Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Personal Communications
Published in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2018

22-05-2018

Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Applications and Energy Efficient Routing Protocols

Authors: Reem E. Mohamed, Ahmed I. Saleh, Maher Abdelrazzak, Ahmed S. Samra

Published in: Wireless Personal Communications | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is a group of small power-constrained nodes that sense data and communicate it to the base station (BS). These nodes cover a vast region of interest (ROI) for several purposes according to the application need. The first challenge encountered in WSNs is how to cover the ROI perfectly and send the monitored data to the BS. Although the energy introduced during setup phase and the violation of energy fairness constraint of dynamic routing topologies, they achieve high network performance in terms of coverage and connectivity. In this paper, we categorize the applications of WSN based on different aspects to show the major protocol design issues. Thus, the energy efficiency of the recent proactive routing protocols is studied from different angles. The energy overhead and energy fairness of each protocol were carefully analyzed. The most energy efficient routing protocols for homogeneous proactive networks were studied and compared to highlight the research challenges and existing problems in this area. The results proved that energy overhead and route selection are the most effective aspects of network lifetime and network efficiency.
previous article Blind Equalization Algorithm for Different Eigenvalue Spread Channels
next article New Approach for Privacy-Aware Location-Based Service Communications

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Willig, A., Matheus, K., & Wolisz, A. (2005). Wireless technology in industrial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(6), 1130–1151.CrossRef
2.
Sazonov, E. (2016). Wireless intelligent sensor network for autonomous structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the SPIE (Vol. 5384, pp. 305–314).
3.
Wang, J., Niu, Y., Cho, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Analysis of energy consumption in direct transmission and multi-hop transmission for wireless sensor networks. In 2007 3rd international IEEE conference on signal-image technology and internet-based systems (pp. 275–280).
4.
5.
Yuan, H.-Y., Dai, J.-G., & Li, X.-L. (2007). An energy-efficient clustering algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Chinese Journal of Sensors Actuators, 20(12), 131–142.
6.
Yun, Y., Member, S., & Xia, Y. (2010). Maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks with mobile sink in delay-tolerant applications. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9(9), 1308–1318.CrossRef
7.
Waheed Khan, A., Abdullah, A. H., Anisi, M. H., & Iqbal Bangash, J. (2014). A comprehensive study of data collection schemes using mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. Sensors (Switzerland), 14(2), 2510–2548.CrossRef
8.
Lenzini, L., Martorini, L., Mingozzi, E., & Stea, G. (2006). Tight end-to-end per-flow delay bounds in FIFO multiplexing sink-tree networks. Performance Evaluation, 63(9–10), 956–987.CrossRef
9.
Liang, W., Luo, J., & Xu, X. (2010). Prolonging network lifetime via a controlled mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. In GLOBECOM—IEEE global telecommunication conference.
10.
Mudumbai, R., Brown, D. R., Madhow, U., & Poor, H. V. (2009). Distributed transmit beamforming: Challenges and recent progress. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(2), 102–110.CrossRef
11.
Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In 2nd international workshop on sensor and actor network protocols and application (SANPA 2004) (pp. 1–11).
12.
Rawat, P., Singh, K. D., Chaouchi, H., & Bonnin, J. M. (2014). Wireless sensor networks: A survey on recent developments and potential synergies. The Journal of Supercomputing, 68(1), 1–48.CrossRef
13.
Naeimi, S., Ghafghazi, H., Chow, C. O., & Ishii, H. (2012). A survey on the taxonomy of cluster-based routing protocols for homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Sensors (Switzerland), 12(6), 7350–7409.CrossRef
14.
Singh, S. P., & Sharma, S. C. (2015). A survey on cluster based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science, 45(C), 687–695.CrossRef
15.
