Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 8/2016

29-03-2016 | Original Paper

Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach

Authors: Fawaz AL-Nassar, Rajeev Ruparathna, Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha, Husnain Haider, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq

Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Issue 8/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The building industry has regularly been criticized for resource exploitation, energy use, waste production, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts on the landscape. The growing population demands more built environment to accommodate the socioeconomic wellbeing. Adopting conventional construction practices would continue the aforementioned issues. Therefore, it is important to integrate life cycle thinking into building construction to minimize its social, environmental, and economic impacts. The objective of this study is to assess the life cycle impact of commonly used wall–roof systems for low rise commercial building construction in Canada. A framework is developed to assess different building alternatives using the triple bottom line of sustainability. Identified environmental and socioeconomic impact indicators are eventually aggregated to develop a life cycle impact index. Material quantities of six wall–roof combinations for a single-storey commercial building were obtained from industrial partners. State-of-the-art life cycle assessment software is used to assess the life cycle impacts of different wall–roof systems. To accommodate decision makers’ preferences of sustainability, wall–roof combinations are assessed for three potential scenarios namely, eco-centric, neutral, and economy-centric using multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework has also been implemented on a case study of low rise building in Calgary (Alberta, Canada) to evaluate its practicality. The study results revealed that the concrete–steel building is the most sustainable alternative in neutral and economy-centric scenario while steel–wood building is the most sustainable building in eco-centric scenario.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Carbon dioxide equivalents.
 
