Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Public Organization Review 3/2020

22-08-2019

The Opportunities and Constraints to Collaboration in Public Sector Management

Authors: Alex Osei-Kojo, Justice Nyigmah Bawole, Emmanuel Kojo Sakyi

Published in: Public Organization Review | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article synthesizes current insights about the opportunities and constraints to collaborative public management. Despite the swath of research on collaboration there has been little attempt to present the opportunities and constraints in a single article that articulates both perspectives coherently. Drawing on an extensive literature review, the main arguments are that collaboration presents opportunities to maximize scarce resources and improve public services delivery. Yet, the difficulty in evaluating the outcomes of collaboration as well as accountability and power-sharing issues remain key constraints. The article concludes that public managers need to critically ponder both perspectives in making decisions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance: changing the boundaries of the state. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(1), 18–45. Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance: changing the boundaries of the state. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(1), 18–45.
go back to reference Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding values public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding values public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Agranoff, R. (2012). Collaborating to manage: A primer for the public sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Agranoff, R. (2012). Collaborating to manage: A primer for the public sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). “Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver?” an empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). “Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver?” an empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701.
go back to reference Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
go back to reference Appleton-Dyer, S., Clinton, J., Carswell, P., & McNeill, R. (2012). Understanding evaluation influence within public sector partnerships: a conceptual model. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 532–546. Appleton-Dyer, S., Clinton, J., Carswell, P., & McNeill, R. (2012). Understanding evaluation influence within public sector partnerships: a conceptual model. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 532–546.
go back to reference Barney, J. (1991). Firms, resources, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Barney, J. (1991). Firms, resources, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
go back to reference Bingham, B. L., & O’Leary, R. (2006). Conclusion: parallel play, not collaboration: missing questions, missing connections. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 161–167. Bingham, B. L., & O’Leary, R. (2006). Conclusion: parallel play, not collaboration: missing questions, missing connections. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 161–167.
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaboration: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaboration: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55.
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.
go back to reference Carr, J. B., & Hawkins, C. (2013). The cost of cooperation: what the research tells us about managing the risks of service collaboration in the U.S. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 224–239. Carr, J. B., & Hawkins, C. (2013). The cost of cooperation: what the research tells us about managing the risks of service collaboration in the U.S. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 224–239.
go back to reference Cheng, A. S., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2012). A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management. Environmental Management, 49(3), 675–689. Cheng, A. S., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2012). A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management. Environmental Management, 49(3), 675–689.
go back to reference Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2008). The responsible contract manager: Protecting the public interest in an outsourced world. Washington, DC: George University Press. Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2008). The responsible contract manager: Protecting the public interest in an outsourced world. Washington, DC: George University Press.
go back to reference Donahue, J. D., Weil, F. A., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2010). “Who’s afraid of central park? Modeling collaborative governance.” The Public Manager, 39(3). Available through https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A390091614/EAIM?u=auraria_main&sid=EAIM&xid=75570f24. Accessed 8 Aug. 2019. Donahue, J. D., Weil, F. A., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2010). “Who’s afraid of central park? Modeling collaborative governance.” The Public Manager, 39(3). Available through https://​link.​gale.​com/​apps/​doc/​A390091614/​EAIM?​u=​auraria_​main&​sid=​EAIM&​xid=​75570f24.​ Accessed 8 Aug. 2019.
go back to reference Edwards, M., Halligan, J., Horrigan, B., & Nicoll, G. (2012). Public governance: Challenges and issues in an age of uncertainty. In M. Edwards, J. Halligan, B. Horrigan, & G. Nicoll (Eds.), Public sector governance in Australia (pp. 223–238). Canberra: ANU E Press. Edwards, M., Halligan, J., Horrigan, B., & Nicoll, G. (2012). Public governance: Challenges and issues in an age of uncertainty. In M. Edwards, J. Halligan, B. Horrigan, & G. Nicoll (Eds.), Public sector governance in Australia (pp. 223–238). Canberra: ANU E Press.
go back to reference Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (Eds.). (2015a). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (Eds.). (2015a). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015b). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: a performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 717–747. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015b). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: a performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 717–747.
go back to reference Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
go back to reference Fleishman, R. (2009). To participate or not to participate? Incentives and obstacles for collaboration. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: new ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 31–52). Washingtn, DC: Georgetown University Press. Fleishman, R. (2009). To participate or not to participate? Incentives and obstacles for collaboration. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: new ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 31–52). Washingtn, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936. Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936.
go back to reference Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2016). Investigating collaborative process over time: a 10- year study of the South Florida restoration task force. American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 180–200. Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2016). Investigating collaborative process over time: a 10- year study of the South Florida restoration task force. American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 180–200.
go back to reference Huxam, C., Vangen, S., Huxam, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 2(3), 337–358. Huxam, C., Vangen, S., Huxam, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 2(3), 337–358.