García-hernández, C. F., Ibargüengoytia-gonzález, P. H., García-hernández, J., & Pérez-díaz, J. A. (2007). Wireless sensor networks and applications: A survey. Journal of Computer Science, 7(3), 264–273.
16.
Shi, E., & Perrig, A. (2004). Designing secure sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 38–43.CrossRef
17.
Rault, T., Bouabdallah, A., Challal, Y., Rault, T., Bouabdallah, A., Challal, Y., et al. (2014). Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: a top-down survey. Computer Network, 67, 104–122.CrossRef
18.
Khan, J. A., Qureshi, H. K., & Iqbal, A. (2016). Energy management in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 41, 159–176.CrossRef
19.
Anisi, M. H., Abdul-Salaam, G., & Abdullah, A. H. (2015). A survey of wireless sensor network approaches and their energy consumption for monitoring farm fields in precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 16(2), 216–238.CrossRef
20.
Asharioun, H., Asadollahi, H., Wan, T. C., & Gharaei, N. (2015). A survey on analytical modeling and mitigation techniques for the energy hole problem in corona-based wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 81(1), 161–187.CrossRef
21.
Liu, X. (2015). Atypical hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(10), 5372–5383.CrossRef
22.
23.
Balen, J., Zagar, D., & Martinovic, G. (2011). Quality of service in wireless sensor networks: A survey and related patents. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 4(3), 188–202.
24.
Liu, X. (2012). A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 12(8), 11113–11153.CrossRef
25.
Pantazis, N. A., Nikolidakis, S. A., Vergados, D. D., & Member, S. (2013). Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(2), 551–591.CrossRef
26.
27.
Gungor, V. C., Hancke, G. P., & Member, S. (2009). Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(10), 4258–4265.CrossRef
28.
Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The internet of things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.CrossRef
29.
Bhatti, S., & Xu, J. X. J. (2009). Survey of target tracking protocols using wireless sensor network. In 2009 5th international conference on wireless and mobile communications (pp. 110–115).
30.
Barrenetxea, G., Ingelrest, F., Schaefer, G., Vetterli, M., Couach, O., & Parlange, M. (2008). SensorScope: Out-of-the-box environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on information processing in sensor networks, IPSN 2008 (pp. 332–343).
31.
Balister, P., & Kumar, S. (2009). Random vs. deterministic deployment of sensors in the presence of failures and placement errors. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, Section III (pp. 2896–2900).
32.
Halder, S., & Ghosal, A. (2016). A location-wise predetermined deployment for optimizing lifetime in visual sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 26(6), 1131–1145.CrossRef
33.
Zou, Y., & Chakrabarty, K. (2003). Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces. In 22nd annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications (Vol. 2, no. C, pp. 1293–1303).
34.
Wang, X., Wang, S., & Ma, J. (2006). Dynamic deployment optimization in wireless sensor networks in wireless sensor networks. Optimization, 1, 182–187.MATH
35.
Jovanov, E., & Milenkovic, A. (2011). Body area networks for ubiquitous healthcare applications: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 35(5), 1245–1254.CrossRef
36.
Akyildiz, I. F., & Stuntebeck, E. P. (2006). Wireless underground sensor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 4(6), 669–686.CrossRef
37.
Felemban, E., Shaikh, F. K., Qureshi, U. M., Sheikh, A. A., & Bin Qaisar, S. (2015). Underwater sensor network applications: A comprehensive survey. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11, 896832.CrossRef
38.
Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, P., & Lin, S. C. (2015). SoftWater: Software-defined networking for next-generation underwater communication systems. Ad Hoc Networks, 46, 1–11.CrossRef
39.
Bokareva, T., Hu, W., Kanhere, S., Ristic, B., & Wales, N. S. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for battlefield surveillance. In Signal processing (pp. 1–5).
40.
Lazarescu, M. T. (2013). Design of a WSN platform for long-term environmental monitoring for IoT applications. The IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 3(1), 45–54.CrossRef
41.
Yang, Z., Li, M., & Liu, Y. (2007). Sea depth measurement with restricted floating sensors. In Proceedings of the real-time systems symposium (Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 469–478).
