Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing

26-08-2023 | Original Article

The paradox of youth’s online political party brand engagement on Facebook: a congruity theory perspective

Authors: Mohit Jamwal, Munish Saini, Saikat Banerjee

Published in: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study aims to solve the mystery of youth’s online political party brand engagement (OPBE) on social networking platforms, such as Facebook through popular perspectives in Consumer Psychology. Drawing extensively on the Congruity theory and Theory of the spiral of silence, this study assesses congruity-based drivers [self-image congruity (SIC), value congruity (VC), and ideological congruity (IDC)] to predict voters’ OPBE on Facebook, and subsequently, their voting intentions. The study tested research propositions on a young sample (aged between 20 and 32) of 324 electorates by employing Structural Equation Modeling using AMOS. The results highlight a relatively substantial impact of the electorate’s ideological congruity, followed by self-image congruity and value congruity with a political party brand on triggering OPBE. Furthermore, based on social inclusion or exclusion scenarios, perceived social support was found to be a critical construct in moderating the relationship between the self-related antecedents (SIC and IDC) and OPBE. The results further advocate that OPBE positively impacts their voting intentions towards the political party brand. Specifically, the study offers suggestions for political candidate selection, based on shared self-congruence to avoid intra-party conflicts and political brand dilution. Besides, several theoretical and managerial implications are also discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Abul-Fottouh, D., & Fetner, T. (2018). Solidarity or schism: Ideological congruence and the Twitter networks of egyptian activists. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 23(1), 23–44.CrossRef
Ahmed, M. A., Lodhi, S. A., & Ahmad, Z. (2017). Political brand equity model: The integration of political brands in voter choice. Journal of Political Marketing, 16(2), 47–179.CrossRef
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.CrossRef
Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2012). Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337(6092), 337.CrossRef
Aydogan, A., Tuna, T., & Kadir Yildirim, A. (2019). Ideological congruence and social media text as data. Representation, 55(2), 59–178.CrossRef
Badrinarayanan, V., Becerra, E. P., & Madhavaram, S. (2014). Influence of congruity in store-attribute dimensions and self-image on purchase intentions in online stores of multichannel retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(6), 1013–1020.CrossRef
Banerjee, S., & Goel, P. (2020). Party brand hate in political market: Antecedents and consequences. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 97–121.CrossRef
Battaglia, M. P. (2008). Non probability sampling. Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 1–4). SAGE Publications.
Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). MyFaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political brand engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44.CrossRef
Bhagat, R. B. (2014). The opportunities and challenges of demographic dividend in India. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies, 12(4), 6099–6113.
Bitrián, P., Buil, I., & Catalán, S. (2021). Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps. Journal of Business Research, 132, 170–185.CrossRef
Bossetta, M., Segesten, A. D., & Trenz, H. J. (2017). Engaging with European politics through Twitter and Facebook: Participation beyond the national? In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social media and european politics (pp. 53–76). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Brändle, V. K., Charlotte, G., & Hans-Jörg, T. (2022). Brexit as ‘politics of division’: Social media campaigning after the referendum. Social Movement Studies, 21, 234–253.CrossRef
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271.CrossRef
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.CrossRef
Calder, B. J., Philips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1982). The concept of external validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 240–244.CrossRef
Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political brand engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883–895.CrossRef
Chan, M. (2016). Social network sites and political brand engagement: Exploring the impact of Facebook connections and uses on political protest and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 430–451.CrossRef
Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639–650.CrossRef
Choi, J., & Lee, J. K. (2015). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258–266.CrossRef
Chun, J. W., & Lee, M. J. (2017). When does individuals’ willingness to speak out increase on social media? Perceived social support and perceived power/control. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 120–129.CrossRef
Conroy, M., Feezell, J. T., & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political brand engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political brand engagement. Computers in Human behavior, 28(5), 1535–1546.CrossRef
Dabula, N. (2017). The influence of political marketing using social media on trust, loyalty and voting intention of the youth of South Africa. Business & Social Sciences Journal, 2(1), 62–112.
Dakof, G. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1990). Victims’ perceptions of social support: What is helpful from whom? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 80.CrossRef
Dalton, R. J. (2014). Interpreting partisan dealignment in Germany. German Politics, 23(1–2), 34–144.
Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24, 261–277.CrossRef
Ekinci, Y., & Riley, M. (2003). An investigation of self-concept: Actual and ideal self-congruence compared in the context of service evaluation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(4), 201–214.CrossRef
Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55.CrossRef
Esser, F., & De Vreese, C. H. (2007). Comparing young voters’ political engagement in the United States and Europe. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1195–1213.CrossRef
Ferrucci, P., Hopp, T., & Vargo, C. J. (2019). Civic engagement, social capital, and ideological extremity: Exploring online political brand engagement and political expression on Facebook. New Media & Society, 22(6), 1095–1115.CrossRef
Ferrucci, P., Hopp, T., & Vargo, C. J. (2020). Civic engagement, social capital, and ideological extremity: Exploring online political brand engagement and political expression on Facebook. New Media & Society, 22(6), 1095–1115.CrossRef
Fietkiewicz, K. J., Lins, E., Baran, K. S., & Stock, W. G. (2016). Inter-generational comparison of social media use: Investigating the online behavior of different generational cohorts. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3829–3838). IEEE. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​HICSS.​2016.​477
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.CrossRef
Guzmán, F., Paswan, A. K., & Van Steenburg, E. (2015). Self-referencing and political candidate brands: A congruency perspective. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 175–199.CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, NJ: Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.CrossRef
Harris, P., & Lock, A. (2010). Mind the gap: The rise of political marketing and a perspective on its future agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 297–307.CrossRef
Heiss, R., Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2020). Pathways to political (dis-) engagement: Motivations behind social media use and the role of incidental and intentional exposure modes in adolescents’ political brand engagement. Communications, 45(1), 671–693.CrossRef
Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513.CrossRef
Hinson, R., Boateng, H., Renner, A., & Kosiba, J. P. B. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement on Facebook: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(2), 204–226.CrossRef
Hsieh, Y. P., & Li, M. H. (2014). Online political participation, civic talk, and media multiplexity: How taiwanese citizens express political opinions on the web. Information Communication & Society, 17(1), 26–44.CrossRef
Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269–283.CrossRef
Islam, J. U., Rahman, Z., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2018). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A solicitation of congruity theory. Internet Research, 28(1), 23–45.CrossRef
Jain, V., & Ganesh, B. E. (2019). Understanding the magic of credibility for political leaders: A case of India and Narendra Modi. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1–2), 15–33.
Jamal, A., Kizgin, H., Rana, N. P., Laroche, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Impact of acculturation, online participation and involvement on voting intentions. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 510–519.CrossRef
Johar, S., & Sirgy, J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23–33.CrossRef
Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 949–964.CrossRef
Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(2), 289–296.
Kaur, N., & Sandhu, A. (2021). The use of web-based social networks: Trends, antecedents, and consequences. Webology, 18, 233–245.CrossRef
Kim, J. H., & Hyun, Y. J. (2013). The importance of social and ideal social dimensions in self-congruity research. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(1), 39–49.CrossRef
Kizgin, H., Jamal, A., Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). The impact of social networking sites on socialization and political brand engagement: Role of acculturation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 503–512.CrossRef
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information Communication & Society, 9, 582–611.CrossRef
Koc-Michalska, K., Gibson, R., & Vedel, T. (2014). Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the web. 2.0 evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 220–244.CrossRef
Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Michalski, T., Gibson, R., & Zajac, J. M. (2021). Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 180–193.CrossRef
Kwon, S. J., Park, E., & Kim, K. J. (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. The Social Science Journal, 51, 534–544.CrossRef
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 585–598.CrossRef
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971.CrossRef
Lee, M. S., Motion, J., & Conroy, D. (2009). Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 169–180.CrossRef
Lee, S. A., & Jeong, M. (2014). Enhancing online brand experiences: An application of congruity theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 49–58.CrossRef
Liu, Y., Rui, J. R., & Cui, X. (2017). Are people willing to share their political opinions on Facebook? Exploring roles of self-presentational concern in spiral of silence. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 294–302.CrossRef
Luna-Cortés, G., López-Bonilla, L. M., & López-Bonilla, J. M. (2019). The influence of social value and self-congruity on interpersonal connections in virtual social networks by Gen-Y tourists. PLoS ONE, 14(6), e0217758.CrossRef
Lutz, C., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). The dark side of online participation: Exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information Communication & Society, 20(6), 876–897.CrossRef
Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52.CrossRef
Marder, B., Marchant, C., Archer-Brown, C., Yau, A., & Colliander, J. (2018). Conspicuous political brand interactions on social network sites. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3–4), 702–724.CrossRef
Mayne, Q., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Ideological congruence and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from 25 advanced democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 822–849.CrossRef
Michie, S., & Gooty, J. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 441–457.CrossRef
Mondak, J. J., & Huckfeldt, R. (2006). The accessibility and utility of candidate character in electoral decision making. Electoral Studies, 25(1), 20–34.CrossRef
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.CrossRef
Nasr, M. (2021). The motivated electorate: Voter uncertainty, motivated reasoning, and ideological congruence to parties. Electoral Studies, 72, 102344.CrossRef
Nielsen, S. W. (2017). On political brands: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Political Marketing, 16(2), 118–146.CrossRef
Nielsen, S. W., & Larsen, V. M. (2014). Party brands and voting. Journal of Electoral Studies, 33, 153–165.CrossRef
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.CrossRef
O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.CrossRef
Ohme, J., Marquart, F., & Kristensen, L. M. (2020). School lessons, social media and political events in a get-out-the-vote campaign: Successful drivers of political brand engagement among youth? Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 886–908.CrossRef
Pang, H. (2018). Can microblogs motivate involvement in civic and political life? Examining uses, gratifications and social outcomes among chinese youth. Online Information Review, 42(5), 663–680.CrossRef
Phipps, M., Brace-Govan, J., & Jevons, C. (2010). The duality of political brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 496–514.CrossRef
Pirannejad, A., & Janssen, M. (2019). Internet and political empowerment: Towards a taxonomy for online political empowerment. Information Development, 35(1), 80–95.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRef
Powell, G. B. (2008). Changing party system polarization, election rules and ideological congruence. In annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320.CrossRef
Procidano, M. E., & Fordham, U. (1992). The nature of perceived social support: Findings of meta-analytic studies. Advances in Personality Assessment, 9, 1–26.
