Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Ethics and Information Technology
Published in: Ethics and Information Technology 1/2019

25-09-2018 | Original Paper

Special operations remote advise and assist: an ethics assessment

Author: Deane-Peter Baker

Published in: Ethics and Information Technology | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

United States Army Special Forces who deployed to Iraq in mid-2014, and who were seeking to help Iraqi forces to combat Islamic State (ISIL) faced a considerable challenge: how could a force of fewer than 50 operators provide guidance and support to their Iraqi allies (mostly Iraqi Special Forces units who had been trained by U.S. forces prior to the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq in 2011) while also keeping in line with Washington’s policy of seeking to avoid any possibility of combat casualties among deployed U.S. Special Forces? Their solution to this dilemma came to be dubbed ‘Remote Advise and Assist’ (RAA). By cobbling together a system of voice and text communications, cameras, interactive maps and mobile handsets, these Special Forces personnel found they could ‘virtually accompany’ their Iraqi partners into hot zones where U.S. boots on the ground were forbidden. This approach seems to have been extremely successful, but potentially raises a range of ethical concerns. Against the backdrop of a general account of the ethics of employing surrogate forces, this paper explores the ethical questions raised by the practice of ‘Remote Advise and Assist’.
next article Augmented reality, augmented ethics: who has the right to augment a particular physical space?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
For example, Paul W. Kahn, Director of the Orville H. Schell Jr. Center for International Human Rights, has argued that ‘riskless warfare’ is at heart “a violation of the fundamental principle that establishes the internal morality of warfare: self-defense within conditions of reciprocal imposition of risk”(Kahn 2002).
 
2
This is not to say that RAA does not potentially pose significant challenges of a different nature. For example, Peter Lee points out that the advent of RPAs has posed a very significant challenge to the self-identity and ethos of aircrew. He reports that in numerous interviews with RAF Predator or Reaper operators he has repeatedly asked the question ‘When asked, how do you describe what you do in the RAF?’ He reports that “Those who transferred from piloting another aircraft type—Tornado, Harrier, Hercules—gave almost identical answers that can be summarized as: ‘I am a pilot who now flies the Reaper’, as opposed to, ‘I am a Reaper pilot’ ” (Lee 2012). Given the strong ethos of physical strength and endurance, physical courage and martial skill associated with SOF it seems at least worth considering the possibility that if RAA becomes a growing part of the SOF role this might come to threaten that self-identity among SOF personnel.
 
3
For an in-depth discussion of contingent pacifism see Alexandra and Dobos (2018).
 
4
Even if one is willing to accept contingent pacifism there is another, unexpected challenge—as I have pointed out elsewhere (Baker 2015), there is no reason that this kind of reductive argument could not lead just as easily to contingent realism.
 
5
Email communication with the author, 28/03/2017.
 
6
See Bart (2014).
 
7
I am grateful to LTCOL Eric Roitsch, US Army Special Forces, for a very helpful discussion which helped shape this part of the paper.
 
8
As I explain elsewhere, Feaver is using these terms in the technical sense of principal-agent theory: “‘Working’ is relatively unproblematic—an agent is working when she is diligently pursuing the tasks assigned to her by her superior. In the case of the military, the military is working when it diligently seeks to fulfil the wishes of its civilian overseers. ‘Shirking’, on the other hand, requires more exploration. In the everyday sense, shirking is simply failing to work, and is often associated with laziness and general inactivity. While this may well sometimes apply to the military, it is not however the central meaning of the term as used in agency theory. For the military may be vigorously pursuing military and/or policy goals, but it will still be shirking if those goals do not correspond with the desires of the civilian principal.”
 
9
Major General Gregory J. Lengyel, opening remarks to the “Resistance and Resilience” Seminar (Baltic Defence College, Tartu, Estonia, 4 November 2014). Quoted in Christman (2017).
 
Literature
Alexandra, A., & Dobos, N. (forthcoming 2018). The new pacifism: Just war in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Ansaro, P. M. (2013). The labor of surveillance and bureaucratized killing: New subjectivities of military drone operators. Social Semiotics, 23(2), 198.
Baggiarini, B. (2015). Drone warfare and the limits of sacrifice. Journal of International Political Theory, 11(1), 128–144, 2015.CrossRef
Baker, D. P. (2015). Epistemic uncertainty and excusable wars. The Philosophical Forum, 46(1), 55–69.CrossRef
Calhoun, L. (2011). The end of military virtue. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 23(3), 377–386.CrossRef
Christman, W. L. (2017). Enhancing the Global SOF Enterprise: A Consortium Concept. JSOU Press Occasional Paper (p. 1). Tampa: Joint Special Operations University Press.
Dillon, P. J. (1992). Ethical Decision making on the battlefield: An analysis of training for U.S. Army Special Forces. Master of Military Art and Science Thesis, (p. 3). US Army Command and General Staff College.
Feaver, P. D. (2003). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kahn, P. W. (2002). The paradox of riskless warfare. Faculty Scholarship Series, 326, 4.
Kant, I. (1993) [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. (J. W. Ellington, Trans.) (pp. 364–423). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kilpatrick, J. (2015). Drones and the martial virtue courage. Journal of Military Ethics, 14(3–4), 202.CrossRef
Lee, P. (2012). Remoteness, risk and aircrew ethos. Air Power Review, 15(1), 12.
Moran, J. (2016). Assessing SOF transparency and accountability: The use of special operations forces by the UK, US, Australia and Canada. London: Remote Control.
Thielenhaus, C., Traeger, P., & Roles, E. (2016). Reaching forward in the war against the Islamic State. Prism, 6(3), 99.
Walsh, J. I., & Schulzke, M. (2015). The ethics of drone strikes: Does reducing the cost of conflict encourage war? (p. 13). Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute and US Army War College Press.
Metadata
Title
Special operations remote advise and assist: an ethics assessment
Author
Deane-Peter Baker
Publication date
25-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Ethics and Information Technology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1388-1957
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8439
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9483-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Ethics and Information Technology 1/2019 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Algorithmic paranoia: the temporal governmentality of predictive policing

Original Paper

Augmented reality, augmented ethics: who has the right to augment a particular physical space?

Original Paper

Advancing the ethical use of digital data in human research: challenges and strategies to promote ethical practice

Original Paper

The value alignment problem: a geometric approach

Original Paper

P2P surveillance in the global village

Premium Partner

    Image Credits