Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 3/2019

18-06-2019

Teacher evaluation as data use: what recent research suggests

Authors: William A. Firestone, Morgaen L. Donaldson

Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Most recent research on teacher evaluation examines evaluation’s measurement properties and accountability uses. Less research studies how evaluation data can improve teaching and student learning. In other contexts, researchers have examined how teachers use data to improve their practice. From general research on teachers’ data use, we apply the data-driven decision-making (DDDM) framework to synthesize research on teacher evaluation since 2009. We illustrate how evaluation data are collected, analyzed, and synthesized to inform instruction and improve student learning. Most research focused on teachers’ use of observation data, not their use of student data. We find that the teachers’ use of evaluation data involves more social learning than the DDDM model implies. The effects of observation on instruction and student learning are often weak, apparently because observers lack the time and knowledge to support teachers’ thorough analysis and synthesis of evaluation data. Implications for policy and further research are offered.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 258–267.CrossRef Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 258–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., ..., Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., ..., Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
go back to reference Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E. (2010). Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 205–225.CrossRef Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E. (2010). Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 205–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, D. T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 178–193.CrossRef Campbell, D. T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 178–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, J., Schuldt, L. C., Brown, L., & Grossman, P. (2016). Leveraging observation tools for instructional improvement: Exploring variability in uptake of ambitious instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–36. Cohen, J., Schuldt, L. C., Brown, L., & Grossman, P. (2016). Leveraging observation tools for instructional improvement: Exploring variability in uptake of ambitious instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–36.
go back to reference Collins, C. (2014). Houston, we have a problem: Teachers find no value in the SAS education value-added assessment system (EVAAS®). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 1–42. Collins, C. (2014). Houston, we have a problem: Teachers find no value in the SAS education value-added assessment system (EVAAS®). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 1–42.
go back to reference Cosner, S. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 568–589.CrossRef Cosner, S. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 568–589.CrossRef
go back to reference Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd Edition ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd Edition ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument: 2013 edition. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group. Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument: 2013 edition. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group.
go back to reference Danielson, C. (2016). Its time to rethink teacher evaluation. Education Week, pp. 20–24. Danielson, C. (2016). Its time to rethink teacher evaluation. Education Week, pp. 20–24.
go back to reference Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. G. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. G. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
go back to reference Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.CrossRef Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28.CrossRef Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 1–11.CrossRef Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Derrington, M. L., & Kirk, J. (2017). Linking job-embedded professional development and mandated teacher evaluation: Teacher as learner. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 630–644.CrossRef Derrington, M. L., & Kirk, J. (2017). Linking job-embedded professional development and mandated teacher evaluation: Teacher as learner. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 630–644.CrossRef
go back to reference Donahue, E. (2014). Teacher perceptions of the impact of an evaluation system on classroom instructional practices Available from Proquest ISBN 9781321659108. Donahue, E. (2014). Teacher perceptions of the impact of an evaluation system on classroom instructional practices Available from Proquest ISBN 9781321659108.
go back to reference Donahue, E., & Vogel, L. R. (2016). Teacher perceptions of the impact of teacher evaluation on classroom instructional practices. Paper presented at the. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–34). Washington, DC. Donahue, E., & Vogel, L. R. (2016). Teacher perceptions of the impact of teacher evaluation on classroom instructional practices. Paper presented at the. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–34). Washington, DC.
go back to reference Donaldson, M. L. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on evaluation reform. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Donaldson, M. L. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on evaluation reform. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
go back to reference Donaldson, M. L., Cobb, C. D., LeChasseur, K., Gabriel, R., Gonzalez, R., Woulfin, S., & Makuch, A. (2014). An evaluation of the pilot implementation of Connecticut's system for educator evaluation and development. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Center for Education Policy Analysis. Donaldson, M. L., Cobb, C. D., LeChasseur, K., Gabriel, R., Gonzalez, R., Woulfin, S., & Makuch, A. (2014). An evaluation of the pilot implementation of Connecticut's system for educator evaluation and development. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Center for Education Policy Analysis.