42.
Spachos, P., & Hatzinakos, D. (2013). Prototypes of opportunistic wireless sensor networks supporting indoor air quality monitoring. In 2013 IEEE 10th consumer, communications and networks conference (pp. 851–852).
43.
Magno, M., Polonelli, T., Benini, L., & Popovici, E. (2015). A low cost, highly scalable wireless sensor network solution to achieve smart LED light control for green buildings. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(5), 2963–2973.CrossRef
44.
Kumar, P., Kumar, P., & Priyadarshini, P. (2012). Underwater acoustic sensor network for early warning generation. In Ocean, 2012 (pp. 1–6).
45.
Al-Fares, M. S., & Sun, Z. (2009). Self-organizing routing protocol to achieve QoS in wireless sensor network for forest fire monitoring. In Proceedings of IEEE 9th Malaysia international conference on communications with a special workshop on digital TV contents, MICC 2009 (pp. 211–216).
46.
Zhang, Q., Li, J., Rong, J., Xu, W., & He, J. (2011). Application of WSN in precision forestry. In Proceedings of IEEE 2011 10th international conference on electronic measurement and instruments, ICEMI 2011 (Vol. 4, pp. 320–323).
47.
Werner-Allen, G., Lorincz, K., Welsh, M., Marcillo, O., Johnson, J., Ruiz, M., et al. (2006). Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano. IEEE Internet Computing, 10(2), 18–25.CrossRef
48.
Nachtigall, J., & Redlich, J. (2011). Wireless alarming and routing protocol for earthquake early warning systems. In 4th IFIP international conference on new technologies, mobility and security, 2011 (pp. 1–6).
49.
50.
Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Mainwaring, A., Culler, D., & Anderson, J. (2004). Chapter 18 analysis of wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Wireless sensor networks (pp. 399–423).
51.
Wark, T., Swain, D., Crossman, C., Valencia, P., Bishop-Hurley, G., & Handcock, R. (2009). Sensor and actuator networks: Protecting environmentally sensitive areas. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(1), 30–36.CrossRef
52.
Coates, R. W., Delwiche, M. J., Broad, A., & Holler, M. (2013). Wireless sensor network with irrigation valve control. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 96, 13–22.CrossRef
53.
Dong, X., Vuran, M. C., & Irmak, S. (2013). Autonomous precision agriculture through integration of wireless underground sensor networks with center pivot irrigation systems. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(7), 1975–1987.CrossRef
54.
Yu, X., Wu, P., Han, W., & Zhang, Z. (2013). A survey on wireless sensor network infrastructure for agriculture. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35(1), 59–64.CrossRef
55.
He, T., Vicaire, P., Yan, T., Cao, Q., Zhou, G., Gu, L., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., Stankovic, J. A., & Abdelzaher, T. F. (2006). Achieving long-term surveillance in VigilNet. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (Vol. V).
56.
Zhang, P., Sadler, C. M., Lyon, S. A., & Martonosi, M. (2004). Hardware design experiences in ZebraNet. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on embedded networked sensor systems—SenSys ’04 (Vol. 7, p. 227).
57.
Butler, Z., Corke, P., Peterson, R., & Rus, D. (2006). From robots to animals: Virtual fences for controlling cattle. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 25(5–6), 485–508.CrossRef
58.
Naumowicz, T., Freeman, R., Heil, A., Calsyn, M., Hellmich, E., Brändle, A., Guilford, T., & Schiller, J. (2008). Autonomous monitoring of vulnerable habitats using a wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the workshop on real-world wireless sensor networks—REALWSN ’08 (p. 51).
59.
Vellidis, G., Tucker, M., Perry, C., Kvien, C., & Bednarz, C. (2008). A real-time wireless smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 61(1), 44–50.CrossRef
60.
Lamont, L., Toulgoat, M., Ezie, M. D., & Patterson, G. (2011). Tiered wireless sensor network architecture for military surveillance applications. In SENSORCOMM 2011, 5th international conference on bio-sensing technology (pp. 288–294).
61.
Ball, M. G., Qela, B., & Wesolkowski, S. (2016). A review of the use of computational intelligence in the design of military surveillance networks. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 621, 663–693.
62.
Sun, B., & Osborne, L. (2007). Intrusion detection techniques in mobile adhoc and wireless sensor networks. Lamar University (pp. 56–63).
63.
Wang, Y. W. Y., Wang, X. W. X., Bin Xie, B. X., Wang, D. W. D., & Agrawal, D. P. (2008). Intrusion detection in homogeneous and heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(6), 698–711.CrossRef
64.
He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., Stankovic, J. A., Abdelzaher, T. F., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., et al. (2004). Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services - MobiSYS '04.
65.
Díaz-Michelena, M. (2009). Small magnetic sensors for space applications. Sensors, 9(4), 2271–2288.CrossRef
66.
Lee, S. H. L., Lee, S., Song, H., & Lee, H. S. (2009). Wireless sensor network design for tactical military applications: Remote large-scale environments. In MILCOM 2009—2009 IEEE military communications conference (Vol. 19, pp. 1–7).
67.
DeBardelaben, J. A. (2003). Multimedia sensor networks for ISR applications. In Conference record of the thirty-seventh Asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers, 2004 (Vol. 2, pp. 2009–2012).
68.
69.
Manvi, S. S. (2013). Coverage optimization based sensor deployment by using PSO for anti-submarine detection in UWASNs (pp. 15–22).
70.
Pantelopoulos, A. & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010). A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(1), 1–12.CrossRef
71.
Al Ameen, M., Liu, J., & Kwak, K. (2012). Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(1), 93–101.CrossRef
72.
73.
Lorincz, K., Malan, D. J., Jones, T. R., Nawoj, A., Clavel, A., Shnayder, V., et al. (2004). Sensor networks for emergency response: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3, 16–23.CrossRef
74.
Ko, J., Gao, T., Rothman, R., & Terzis, A. (2010). Wireless sensing systems in clinical environments: Improving the efficiency of the patient monitoring process. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 29(2), 103–109.CrossRef
75.
Tennina, S., Santos, M. F., Mesodiakaki, A., Mekikis, P., Kartsakli, E., Antonopoulos, A., et al. (2016). WSN4QoL: WSNs for remote patient monitoring in e-Health applications. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 1–6.
76.
Mikhaylov, K., Tervonen, J., Heikkila, J., & Kansakoski, J. (2012). Wireless sensor networks in industrial environment: Real-life evaluation results. In 2nd Baltic congress on future internet communications (BCFIC), 2012 (pp. 1–7).
77.
Hodge, V. J., Keefe, S. O., Weeks, M., & Moulds, A. (2015). Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(3), 1088–1106.CrossRef
78.
Erol-Kantarci, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2015). Energy-efficient information and communication infrastructures in the smart grid: A survey on interactions and open issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1), 179–197.CrossRef
79.
80.
Lynch, J. P. (2006). A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(2), 91–128.MathSciNetCrossRef
81.
Stoianov, I., Nachman, L., Madden, S., Tokmouline, T., & Csail, M. (2007). PIPENET: A wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring. In 6th international symposium on information processing in sensor networks, 2007. IPSN 2007 (pp. 264–273).
82.
Wang, R., Zhang, L., Sun, R., Gong, J., & Cui, L. (2011). EasiTia: A pervasive traffic information acquisition system based on wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 615–621.CrossRef
83.
Alrajeh, N. A., Alabed, M. S., & Elwahiby, M. S. (2013). Secure ant-based routing protocol for wireless sensor network. In International journal of distributed sensor networks (Vol. 2013).
84.
Khan, A., & Jenkins, L. (2008). Undersea wireless sensor network for ocean pollution prevention. In 3rd international conference on communication systems software and middleware and workshops (COMSWARE ’08) (No. i, pp. 2–8).
85.
Yu, H., & Guo, M. (2012). An efficient oil and gas pipeline monitoring systems based on wireless sensor networks. In 2012 international conference on information security and intelligence control (ISIC) (pp. 178–181).
86.
Antil, P., & Malik, A. (2014). Hole detection for quantifying connectivity in wireless sensor networks: A survey (Vol. 2014).
87.
88.
Gravogl, K., Haase, J., & Grimm, C. (2011). Choosing the best wireless protocol for typical applications. In 24th international conference on architecture of computing systems (ARCS) (p. 6).
89.
Schuegraf, K., Abraham, M. C., Brand, A., Naik, M., & Thakur, R. (2013). Semiconductor logic technology innovation to achieve sub-10 nm manufacturing. IEEE Journal of Electron Devices Society, 1(3), 66–75.CrossRef
