Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. The Fire-Resistive Principle

Authors : Kevin LaMalva, John Gales, Anthony Abu, Luke Bisby

Published in: International Handbook of Structural Fire Engineering

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Evaluation of structural fire protection may be considered within two distinct domains: the time domain and the strength domain. Time is conventionally used for standard fire resistance requirements in building codes, in which a particular fire resistance assembly is shown to provide adequate resistance to a standard fire exposure under test conditions for a period of time. Strength compares applied gravity loads and fire effects (e.g., thermally induced forces) to the capacity (e.g., temperature-dependent strength) of the structural system.
In the context of structural engineering, the fundamental philosophy used to design structures can be simply expressed as capacity > demand. The demand refers to loads that are imposed on a structure including its self-weight. The capacity refers to the global and local ability of a structure to carry an imposed demand. The conventional design of a structural system evaluates demand and capacity with respect to specific performance objectives including strength, stability, and stiffness.
Evaluation of structural fire protection within the time domain primarily considers the demand on the structure due to heating, which can be reduced with the application of protective insulation. However, this type of evaluation does not necessarily credit nor discount the capacity of the structure itself to endure fire exposure nor does it properly evaluate all aspects of the demand (e.g., thermally induced forces; see Sect. 2.1.4). Also, the consideration of demand due to heating is not with respect to specific performance objectives, but rather superficial failure criteria enforced during standard fire testing.
Evaluation of structural fire protection within the strength domain accounts for all contributions of the demand on a structural system, as well as its capacity to endure these demands with respect to required performance objectives.
There is no practical method for a designer to quantitatively compare the level of safety provided by an analysis conducted within the time domain compared to one conducted with the strength domain. Hence, the designer should adopt one or the other exclusively for a given analysis.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference ASTM. (2016). E119-16a standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International. ASTM. (2016). E119-16a standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International.
2.
go back to reference UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Volume 1, Northbrook, IL: UL. UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Volume 1, Northbrook, IL: UL.
3.
go back to reference Reed, S. A. (1896) Work of the committee of fire-proofing tests. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 192(851), 322–335. Reed, S. A. (1896) Work of the committee of fire-proofing tests. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 192(851), 322–335.
4.
go back to reference Andrews, Jaques and Rantoul. (1891). Tests of fireproof arches. The American Architect and Building News, 195–201. Andrews, Jaques and Rantoul. (1891). Tests of fireproof arches. The American Architect and Building News, 195–201.
5.
go back to reference Constable, S. (1897) Comparative standard fireproof floor tests of the new york building department. The Engineering Record, 337–340; 359–363; 382–387; 402–440. Constable, S. (1897) Comparative standard fireproof floor tests of the new york building department. The Engineering Record, 337–340; 359–363; 382–387; 402–440.
6.
go back to reference Himmelwright, A. (1898). Fireproof Construction. The Polytechnic, 167-175. Himmelwright, A. (1898). Fireproof Construction. The Polytechnic, 167-175.
7.
go back to reference Hutton, F. (1900). Heat and heat engines. Wiley, 611pp. Hutton, F. (1900). Heat and heat engines. Wiley, 611pp.
8.
go back to reference Gales, J., Bisby, L., & Maluk, C. (2012). Structural fire testing – Where are we, how did we get here, and where are we going? In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto, Portugal, 22 pp. Gales, J., Bisby, L., & Maluk, C. (2012). Structural fire testing – Where are we, how did we get here, and where are we going? In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto, Portugal, 22 pp.
9.
go back to reference Woolson, I., & Miller, R. (1912). Fire tests of floors in the United States. In International Association for Testing Materials 6th Congress, New York. Woolson, I., & Miller, R. (1912). Fire tests of floors in the United States. In International Association for Testing Materials 6th Congress, New York.
10.
go back to reference Abraham, L. A. (1900). Himmelwright’s testimony, report of the special Committee of the Assembly, appointed to investigate the public offices and departments of the City of New York. Albany. Abraham, L. A. (1900). Himmelwright’s testimony, report of the special Committee of the Assembly, appointed to investigate the public offices and departments of the City of New York. Albany.
11.
go back to reference Henning, G. (1905, May 2). To the editor of the New York Times. Henning, G. (1905, May 2). To the editor of the New York Times.
12.
go back to reference Ingberg, S. (1921). Fire tests of building columns, Technologic paper 184. National Bureau of Standards, Washington Ingberg, S. (1921). Fire tests of building columns, Technologic paper 184. National Bureau of Standards, Washington
13.
go back to reference Ingberg, S. (1928). Tests of the severity of building fires. NFPA Quarterly, 22, 43–61. Ingberg, S. (1928). Tests of the severity of building fires. NFPA Quarterly, 22, 43–61.
14.
go back to reference Sachs, E. (1906). Fire tests with floors: a floor of reinforced concrete on the coignet system, 28pp. Sachs, E. (1906). Fire tests with floors: a floor of reinforced concrete on the coignet system, 28pp.