go back to reference Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). New York: Routledge. Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Finfgeld-Connett, D., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 194–204.CrossRef Finfgeld-Connett, D., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 194–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 100–107.CrossRef Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 100–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Firestone, W. A., Blitz, C. L., Gitomer, D. H., Gradinarova-Kirova, D., Shcherbakov, A., & Nordin, T. L. (2013). Year 1 report: New Jersey teacher evaluation pilot program. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education. Firestone, W. A., Blitz, C. L., Gitomer, D. H., Gradinarova-Kirova, D., Shcherbakov, A., & Nordin, T. L. (2013). Year 1 report: New Jersey teacher evaluation pilot program. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education.
go back to reference Firestone, W. A., Nordin, T. L., Shcherbakov, A., Kirova, D., & Blitz, C. L. (2014). Pilot teacher evaluation program: Year 2 final report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education. Firestone, W. A., Nordin, T. L., Shcherbakov, A., Kirova, D., & Blitz, C. L. (2014). Pilot teacher evaluation program: Year 2 final report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Graduate School of Education.
go back to reference Ford, T., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. (2015). Teacher self- efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 1–47. Ford, T., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. (2015). Teacher self- efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 1–47.
go back to reference Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Brown, S., Rickles, J., Song, M., & Manzeske, D. (2017). Impact of providing performance feedback to teachers and principals. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Brown, S., Rickles, J., Song, M., & Manzeske, D. (2017). Impact of providing performance feedback to teachers and principals. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
go back to reference Gitomer, D., Bell, C., Qi, Y., McCaffrey, D., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). The instructional challenge in improving teaching quality: Lessons from a classroom observation protocol. Teachers College Record, 116(6), 1–32. Gitomer, D., Bell, C., Qi, Y., McCaffrey, D., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). The instructional challenge in improving teaching quality: Lessons from a classroom observation protocol. Teachers College Record, 116(6), 1–32.
go back to reference Goldhaber, D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 87–95.CrossRef Goldhaber, D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 87–95.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2010). Implicit measurement of teacher quality: Using performance on the job to inform teacher tenure decisions. American Economic Review, 100, 250–255.CrossRef Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2010). Implicit measurement of teacher quality: Using performance on the job to inform teacher tenure decisions. American Economic Review, 100, 250–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015a). Make room for value added: Principals' human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 96–104.CrossRef Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015a). Make room for value added: Principals' human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 96–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Neumerski, C., Murphy, J., Blisset, R., & Porter, A. (2015b). Making time for instructional leadership. In The evolution of the SAM process (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Neumerski, C., Murphy, J., Blisset, R., & Porter, A. (2015b). Making time for instructional leadership. In The evolution of the SAM process (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
go back to reference Goldstein, J. (2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 479–508.CrossRef Goldstein, J. (2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 479–508.CrossRef
go back to reference Gonzalez, R. A., & Firestone, W. A. (2013). Educational tug-of-war: Internal and external accountability of principals in varied contexts. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 383–406.CrossRef Gonzalez, R. A., & Firestone, W. A. (2013). Educational tug-of-war: Internal and external accountability of principals in varied contexts. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 383–406.CrossRef
go back to reference Gummer, E. B., & Mandinach, E. S. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1. Gummer, E. B., & Mandinach, E. S. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1.
go back to reference Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28.CrossRef Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Hanushek, E. A. (2009). Teacher deselection. In D. Goldhaber & J. Hannaway (Eds.), Creating a new teaching profession (pp. 165–180). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. Hanushek, E. A. (2009). Teacher deselection. In D. Goldhaber & J. Hannaway (Eds.), Creating a new teaching profession (pp. 165–180). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
go back to reference Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271.CrossRef Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204.CrossRef Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellrung, K., & Hartig, J. (2013). Review: Understanding and using feedback – A review of empirical studies concerning feedback from external evaluations to teachers. Educational Research Review, 9, 174–190.CrossRef Hellrung, K., & Hartig, J. (2013). Review: Understanding and using feedback – A review of empirical studies concerning feedback from external evaluations to teachers. Educational Research Review, 9, 174–190.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, H. C., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384.CrossRef Hill, H. C., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., van, D. K., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. M. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377–386.CrossRef Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., van, D. K., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. M. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the "data-driven" mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making). In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: 106th yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 105–131). Chicago: NSSE. Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the "data-driven" mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making). In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: 106th yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 105–131). Chicago: NSSE.
