Top

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Published in:

05-12-2019 | Original Article

The impact of climate damage function on the social cost of carbon and economic growth rate

Authors: Zaili Zhen, Lixin Tian

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 7/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of climate damage function on the social cost of carbon (SCC) and the economic growth rate. In a two-sector economic model with endogenous growth, we construct a 7-dimensional nonlinear system and then linearize the nonlinear system to derive the expression of the SCC containing the damage function. We find that the selected damage function has significant impacts when we calculate the SCC. In our model, the long run SCC per unit of output is the discount flow of the damage function caused by temperature rise and it is also affected by temperature adjustment rate and some other parameters. The specific form of damage function directly affects the social evaluation of the externality of pollution. The concavity of the SCC in the time path depends on second derivative of the damage function in infinite time. Higher-order damage function increase the SCC. We find that when the society is in an optimal state, the long-term economic growth rate can still be guaranteed to be positive when the convex damage function is chosen. The key of mitigation and adaptation strategies is the development of effective climate policies. Thus, as global recommendations for mitigation and adaptation strategies, we recommendation policy makers to use a highly convex damage function to calculate the SCC. We suggest policy makers consider carbon tax policies based on SCC. This makes the economic view of pollution closer to the mitigation target of climate policy-makers.

previous article Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery

next article Technology-side carbon abatement cost curves for China’s power generation sector

Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2009) The impact of climate change on the balanced growth equivalent: an application of FUND. Environ Resour Econ 43(3):351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9269-5CrossRef

Bretschger L, Karydas C (2018) Optimum growth and carbon policies with lags in the climate system. Environ Resour Econ 70(4):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0153-4CrossRef

Bretschger L, Pattakou A (2018) As bad as it gets: how climate damage functions affect growth and the social cost of carbon. Environ Resour Econ 72:5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0219-yCrossRef

Bretschger L, Vinogradova A (2018) Escaping damocles’ sword: endogenous climate shocks in a growing economy. CER-ETH–Cent Econ Res ETH Zurich Work Pap 18:291

Burke M, Dykema J, Lobell DB et al (2015) Incorporating climate uncertainty into estimates of climate change impacts. Rev Econ Stat 97(2):461–471. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00478CrossRef

Dietz S, Stern N (2015) Endogenous growth, convexity of damage and climate risk: how nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Econ J 125(583):574–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12188CrossRef

Duan HB, Zhang GP, Wang SY et al (2019a) Robust climate change research: an review on multimodel analysis. Environ Res Lett 14(3):033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf8f9CrossRef

Duan HB, Zhang GP, Wang SY et al (2019b) Integrated benefit-cost analysis of China’s optimal adaptation and targeted mitigation. Ecol Econ 160:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.008CrossRef

Estrada F, Tol RSJ, Gay-García C (2015) The persistence of shocks in GDP and the estimation of the potential economic costs of climate change. Environ Model Softw 69(C):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.010CrossRef

Fankhauser S (1995) Protection versus retreat: the economic costs of sea-level rise. Environ Plan A 27(2):299–319. https://doi.org/10.1068/a270299CrossRef

Farmer JD, Hepburn C, Mealy P et al (2015) A third wave in the economics of climate change. Environ Resour Econ 62(2):329–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9965-2CrossRef

Field CB (2014) Climate change 2014–impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: regional aspects. Cambridge University Press

Golosov M, Hassler J, Krusell P et al (2014) Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. Econometrica 82(1):41–88. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10217CrossRef

Guivarch C, Pottier A (2018) Climate damage on production or on growth: what impact on the social cost of carbon? Environ Model Assess 23(2):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9572-4CrossRef

Hanemann WM (2008) What is the economic cost of climate change? CUDARE Working Papers - University of California, Berkeley

Hooss G, Voss R, Hasselmann K et al (2001) A nonlinear impulse response model of the coupled carbon cycle-climate system (NICCS). Clim Dyn 18(3–4):189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820100170CrossRef

Hope C (2006) The marginal impact of CO₂ from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC’s five reasons for concern. Integr Assess 6(1):19–56

Hope C (2013) Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO₂: why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002. Clim Chang 117(3):531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0633-zCrossRef

Huang F, Zhou D, Wang Q et al (2019) Decomposition and attribution analysis of the transport sector’s carbon dioxide intensity change in China. Transp Res A Policy Pract 119:343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.001CrossRef

Krey V, Masera O, Blanford G et al (2014) Annex II: metrics & methodology, climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Meyer V, Becker N, Markantonis V et al (2013) Assessing the costs of natural hazards-state of the art and knowledge gaps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(5):1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013CrossRef

Mi ZF, Pan SY, Yu H et al (2015) Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO₂, emission: a case study of Beijing. J Clean Prod 103:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.011CrossRef

Moore FC, Diaz DB (2015) Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nat Clim Chang 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2481

Nordhaus WD (1994) Expert opinion on climate change. Am Sci 82(1):45–51

Nordhaus WD (2007a) Accompanying notes and documentation on development of DICE-2007 model: notes on DICE-2007.v8 of September 21, 2007 New Haven. Yale University, CT: Yale University

Nordhaus WD (2007b) Alternative measures of output in global economic-environmental models: purchasing power parity or market exchange rates? Energy Econ 29(3):349–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.02.003CrossRef

Nordhaus WD (2011) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: background and results from the RICE-2011 model. Soc Sci Electron Publ 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945844

Nordhaus WD (2012) Economic policy in the face of severe tail events. J Publ Econ Theory 14(2):197–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01544.xCrossRef

Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000). Warming the world: economic models of global warming. MIT press

Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am Econ Rev 86(4):741–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(96)01196-6CrossRef

Pindyck RS (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 51(3):860–872. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860CrossRef

Stanton EA, Ackerman F, Kartha S (2009) Inside the integrated assessment models: four issues in climate economics. Clim Dev 1(2):166–184. https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2009.0015CrossRef

Svirezhev Y, Brovkin V, Bloh WV et al (1999) Optimisation of reduction of global CO₂, emission based on a simple model of the carbon cycle. Environ Model Assess 4(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019039628546CrossRef

Tol RSJ (2002) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part 1: benchmark estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(1):47–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014500930521CrossRef

van den Bijgaart I, Gerlagh R, Korsten L, et al. (2013) A simple formula for the social cost of carbon. 2013. Feem working papers “Note Di Lavoro” series

van den Bijgaart I, Gerlagh R, Liski M et al (2016) A simple formula for the social cost of carbon. J Environ Econ Manag 77(3):75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.01.005CrossRef

Weitzman ML (2010) What is the “damages function” for global warming—and what difference might it make. Clim Chang Econ 1(01):57–69. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007810000042CrossRef

Weitzman ML (2012) GHG targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages. J Publ Econ Theory 14(2):221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01539.xCrossRef

Zhou X, Zhou D, Wang Q et al (2019) How information and communication technology drives carbon emissions: a sector-level analysis for China. Energy Econ 81:380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.014CrossRef

Title: The impact of climate damage function on the social cost of carbon and economic growth rate
Authors: Zaili Zhen
Lixin Tian
Publication date: 05-12-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09908-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy

Green innovation efficiency across China’s 30 provinces: estimate, comparison, and convergence

Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery

Co-control of carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions in China from a cost-effective perspective

Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power in different regions of China and spatial correlations

Uncovering impact factors of carbon emissions from transportation sector: evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta Area