Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Review of Industrial Organization 2/2018

22-11-2017

Strategic Interaction in a Repeated Game: Evidence from NCAA Football Recruiting

Authors: Brad R. Humphreys, Jane E. Ruseski

Published in: Review of Industrial Organization | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We analyze decisions to comply or cheat on NCAA recruiting regulations in the context of repeated interactions. Teams possess private information about resources devoted to football programs, recruiting effort made by rival programs, and rival program behavior. We test for evidence that the behavior of NCAA Division IA football programs conforms to predictions from repeated game theoretic models using panel data from IA football over the period 1978–2005. We find anecdotal and empirical support for strategic interaction. The presence of in-conference rivals under NCAA sanctions increases the probability of a team being placed under future sanctions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
NCAA regulations restrict athletes to 4 years of competition, except in exceptional circumstances. NCAA student athletes can practice for one season without appearing in contests—a process that is called “red shirting”—so athletes often spend 5 years attending the college or university with which they sign.
 
2
It is worth noting that member institutions compete vigorously on the coaching component of the input market where there are no agreements about the compensation packages that can be offered to the coaching staff.
 
3
The 2014–2015 football post-season featured the first ever College Football Playoff. The total payout to the Power Five conferences was: $83.5 million to the ACC; $58 million to the Big 12; $60 million to the Big Ten; $60 million to the Pac-12; and $87.5 million to the SEC.
 
4
The NCAA penalty cancelled only all SMU home games, in 1988 but the university shut down the football program for the entire 1988 season.
 
5
This is a simplification of the process. From 1992 through 2013 a group of post-season bowl games called the Bowl Championship Series Series (BCS) matched the highest ranked teams at the end of the season in a group of high profile bowl games. The winner of one of these games was crowned the “National Champion”; however, this is was not a post-season tournament. The BCS was replaced with a four-team playoff in 2014.
 
6
The ACC, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 10/12, and SEC, and their immediate predecessors, the Big 8, SWC, and Big East.
 
Literature
go back to reference Apesteguia, J., Dufwenberg, M., & Selten, R. (2007). Blowing the whistle. Economic Theory, 31(1), 143–166.CrossRef Apesteguia, J., Dufwenberg, M., & Selten, R. (2007). Blowing the whistle. Economic Theory, 31(1), 143–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Brenner, S. (2009). An empirical study of the European corporate leniency program. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(6), 639–645.CrossRef Brenner, S. (2009). An empirical study of the European corporate leniency program. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(6), 639–645.CrossRef
go back to reference Depken, C. A., & Wilson, D. P. (2004). Institutional change in the NCAA and competitive balance in intercollegiate football. In J. Fizel & R. D. Fort (Eds.), Economics of college sports (pp. 179–210). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. Depken, C. A., & Wilson, D. P. (2004). Institutional change in the NCAA and competitive balance in intercollegiate football. In J. Fizel & R. D. Fort (Eds.), Economics of college sports (pp. 179–210). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
go back to reference Depken, C. A., & Wilson, D. P. (2006). NCAA enforcement and competitive balance in college football. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 826–845.CrossRef Depken, C. A., & Wilson, D. P. (2006). NCAA enforcement and competitive balance in college football. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 826–845.CrossRef
go back to reference DuMond, J. M., Lynch, A. K., & Platania, J. (2008). An economic model of the college football recruiting process. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(1), 67–87.CrossRef DuMond, J. M., Lynch, A. K., & Platania, J. (2008). An economic model of the college football recruiting process. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(1), 67–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Eckard, E. W. (1998). The NCAA cartel and competitive balance in college football. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(3), 347–369.CrossRef Eckard, E. W. (1998). The NCAA cartel and competitive balance in college football. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(3), 347–369.CrossRef
go back to reference Fizel, J., & Brown, C. A. (2014). Assessing the determinants of NCAA football violations. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3), 277–290.CrossRef Fizel, J., & Brown, C. A. (2014). Assessing the determinants of NCAA football violations. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3), 277–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Fleisher, A. A., Shughart, W. F., Tollison, R. D., & Goff, B. L. (1988). Crime or punishment?: Enforcement of the NCAA football cartel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 10(4), 433–451.CrossRef Fleisher, A. A., Shughart, W. F., Tollison, R. D., & Goff, B. L. (1988). Crime or punishment?: Enforcement of the NCAA football cartel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 10(4), 433–451.CrossRef
go back to reference Fleisher, A. A., Goff, B. L., & Tollison, R. D. (1992). The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A study in cartel behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fleisher, A. A., Goff, B. L., & Tollison, R. D. (1992). The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A study in cartel behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Harris, J. S. (2015). The demand for student–athlete labor and the supply of violations in the NCAA. Marquette Sports Law Review, 26, 411–432. Harris, J. S. (2015). The demand for student–athlete labor and the supply of violations in the NCAA. Marquette Sports Law Review, 26, 411–432.
go back to reference Humphreys, B. R., & Ruseski, J. E. (2009). Monitoring cartel behavior and stability: Evidence from NCAA football. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 720–735. Humphreys, B. R., & Ruseski, J. E. (2009). Monitoring cartel behavior and stability: Evidence from NCAA football. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 720–735.
go back to reference Spence, M. (1978). Tacit co-ordination and imperfect information. Canadian Journal of Economics, 11(3), 490–505.CrossRef Spence, M. (1978). Tacit co-ordination and imperfect information. Canadian Journal of Economics, 11(3), 490–505.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Strategic Interaction in a Repeated Game: Evidence from NCAA Football Recruiting
Authors
Brad R. Humphreys
Jane E. Ruseski
Publication date
22-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Review of Industrial Organization / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0889-938X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7160
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-017-9600-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Review of Industrial Organization 2/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner