Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2/2005

01-05-2005

Student Ratings and Professor Self-Ratings of College Teaching: Effects of Gender and Divisional Affiliation

Authors: Susan A. Basow, Suzanne Montgomery

Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Issue 2/2005

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Twenty female and 23 male professors at a liberal arts college participated along with their 803 undergraduate students in a questionnaire study of the effects of professor gender, student gender, and divisional affiliation on student ratings of professors and professor self-ratings. Students rated their professors on 26 questions tapping five teaching factors as well as overall teaching effectiveness. Professors rated themselves on the same questions as well as on nine exploratory ones. On student ratings, there were main effects for both professor gender (female professors were rated higher than male professors on the two interpersonal factors) and division (natural science courses were rated lowest on most factors). These patterns were qualified by significant interactions between professor gender and division. Although professor self-ratings varied by division, there were few significant correlations between professor self-ratings and students' ratings. Implications for future research are discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education 48, 193–210. Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education 48, 193–210.
go back to reference Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: when gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 656–665.CrossRef Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: when gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 656–665.CrossRef
go back to reference Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: gender patterns in student choices. Sex Roles 43, 407–417.CrossRef Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: gender patterns in student choices. Sex Roles 43, 407–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 308–314.CrossRef Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 308–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett, S. K (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 170–179.CrossRef Bennett, S. K (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 170–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist 58, 1019–1027.CrossRef Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist 58, 1019–1027.CrossRef
go back to reference Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: sex still males a difference. Gender in the Workplace 10, 69–80. Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: sex still males a difference. Gender in the Workplace 10, 69–80.
go back to reference Cataldi, E. F., Fahimi, M., & Bradburn, E. M. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF: 04) report on faculty and instructional staff in Fall 2003. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005172. Cataldi, E. F., Fahimi, M., & Bradburn, E. M. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF: 04) report on faculty and instructional staff in Fall 2003. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://​nces.​ed.​gov/​pubsearch/​pubsinfo.​asp?​pubid=​2005172.​
go back to reference Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71, 17–33.CrossRef Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71, 17–33.CrossRef
go back to reference D'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, 1198–1208.CrossRef D'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, 1198–1208.CrossRef
go back to reference Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (Neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30, 137–194.CrossRef Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (Neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30, 137–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34, 151–211.CrossRef Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34, 151–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52, 1209–1217.CrossRef Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52, 1209–1217.CrossRef
go back to reference Hancock, G. R., Shannon, D. M., & Trentham, L. L. (1993). Student and teacher gender in ratings of university faculty: results from five colleges of study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 6, 235–248.CrossRef Hancock, G. R., Shannon, D. M., & Trentham, L. L. (1993). Student and teacher gender in ratings of university faculty: results from five colleges of study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 6, 235–248.CrossRef
go back to reference Hildebrand, M., & Wilson, R. (1970). Effective University Teaching and its Evaluation. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education. Hildebrand, M., & Wilson, R. (1970). Effective University Teaching and its Evaluation. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
go back to reference Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P. D., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 342–344.CrossRef Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P. D., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 342–344.CrossRef
go back to reference Leventhal, L., Perry, R., & Abrami, P. (1977). Effects of lecturer quality and student perception of lecturer's experience on teaching ratings and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 360–374.CrossRef Leventhal, L., Perry, R., & Abrami, P. (1977). Effects of lecturer quality and student perception of lecturer's experience on teaching ratings and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 360–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 264–279.CrossRef Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 264–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist 52, 1187–1197.CrossRef Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist 52, 1187–1197.CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, A., Masterson, J.T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Communication Education 45, 29–39.CrossRef Moore, A., Masterson, J.T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Communication Education 45, 29–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Santhanam, E. & Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education 7, 17–31.CrossRef Santhanam, E. & Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education 7, 17–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: she's fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1329–1342.CrossRef Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: she's fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1329–1342.CrossRef
go back to reference Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and University Teaching. Albany, New York: State University of New York. Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and University Teaching. Albany, New York: State University of New York.
Metadata
Title
Student Ratings and Professor Self-Ratings of College Teaching: Effects of Gender and Divisional Affiliation
Authors
Susan A. Basow
Suzanne Montgomery
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Electronic ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2/2005 Go to the issue

Premium Partner