Skip to main content
Top
Published in: OR Spectrum 3/2017

06-05-2017 | Regular Article

The benefits of incorporating utility dependencies in finite mixture probit models

Authors: Friederike Paetz, Winfried J. Steiner

Published in: OR Spectrum | Issue 3/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We propose an application of a new finite mixture multinomial conditional probit (FM-MNCP) model that accommodates preference heterogeneity and explicitly accounts for utility dependencies between choice alternatives considering both local and background contrast effects. The latter is accomplished by using a one-factor structure for segment-specific covariance matrices allowing for nonzero off-diagonal covariance elements. We compare the model to a finite mixture multinomial independent probit (FM-MNIP) model that as well accommodates heterogeneity but assumes independence. That way, we address the potential benefits of a model that additionally accounts for dependencies over a model that accommodates heterogeneity only. Our model comparison is based on empirical data for smoothies and is assessed in terms of fit, holdout validation, and market share predictions. One of the main findings of our empirical study is that allowing for utility dependencies may counterbalance the effects of considering heterogeneity, and vice versa. Additional findings from a simulation study indicate that the FM-MNCP model outperforms the FM-MNIP model with respect to parameter recovery.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Andrews RL, Ainslie A, Currim IS (2002a) An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity. J Mark Res 39:479–487CrossRef Andrews RL, Ainslie A, Currim IS (2002a) An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity. J Mark Res 39:479–487CrossRef
go back to reference Andrews R, Ansari A, Currim I (2002b) Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery. J Mark Res 39:87–98CrossRef Andrews R, Ansari A, Currim I (2002b) Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery. J Mark Res 39:87–98CrossRef
go back to reference Andrews R, Currim I (2003) A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models. J Mark Res 40:235–243CrossRef Andrews R, Currim I (2003) A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models. J Mark Res 40:235–243CrossRef
go back to reference Baur A, Klein R, Steinhardt C (2014) Model-based decision support for optimal brochure pricing: applying advanced analytics in the tour operating industry. OR Spectrum 36:557–584CrossRef Baur A, Klein R, Steinhardt C (2014) Model-based decision support for optimal brochure pricing: applying advanced analytics in the tour operating industry. OR Spectrum 36:557–584CrossRef
go back to reference Bolduc D, Fortin B, Fournier M (1996) The impact of incentive policies on practice location of doctors: a multinomial probit analysis. J Labor Econ 14:703–732CrossRef Bolduc D, Fortin B, Fournier M (1996) The impact of incentive policies on practice location of doctors: a multinomial probit analysis. J Labor Econ 14:703–732CrossRef
go back to reference Boztuğ Y, Hildebrandt L, Raman K (2014) Detecting price thresholds in choice models using a semi-parametric approach. OR Spectrum 36:187–207 Boztuğ Y, Hildebrandt L, Raman K (2014) Detecting price thresholds in choice models using a semi-parametric approach. OR Spectrum 36:187–207
go back to reference Bunch D (1991) Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transp Res B 25B:1–12CrossRef Bunch D (1991) Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transp Res B 25B:1–12CrossRef
go back to reference Crabbe M, Jones B, Vandebroek M (2013) Comparing two-stage segmentation methods for choice data with a one-stage latent class choice analysis. Commun Stat Simul Comput 42:1188–1212CrossRef Crabbe M, Jones B, Vandebroek M (2013) Comparing two-stage segmentation methods for choice data with a one-stage latent class choice analysis. Commun Stat Simul Comput 42:1188–1212CrossRef
go back to reference Daganzo C (1979) Multinomial probit: the theory and its applications to demand forecasting. Academic Press, New York Daganzo C (1979) Multinomial probit: the theory and its applications to demand forecasting. Academic Press, New York
go back to reference Dansie B (1985) Parameter estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transp Res B 19B:526–528CrossRef Dansie B (1985) Parameter estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transp Res B 19B:526–528CrossRef
go back to reference DeSarbo W, Ramaswamy V, Cohen S (1995) Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Mark Lett 6:137–147CrossRef DeSarbo W, Ramaswamy V, Cohen S (1995) Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Mark Lett 6:137–147CrossRef
go back to reference Dhar R, Nowlis S, Sherman S (2000) Trying hard or hardly trying: an analysis of context effects in choice. J Consum Psychol 9:189–200CrossRef Dhar R, Nowlis S, Sherman S (2000) Trying hard or hardly trying: an analysis of context effects in choice. J Consum Psychol 9:189–200CrossRef
go back to reference Elrod T, Keane M (1995) A factor analytic probit model for representing the market structure of panel data. J Mark Res 32:1–16CrossRef Elrod T, Keane M (1995) A factor analytic probit model for representing the market structure of panel data. J Mark Res 32:1–16CrossRef
go back to reference Fennell G, Allenby GM, Yang S, Edwards Y (2003) The effectiveness of demographic and psychographic variables for explaining brand and product category use. Quant Mark Econ 1:223–244CrossRef Fennell G, Allenby GM, Yang S, Edwards Y (2003) The effectiveness of demographic and psychographic variables for explaining brand and product category use. Quant Mark Econ 1:223–244CrossRef
