Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2018

11-02-2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Study of anaerobic co-digestion on wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate using BMP test

Authors: Youngsam Yoon, Suyoung Lee, KiHeon Kim, Taewan Jeon, Sunkyoung Shin

Published in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Issue 1/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The study conducted basic component analyses including three component analyses, elementary analysis and heavy metal content and BMP test according to the mixing ratio for food waste leachate and wastewater treatment sludge(from brewery, dairy factory, bread factory, sewage sludge), and calculated biogas production speed using mathematical models. According to the elementary analysis of organic wastes, the C/N ratio, a major condition for anaerobic digestion, is 5.40–9.23, except for food waste leachate (FWL). Defined by Tchobanoglous’ mathematical biogas prediction model, methane gas and biogas productions increased, depending on the mixing rate of FWL. Furthermore, anaerobic digestion of both wastewater sludge and food waste leachate based on the correct mixing ratio, increases methane gas productions compared to digesting wastewater sludge alone. In other words, co-anaerobic digestion is more likely to realize biogasification than single anaerobic digestion. We mixed food waste leachate and wastewater treatment sludge by proportion of 1:9, 3:7, and 5:5, respectively. It turns out that they produced 118, 175, 223 CH4 mL/g VS with the dairy factory, 176, 233, 263 CH4mL/g VS with the brewery, 268, 300, 314 CH4 mL/g VS with the bread factory and 233, 298, 344 CH4-mL/g VS with the sewage sludge of methane gas. The result proposes that as the mixing rate of food waste leachate rises, the methane gas production increases as well. In the case of co-digestion of wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate based on the mixing ratio, more methane gas is produced compared to single digestion of wastewater treatment sludge. Modified Gompertz and exponential models describe the BMP test results that show how methane gas is produced from organic waste. According to the test, the higher the mixing rate of food waste leachate is, the higher the methane gas production is. The mixing ratio of food waste leachate which produces the largest volume of methane gas is 1:9 for the dairy and bread facilities and 3:7 for brewery and sewage sludge. Modified Gompertz and exponential models describe the test results very well. The correlation values (R 2) that show how close the results of model prediction and experiment are 0.920–0.996.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Danny Harvey LD (1993) A guide to global warming potentials (GWPs). Energy Policy 21(1):24–34 Danny Harvey LD (1993) A guide to global warming potentials (GWPs). Energy Policy 21(1):24–34
2.
go back to reference Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy JB, Young LY, McCarty PL (1979) Bioassay for Monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxity. Water Resour 13: 485–492 Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy JB, Young LY, McCarty PL (1979) Bioassay for Monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxity. Water Resour 13: 485–492
3.
go back to reference Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management engineering principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York USA Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management engineering principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York USA
4.
go back to reference Buswell AM, Mueller HF (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind Eng Chem 44(3):550–552CrossRef Buswell AM, Mueller HF (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind Eng Chem 44(3):550–552CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gossett JM (1975) Heat treatment of refuse for increasing anaerobic biodegradability. Civil Engineering Technical Report, 198. Stanford University, Stanford Gossett JM (1975) Heat treatment of refuse for increasing anaerobic biodegradability. Civil Engineering Technical Report, 198. Stanford University, Stanford
6.
go back to reference Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owen JM, Jerger DE, Peck MW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 5(1):95–111CrossRef Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owen JM, Jerger DE, Peck MW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 5(1):95–111CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(4):849–860CrossRef Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(4):849–860CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shelton DR, Tiedje JM (1984) General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(4):850–857 Shelton DR, Tiedje JM (1984) General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(4):850–857
9.
go back to reference Parkin GF, Owen WF (1986) Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludge. J Environ Eng 112:867–920CrossRef Parkin GF, Owen WF (1986) Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludge. J Environ Eng 112:867–920CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McCarty PL (1964) Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals, I. Chemistry and microbiology II. Environmental requirements and control III. Toxic materials and their control IV. Process design. Public Works 95:9–12 McCarty PL (1964) Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals, I. Chemistry and microbiology II. Environmental requirements and control III. Toxic materials and their control IV. Process design. Public Works 95:9–12
11.
go back to reference McCarty PL, McKinney RE (1961) Volatile acid toxicity in anaerobic digestion. JWPCF 33(3):223–232 McCarty PL, McKinney RE (1961) Volatile acid toxicity in anaerobic digestion. JWPCF 33(3):223–232
12.
go back to reference WPCF (1987) Anaerobic Sludge Digestion, Manual of Practice 16, 2nd Edition WPCF (1987) Anaerobic Sludge Digestion, Manual of Practice 16, 2nd Edition
13.
go back to reference Cho JK, Park SC, Chang HN (1995) Biochemical methane potential and solid state anaerobic digestion of Korea food waste. Bioresour Technol 52:245–253CrossRef Cho JK, Park SC, Chang HN (1995) Biochemical methane potential and solid state anaerobic digestion of Korea food waste. Bioresour Technol 52:245–253CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rodrigo AL, Largus TA, Norman RS (2011) Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 102:2255–2264CrossRef Rodrigo AL, Largus TA, Norman RS (2011) Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 102:2255–2264CrossRef
15.
go back to reference EI-mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour Technol 101:4021–4028CrossRef EI-mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour Technol 101:4021–4028CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bilgili MS, Ahmet D, Gamze V (2009) Evaluation and modeling of biochemical methane potential(BMP) of landfilled solid waste: a pilot scale study. Bioresour Technol 100:4976–4980CrossRef Bilgili MS, Ahmet D, Gamze V (2009) Evaluation and modeling of biochemical methane potential(BMP) of landfilled solid waste: a pilot scale study. Bioresour Technol 100:4976–4980CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee D, Lee S, Bae J, Kang J, Kim K, Rhee S, Park J, Cho J, Chung J, Seo D (2015) Effect of volatile fatty acid concentration on anaerobic degradation rate from field anaerobic digestion facilities treating food waste leachate in South Korea. J Chem. doi:10.1155/2015/640717 Lee D, Lee S, Bae J, Kang J, Kim K, Rhee S, Park J, Cho J, Chung J, Seo D (2015) Effect of volatile fatty acid concentration on anaerobic degradation rate from field anaerobic digestion facilities treating food waste leachate in South Korea. J Chem. doi:10.​1155/​2015/​640717
18.
go back to reference Kim S, Ju H (2012) Feasibility of co-digestion of sewage sludge, swine waste and food waste leachate. J Korea 20(1):61–70 Kim S, Ju H (2012) Feasibility of co-digestion of sewage sludge, swine waste and food waste leachate. J Korea 20(1):61–70
Metadata
Title
Study of anaerobic co-digestion on wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate using BMP test
Authors
Youngsam Yoon
Suyoung Lee
KiHeon Kim
Taewan Jeon
Sunkyoung Shin
Publication date
11-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Electronic ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0581-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2018 Go to the issue