2
From 79 Mt CO2e in 2010.
 
3
RSMeans provides updated building construction cost data for estimation.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anderson J, Shiers D, Steele K (2009) The green guide to specification: an environmental profiling system for building materials and components. Wiley, Ames Anderson J, Shiers D, Steele K (2009) The green guide to specification: an environmental profiling system for building materials and components. Wiley, Ames
go back to reference Assaf SA, Al-Hammad A, Jannadi OA, Saad SA (2002) Assessment of the problems of application of life cycle costing in construction projects. Cost Eng 44:17–22 Assaf SA, Al-Hammad A, Jannadi OA, Saad SA (2002) Assessment of the problems of application of life cycle costing in construction projects. Cost Eng 44:17–22
go back to reference Athena Sustainable Materials Institute (2016) IE for buildings. Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Ottawa Athena Sustainable Materials Institute (2016) IE for buildings. Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Ottawa
go back to reference Bank LC, Thompson BP, McCarthy M (2011) Decision-making tools for evaluating the impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings. Carbon Manag 2:431–441. doi:10.4155/cmt.11.33 CrossRef Bank LC, Thompson BP, McCarthy M (2011) Decision-making tools for evaluating the impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings. Carbon Manag 2:431–441. doi:10.​4155/​cmt.​11.​33 CrossRef
go back to reference Boyd DR (2001) Canada vs. the OECD: an environmental comparison. University of Victoria, Victoria Boyd DR (2001) Canada vs. the OECD: an environmental comparison. University of Victoria, Victoria
go back to reference Bull JW (1993) Life cycle costing for construction. Spon press, London Bull JW (1993) Life cycle costing for construction. Spon press, London
go back to reference CCME (2014) State of waste management in Canada. Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (CCME), Kanata CCME (2014) State of waste management in Canada. Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (CCME), Kanata
go back to reference Crawford R (2011) Life cycle assessment in the built environment. Taylor & Francis, New York Crawford R (2011) Life cycle assessment in the built environment. Taylor & Francis, New York
go back to reference David Suzuki Foundation (2010) The maple leaf in the OECD: Canada’s environmental performance. David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver David Suzuki Foundation (2010) The maple leaf in the OECD: Canada’s environmental performance. David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver
go back to reference Environment Canada (2012a) Canada’s emissions trends 2012. Minister of the Environment, Ottawa Environment Canada (2012a) Canada’s emissions trends 2012. Minister of the Environment, Ottawa
go back to reference Environment Canada (2012b) National Inventory Report: 1990–2010. Ottawa Environment Canada (2012b) National Inventory Report: 1990–2010. Ottawa
go back to reference European Commission (2014) Life-cycle costing European Commission (2014) Life-cycle costing
go back to reference Fard NH (2012) Emergy based-sustainability rating system for buildings: case study for Canada. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Fard NH (2012) Emergy based-sustainability rating system for buildings: case study for Canada. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver
go back to reference Goedkoop M (2001) The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment methodology annex Goedkoop M (2001) The Eco-indicator 99 a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment methodology annex
go back to reference Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2012) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, First edit. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM) Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2012) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, First edit. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM)
go back to reference Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual
go back to reference Hossaini N, Reza B, Akhtar S et al (2015) AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver. J Environ Plan Manag 58:1217–1241. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.920704 CrossRef Hossaini N, Reza B, Akhtar S et al (2015) AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver. J Environ Plan Manag 58:1217–1241. doi:10.​1080/​09640568.​2014.​920704 CrossRef
go back to reference Industry Canada (2011) Buildings. In: Corp. Soc. Responsib Industry Canada (2011) Buildings. In: Corp. Soc. Responsib
go back to reference ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management–Life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management–Life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference Jeffrey C (2011) Construction and demolition waste recycling: a literature review. Halifax Jeffrey C (2011) Construction and demolition waste recycling: a literature review. Halifax
go back to reference Kashyap M, Khalfan M, Zainul-Abidin N (2003) A proposal foe achieving sustainability in construction projects through concurrent engineering. The RICS Foundation, London Kashyap M, Khalfan M, Zainul-Abidin N (2003) A proposal foe achieving sustainability in construction projects through concurrent engineering. The RICS Foundation, London
go back to reference Kibert CJ (2012) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken Kibert CJ (2012) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
go back to reference Lindfors L-G (1995) Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Indiana University, Copenhagen Lindfors L-G (1995) Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Indiana University, Copenhagen
go back to reference Meil J, Lucuik M, O’Connor J, Dangerfield J (2006) A life cycle environmental and economic assessment of optimum value engineering in houses. For Prod J 56:19–25 Meil J, Lucuik M, O’Connor J, Dangerfield J (2006) A life cycle environmental and economic assessment of optimum value engineering in houses. For Prod J 56:19–25
go back to reference National Audit Office (2005) Improving public services through better construction. National Audit Office, London National Audit Office (2005) Improving public services through better construction. National Audit Office, London
go back to reference Natural Resources Canada (2012) Energy efficiency trends in Canada, 1990 to 2009. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa Natural Resources Canada (2012) Energy efficiency trends in Canada, 1990 to 2009. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa
go back to reference Natural Resources Canada (2013) Sustainable development strategy 2007–2009. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa Natural Resources Canada (2013) Sustainable development strategy 2007–2009. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa
go back to reference Natural Resources Canada (2014) Buildings. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa Natural Resources Canada (2014) Buildings. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa
go back to reference Nisbet M, Venta G, Foo S (2002) Demolition and deconstruction: review of the current status of reuse and recycling of building materials. Pittsburgh Nisbet M, Venta G, Foo S (2002) Demolition and deconstruction: review of the current status of reuse and recycling of building materials. Pittsburgh
go back to reference Nyboer J, Kamiya G (2012) Energy use and related data: Canadian Construction Industry 1990 to 2010. Burnaby BC Nyboer J, Kamiya G (2012) Energy use and related data: Canadian Construction Industry 1990 to 2010. Burnaby BC
go back to reference Phelan M (2015) Square foot costs 2015 book. RSMeans, Norwell Phelan M (2015) Square foot costs 2015 book. RSMeans, Norwell
go back to reference Recycling council of Alberta (2012) Recycling Council of Alberta Newsletter: connector. Recycling council of Alberta, Bluffton Recycling council of Alberta (2012) Recycling Council of Alberta Newsletter: connector. Recycling council of Alberta, Bluffton
go back to reference Reza B, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2013) Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability appraisal of infrastructure systems: a case study on paved roads. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0615-5 Reza B, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2013) Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability appraisal of infrastructure systems: a case study on paved roads. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.​1007/​s10098-013-0615-5
go back to reference Rezgui Y, Wilson IE, Li H (2010) Promoting sustainability awareness through energy engaged virtual communities of construction stakeholders. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Rezgui Y, Wilson IE, Li H (2010) Promoting sustainability awareness through energy engaged virtual communities of construction stakeholders. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
go back to reference Risch E, Loubet P, Núñez M, Roux P (2014) How environmentally significant is water consumption during wastewater treatment? Application of recent developments in LCA to WWT technologies used at 3 contrasted geographical locations. Water Res 57:20–30. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.023 CrossRef Risch E, Loubet P, Núñez M, Roux P (2014) How environmentally significant is water consumption during wastewater treatment? Application of recent developments in LCA to WWT technologies used at 3 contrasted geographical locations. Water Res 57:20–30. doi:10.​1016/​j.​watres.​2014.​03.​023 CrossRef
go back to reference Ruparathna R (2013) Emergy based procurement framework to improve sustainability performance in construction. University of British Columbia, Vancouver Ruparathna R (2013) Emergy based procurement framework to improve sustainability performance in construction. University of British Columbia, Vancouver
go back to reference Scrap Monster (2015) North America scarp metal prices Scrap Monster (2015) North America scarp metal prices
go back to reference Sev A (2009) How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development?A conceptual framework. Sustain Dev 17:161–173. doi:10.1002/sd CrossRef Sev A (2009) How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development?A conceptual framework. Sustain Dev 17:161–173. doi:10.​1002/​sd CrossRef
go back to reference United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products. United Nations Environment Programme, Nirobi United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products. United Nations Environment Programme, Nirobi
go back to reference Yale University (2014) Country rankings. Yale University, New Haven Yale University (2014) Country rankings. Yale University, New Haven
go back to reference Yoon K, Hwang GI (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, Sage University. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef Yoon K, Hwang GI (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, Sage University. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef
go back to reference Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL et al (2008) Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISOLCA practice. Leiden, Netherlands Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL et al (2008) Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISOLCA practice. Leiden, Netherlands
Metadata
Title
Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach
Authors
Fawaz AL-Nassar
Rajeev Ruparathna
Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha
Husnain Haider
Kasun Hewage
Rehan Sadiq
Publication date
29-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Electronic ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1168-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 8/2016 Go to the issue