State of the Art for Evaluation of Inventive Design Solution Concepts

Several attempts have been made to define inventive design by both scientific and artistic terms. Inventive design is a thought-provoking engineering activity associated to all areas of human life. It follows the laws of science, fulfill the requirements for realization of a solution concept and needs professional integrity and responsibility. It is an attempt to possible realization of concepts by meeting particular constraints [2]. Inventive design is acquisition of knowledge and capitalization [7]. Inventiveness here is in terms of invention which means “the action of creating or designing (something that has not existed before), typically a process or device” [8]. T. Chikatham one of the authors [2] compared inventive design and routine design as given in Table 1: In Inventive Design, the contradicted features of a situation or problem by TRIZ tools is highlighted and these contradictions are then considered as a key source to solve problem [9].

The first article on TRIZ was by Genrich Altshuller in 1956 [10]. Its application has been observed in various fields like technic, management, sociology, education and marketing [11]. During 80s Altshuller work developed into a set of tools to carryout systematic creativity called TRIZ “Theory of inventive problem solving” and in 90s to OTSM “General theory of strong thinking” and ZhSTL “Lifetime strategy for creative person” [10]. The research progress in field of TRIZ as a result gave rise to organized data in order to understand TRIZ and its extension as IDM (Inventive Design Method).

The Inventive Design Method is the output of many years of research by INSA Strasbourg France [12]. With the intention to build an abstract model with initial problem formulation using the theoretical approach of TRIZ C. Zanni Merk [7] proposed an ontology for computer based innovation. In further progress of TRIZ, Francois Rousselot [13] proposed an important formal definition of contradiction and its possible applications in inventive design with respect to the TRIZ fundamentals. Following the previous work the extension of TRIZ called inventive design method IDM proposed and developed and framed into a computer software named STEPS by INSA Strasbourg [14]. Currently there are different TRIZ based computer-aided innovation (CAI) systems, which support design phase inventive design [15]. These CAI systems provide suitable tools for designer to generate solution concepts and their rankings on the basis of multi criteria decision methods but still lack in evaluation of generated solution concepts. Keeping all these in consideration our focus will be regarding need of a confident evaluation model along with specific criteria (quality, maintainability etc.) of solution concepts, which come from the previous steps of inventive design using different TRIZ tools and methods.

Inventive design can be subdivided into four main steps shown in Fig. 1: initial situation analysis, contradiction formulation, solution concept generation, and solution concept selection or evaluation of solution concepts [5].

The primary steps of inventive design development known by the term ‘concept development’. Concept development contains a sequences of divergent steps and convergent steps, completed at different levels of solution concept [16]. In concept development, generation of solution concepts belongs to divergent steps while evaluation and selection of the best solution concepts are related to convergent steps.

A concept of any product is a predicted representation of the shape of product, its working standards and technology. It is a well explained definition of product characteristics that how the product will satisfy the voice of customer. Generally a concept is considered as a sketch or 3D model following a detail description. The success of any product depends on the selection of best concept. Success here means the commercialization of the quality product.

With reference to inventive design solution concepts, the arrival of TRIZ and its extension to IDM has been considered as a systematic methodology to produce set of solution concepts as compared to earlier unstructured methods [17]. As mentioned in the introduction that a solution concept should be describe in a concrete way with a description template. The description template for solution concept characterizes into five categories [13]. These five categories are: 1) an abstract of idea describing the general properties, all the relevant performing functions, extra note, merits/demerits. 2) A complete explanation of problem model (in which contradiction contain action parameter and evaluation parameter or SU-field model) and solution model (using tools like inventive principle, inventive standard, physical effect database). 3) Possible outcomes, trends and developments from the outcomes of related projects in term of hypothesizes and laws of technical systems evolution, 4) keeping the objective of the project point out all the inacceptable conditions. 5) A sketch of the solution concept, which is synthesized by model of solution and hypothesis of solution concept. After the set of solution concepts are identified and ranked using Pugh matrix by the inventive design methodology for the next step to select the solution concept to develop or solution concept evaluation.

The evaluation phase of solution concept is the key challenge for the designers, as well as the customers. Particularly in solution concept selection phase qualitative methods are used to evaluate the generated solution concepts. Although, to facilitate the inventive design solution concepts evaluation steps, there are many methodologies used by designers and customers [14, 19]. However, these methodologies are generally described in a qualitative, declarative manner, which does not allow to choose the best solution concept neither to have a shareable formal or visual representation between partners of the project. In inventive design the process stops after ranking of solution concepts and final selection of solution concept to develop depends on R&D or the top management of company. That is why, the absence of a confident model does not allow evaluation and compare competing concepts thereby making a challenge for researchers and designers to develop a confident model for evaluation of inventive design solution concepts.

In this section, an overview of the most prominent research work regarding inventive design solution concept is given in the Table 2. The purpose of this research is to highlight the need for inventive design solution concepts evaluation model.

Not every method is used in every inventive design process. Only those that seem appropriate for the problem situation and that contribute to a successful outcome are used. Based on the most relevant and latest research articles considered in this state of the art, we clearly identify the research gap regarding evaluation of inventive design solution concepts. More clearly stating that there is not any certain tool, model etc., for evaluation of solution concepts in inventive design to suggest a specific solution in the solution concept building phase or solution evaluation phase as showing our position in Fig. 1.