16.
go back to reference Jeanes, D. (1982, April 26–30). Predicting fire endurance of steel structures. In American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) National Convention, Las Vegas, Nevada. Preprint 82-033. Jeanes, D. (1982, April 26–30). Predicting fire endurance of steel structures. In American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) National Convention, Las Vegas, Nevada. Preprint 82-033.
17.
go back to reference Ryan, J., & Robertson, A. (1959). Proposed criteria for defining load failure of beams, floors and roof constructions during fire tests. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-C, Engineering and Instrumentation, 63(2). Ryan, J., & Robertson, A. (1959). Proposed criteria for defining load failure of beams, floors and roof constructions during fire tests. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-C, Engineering and Instrumentation, 63(2).
18.
go back to reference ASTM E 119. (1971). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International. ASTM E 119. (1971). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International.
19.
go back to reference ASTM E 119. (2016). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials, ASTM International. ASTM E 119. (2016). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials, ASTM International.
20.
go back to reference UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL. UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL.
21.
go back to reference American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2016). AISC Standard 360-16, Appendix 4, Chicago, IL. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2016). AISC Standard 360-16, Appendix 4, Chicago, IL.
22.
go back to reference Bailey, C., Lennon, T., & Moore, D. (1999). The behaviour of full-scale steel-framed buildings subjected to compartment fires. The Structural Engineer, 77(8). Bailey, C., Lennon, T., & Moore, D. (1999). The behaviour of full-scale steel-framed buildings subjected to compartment fires. The Structural Engineer, 77(8).
23.
go back to reference LaMalva, K. J. (2017, August.). Reexamination of restrained vs. unrestrained. FPE Extra, Issue #20, Society of Fire Protection Engineers LaMalva, K. J. (2017, August.). Reexamination of restrained vs. unrestrained. FPE Extra, Issue #20, Society of Fire Protection Engineers
24.
go back to reference Carter, C. J., & Alfawakhiri, F. (2013, September). Restrained or unrestrained? Modern Steel Construction. Carter, C. J., & Alfawakhiri, F. (2013, September). Restrained or unrestrained? Modern Steel Construction.
25.
go back to reference Gross, J., et al. (2005). NIST NCSTAR 1-6B: Fire resistance tests of floor truss systems, federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gross, J., et al. (2005). NIST NCSTAR 1-6B: Fire resistance tests of floor truss systems, federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
26.
go back to reference ASCE/SEI 7-16. (2016). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute. ASCE/SEI 7-16. (2016). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute.
27.
go back to reference LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Chapter IV-9: Fire design. In Architects guide to structures. Routledge. LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Chapter IV-9: Fire design. In Architects guide to structures. Routledge.
28.
go back to reference International Building Code 2015, International Code Council. International Building Code 2015, International Code Council.
29.
go back to reference International Existing Building Code 2012, International Code Council. International Existing Building Code 2012, International Code Council.
30.
go back to reference ASCE/SEI/SFPE 29. (2005). Standard calculation methods for structural fire protection. Structural Engineering Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE/SEI/SFPE 29. (2005). Standard calculation methods for structural fire protection. Structural Engineering Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers.
31.
go back to reference Harmathy, T. (1965). Ten rules of fire endurance rating. Fire Technology, 1(2). Harmathy, T. (1965). Ten rules of fire endurance rating. Fire Technology, 1(2).
32.
go back to reference LaMalva, K. J. (2014). U.S. efforts toward standardization of structural fire engineering practice. In Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Queensland. LaMalva, K. J. (2014). U.S. efforts toward standardization of structural fire engineering practice. In Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Queensland.
33.
go back to reference Ellingwood, B., et al. (1982). Probability based load criteria: load factors and load combinations. Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, 108(5). Ellingwood, B., et al. (1982). Probability based load criteria: load factors and load combinations. Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, 108(5).
34.
go back to reference ISO 13824. (2009). Basis of design of structures – General principles on risk assessment of systems involving structures. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13824. (2009). Basis of design of structures – General principles on risk assessment of systems involving structures. International Organization for Standardization.
35.
go back to reference AISC 360. (2016). Specification for structural Steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction. AISC 360. (2016). Specification for structural Steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.
36.
go back to reference Ellingwood, B., & Bruce R. et al. (1980). Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58: Building code requirement for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures, NBS Special Publication 577, National Bureau of Standards. Ellingwood, B., & Bruce R. et al. (1980). Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58: Building code requirement for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures, NBS Special Publication 577, National Bureau of Standards.
37.
go back to reference LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Structural fire protection’s shifting paradigm. Fire Protection Engineering, Issue #74, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Q2. LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Structural fire protection’s shifting paradigm. Fire Protection Engineering, Issue #74, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Q2.