Quintelier, E., & Theocharis, Y. (2013). Online political brand engagement, facebook, and personality traits. Social Science Computer Review, 31(3), 280–290.CrossRef
Roblek, V., Mesko, M., Dimovski, V., & Peterlin, J. (2019). Smart technologies as social innovation and complex social issues of the Z generation. Kybernetes, 48(1), 91–107.CrossRef
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
Rost, K., Stahel, L., & Frey, B. S. (2016). Digital social norm enforcement: Online firestorms in social media. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0155923.CrossRef
Scammell, M. (2015). Politics and image: The conceptual value of branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 7–18.CrossRef
Scarrow, S. E., & Gezgor, B. (2010). Declining memberships, changing members? European political party members in a new era. Party Politics, 16(6), 823–843.CrossRef
Schneider, H. (2004). Branding in politics—manifestations, relevance and identity-oriented management. Journal of Political Marketing, 3(3), 41–67.CrossRef
Shi, R., Messaris, P., & Cappella, J. N. (2014). Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(4), 975–990.CrossRef
Shim, K., & Oh, K. (2019). Does fear of isolation disappear online? Attention-seeking motivators in online political engagement. Media and Communication, 7(1), 128–138.CrossRef
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300.CrossRef
Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13(3), 195–206.CrossRef
Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J. O., Chon, K. S., Claiborne, C. B., ... & Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 229–241.
Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 102–113.CrossRef
Srivardhana, T. (2019). Enabling process of e-WOM and self-image congruence in Facebook page: A case study of passionate partisanship in the Thai professional soccer team. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 19(5/6), 425.CrossRef
Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.CrossRef
Swann, W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 392.CrossRef
Torney-Purta, J., & Amadeo, J. (2003). A cross-national analysis of political and civic involvement among adolescents. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 269–274.
Tsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017). Consumer engagement with brands on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(1), 2–21.CrossRef
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2010). The story of social identity. In rediscovering social identity: Key readings. Psychology Press.
Vachana, V. R., & Roy, M. (2018). NOTA and the Indian voter. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(6), 29.
Vale, L., & Fernandes, T. (2018). Social media and sports: Driving fan engagement with football clubs on Facebook. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 37–55.CrossRef
Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2014). Facebook, Twitter, and youth engagement: A quasi-experimental study of social media use and protest behavior using propensity score matching. International Journal of Communication, 17(1), 33–47.
Van Erkel, P. F. (2019). Sharing is caring: The role of voter-candidate similarities in intra-party electoral competition. European Political Science Review, 11(1), 75–89.CrossRef
Vinuales, G., & Thomas, V. L. (2021). Not so social: When social media increases perceptions of exclusions and negatively affects attitudes toward content. Psychology & Marketing, 38(2), 313–327.CrossRef
Walter, A. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2019). Voters’ partisan responses to politicians’ immoral behavior. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1075–1097.CrossRef
White, J., & Chernatony, L. D. (2002). New labour: A study of the creation, development and demise of a political brand. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(2–3), 45–52.CrossRef
Williams, E. A., Pillai, R., Lowe, K. B., Jung, D., & Herst, D. (2009). Crisis, charisma, values, and voting behavior in the 2004 presidential election. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 70–86.CrossRef
Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion–policy link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432.CrossRef
Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political brand engagement in three advanced democracies. Information Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167.CrossRef
Xu, X., & Pratt, S. (2018). Social media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: An application of self-congruence theory to the chinese generation Y. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(7), 958–972.CrossRef
Yang, J., & Kim, Y. M. (2017). Equalization or normalization? Voter–candidate engagement on Twitter in the 2010 US midterm elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 232–247.CrossRef
Zhang, X., & Lin, W. Y. (2014). Political participation in an unlikely place: How individuals engage in politics through social networking sites in China. International Journal of Communication, 8, 21–42.
Metadata
Title
The paradox of youth’s online political party brand engagement on Facebook: a congruity theory perspective
Authors
Mohit Jamwal
Munish Saini
Saikat Banerjee
Publication date
26-08-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing
Print ISSN: 1865-1984
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1992
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00384-4