90.
Park, P. (2011). Modeling, analysis, and design of wireless sensor network protocols. Doctoral Thesis, KTH, School of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control, Lab SE-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
91.
Heidemann, J., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1958), 158–175.CrossRef
92.
93.
Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.CrossRef
94.
Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system science (Vol. 0, no. c, pp. 3005–3014).
95.
Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2002). PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 3, 1125–1130.
96.
97.
Upadhyayula, S., & Gupta, S. K. S. (2007). Spanning tree based algorithms for low latency and energy efficient data aggregation enhanced convergecast (DAC) in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 5(5), 626–648.CrossRef
98.
Younis, O. (2004). Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: A hybrid, energy-efficient approach. In 3rd annual conference on IEEE (pp. 1–12).
99.
Hong, J., Kook, J., & Lee, S. (2009). T-LEACH: The method of threshold-based cluster head replacement for wireless sensor networks. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(5), 513–521.CrossRef
100.
Salim, A., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. M. (2014). IBLEACH: Intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 20, 1515–1525.CrossRef
101.
Singh, S., Chand, S., Kumar, R., Malik, A., & Kumar, B. (2016). NEECP: Novel energy-efficient clustering protocol for prolonging lifetime of WSNs. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 6(5), 151–157.CrossRef
102.
Sicari, S., Grieco, L. A., Rizzardi, A., Boggia, G., & Coen-porisini, A. (2014). SETA: A SEcure sharing of TAsks in clustered wireless sensor networks. In 9th IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications 2013, WiMob 2013 (No. i, pp. 239–246).
103.
Xia, H., Jia, R. Z., & Pan, Y. Z. (2016). Energy-efficient routing algorithm based on unequal clustering and connected graph in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 23(2), 141–150.CrossRef
104.
Abdelhakim, M., & Member, I. (2016). Mobile coordinated wireless sensor network: An energy efficient scheme for real-time transmissions. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 8716, 1–15.
105.
Farouk, F., Rizk, R., & Zaki, F. W. (2014). Multi-level stable and energy-efficient clustering protocol in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 4(October), 159–169.CrossRef
106.
Ishmanov, F., Malik, A. S., & Kim, S. W. (2011). Energy consumption balancing (ECB) issues and mechanisms in wireless sensor networks (WSNs): A comprehensive overview. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 22(4), 151–167.CrossRef
107.
Vincent, P. J., & Mceachen, J. (2006). An energy-efficient approach for information transfer from distributed wireless sensor systems. In IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2006 (pp. 100–105).
108.
Pottie, G. J., & Kaiser, W. J. (2000). Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 51–58.CrossRef
109.
Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237.CrossRef
110.
Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. (2002) PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference USA (Vol. 3, pp. 1125–1130).
Metadata
Title
Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Applications and Energy Efficient Routing Protocols
Authors
Reem E. Mohamed
Ahmed I. Saleh
Maher Abdelrazzak
Ahmed S. Samra
Publication date
22-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Personal Communications / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Electronic ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5747-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2018 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A Triangular Complementary Split Ring Resonator Based Compact Metamaterial Antenna for Multiband Operation

OriginalPaper

New Approach for Privacy-Aware Location-Based Service Communications

OriginalPaper

Design and Analysis of UWB Filter with Single Notch Band

OriginalPaper

Slot Antenna Array with Integrated Filter for WLAN Application at 5.2 GHz

OriginalPaper

An Improved Pillar K-Means Based Protocol for Privacy-Preserving Location Monitoring in Wireless Sensor Network

ReviewPaper

A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-hop Wireless Networks: Milestones, Changing Trends and Concomitant Challenges