38.
go back to reference SFPE. (2007). Engineering guide to performance-based fire protection (2nd ed.), Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE. (2007). Engineering guide to performance-based fire protection (2nd ed.), Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
39.
go back to reference SFPE. (2009). Guidelines for peer review in the Fire protection design process. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE. (2009). Guidelines for peer review in the Fire protection design process. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
40.
go back to reference LaMalva, K. J. (2018, January). Developments in structural fire protection design - a U.S. perspective. The Structural Engineer, 96, Institution of Fire Engineers. LaMalva, K. J. (2018, January). Developments in structural fire protection design - a U.S. perspective. The Structural Engineer, 96, Institution of Fire Engineers.
41.
go back to reference SFPE. (2003). Engineering guide to human behavior in fire. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE. (2003). Engineering guide to human behavior in fire. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
42.
go back to reference NFPA. (2013). 557: Standard for determination of fire loads for use in structural fire protection design. National Fire Protection Association. NFPA. (2013). 557: Standard for determination of fire loads for use in structural fire protection design. National Fire Protection Association.
43.
go back to reference SFPE S.01. (2011). Engineering standard on calculating Fire exposures to structures. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE S.01. (2011). Engineering standard on calculating Fire exposures to structures. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
44.
go back to reference SFPE. (2014). S.02: Engineering standard on the development and use of methodologies to predict the thermal performance of structural and fire resistive assemblies. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE. (2014). S.02: Engineering standard on the development and use of methodologies to predict the thermal performance of structural and fire resistive assemblies. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
45.
go back to reference Eurocode 1. (2001). Basis of design and actions on structures, part 1.2: Actions on structures – Actions on structures exposed to fire, ENV 1991-1-2. CEN. Eurocode 1. (2001). Basis of design and actions on structures, part 1.2: Actions on structures – Actions on structures exposed to fire, ENV 1991-1-2. CEN.
46.
go back to reference SFPE G.06. (2011). Engineering guidelines for substantiating a fire model for a given application. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE G.06. (2011). Engineering guidelines for substantiating a fire model for a given application. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
47.
go back to reference Ellingwood, B., & Corotis, R.. (1991). Load combinations for buildings exposed to fires. Engineering Journal. American Institute of Steel Construction. Ellingwood, B., & Corotis, R.. (1991). Load combinations for buildings exposed to fires. Engineering Journal. American Institute of Steel Construction.
48.
go back to reference NFPA. (2021). 5000: Building construction and safety code. National Fire Protection Association. Quincy, MA. NFPA. (2021). 5000: Building construction and safety code. National Fire Protection Association. Quincy, MA.
49.
go back to reference NFPA. (2021). 101: Life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA. NFPA. (2021). 101: Life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
50.
go back to reference ASCE/SEI. (2018). Manual of practice no. 138: Structural fire engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA. ASCE/SEI. (2018). Manual of practice no. 138: Structural fire engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.
52.
go back to reference Buchanan, A., & Abu, A. (2017). Structural design for fire safety (2nd ed.). Wiley. Buchanan, A., & Abu, A. (2017). Structural design for fire safety (2nd ed.). Wiley.
53.
go back to reference Carlson, C., Selvaggio, S., & Gustaferro, A. (1965). A review of studies of the effects of restraint on the fire resistance of prestressed concrete. Portland Cement Association Research Department Bulletin 206, Portland Cement Association (USA) Carlson, C., Selvaggio, S., & Gustaferro, A. (1965). A review of studies of the effects of restraint on the fire resistance of prestressed concrete. Portland Cement Association Research Department Bulletin 206, Portland Cement Association (USA)
54.
go back to reference Wang, Y., Burgess, I., Wald, F., & Gillie, M. (2012). Performance-based fire engineering of structures. CRC Press. Wang, Y., Burgess, I., Wald, F., & Gillie, M. (2012). Performance-based fire engineering of structures. CRC Press.
55.
go back to reference British Steel. (1999). The behaviour of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire. Swinden Technology Centre. British Steel. (1999). The behaviour of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire. Swinden Technology Centre.
56.
go back to reference Purkiss, J., & Li, L. (2014). Fire safety engineering design of structures. CRC Press. Purkiss, J., & Li, L. (2014). Fire safety engineering design of structures. CRC Press.
57.
go back to reference Bisby, L. (2016). Structural mechanics, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering (5th ed., pp. 255–276).CrossRef Bisby, L. (2016). Structural mechanics, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering (5th ed., pp. 255–276).CrossRef
58.
go back to reference CEN. (2005b). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-2: General rules – Structural fire design. EN 1993-1-2. European Committee for Standardization. CEN. (2005b). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-2: General rules – Structural fire design. EN 1993-1-2. European Committee for Standardization.
59.
go back to reference Wang, Y. C. (2002). Steel and composite structures: Behaviour and design for fire safety. Spoon Press.CrossRef Wang, Y. C. (2002). Steel and composite structures: Behaviour and design for fire safety. Spoon Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Fire-Resistive Principle
Authors
Kevin LaMalva
John Gales
Anthony Abu
Luke Bisby
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77123-2_2