Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Multidimensional Studies of the Theory of the Standard of Criminal Proof Under the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure

Author : Bo Yang

Published in: Facts and Evidence

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

“If there is a trial, it must be proved”, so trial is based on proof and the proof is directed by legal standard of criminal proof, judges make judgments only when arriving the standard of criminal proof. The legitimacy of trial is closely related to the achievement of legal standard of criminal proof: under the system of divinity evidence, the legitimacy of judicial decision resorts to the indication of gods; under the system of legal evidence, formal legal reality intensifies the legitimacy of trial; under the discretionary evaluation system, the legitimacy of trial performances as formation of discretional evaluation of evidence of judge.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Huang (2001, p. 243).
 
2
Bayless (1996, p. 37).
 
3
For a long time, the arguments about the standard of criminal proof, that is the argument between the legal truth and the objective truth.
 
4
Wu (2014, p. 150).
 
5
Shen (2015, p. 5).
 
6
Strictly speaking, the investigation centralism and the trial centralism are not in corresponding categories. The latter one is corresponding to the “assemble-line” style, while the former one is the product derived from the “assemble-line” style. Based on the demands of the theoretical evidence, this paper directly makes them correspond to each other.
 
7
Li (1992, p. 464).
 
8
Such the typical article, Long (2004), Chen (2012).
 
9
Chen (2014b, pp. 179–181).
 
10
Murphy (1997, p. 109).
 
11
Min (2015, p. 42).
 
12
Min (2015, p. 42).
 
13
Wu (2014, p. 158).
 
14
Shen (2015, p. 5).
 
15
Chen (2014a, p. 254).
 
16
Chen (2014a, p. 260).
 
17
He (2001, p. 54).
 
18
Li and Wang (2001, p. 126).
 
19
Long (1999, p. 301).
 
Literature
go back to reference Bayless, Michael D. 1996. The Principle of Law, trans. Wenxian Zhang etc., 37. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House. Bayless, Michael D. 1996. The Principle of Law, trans. Wenxian Zhang etc., 37. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
go back to reference Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Research on the Rule of Objective Verification. Studies in Law and Business 2. Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Research on the Rule of Objective Verification. Studies in Law and Business 2.
go back to reference Chen, Ruihua. 2014a. Criminal Evidence Law, 2nd ed., 254, 260. Peking University Publisher. Chen, Ruihua. 2014a. Criminal Evidence Law, 2nd ed., 254, 260. Peking University Publisher.
go back to reference Chen, Ruihua. 2014b. The Relationship Between the Subjective Factor and the Objective Factor. China Legal Science 3: 179–181. Chen, Ruihua. 2014b. The Relationship Between the Subjective Factor and the Objective Factor. China Legal Science 3: 179–181.
go back to reference He, Jiahong. 2001. Research on the Aim and the Standard: Also on the Basic Concept and Category. Peking University Law Journal 6: 54. He, Jiahong. 2001. Research on the Aim and the Standard: Also on the Basic Concept and Category. Peking University Law Journal 6: 54.
go back to reference Huang, Maorong. 2001. Method of Jurisprudence and Modern Civil Law, 243. China University of Political Science and Law Press. Huang, Maorong. 2001. Method of Jurisprudence and Modern Civil Law, 243. China University of Political Science and Law Press.
go back to reference Li, Xuedeng. 1992. A Comparative Study of Evidence Law, 464. Wu-Nan Book Publishing Company. Li, Xuedeng. 1992. A Comparative Study of Evidence Law, 464. Wu-Nan Book Publishing Company.
go back to reference Li, Xuekuan, and Haiyan Wang. 2001. Research on the Hierarchies of Standard of Proof. China Legal Science 5: 126. Li, Xuekuan, and Haiyan Wang. 2001. Research on the Hierarchies of Standard of Proof. China Legal Science 5: 126.
go back to reference Long, Zongzhi. 1999. Research on the Relative Rationalism, 301. China University of Political and Law Press. Long, Zongzhi. 1999. Research on the Relative Rationalism, 301. China University of Political and Law Press.
go back to reference Long, Zongzhi. 2004. The Objective Verification and the Subjective Evaluation: The Two Kind of Pattern of Criminal Proof. Chinese Journal of Law 2. Long, Zongzhi. 2004. The Objective Verification and the Subjective Evaluation: The Two Kind of Pattern of Criminal Proof. Chinese Journal of Law 2.
go back to reference Min, Chunlei. 2015. The Trial Centralism: The Understanding of Its Connotation and Realization Rath. Science of Law 3: 42. Min, Chunlei. 2015. The Trial Centralism: The Understanding of Its Connotation and Realization Rath. Science of Law 3: 42.
go back to reference Murphy, Peter. 1997. Murphy on Evidence, 6th ed., 109. Blackstone Press Limited. Murphy, Peter. 1997. Murphy on Evidence, 6th ed., 109. Blackstone Press Limited.
go back to reference Shen, Deyong. 2015. On the Reform of the Litigation System of the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. China Legal Science 3: 5. Shen, Deyong. 2015. On the Reform of the Litigation System of the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. China Legal Science 3: 5.
go back to reference Wu, Zeyong. 2014. ‘Justice’ or ‘Utopia’?—Civil Procedural Proof Standard in Comparative Perspective. The Jurist 3: 150, 158. Wu, Zeyong. 2014. ‘Justice’ or ‘Utopia’?—Civil Procedural Proof Standard in Comparative Perspective. The Jurist 3: 150, 158.
Metadata
Title
The Multidimensional Studies of the Theory of the Standard of Criminal Proof Under the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure
Author
Bo Yang
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9639-1_19