Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Minds and Machines 3/2018

29-08-2018

Super Artifacts: Personal Devices as Intrinsically Multifunctional, Meta-representational Artifacts with a Highly Variable Structure

Author: Marco Fasoli

Published in: Minds and Machines | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The computer is one of the most complex artifacts ever built. Given its complexity, it can be described from many different points of view. The aim of this paper is to investigate the representational structure and multifunctionality of a particular subset of computers, namely personal devices (PCs, laptops, smartphones, tablets) from a user-centred perspective. The paper also discusses the concept of “cognitive task”, as recently employed in some definitions of cognitive artifacts, and investigates the metaphysical properties of such artifacts. From a representational point of view, the article introduces the concepts of artifactual meta-representation and of semi-transparency, two features that personal devices share with some cognitive and non-cognitive artifacts. Recognising the meta-representational nature of personal devices and of other cognitive artifacts, thus overcoming semi-transparency, is important for the understanding of why different artifacts offer us different cognitive affordances as well as different cognitive advantages. In this sense, it is not simply a theoretical achievement, but has some important practical consequences. In our highly technological world we can use different kinds of computers and artifacts for solving the same tasks, and we need to understand why some artifacts are better suited for some tasks than others. The ultimate characterisation of personal devices that emerges from this work is that of a sort of super-artifact. This special status is given to personal devices because of their distinctive features. They are in fact intrinsically multifunctional and meta-representational artifacts, with extremely variable structures. As super-artifacts, personal devices are characterised by macro-functionality and can be easily used as both cognitive artifacts and tools for other functions, depending on the kind of representations they instantiate.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
It is easy to acknowledge that, despite its name, the smartphone is actually a computer.
 
Literature
go back to reference Brey, P. (2000). Theories of technology as extensions of human faculties. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Metaphysics, epistemology and technology. Research in philosophy and technology (Vol. 19, pp. 59–78). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Brey, P. (2000). Theories of technology as extensions of human faculties. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Metaphysics, epistemology and technology. Research in philosophy and technology (Vol. 19, pp. 59–78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human–computer interaction. Minds and Machines, 15, 383–398.CrossRef Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human–computer interaction. Minds and Machines, 15, 383–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Brey, P. A., & Soraker, J. (2009). Philosophy of computing and information technology. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Brey, P. A., & Soraker, J. (2009). Philosophy of computing and information technology. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Carrara, M., & Mingardo, D. (2013). Artifact categorization. Trends and problems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(4), 351–373.CrossRef Carrara, M., & Mingardo, D. (2013). Artifact categorization. Trends and problems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(4), 351–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Casati, R. (2017). Two, then four modes of functioning of the mind: Towards an unification of “dual” theories of reasoning and theories of cognitive artifacts. In J. Zacks & H. Taylor (Eds.), Representations in mind and world (pp. 7–23). London: Routlege. Casati, R. (2017). Two, then four modes of functioning of the mind: Towards an unification of “dual” theories of reasoning and theories of cognitive artifacts. In J. Zacks & H. Taylor (Eds.), Representations in mind and world (pp. 7–23). London: Routlege.
go back to reference Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741–765.CrossRef Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741–765.CrossRef
go back to reference Heersmink, R. (2013). A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories. Review of Philosphy and Psychology, 4, 465–481.CrossRef Heersmink, R. (2013). A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories. Review of Philosphy and Psychology, 4, 465–481.CrossRef
go back to reference Heersmink, R. (2014). The metaphysics of cognitive artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19(1), 1–16. Heersmink, R. (2014). The metaphysics of cognitive artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19(1), 1–16.
go back to reference Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. (2010). Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer. Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. (2010). Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Hutchins, E. (1999). Cognitive artifacts. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopaedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 126–128). Cambridge: MIT Press. Hutchins, E. (1999). Cognitive artifacts. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopaedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 126–128). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Kaptelinin, V., & Czerwinski, M. (2007). Beyond the desktop metaphor: Designing integrated digital work environments (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press. Kaptelinin, V., & Czerwinski, M. (2007). Beyond the desktop metaphor: Designing integrated digital work environments (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Kornblith, H. (1980). Referring to artifacts. The Philosophical Review, 89(1), 109–114.CrossRef Kornblith, H. (1980). Referring to artifacts. The Philosophical Review, 89(1), 109–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Cambridge: MIT Press. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.CrossRef Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.CrossRef
go back to reference Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human–computer interface (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human–computer interface (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York City: Basic Books. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York City: Basic Books.
go back to reference Peirce, C. S. (1935). The collected papers of Charles Peirce (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Peirce, C. S. (1935). The collected papers of Charles Peirce (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon, a pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215–254.CrossRef Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon, a pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Preston, B. (2013). A philosophy of material culture: Action, function, and mind. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Preston, B. (2013). A philosophy of material culture: Action, function, and mind. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Roda, C. (2011). Human attention in digital environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Roda, C. (2011). Human attention in digital environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, L. (1974). Functions. Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139–168. Wright, L. (1974). Functions. Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139–168.
Metadata
Title
Super Artifacts: Personal Devices as Intrinsically Multifunctional, Meta-representational Artifacts with a Highly Variable Structure
Author
Marco Fasoli
Publication date
29-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Minds and Machines / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0924-6495
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8641
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9476-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Minds and Machines 3/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner