Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Foreword and Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. The Fire-Resistive Principle

verfasst von : Kevin LaMalva, John Gales, Anthony Abu, Luke Bisby

Erschienen in: International Handbook of Structural Fire Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Evaluation of structural fire protection may be considered within two distinct domains: the time domain and the strength domain. Time is conventionally used for standard fire resistance requirements in building codes, in which a particular fire resistance assembly is shown to provide adequate resistance to a standard fire exposure under test conditions for a period of time. Strength compares applied gravity loads and fire effects (e.g., thermally induced forces) to the capacity (e.g., temperature-dependent strength) of the structural system.
In the context of structural engineering, the fundamental philosophy used to design structures can be simply expressed as capacity > demand. The demand refers to loads that are imposed on a structure including its self-weight. The capacity refers to the global and local ability of a structure to carry an imposed demand. The conventional design of a structural system evaluates demand and capacity with respect to specific performance objectives including strength, stability, and stiffness.
Evaluation of structural fire protection within the time domain primarily considers the demand on the structure due to heating, which can be reduced with the application of protective insulation. However, this type of evaluation does not necessarily credit nor discount the capacity of the structure itself to endure fire exposure nor does it properly evaluate all aspects of the demand (e.g., thermally induced forces; see Sect. 2.1.4). Also, the consideration of demand due to heating is not with respect to specific performance objectives, but rather superficial failure criteria enforced during standard fire testing.
Evaluation of structural fire protection within the strength domain accounts for all contributions of the demand on a structural system, as well as its capacity to endure these demands with respect to required performance objectives.
There is no practical method for a designer to quantitatively compare the level of safety provided by an analysis conducted within the time domain compared to one conducted with the strength domain. Hence, the designer should adopt one or the other exclusively for a given analysis.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Foreword and Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Keys to Successful Design
Literatur
1.
ASTM. (2016). E119-16a standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International.
2.
UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Volume 1, Northbrook, IL: UL.
3.
Reed, S. A. (1896) Work of the committee of fire-proofing tests. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 192(851), 322–335.
4.
Andrews, Jaques and Rantoul. (1891). Tests of fireproof arches. The American Architect and Building News, 195–201.
5.
Constable, S. (1897) Comparative standard fireproof floor tests of the new york building department. The Engineering Record, 337–340; 359–363; 382–387; 402–440.
6.
Himmelwright, A. (1898). Fireproof Construction. The Polytechnic, 167-175.
7.
Hutton, F. (1900). Heat and heat engines. Wiley, 611pp.
8.
Gales, J., Bisby, L., & Maluk, C. (2012). Structural fire testing – Where are we, how did we get here, and where are we going? In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto, Portugal, 22 pp.
9.
Woolson, I., & Miller, R. (1912). Fire tests of floors in the United States. In International Association for Testing Materials 6th Congress, New York.
10.
Abraham, L. A. (1900). Himmelwright’s testimony, report of the special Committee of the Assembly, appointed to investigate the public offices and departments of the City of New York. Albany.
11.
Henning, G. (1905, May 2). To the editor of the New York Times.
12.
Ingberg, S. (1921). Fire tests of building columns, Technologic paper 184. National Bureau of Standards, Washington
13.
Ingberg, S. (1928). Tests of the severity of building fires. NFPA Quarterly, 22, 43–61.
14.
Sachs, E. (1906). Fire tests with floors: a floor of reinforced concrete on the coignet system, 28pp.
15.
16.
Jeanes, D. (1982, April 26–30). Predicting fire endurance of steel structures. In American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) National Convention, Las Vegas, Nevada. Preprint 82-033.
17.
Ryan, J., & Robertson, A. (1959). Proposed criteria for defining load failure of beams, floors and roof constructions during fire tests. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-C, Engineering and Instrumentation, 63(2).
18.
ASTM E 119. (1971). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International.
19.
ASTM E 119. (2016). Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials, ASTM International.
20.
UL Fire Resistance Directory. (2015). Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL.
21.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2016). AISC Standard 360-16, Appendix 4, Chicago, IL.
22.
Bailey, C., Lennon, T., & Moore, D. (1999). The behaviour of full-scale steel-framed buildings subjected to compartment fires. The Structural Engineer, 77(8).
23.
LaMalva, K. J. (2017, August.). Reexamination of restrained vs. unrestrained. FPE Extra, Issue #20, Society of Fire Protection Engineers
24.
Carter, C. J., & Alfawakhiri, F. (2013, September). Restrained or unrestrained? Modern Steel Construction.
25.
Gross, J., et al. (2005). NIST NCSTAR 1-6B: Fire resistance tests of floor truss systems, federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
26.
ASCE/SEI 7-16. (2016). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute.
27.
LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Chapter IV-9: Fire design. In Architects guide to structures. Routledge.
28.
International Building Code 2015, International Code Council.
29.
International Existing Building Code 2012, International Code Council.
30.
ASCE/SEI/SFPE 29. (2005). Standard calculation methods for structural fire protection. Structural Engineering Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers.
31.
Harmathy, T. (1965). Ten rules of fire endurance rating. Fire Technology, 1(2).
32.
LaMalva, K. J. (2014). U.S. efforts toward standardization of structural fire engineering practice. In Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Queensland.
33.
Ellingwood, B., et al. (1982). Probability based load criteria: load factors and load combinations. Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, 108(5).
34.
ISO 13824. (2009). Basis of design of structures – General principles on risk assessment of systems involving structures. International Organization for Standardization.
35.
AISC 360. (2016). Specification for structural Steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.
36.
Ellingwood, B., & Bruce R. et al. (1980). Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58: Building code requirement for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures, NBS Special Publication 577, National Bureau of Standards.
37.
LaMalva, K. J. (2017). Structural fire protection’s shifting paradigm. Fire Protection Engineering, Issue #74, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Q2.
38.
SFPE. (2007). Engineering guide to performance-based fire protection (2nd ed.), Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
39.
SFPE. (2009). Guidelines for peer review in the Fire protection design process. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
40.
LaMalva, K. J. (2018, January). Developments in structural fire protection design - a U.S. perspective. The Structural Engineer, 96, Institution of Fire Engineers.
41.
SFPE. (2003). Engineering guide to human behavior in fire. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
42.
NFPA. (2013). 557: Standard for determination of fire loads for use in structural fire protection design. National Fire Protection Association.
43.
SFPE S.01. (2011). Engineering standard on calculating Fire exposures to structures. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
44.
SFPE. (2014). S.02: Engineering standard on the development and use of methodologies to predict the thermal performance of structural and fire resistive assemblies. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
45.
Eurocode 1. (2001). Basis of design and actions on structures, part 1.2: Actions on structures – Actions on structures exposed to fire, ENV 1991-1-2. CEN.
46.
SFPE G.06. (2011). Engineering guidelines for substantiating a fire model for a given application. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
47.
Ellingwood, B., & Corotis, R.. (1991). Load combinations for buildings exposed to fires. Engineering Journal. American Institute of Steel Construction.
48.
NFPA. (2021). 5000: Building construction and safety code. National Fire Protection Association. Quincy, MA.
49.
NFPA. (2021). 101: Life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
50.
ASCE/SEI. (2018). Manual of practice no. 138: Structural fire engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.
51.
52.
Buchanan, A., & Abu, A. (2017). Structural design for fire safety (2nd ed.). Wiley.
53.
Carlson, C., Selvaggio, S., & Gustaferro, A. (1965). A review of studies of the effects of restraint on the fire resistance of prestressed concrete. Portland Cement Association Research Department Bulletin 206, Portland Cement Association (USA)
54.
Wang, Y., Burgess, I., Wald, F., & Gillie, M. (2012). Performance-based fire engineering of structures. CRC Press.
55.
British Steel. (1999). The behaviour of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire. Swinden Technology Centre.
56.
Purkiss, J., & Li, L. (2014). Fire safety engineering design of structures. CRC Press.
57.
Bisby, L. (2016). Structural mechanics, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering (5th ed., pp. 255–276).CrossRef
58.
CEN. (2005b). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-2: General rules – Structural fire design. EN 1993-1-2. European Committee for Standardization.
59.
Wang, Y. C. (2002). Steel and composite structures: Behaviour and design for fire safety. Spoon Press.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Fire-Resistive Principle
verfasst von
Kevin LaMalva
John Gales
Anthony Abu
Luke Bisby
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
International Handbook of Structural Fire Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77122-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-77123-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77123-2_2