go back to reference Greene W, Hensher D (2013) Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model. Appl Econ 45:1897–1902CrossRef Greene W, Hensher D (2013) Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model. Appl Econ 45:1897–1902CrossRef
go back to reference Grün B, Leisch F (2008) Identifiability of finite mixtures of multinomial logit models with varying and fixed effects. J Classif 25:225–247CrossRef Grün B, Leisch F (2008) Identifiability of finite mixtures of multinomial logit models with varying and fixed effects. J Classif 25:225–247CrossRef
go back to reference Gustafson A, Herrmann A, Huber F (2003) Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice. In: Gustafson A, Herrmann A, Huber F (eds) Conjoint measurement: methods and applications, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–46CrossRef Gustafson A, Herrmann A, Huber F (2003) Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice. In: Gustafson A, Herrmann A, Huber F (eds) Conjoint measurement: methods and applications, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–46CrossRef
go back to reference Haaijer R, Wedel M, Vriens M, Wansbeek TJ (1998) Utility covariances and context effects in conjoint MNP models. Mark Sci 17:236–252CrossRef Haaijer R, Wedel M, Vriens M, Wansbeek TJ (1998) Utility covariances and context effects in conjoint MNP models. Mark Sci 17:236–252CrossRef
go back to reference Haase K, Müller S (2015) Insights into clients’ choice in preventive health care facility location planning. OR Spectrum 37:273–291CrossRef Haase K, Müller S (2015) Insights into clients’ choice in preventive health care facility location planning. OR Spectrum 37:273–291CrossRef
go back to reference Huber J, Arora N, Johnson RM (1998) Capturing heterogeneity in consumer choices. ART Forum. American Marketing Association, Chicago Huber J, Arora N, Johnson RM (1998) Capturing heterogeneity in consumer choices. ART Forum. American Marketing Association, Chicago
go back to reference Hausman J, Wise D (1978) A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 46:403–429CrossRef Hausman J, Wise D (1978) A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 46:403–429CrossRef
go back to reference Karniouchina EV, Moore WL, van der Rhee B, Verma R (2009) Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research. Eur J Oper Res 197:340–348CrossRef Karniouchina EV, Moore WL, van der Rhee B, Verma R (2009) Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research. Eur J Oper Res 197:340–348CrossRef
go back to reference Keane M (1992) A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. J Bus Econ Stat 10:193–200 Keane M (1992) A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. J Bus Econ Stat 10:193–200
go back to reference Keane M, Wasi N (2013) Comparing alternative models of heterogeneity in consumer choice behavior. J Appl Econom 28:1018–1045 Keane M, Wasi N (2013) Comparing alternative models of heterogeneity in consumer choice behavior. J Appl Econom 28:1018–1045
go back to reference Löffler S, Baier D (2015) Bayesian conjoint analysis in water park pricing: a new approach taking varying part worths for attribute levels into account. J Serv Sci Manag 8:46–56 Löffler S, Baier D (2015) Bayesian conjoint analysis in water park pricing: a new approach taking varying part worths for attribute levels into account. J Serv Sci Manag 8:46–56
go back to reference McCullough RP (2009) Comparing hierarchical Bayes and latent class choice: practical issues for sparse data sets. In: 2009 Sawtooth software conference proceedings, pp 273–284 McCullough RP (2009) Comparing hierarchical Bayes and latent class choice: practical issues for sparse data sets. In: 2009 Sawtooth software conference proceedings, pp 273–284
go back to reference McLachlan G, Krishnan T (2007) The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, Hoboken McLachlan G, Krishnan T (2007) The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, Hoboken
go back to reference Moore WL (2004) A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. Int J Res Mark 21:299–312CrossRef Moore WL (2004) A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. Int J Res Mark 21:299–312CrossRef
go back to reference Moore WL, Gray-Lee J, Louviere JJ (1998) A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation. Mark Lett 9:195–208CrossRef Moore WL, Gray-Lee J, Louviere JJ (1998) A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation. Mark Lett 9:195–208CrossRef
go back to reference Natter M, Feurstein M (2002) Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models. Eur J Oper Res 137:448–458CrossRef Natter M, Feurstein M (2002) Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models. Eur J Oper Res 137:448–458CrossRef
go back to reference Otter T, Tüchler R, Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2004) Capturing consumer heterogeneity in metric conjoint analysis using Bayesian mixture models. Int J Res Mark 21:285–297CrossRef Otter T, Tüchler R, Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2004) Capturing consumer heterogeneity in metric conjoint analysis using Bayesian mixture models. Int J Res Mark 21:285–297CrossRef
go back to reference Özkan C, Karaesmen F, Özekici S (2015) A revenue management problem with a choice model of consumer behavior. OR Spectrum 37:457–473CrossRef Özkan C, Karaesmen F, Özekici S (2015) A revenue management problem with a choice model of consumer behavior. OR Spectrum 37:457–473CrossRef
go back to reference Paetz F (2013) Finite Mixture Multinomiales Probitmodell: Konzeption und Umsetzung. Springer, WiesbadenCrossRef Paetz F (2013) Finite Mixture Multinomiales Probitmodell: Konzeption und Umsetzung. Springer, WiesbadenCrossRef