go back to reference Israel, M., Kamman, M. L., McCray, E. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (2014). Mentoring in action: The interplay among professional assistance, emotional support, and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 45–63. Israel, M., Kamman, M. L., McCray, E. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (2014). Mentoring in action: The interplay among professional assistance, emotional support, and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 45–63.
go back to reference Jennings, J. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–23. Jennings, J. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–23.
go back to reference Jiang, J. Y., Sporte, S. E., & Luppescu, S. (2015). Teachers' perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago's REACH students. Educational Resarcher, 44(2), 105–116.CrossRef Jiang, J. Y., Sporte, S. E., & Luppescu, S. (2015). Teachers' perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago's REACH students. Educational Resarcher, 44(2), 105–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, S. M., & Fiarman, S. E. (2012). The potential of peer review. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 20–25. Johnson, S. M., & Fiarman, S. E. (2012). The potential of peer review. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 20–25.
go back to reference Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 241–268.CrossRef Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 241–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. (2009). Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision making within a standards-based evaluation system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(1), 34–70.CrossRef Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. (2009). Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision making within a standards-based evaluation system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(1), 34–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Koedel, C., Li, J., Tan, L., & Springer, M. G. (2017). The impact of performance ratings on job satisfaction for public school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 241–278.CrossRef Koedel, C., Li, J., Tan, L., & Springer, M. G. (2017). The impact of performance ratings on job satisfaction for public school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 241–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753.CrossRef Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753.CrossRef
go back to reference Lachlan-Hache, L. (2015). The art and science of student learning objectives: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Lachlan-Hache, L. (2015). The art and science of student learning objectives: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
go back to reference Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
go back to reference Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166.CrossRef Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 534–575.CrossRef Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 534–575.CrossRef
go back to reference Mandinach, E.B. & Honey, M. (eds) (2008). Data-driven decision-making: An introduction. New York: Teachers College Press. Mandinach, E.B. & Honey, M. (eds) (2008). Data-driven decision-making: An introduction. New York: Teachers College Press.
go back to reference Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 42(7), 71–85.CrossRef Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 42(7), 71–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376.CrossRef Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11). Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
go back to reference Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
go back to reference McCullough, M., English, B., Angus, M. H., & Gill, B. (2015). Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Implementation experiences of early-adopting districts. (REL 2015–093).Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. McCullough, M., English, B., Angus, M. H., & Gill, B. (2015). Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Implementation experiences of early-adopting districts. (REL 2015–093).Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic.
go back to reference McGrath, J. E. (1982). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and methods. In J. E. McGrath, J. Martin, & R. A. Kulka (Eds.), Judgement calls in research (pp. 69–102). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. McGrath, J. E. (1982). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and methods. In J. E. McGrath, J. Martin, & R. A. Kulka (Eds.), Judgement calls in research (pp. 69–102). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference McGuin, P (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants, and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, (26)1, 136–159. McGuin, P (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants, and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, (26)1, 136–159.
go back to reference McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Munger, M. S. (2012). Shared responsibility for teacher quality: How do principals respond to peer assistance and review?(Ed.D.). Munger, M. S. (2012). Shared responsibility for teacher quality: How do principals respond to peer assistance and review?(Ed.D.).
go back to reference Noblit, G., & Hare, D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef Noblit, G., & Hare, D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef
go back to reference Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching OECD Publishing. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching OECD Publishing.
go back to reference Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th Ed. ed., pp. 787–850). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.CrossRef Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th Ed. ed., pp. 787–850). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Reinhorn, S. K., Johnson, S. M., & Simon, N. S. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the Massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383–406.CrossRef Reinhorn, S. K., Johnson, S. M., & Simon, N. S. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the Massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383–406.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruffini, S. J., Makkonen, R., Tejwani, J., & Diaz, M. (2014). Principal and teacher perceptions of implementation of multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems in Arizona. REL 2015–062. San Francisco: Regional Educational Laboratory West. Ruffini, S. J., Makkonen, R., Tejwani, J., & Diaz, M. (2014). Principal and teacher perceptions of implementation of multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems in Arizona. REL 2015–062. San Francisco: Regional Educational Laboratory West.
