Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Multidimensional Studies of the Theory of the Standard of Criminal Proof Under the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure

verfasst von : Bo Yang

Erschienen in: Facts and Evidence

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

“If there is a trial, it must be proved”, so trial is based on proof and the proof is directed by legal standard of criminal proof, judges make judgments only when arriving the standard of criminal proof. The legitimacy of trial is closely related to the achievement of legal standard of criminal proof: under the system of divinity evidence, the legitimacy of judicial decision resorts to the indication of gods; under the system of legal evidence, formal legal reality intensifies the legitimacy of trial; under the discretionary evaluation system, the legitimacy of trial performances as formation of discretional evaluation of evidence of judge.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Huang (2001, p. 243).
 
2
Bayless (1996, p. 37).
 
3
For a long time, the arguments about the standard of criminal proof, that is the argument between the legal truth and the objective truth.
 
4
Wu (2014, p. 150).
 
5
Shen (2015, p. 5).
 
6
Strictly speaking, the investigation centralism and the trial centralism are not in corresponding categories. The latter one is corresponding to the “assemble-line” style, while the former one is the product derived from the “assemble-line” style. Based on the demands of the theoretical evidence, this paper directly makes them correspond to each other.
 
7
Li (1992, p. 464).
 
8
Such the typical article, Long (2004), Chen (2012).
 
9
Chen (2014b, pp. 179–181).
 
10
Murphy (1997, p. 109).
 
11
Min (2015, p. 42).
 
12
Min (2015, p. 42).
 
13
Wu (2014, p. 158).
 
14
Shen (2015, p. 5).
 
15
Chen (2014a, p. 254).
 
16
Chen (2014a, p. 260).
 
17
He (2001, p. 54).
 
18
Li and Wang (2001, p. 126).
 
19
Long (1999, p. 301).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bayless, Michael D. 1996. The Principle of Law, trans. Wenxian Zhang etc., 37. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House. Bayless, Michael D. 1996. The Principle of Law, trans. Wenxian Zhang etc., 37. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Research on the Rule of Objective Verification. Studies in Law and Business 2. Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Research on the Rule of Objective Verification. Studies in Law and Business 2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Ruihua. 2014a. Criminal Evidence Law, 2nd ed., 254, 260. Peking University Publisher. Chen, Ruihua. 2014a. Criminal Evidence Law, 2nd ed., 254, 260. Peking University Publisher.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Ruihua. 2014b. The Relationship Between the Subjective Factor and the Objective Factor. China Legal Science 3: 179–181. Chen, Ruihua. 2014b. The Relationship Between the Subjective Factor and the Objective Factor. China Legal Science 3: 179–181.
Zurück zum Zitat He, Jiahong. 2001. Research on the Aim and the Standard: Also on the Basic Concept and Category. Peking University Law Journal 6: 54. He, Jiahong. 2001. Research on the Aim and the Standard: Also on the Basic Concept and Category. Peking University Law Journal 6: 54.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang, Maorong. 2001. Method of Jurisprudence and Modern Civil Law, 243. China University of Political Science and Law Press. Huang, Maorong. 2001. Method of Jurisprudence and Modern Civil Law, 243. China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Xuedeng. 1992. A Comparative Study of Evidence Law, 464. Wu-Nan Book Publishing Company. Li, Xuedeng. 1992. A Comparative Study of Evidence Law, 464. Wu-Nan Book Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Xuekuan, and Haiyan Wang. 2001. Research on the Hierarchies of Standard of Proof. China Legal Science 5: 126. Li, Xuekuan, and Haiyan Wang. 2001. Research on the Hierarchies of Standard of Proof. China Legal Science 5: 126.
Zurück zum Zitat Long, Zongzhi. 1999. Research on the Relative Rationalism, 301. China University of Political and Law Press. Long, Zongzhi. 1999. Research on the Relative Rationalism, 301. China University of Political and Law Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Long, Zongzhi. 2004. The Objective Verification and the Subjective Evaluation: The Two Kind of Pattern of Criminal Proof. Chinese Journal of Law 2. Long, Zongzhi. 2004. The Objective Verification and the Subjective Evaluation: The Two Kind of Pattern of Criminal Proof. Chinese Journal of Law 2.
Zurück zum Zitat Min, Chunlei. 2015. The Trial Centralism: The Understanding of Its Connotation and Realization Rath. Science of Law 3: 42. Min, Chunlei. 2015. The Trial Centralism: The Understanding of Its Connotation and Realization Rath. Science of Law 3: 42.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, Peter. 1997. Murphy on Evidence, 6th ed., 109. Blackstone Press Limited. Murphy, Peter. 1997. Murphy on Evidence, 6th ed., 109. Blackstone Press Limited.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen, Deyong. 2015. On the Reform of the Litigation System of the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. China Legal Science 3: 5. Shen, Deyong. 2015. On the Reform of the Litigation System of the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. China Legal Science 3: 5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, Zeyong. 2014. ‘Justice’ or ‘Utopia’?—Civil Procedural Proof Standard in Comparative Perspective. The Jurist 3: 150, 158. Wu, Zeyong. 2014. ‘Justice’ or ‘Utopia’?—Civil Procedural Proof Standard in Comparative Perspective. The Jurist 3: 150, 158.
Metadaten
Titel
The Multidimensional Studies of the Theory of the Standard of Criminal Proof Under the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure
verfasst von
Bo Yang
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9639-1_19

Premium Partner