., E. Talmor, and J.S. Wallace. 2006. An examination of multiple governance forces within bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Services Research 29 (2): 105–123.CrossRef
go back to reference Toufik, B.B. 2015. The Role of Shari ah Supervisory Board (SSB) in Ensuring Good Corporate Governance Practice in Islamic Banks. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences 2 (2): 109–118. Toufik, B.B. 2015. The Role of Shari ah Supervisory Board (SSB) in Ensuring Good Corporate Governance Practice in Islamic Banks. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences 2 (2): 109–118.
go back to reference Trinh, V.Q., M. Elnahass, and A. Salama. 2021. Board busyness and new insights into alternative bank dividends models. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 56 (4): 1289–1328.CrossRef Trinh, V.Q., M. Elnahass, and A. Salama. 2021. Board busyness and new insights into alternative bank dividends models. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 56 (4): 1289–1328.CrossRef
go back to reference Vafeas, N. 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1): 113–142.CrossRef Vafeas, N. 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1): 113–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Williamson, O.E. 1984. Corporate governance. The Yale Law Journal 93: 1197.CrossRef Williamson, O.E. 1984. Corporate governance. The Yale Law Journal 93: 1197.CrossRef
go back to reference Wintoki, M.B., J.S. Linck, and J.M. Netter. 2012. Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 105 (3): 581–606.CrossRef Wintoki, M.B., J.S. Linck, and J.M. Netter. 2012. Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 105 (3): 581–606.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajac, E.J., and J.D. Westphal 1996, August. Director reputation, CEO/Board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1996, No. 1, pp. 254–258). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Zajac, E.J., and J.D. Westphal 1996, August. Director reputation, CEO/Board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1996, No. 1, pp. 254–258). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
go back to reference Zhang, E.J. 2016. Preoccupied independent directors. Working paper, UNSW Business School. Zhang, E.J. 2016. Preoccupied independent directors. Working paper, UNSW Business School.
Metadata
Title
Setting the Stage: Board Busyness as a Matter of Modern Banking Context
Author
Vu Quang Trinh
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89228-9_3