go back to reference Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S. R., & Brown, E. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-teacher conferences, and district implementation. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S. R., & Brown, E. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-teacher conferences, and district implementation. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
go back to reference Sebastian, J., Camburn, E. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47–84.CrossRef Sebastian, J., Camburn, E. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Sinnema, C. E. L., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The leadership of teaching and learning: Implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343.CrossRef Sinnema, C. E. L., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The leadership of teaching and learning: Implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Sporte, S. E., Stevens, W. D., Healey, K., Jiang, J., Hart, H., & University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago, School Research. (2013). Teacher evaluation in practice: Implementing Chicago's REACH students. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago school research. Sporte, S. E., Stevens, W. D., Healey, K., Jiang, J., Hart, H., & University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago, School Research. (2013). Teacher evaluation in practice: Implementing Chicago's REACH students. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago school research.
go back to reference Stecher, B. M., Garet, M., Holtzman, D., & Hamilton, L. (2012). Implementing measures of teacher effectiveness. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 39–43.CrossRef Stecher, B. M., Garet, M., Holtzman, D., & Hamilton, L. (2012). Implementing measures of teacher effectiveness. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 39–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., et al. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report: The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRef Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., et al. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report: The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRef
go back to reference Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448.CrossRef Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448.CrossRef
go back to reference Steinberg, M. P., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s excellence in teaching project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 535–572.CrossRef Steinberg, M. P., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s excellence in teaching project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 535–572.CrossRef
go back to reference Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359.CrossRef Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359.CrossRef
go back to reference Stosich, L. F. (2016). E. L. Common standards and teacher evaluation: Principals and teachers’ craft coherence among multiple accountability policies. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Stosich, L. F. (2016). E. L. Common standards and teacher evaluation: Principals and teachers’ craft coherence among multiple accountability policies. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
go back to reference Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
go back to reference Supovitz, J. A. (2012). Getting at student understanding - the key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11). Supovitz, J. A. (2012). Getting at student understanding - the key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11).
go back to reference Taut, S., Santelices, M. V., Araya, C., & Manzi, J. (2011). Perceived effects and uses of the national teacher evaluation system in Chilean elementary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(4), 218–229.CrossRef Taut, S., Santelices, M. V., Araya, C., & Manzi, J. (2011). Perceived effects and uses of the national teacher evaluation system in Chilean elementary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(4), 218–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. The American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651.CrossRef Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. The American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, E., Wingert, P., Conant, E., & Register, S. (2010). Why we can’t get rid of failing teachers. Newsweek, 155(11), 24. Thomas, E., Wingert, P., Conant, E., & Register, S. (2010). Why we can’t get rid of failing teachers. Newsweek, 155(11), 24.
go back to reference Timperley, H. S. (2005). Instructional leadership challenges: The case of using student achievement information for instructional improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), 3–22.CrossRef Timperley, H. S. (2005). Instructional leadership challenges: The case of using student achievement information for instructional improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), 3–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 891–899.CrossRef Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 891–899.CrossRef
go back to reference Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530.CrossRef Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530.CrossRef
go back to reference Vaillant, D., & Gonzalez-Vaillant, G. (2017). Within the teacher evaluation policies black box: Two case studies. Teacher Development, 21(3), 404–421.CrossRef Vaillant, D., & Gonzalez-Vaillant, G. (2017). Within the teacher evaluation policies black box: Two case studies. Teacher Development, 21(3), 404–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.
go back to reference White, B. R., Cowhy, J., Stevens, W. D., & Sporte, S. E. (2012). Designing and implementing the next generation of teacher evaluation systems: Lessons learned from case studies in five Illinois districts. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research. White, B. R., Cowhy, J., Stevens, W. D., & Sporte, S. E. (2012). Designing and implementing the next generation of teacher evaluation systems: Lessons learned from case studies in five Illinois districts. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
go back to reference Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.CrossRef Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Metadata
Title
Teacher evaluation as data use: what recent research suggests
Authors
William A. Firestone
Morgaen L. Donaldson
Publication date
18-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Electronic ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09300-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 3/2019 Go to the issue