go back to reference Paetz F, Steiner W (2014) A finite mixture multinomial probit model for choice based conjoint analysis: a simulation study. In: Proceedings of the 43th EMAC conference, University of Valencia, Spain Paetz F, Steiner W (2014) A finite mixture multinomial probit model for choice based conjoint analysis: a simulation study. In: Proceedings of the 43th EMAC conference, University of Valencia, Spain
go back to reference Paetz F, Steiner W (2015) Die Berücksichtigung von Abhängigkeiten zwischen Alternativen in Finite Mixture Conjoint Choice Modellen: Eine Simulationsstudie. Mark ZFP 37:90–100CrossRef Paetz F, Steiner W (2015) Die Berücksichtigung von Abhängigkeiten zwischen Alternativen in Finite Mixture Conjoint Choice Modellen: Eine Simulationsstudie. Mark ZFP 37:90–100CrossRef
go back to reference Raftery A (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–163CrossRef Raftery A (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–163CrossRef
go back to reference Rooderkerk R, Van Heerde H, Bijmolt T (2011) Incorporating context effects into a choice model. J Mark Res 48:767–780CrossRef Rooderkerk R, Van Heerde H, Bijmolt T (2011) Incorporating context effects into a choice model. J Mark Res 48:767–780CrossRef
go back to reference Rossi P, Allenby G, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian statistics in marketing. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Rossi P, Allenby G, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian statistics in marketing. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
go back to reference Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrasts and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29:281–295CrossRef Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrasts and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29:281–295CrossRef
go back to reference Steiner WJ (2010) A Stackelberg–Nash model for new product design. OR Spectrum 32:21–48CrossRef Steiner WJ (2010) A Stackelberg–Nash model for new product design. OR Spectrum 32:21–48CrossRef
go back to reference Steiner W, Hruschka H (2000) Conjointanalyse-basierte Produkt(linien)gestaltung unter Berücksichtigung von Konkurrenzreaktionen. OR Spektrum 22:71–95CrossRef Steiner W, Hruschka H (2000) Conjointanalyse-basierte Produkt(linien)gestaltung unter Berücksichtigung von Konkurrenzreaktionen. OR Spektrum 22:71–95CrossRef
go back to reference Swait J (2003) Flexible covariance structures for categorical dependent variables through finite mixtures of generalized extreme value models. J Bus Econ Stat 21:80–87CrossRef Swait J (2003) Flexible covariance structures for categorical dependent variables through finite mixtures of generalized extreme value models. J Bus Econ Stat 21:80–87CrossRef
go back to reference Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Train K (2008) Em algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions. J Choice Model 1:40–69CrossRef Train K (2008) Em algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions. J Choice Model 1:40–69CrossRef
go back to reference Tuma M, Decker R (2013) Finite mixture models in market segmentation: a review and suggestions for best practices. Electron J Bus Res Methods 11:2–15 Tuma M, Decker R (2013) Finite mixture models in market segmentation: a review and suggestions for best practices. Electron J Bus Res Methods 11:2–15
go back to reference Vriens M, Wedel M, Wilms T (1996) Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison. J Mark Res 33:73–85CrossRef Vriens M, Wedel M, Wilms T (1996) Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison. J Mark Res 33:73–85CrossRef
go back to reference Wedel M, Kamakura W (2000) Market segmentation-conceptual and methodological foundations. Kluver Academic Publishers, NorwellCrossRef Wedel M, Kamakura W (2000) Market segmentation-conceptual and methodological foundations. Kluver Academic Publishers, NorwellCrossRef
go back to reference Wedel M, Kamakura W, Arora N, Bemmaor NJC, Elrod T, Johnson R, Lenk P, Neslin S, Poulson C (1999) Discrete and continuous representations of unobserved heterogeneity in choice modeling. Mark Lett 10:219–232CrossRef Wedel M, Kamakura W, Arora N, Bemmaor NJC, Elrod T, Johnson R, Lenk P, Neslin S, Poulson C (1999) Discrete and continuous representations of unobserved heterogeneity in choice modeling. Mark Lett 10:219–232CrossRef
go back to reference Weeks M (1997) The multinomial probit model revisited: a discussion of parameter estimability, identification and specification testing. J Econ Surv 11:297–320CrossRef Weeks M (1997) The multinomial probit model revisited: a discussion of parameter estimability, identification and specification testing. J Econ Surv 11:297–320CrossRef
go back to reference Xu H, Craig B (2009) A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 65:1145–1155CrossRef Xu H, Craig B (2009) A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 65:1145–1155CrossRef
go back to reference Yai T, Iwakura S, Morichi S (1997) Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transp Res B 31:195–207CrossRef Yai T, Iwakura S, Morichi S (1997) Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transp Res B 31:195–207CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The benefits of incorporating utility dependencies in finite mixture probit models
Authors
Friederike Paetz
Winfried J. Steiner
Publication date
06-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
OR Spectrum / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0171-6468
Electronic ISSN: 1436-6304
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-017-0478-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

OR Spectrum 3/2017 Go to the issue