Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Empirical Research

The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?

Authors: Christian Homburg, Arnd Vomberg, Margit Enke, Philipp H. Grimm

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Issue 1/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999), which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.CrossRef Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Bauerly, R. J., Johnson, D. T., & Singh, M. (2005). Readability and the impact of marketing. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25. Bauerly, R. J., Johnson, D. T., & Singh, M. (2005). Readability and the impact of marketing. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
go back to reference Brown, S. W. (2005). When executives speak, we should listen and act differently. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.CrossRef Brown, S. W. (2005). When executives speak, we should listen and act differently. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Cespedes, F. (1994). Industrial marketing: managing new requirements. Sloan Management Review, 35, 45–60. Cespedes, F. (1994). Industrial marketing: managing new requirements. Sloan Management Review, 35, 45–60.
go back to reference Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.CrossRef Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135–145.CrossRef Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135–145.CrossRef
go back to reference Day, G. S. (2004). Invited commentaries on ‘evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing’: achieving advantage with a new dominant logic. Journal of Marketing, 68, 18–19.CrossRef Day, G. S. (2004). Invited commentaries on ‘evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing’: achieving advantage with a new dominant logic. Journal of Marketing, 68, 18–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Engelen, A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A cross-cultural perspective of marketing departments’ influence tactics. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 73–94.CrossRef Engelen, A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A cross-cultural perspective of marketing departments’ influence tactics. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 73–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74, 80–92.CrossRef Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74, 80–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRef Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.CrossRef Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.CrossRef
go back to reference Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71, 121–139.CrossRef Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71, 121–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.CrossRef Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69, 115–130.CrossRef Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69, 115–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 7–18.CrossRef Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 7–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2007). The thought worlds of marketing and sales: which differences make a difference? Journal of Marketing, 71, 124–142.CrossRef Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2007). The thought worlds of marketing and sales: which differences make a difference? Journal of Marketing, 71, 124–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63, 1–17.CrossRef Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.CrossRef Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Hyde, P., Landry, E., & Tipping, A. (2004). Making the perfect marketer: a study from the association of national advertisers and Booz Allen Hamilton suggests five ways to make marketing more relevant than ever. Strategy & Business, 37, 36–43. Hyde, P., Landry, E., & Tipping, A. (2004). Making the perfect marketer: a study from the association of national advertisers and Booz Allen Hamilton suggests five ways to make marketing more relevant than ever. Strategy & Business, 37, 36–43.
go back to reference Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.CrossRef Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.CrossRef Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.CrossRef Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, V., & Shah, D. (2009). Expanding the role of marketing: from customer equity to market capitalization. Journal of Marketing, 73, 119–136.CrossRef Kumar, V., & Shah, D. (2009). Expanding the role of marketing: from customer equity to market capitalization. Journal of Marketing, 73, 119–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75, 16–30.CrossRef Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75, 16–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Lehmann, D. R. (1996). Some thoughts on the futures of marketing. In D. R. Lehmann & K. E. Jocz (Eds.), Reflections on the futures of marketing: practice and education (pp. 121–135). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. Lehmann, D. R. (1996). Some thoughts on the futures of marketing. In D. R. Lehmann & K. E. Jocz (Eds.), Reflections on the futures of marketing: practice and education (pp. 121–135). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
go back to reference Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Metrics for marketing matter. Journal of Marketing, 68, 73–75.CrossRef Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Metrics for marketing matter. Journal of Marketing, 68, 73–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRef Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2011). Salespeople’s knowledge-sharing behaviors with coworkers outside the sales unit. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31, 103–122.CrossRef Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2011). Salespeople’s knowledge-sharing behaviors with coworkers outside the sales unit. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31, 103–122.CrossRef
go back to reference Mizik, N. (2014). Assessing the total financial performance impact of brand equity with limited time-series data. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0431]. Mizik, N. (2014). Assessing the total financial performance impact of brand equity with limited time-series data. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1509/​jmr.​13.​0431].
go back to reference Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2008). The financial value impact of perceptual brand attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 15–32.CrossRef Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2008). The financial value impact of perceptual brand attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 15–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2009). Valuing branded businesses. Journal of Marketing, 73, 137–153.CrossRef Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2009). Valuing branded businesses. Journal of Marketing, 73, 137–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Moorman, C., & Rust, R. T. (1999). The role of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 180–197.CrossRef Moorman, C., & Rust, R. T. (1999). The role of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 180–197.CrossRef
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. (2007). Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 79–93.CrossRef O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. (2007). Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 79–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 271–288.CrossRef Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 271–288.CrossRef
go back to reference Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69, 167–176.CrossRef Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69, 167–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRef Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72, 27–45.CrossRef Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72, 27–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004a). Measuring marketing productivity: current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68, 76–89.CrossRef Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004a). Measuring marketing productivity: current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68, 76–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004b). Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68, 109–127.CrossRef Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004b). Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68, 109–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Schultz, D. E. (2005). MR deserves blame for marketing’s decline. Marketing News, 39, 7. Schultz, D. E. (2005). MR deserves blame for marketing’s decline. Marketing News, 39, 7.
go back to reference Sethi, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. Journal of Marketing, 72, 118–134.CrossRef Sethi, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. Journal of Marketing, 72, 118–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2005). Does marketing need reform? in: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2005). Does marketing need reform? in: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
go back to reference Stock, R. M., & Reifenscheid, I. (2014). Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 264–276.CrossRef Stock, R. M., & Reifenscheid, I. (2014). Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 264–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Tavassoli, N. T., Sorescu, A., & Chandy, R. (2014). Employee-based brand equity: Why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0435]. Tavassoli, N. T., Sorescu, A., & Chandy, R. (2014). Employee-based brand equity: Why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1509/​jmr.​13.​0435].
go back to reference Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73, 14–37.CrossRef Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73, 14–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Verhoef, P. C., Leeflang, P. S. H., Reiner, J., Natter, M., Baker, W., Grinstein, A., Gustafsson, A., Morrison, P., & Saunders, J. (2011). A cross-national investigation into the marketing department’s influence within the firm: Toward initial empirical generalizations. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 59–86.CrossRef Verhoef, P. C., Leeflang, P. S. H., Reiner, J., Natter, M., Baker, W., Grinstein, A., Gustafsson, A., Morrison, P., & Saunders, J. (2011). A cross-national investigation into the marketing department’s influence within the firm: Toward initial empirical generalizations. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 59–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Webster, F. E. (2005). Back to the future: integrating marketing as tactic, strategy, and organizational culture. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25. Webster, F. E. (2005). Back to the future: integrating marketing as tactic, strategy, and organizational culture. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
go back to reference Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline and dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 35–43. Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline and dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 35–43.
Metadata
Title
The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?
Authors
Christian Homburg
Arnd Vomberg
Margit Enke
Philipp H. Grimm
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Electronic ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1/2015 Go to the issue

Conceptual/Theoretical Paper

A holistic market conceptualization