Top

Small Business Economics

Published in:

01-01-2015

The distribution of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian opportunities

Authors: Jeroen P. J. de Jong, Orietta Marsili

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 1/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Despite their presence in modern entrepreneurship theories, empirical investigations of opportunity types are scarce. We develop a 5-dimensional bipolar scale to measure the extent in which opportunities are Schumpeterian or Kirznerian. Drawing on this measure, we examine the shape of the opportunity distribution in relation to the environment and the characteristics of individuals who exploit them. Across a sample of 181 new products introduced by high-tech entrepreneurs, we find that pure Schumpeterian and Kirznerian types are rare, but rather opportunities display varying degrees of membership to one or the other type. The distribution is more skewed toward Schumpeterian opportunities for larger ventures, with a strategic focus on future needs, and operating in growing markets. In contrast, Kirznerian opportunities are more frequently pursued by small ventures, and by entrepreneurs that are young, with a strategic focus on present needs, and who are less innovative in their behavior.

previous article The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

next article Necessity entrepreneurship and competitive strategy

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.

Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. (1999). The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 19–33). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 557–583.CrossRef

Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Sourav, R. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.CrossRef

Arrow, K. (2000). Innovation in large and small firms. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Becker, M., Knudsen, T., & Swedberg, R. (2011). The entrepreneur: Classic texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.

Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.

Bruderl, J., & Schussler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 530–547.CrossRef

Buenstorf, G. (2007). Creation and pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities: An evolutionary economics perspective. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 323–337.CrossRef

Craig, J. B. L., & Johnson, D. (2006). Establishing individual differences related to opportunity alertness and innovation dependent on academic-career training. Journal of Management Development, 25(1), 28–39.CrossRef

Davidsson, P., Lindmark, L., & Olofsson, C. (1994). New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Regional Studies, 28(4), 395–410.CrossRef

Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 659–679.CrossRef

Dimov, D. (2010a). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57–81.CrossRef

Dimov, D. (2010b). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123–1153.CrossRef

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.

Douhan, R., Eliasson, G., & Henrekson, M. (2007). Israel M. Kirzner: An outstanding Austrian contributor to the economics of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 29(1), 213–223.CrossRef

Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425–449.CrossRef

Ebersberger, B., Marsili, O., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2010). Into thin air: Using a quantile regression approach to explore the relationship between R&D and innovation. International Review of Applied Economics, 24(1), 95–102.CrossRef

Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.CrossRef

Fu-Lai Yu, T. (2001). An entrepreneurial perspective of institutional change. Constitutional Political Economy, 12(3), 217–236.CrossRef

Gartner, W. B., Carter, N. M., & Hills, G. E. (2003). The language of opportunity. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (Eds.), New movements in entrepreneurship (pp. 103–124). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1989). Effectiveness of individual and aggregate compensation strategies. Industrial Relations, 28(3), 431–445.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2007). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Holcombe, R. G. (1998). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Quarterly journal of Austrian economics, 1(2), 45–62.CrossRef

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1–2), 5–17.CrossRef

Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The Alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32, 145–152.CrossRef

Koenker, R. W., & Bassett, G. J. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.CrossRef

Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. (2001). Quantile regression: An introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 43–56.CrossRef

Koppl, R., & Minniti, M. (2010). Market processes and entrepreneurial studies. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research, Vol. 5 (p. 217). New York City: Springer.CrossRef

Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741–755.

Lévesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177–194.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S., Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28, 273–283.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Preisendörfer, P., & Voss, T. (1990). Organizational mortality of small firms: The effects of entrepreneurial age and human capital. Organization Studies, 11(1), 107–129.CrossRef

Reid, S. E., & De Brentani, U. (2004). The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), 170–184.CrossRef

Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33, 229–255.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.

Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 13–17.CrossRef

Stam, E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and innovation. In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Eds.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy, Chap. 5. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Stuart, R. W., & Abetti, P. A. (1990). Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3), 151–162.CrossRef

Tushman, M. L., Anderson, P. C., & O’Reilly, C. (1997). Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: Organization renewal through innovation streams and strategic change. In M. L. Tushman & P. C. Anderson (Eds.), Managing strategic innovation and change. New York: Oxford University Press.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 119–138). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Title: The distribution of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian opportunities
Authors: Jeroen P. J. de Jong
Orietta Marsili
Publication date: 01-01-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Small Business Economics / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9585-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Venture capital financing and the financial distress risk of portfolio firms: How independent and bank-affiliated investors differ

High-growth firms in changing competitive environments: the US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002)

Spatial patterns in new firm formation: are cooperatives different?

High-growth firms and productivity: evidence from the United Kingdom

The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

Running in the family: parental role models in entrepreneurship