go back to reference Kettl, D. F. (2008). The next government of the United States: Why our institutions fail us and how to fix them. New York: W.W.W Norton and Company. Kettl, D. F. (2008). The next government of the United States: Why our institutions fail us and how to fix them. New York: W.W.W Norton and Company.
go back to reference Klijn, E.-H. (2005). Networks and inter-organizational management: challenging, steering, evaluation and the role of public actors in public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Politt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 257–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Klijn, E.-H. (2005). Networks and inter-organizational management: challenging, steering, evaluation and the role of public actors in public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Politt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 257–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 111–121. Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 111–121.
go back to reference Koschmann, M. A., Khun, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 332–354. Koschmann, M. A., Khun, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 332–354.
go back to reference Leach, W. D. (2006). Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from Western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 100–110. Leach, W. D. (2006). Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from Western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 100–110.
go back to reference Marek, L., Brock, D.-J. P., & Savla, J. (2015). Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 67–85. Marek, L., Brock, D.-J. P., & Savla, J. (2015). Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 67–85.
go back to reference Margernum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge: MIT Press. Margernum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 33–43. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 33–43.
go back to reference McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279–288. McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279–288.
go back to reference North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference O’Flynn, J. (2008). Elusive appeal or aspirational ideal? The rhetoric and reality of the ‘collaborative turn’ in public policy. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia? (pp. 181–194). Canberra: ANU Press. O’Flynn, J. (2008). Elusive appeal or aspirational ideal? The rhetoric and reality of the ‘collaborative turn’ in public policy. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia? (pp. 181–194). Canberra: ANU Press.
go back to reference O'Toole, L. J. Jr., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505–526. O'Toole, L. J. Jr., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505–526.
go back to reference O’Leary, R., Gazley, B., McGuire, M., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). Public managers in collaboration. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The new collaborative manager: New ideas for the 21stcentury (pp. 1–12). Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Press. O’Leary, R., Gazley, B., McGuire, M., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). Public managers in collaboration. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The new collaborative manager: New ideas for the 21stcentury (pp. 1–12). Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Press.
go back to reference O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2009). The new collaborative manager: New ideas for the 21stcentury. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Press. O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2009). The new collaborative manager: New ideas for the 21stcentury. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Press.
go back to reference Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaborative. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 591–606. Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaborative. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 591–606.
go back to reference Philips, S. D. (2004). The limits of horizontal governance: voluntary sector- government collaboration in Canada. Society and Economy, 26(2/3), 383–405. Philips, S. D. (2004). The limits of horizontal governance: voluntary sector- government collaboration in Canada. Society and Economy, 26(2/3), 383–405.
go back to reference Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
go back to reference Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really matter? A framework for evaluating public organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really matter? A framework for evaluating public organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.
go back to reference Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417.
go back to reference Rethemeyer, K. R. 2009. "Making sense of collaboration and governance: Issues and challenges." Public Performance and Management Review, 32(4), 566–573. Rethemeyer, K. R. 2009. "Making sense of collaboration and governance: Issues and challenges." Public Performance and Management Review, 32(4), 566–573.
go back to reference Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Development process of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Development process of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.
go back to reference Rubin, B. M., Rubin, R. S., & Anthony Rolle, R. (1999). Successful collaborative management and collective bargaining in the public sector: an empirical analysis. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(4), 517–536. Rubin, B. M., Rubin, R. S., & Anthony Rolle, R. (1999). Successful collaborative management and collective bargaining in the public sector: an empirical analysis. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(4), 517–536.
go back to reference Ryan, C., & Walsh, P. (2004). Collaboration of public sector agencies: Reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 621–631. Ryan, C., & Walsh, P. (2004). Collaboration of public sector agencies: Reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 621–631.
go back to reference Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873. Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.
go back to reference Sousa, D. J., & Klyza, C. M. G. (2007). New directions in environmental policy making: An emerging collaborative regime or reinventing interest group liberalism? Natural Resource Journal, 47(2), 377–444. Sousa, D. J., & Klyza, C. M. G. (2007). New directions in environmental policy making: An emerging collaborative regime or reinventing interest group liberalism? Natural Resource Journal, 47(2), 377–444.
go back to reference Sullivan, H., Barnes, M., & Matka, E. (2002). Building collaborative capacity through ‘theories of change. Evaluation, 8(2), 205–226. Sullivan, H., Barnes, M., & Matka, E. (2002). Building collaborative capacity through ‘theories of change. Evaluation, 8(2), 205–226.
go back to reference Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32.
go back to reference Trend, M. G. (1979). On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses. A case study. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation (pp. 68–85). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Trend, M. G. (1979). On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses. A case study. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation (pp. 68–85). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Metadata
Title
The Opportunities and Constraints to Collaboration in Public Sector Management
Authors
Alex Osei-Kojo
Justice Nyigmah Bawole
Emmanuel Kojo Sakyi
Publication date
22-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Public Organization Review / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00452-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Public Organization Review 3/2020 Go to the issue